Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 537

Diversification is not a free lunch

Harry Markowitz is reported to have said that “diversification is the only free lunch in investing”. This is the notion that holding a broader range of assets can result in better returns without assuming more risk. Over the decades this has become accepted wisdom – but it is not true. Diversification isn’t free; it is painful and difficult to achieve.

Why diversification is difficult

Diversification is a vital concept for investors. It is an acceptance that the future is inherently unknowable and can take many different directions. If done well it provides protection against both uncertainty and hubris. The best indicator of an investor’s overconfidence is how concentrated their portfolio is. If we could accurately predict the future, then we would only own one security.

Given this, why is diversification a problem?

Because it is behaviourally difficult. To be appropriately diversified not only means holding assets that will be a disappointment, but where we actively want them to disappoint in advance.

If everything is performing well and in concert, our portfolios are probably not diversified.

If we are appropriately diversified, we will look at our portfolio and see a collection of strong performers and laggards. Rather than be comfortable with this as an inevitable feature of diversification however, we will have the urge to make changes. Removing the struggling positions and adding more to those that have produced stellar results.

It is far more comfortable for our portfolios to be focused on the top performing assets rather than be genuinely diversified. It will feel like there is nothing to worry about – everything is working well. Although we are drawn towards this type of situation, it is merely a short-term complacency that will foster almost certain long-term pain.

Diversification is constantly put in jeopardy by our behavioural failings. For the assets that are outperforming in our portfolios, the prevailing market narratives will persuade us that this environment will persist forever. Conversely, the stories around the stragglers will make us believe that they will never deliver again.

When we are reviewing the performance of our portfolio, diversification often feels like a bad idea – because we could have always held more of the assets that provided the highest returns.

Hindsight makes diversification look unnecessary.

Things to remember about diversification

Given that maintaining appropriate levels of diversification is likely to prove a constant challenge for investors, there are two crucial concepts to place at the forefront of our thinking:

– Things will be different in the future: Markets are constantly adapting, things will be different in the future in ways that we are unable to predict.

– Things could have been different in the past: When we look at the performance of our portfolios, we assume that it was inescapable that this particular course had been charted, but, of course, this is never the case. In a chaotic, complex system, entirely different outcomes could have come to pass.

Diversification requires us to own positions that haven’t performed well, and we don’t expect to always perform well. That doesn’t mean we should naively hold any asset irrespective of its fundamental characteristics, but we must accept that to be well-diversified requires us to have relative slackers in our portfolios at all points in time.

Nothing that works in investing provides a free lunch, it always comes with some behavioural pain. For diversification, it is the acute sense of regret about how much better things could have been.

 

Joe Wiggins is Chief Investment Officer at Fundhouse (UK) and publisher of investment insights through a behavioural science lens at www.behaviouralinvestment.com. His book The Intelligent Fund Investor explores the beliefs and behaviours that lead investors astray, and shows how we can make better decisions.

 

6 Comments
Barry
December 05, 2023

The article is based on a total fallacy.
Diversity is across companies and sectors and geography etc, not across winners and lovers. The aim is to diversify across the winners. If a company is not performing it makes no sense to retain it just for the sake of diversity. What a woke idea.

CC
December 03, 2023

But Warren Buffet says most investors are best off putting 90% into the S&P500 index

richard goers
December 03, 2023

Not to labour the point - if ~ 5% of stocks create 100% of the wealth [resourced facts] then these stocks have particular attributes that make them successful - research is to find these attributes, even as they may change through time - their edge or moat - and history of their price action gives us thee winners Diversification, into ETF indexes like ASX200 or SP500 have the majority of stocks that dont make the cash rate as a return, or more to the point, the magnificent 7 stocks in the NASDAQ prove the point I dont see the rationalalisation to buy stocks that dont make a solid return above the riskless rate in their history but to seek out and look for the winners - as the rest are road kill if capital gains are the metric - nonetheless it cant be easy to do this research and take the risk appetite needed for a concentrated portfolio - so put 80% into a diversified portfolio and 20% into 'extreme' punts = aka BTC or biotech or AI or a concentrated AI portfolio - or if an Australian, investment houses

Graham Wright
December 03, 2023

Diversification! The greatest misleader perpetrated on investors managing their own investments. It is almost certainly a must for fund managers who have large FUM to invest and who have to consider the risk profiles of their investors. At the other end of the scale, business owners, especially in their starting years, have a single investment, their business, and a single product or service, all supported by committing the whole of their owned assets plus borrowings, to their investment. They usually have neither resources or time for diversification until the initial business succeeds. They put all their eggs into one basket and fully commit themselves to work for success. Diversifying our investments does not create wealth. Working hard to find the right investments and working to make the investments profitable is what works. The business manager works to make his/her future successful, no sitting waiting for the profits to roll in. They make modifications to their business as the business environment says change is needed, just as we investors need to constantly review our investments and make changes as the environment tells us that change may be needed.

Lyn
December 01, 2023

With thanks to author, your article gave me a perk as only yesterday reviewed a "laggard" with critical eyes on quarterly report I'd avoided, a will it or won't it? and a serve of self-doubt. It is hard to stick at diverse course, as inferred in part of Munger obit article the money is in the waiting so this edition gave a lone investor a lift even though inherently knew should not doubt decision to stick.

Julie T
November 30, 2023

Just because diversification is difficult to deal with psychologically doesn't make the theory wrong. Far from it. There's lots of academic literature supporting Markowitz. Though this article doesn't disapprove the theory, it makes some valid points.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Corporate bond opportunities in today’s market

Are demographics destiny for the stock market?

The problem with concentrated funds

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.