Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 9

Edition 9

  •   5 April 2013
  •      
  •   

Welcome from Chris Cuffe

This morning, the Government announced a range of superannuation changes, and here's the full Media Release. There's more information on our website.

Once when you put down the chocolate eggs and switched on the ABC News on an Easter Sunday evening, the first item featured the inside of a cathedral. Now, it’s superannuation, regulatory speculation and the great class divide. In my view, there’s only one way we can go with this, as my article explains.

In its Media Release today, the Government has announced a Council of Superannuation Custodians to ensure that any future superannuation changes are consistent with an agreed Charter of Superannuation Adequacy and Sustainability. On first look, this sounds similar to my proposal, and seems like a worthwhile move.

Some of the claims about super are difficult to believe. Is it really possible that many people are saving significant amounts in super then taking it out at the first opportunity to spend it on prestige cars and overseas holidays, with a strategy to rely on the government pension? The maximum single pension rate is $366.85 a week or $19,000 a year. If this is part of your financial plan, you need to consider how far $50 a day goes in Australia today - a month’s worth gone in one insurance bill.

Pauline Vamos is the CEO of The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) and is one of the more influential voices in the super debate. Her article puts much needed balance back into the debate by addressing some misleading information.

It’s easy to find a place for cash, fixed interest and shares in an investment portfolio, but alternative investments are trickier. Dominic McCormick shows how the choices are becoming more liquid and easier to justify, while David Bell clarifies what is meant by a ‘hedge fund’, and some traps to watch for.

Graham Hand explores a disconnect in the ability of public super funds to invest in the deposits of our banks at a time when they should reduce reliance on foreign borrowings, and it comes with another free kick given to SMSFs by the regulators. We need to take a bigger picture perspective on banks and public super funds for the sake of long-term financial stability.

Chris

Latest posts from Cuffelinks, 5 April 2013, Edition 9

  • Let’s kick this political football out of the ground Chris Cuffe
  • Debating the value of super Pauline Vamos
  • APRA helps SMSFs but large super funds left hanging Graham Hand
  • Improving access to liquid alternatives Dominic McCormick
  • How ASIC defines ‘hedge funds’ and what it means to you David Bell

View email | Download PDF


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.