Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 245

Four checks for super downsizer contributions

The downsizer contributions legislation will allow an individual aged 65 years or over to use the proceeds of the sale of one main residence to make contributions of up to $300,000 to superannuation for themselves and/or their spouse. The legislation became law in December 2017 and is designed to reduce pressure on housing affordability. However, downsizer contributions can only be made if the contract for sale of the home is exchanged on or after 1 July 2018.

In this article, we outline the eligibility criteria and requirements that relate to:

  1. the contributor
  2. the downsizer contribution cap
  3. the home
  4. contributing to super

1. The contributor

The person making the contribution must be age 65 or over. There is no maximum age, no work test requirement, and no requirement for the contributor to be permanently retired.

2. Downsizer contribution cap

The downsizer contribution cap is the maximum amount that can be contributed to super. The cap is calculated as the lesser of:

  • the proceeds of the sale
  • $300,000 per person

If a couple sell their home for $1 million, they can contribute $300,000 each. If a couple sell their home for $400,000, the contribution made between the two of them may not exceed $400,000. They could contribute $200,000 each or some other combination totalling up to $400,000 with no more than $300,000 for one person.

3. The home

The sale contract for the home must be exchanged on or after 1 July 2018. The settlement date is not relevant. The home must be located in Australia and must be affixed to land. Caravans, houseboats, or other mobile homes are not eligible.

The home must have been owned for 10 years or more by the contributor, their spouse, or former spouse. Ownership can be held solely, jointly, or as tenants in common.

There is no need for the spouses to have been in a relationship for 10 years or more. For example, if a person has owned a home in their sole name for more than 10 years, their current spouse of only two years is still eligible to receive a downsizer contribution if the home is sold.

The home must qualify for the main residence capital gains tax (CGT) concession or would have qualified if it is a pre-CGT asset, acquired before 20 September 1985.

A home will be eligible if the main residence CGT concession applies in part or in full. This means that the property does not need to be a current home. It could be a former home that is now an investment property.

This is also relevant for the sale of a farm or business where only a partial main residence CGT exemption applies because the property is also used for income producing purposes.

Case studies

Sidney and Isabel are both in their 70s and are looking to retire from the farm. They have lived in the homestead on the farm for 45 years and they sell the farm in 2019 for $3 million.

As they qualify for a partial main residence exemption they can each contribute $300,000 to super. There is no need to apportion the proceeds from the sale between the part of the farm used as the main residence and the income-producing part of the farm.

Although the contributions are named downsizing contributions, there is no need to sell the home to buy a smaller home. In fact, there is no need to buy another home at all.

In addition, if a person was to ‘upsize’ their home and buy a more expensive one, they could still make a downsizer contribution (up to the sale proceeds of the home) if they have other cash that they can use to contribute to super.

Kim and Kanye sell their $1 million home and buy a $1.5 million home, using some of the $2 million they have available in cash. As the sale proceeds are $1 million, they can each contribute $300,000 to super.

4. Contributing to super

A downsizer contribution does not count towards the non-concessional contributions cap and a person’s total super balance is not relevant. Normally, non-concessional contributions cannot be made if a person has a total super balance of $1.6 million or more at the previous 30 June. However, downsizer contributions can still be made even if a person has $3 million in super.

The balance at 30 June after the contribution is, however, relevant if making other non-concessional contributions. There is no exemption from the total super balance for downsizer contributions.

The ability to make a downsizer contribution is a once-in–a-lifetime event: only one home sale ever is eligible for downsizer contributions. For example, if a person sells their only home and contributes $100,000 to super and buys a new home, when they subsequently sell their new home, they are not able to ‘top-up’ their downsizer contributions.

Downsizer contributions cannot be used to claim a tax deduction or to receive a Government co-contribution.

The proceeds from the sale of the home must be paid to super within 90 days of receipt. Multiple contributions may be made from the sale of a single home, however, they must all be made within 90 days of receipt.

Further, individuals must elect to treat the contribution as a downsizer contribution by completing the ATO downsizer contribution form. The form must be received by the super fund at or before the time the contribution is made.

Whilst the downsizer contribution may increase a person’s super retirement income, it may reduce any Centrelink age pension. Unlike the family home, there is no Centrelink means test exemption for the downsizer contributions. Any downsizer contribution to super for members over their qualifying age pension age counts towards the age pension assets test and is deemed under the income test.

Conclusion

The downsizer contribution could assist older Australians who would otherwise be precluded from contributing to super to upsize their super balances. However, people in receipt of Centrelink benefits should seek professional financial advice before making downsizer contributions to understand any reduction in age pension that may result.

 

Julie Steed is Senior Technical Services Manager at Australian Executor Trustees. This article is in the nature of general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   21 March 2018
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Five things SMSF trustees should consider right now

There's a reason why your super is locked up until your 60s

How much super should you have?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.