Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 182

Why is factor investing a ‘thing’?

There’s a lot of hype around a trend called ‘factor investing’ which (as part of broader ‘smart beta’ thinking) has been called “the fastest growing segment of the investment management industry” (for example, this article). But what is factor investing, why is it important and why do many believe it is more than just a fad? This is written from the perspective of a large superannuation fund equity investor.

Starting with the basics

Let’s begin with the simple notions of ‘beta’ and ‘alpha’ in an equity portfolio. Broadly, beta (denoted by the Greek letter ß) captures the amount by which an equity portfolio moves with the market. So, a passive strategy which tracks the broad market (for example, S&P/ASX 200 or MSCI World) will have a beta of 1. On the other hand, alpha (denoted by the Greek letter a) captures the amount of portfolio movement not related to the market. Superannuation funds often appoint active managers to generate ‘positive alpha’; that is, returns above a pure market return. Of course, alpha can be negative, meaning the portfolio has underperformed the market. The typical way of thinking about equity portfolios is to examine the beta and alpha components which together explain the entirety of a portfolio’s performance.

The alpha/beta distinction gives a superannuation fund investor a useful choice between adopting a fairly cheap passive approach to deliver equity beta returns or adding the costs of active management to the portfolio to (hopefully) deliver extra performance through alpha.

Enter factor investing. The insight at the heart of the factor trend is that a lot of alpha can actually be explained by some common factor risks that exist across stocks. The academic literature dates back to 1976 and the most well-accepted equity factors are Value, Quality, Size, Momentum, Dividend Yield and Low Volatility. Value and Low Volatility seem to be of particular interest to large superannuation funds at present. These investors are also exploring variations like factor combinations, timing factors and tax-managed factor approaches. There are key differences in the behaviour of factor risks between the Australian and global equity markets, which investors need to understand.

Challenging the traditional alpha/beta model

Factor investing challenges the traditional alpha/beta investment paradigm because it suggests that much of what has been labelled alpha is actually returns from simple factor bets (a type of beta). A factor-based equity approach can be constructed using straightforward ‘passive-like’ rules, offering transparency and control. They can be offered in a separate account or pooled fund form, including ETFs. These investment options offer superannuation funds the opportunity to outperform the market without the costs associated with active management. Avoiding the ‘black box’ of many active management approaches is also an attraction. Factor investing is a ‘thing’ because funds realise they have three choices – alpha/factor beta/traditional beta – not just two.

Our most recent factor research identified one of the common traps funds fall into; inadvertently introducing other risks into an equity portfolio while trying to construct a pure factor exposure. We also noted, perhaps counter-intuitively, that factor investing does not ring a ‘death knell’ for active equity managers who have been important components of the equity puzzle for many funds to date. Rather, factor investing provides an opportunity for active managers to clearly differentiate themselves from mere ‘factor providers’ and to negotiate generous risk budgets with their clients to deliver true alpha based on their research and unique insights.

For superannuation funds (and other investors) who embrace the factor trend, their job is twofold: to implement a well-constructed equity portfolio that reflects their factor convictions (and, as far as possible, nothing else); and to reposition their active manager partners (and internal management teams) to harvest alpha as a true complement and enhancement to the fund’s factor bets.

 

Raewyn Williams is Managing Director of Research at Parametric, a US-based investment advisor. Parametric is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of the provision of financial services to wholesale clients as defined in the Act and is regulated by the SEC under US laws, which may differ from Australian laws. This information is intended for wholesale use only and not for retail clients, as defined in the Act. Parametric is not a licensed tax agent or advisor in Australia and this does not represent tax advice. Additional information is available at www.parametricportfolio.com/au.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.