Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 65

Don’t set and forget

As value investors, we buy high quality companies with good long term prospects. A company that is able to produce a product that is in high demand, whilst maintaining its competitive advantage, may be able to enjoy above average returns for a considerable period.

Yet the lure of excess profits can be too much for competitors to resist. A strong competitive advantage supports earnings growth, but there may come a time when a company’s defences are breached, and the share price comes tumbling down. This reversion can be quite dramatic, so while we advocate investing for the long-term, it doesn’t mean you should discount short-term developments.

To illustrate this concept, there have been three market darlings that have experienced material share price declines in recent months. These companies are Coca-Cola Amatil (ASX: CCL), Super Retail Group (ASX: SUL) and Cochlear (ASX: COH). Investors that maintained an active interest in their investments would have been better placed to identify the negative structural shifts experienced by each company than those that kept their holdings in the ‘bottom drawer’.

You would all be familiar with Coca-Cola Amatil, one of the largest bottlers of beverages in the Asia-Pacific region. The company controls iconic brands, which has translated to strong financial performance. Between 2006 and 2011, the company’s earnings per share grew by 12% each year.

Yet since 2012, Coca-Cola’s volumes in the Australian soft drink market have declined from 50% to 42%. The oligopoly that makes up Australia’s grocery retail landscape has put Coca-Cola Amatil on a strict diet of shrinking volumes, values and loss of market share, particularly to ‘private label’ soft drinks.

As such, it has become unclear if Woolworths, Coles and Aldi are significant distributors of Coca-Cola Amatil’s products, significant competitors, or both? To find the answer, the company has launched a strategic review, which typically marks the beginning of a prolonged, and costly, turnaround programme. The CCL share price has declined from over $15 to around $9.50 in the past 14 months, such is the uncertainty of the company’s long-term prospects.

Super Retail Group is another company that has generated consistent earnings growth with quality brands such as SuperCheap Auto, BCF, Rebel and Amart Sports. Between 2006 and 2013, the company increased its average annual earnings per share by 20%.

Super Retail Group has experienced a number of hurdles this financial year; the leisure category has been impacted by customers in regional and mining areas spending less on fishing and recreational equipment; the implementation of a company-wide IT system has not gone to expectations; and existing store sales have been cannibalised by an overlapping store network.

One of Super Retail Group’s core competitive advantages has been its ability to integrate large acquisitions into its network – Rebel Sports being a case in point. But the more time management is focused on remedying the above issues, the less time is spent looking at large scale acquisition opportunities to assist growth.

While management has a clear strategy to remedy these issues, they cannot confidently state if these benefits will be realised in 2016, 2017 or 2018. The market has certainly reacted unfavourably, with the share price falling by around 35% in the past six months.

The final example is Cochlear, the company that brought hearing to the deaf with the cochlear implant. This incredible leap in technology allowed the company to enjoy many years of favourable growth. From 2004 to 2011, the company grew earnings per share by an average 24.7% per annum.

But problems began to emerge in 2011 when the company was forced to announce a product recall. Recalls can be very costly events, in terms of the financial burden to replace the damaged goods, and the potential reputational damage. Cochlear was able to maintain its strong brand power after this event, and by the end of 2012 the share price was above the pre-recall price.

Yet since the beginning of 2013, the company’s share price has again declined materially. It is becoming increasingly apparent that Cochlear is ceding market share to its competitors. Even for a company like Cochlear that is dedicated to a strong innovation, research and development program, it seems that competitors have been able to replicate their technology and are stealing market share with lower prices.

The aforementioned companies have built their quality reputations by withstanding and overcoming adversity. But during these periods of material uncertainty, even the companies with the longest records of success may not emerge with their competitive position intact. While investors should always invest with the long-term in mind, at times it can be quite painful to simply ‘set and forget’.

 

Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller ‘Value.able’

 

  •   6 June 2014
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Which type of investor are you?

Telstra: the dominant player in an improving industry

In a short-term world, take a longer-term view

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.