Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 611

Four ways to capitalise on a forgotten investing megatrend

Despite the Trump Administration’s retreat from global climate leadership, we nevertheless stand at the beginning of a larger structural shift – the transition to a net-zero economy. For investors, few themes have ever matched the scale and urgency of climate change. Climate change is a multi-decade investment opportunity, and one that will outlast the current four-year term of the Trump presidency.

Decarbonisation is not a distant goal but a process that is already well underway, driven by governments, corporations, and investors alike. Identifying the companies driving this transition requires an approach that goes beyond simply screening out high emitters. The real winners will be those delivering practical solutions to decarbonisation – whether by producing clean energy, reducing industrial emissions, or improving efficiency across sectors.

Opportunities in clean energy

There are investment opportunities in renewable energy producers, though investors should be more cautious with those producing solar and wind energy. China has oversupplied solar, and wind has industry-specific supply chain problems. Nuclear energy, on the other hand, is seeing greater support as a reliable, carbon-free power source.

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG), for example, is a leader in the field. The company owns the largest fleet of nuclear power stations in the US. Nuclear energy is a carbon-free source of electricity, and nearly 90 per cent of Constellation’s annual output is carbon-free. The company is likely to see rising demand for its clean energy.

Corporate investment, too, is turning nuclear climate ambition into reality. Some of the world’s largest companies – including Microsoft, Amazon, and Google – are making direct investments in nuclear power and signing long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) to ensure a stable supply of carbon-free energy. These investments are not just about sustainability, but about meeting demand. Demand is rapidly increasing, driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and data centres, as well as US reshoring and electrification of transport and industry.

At the same time, commercial real estate owners and industrial manufacturers are investing in HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) systems, insulation, and efficiency upgrades, which help cut costs while reducing emissions.

This shift marks a fundamental change in how businesses view climate solutions. Instead of simply offsetting emissions, companies are embedding decarbonisation into their operations, supply chains, and infrastructure. The result is a growing demand for technologies that enable net-zero goals, from energy storage to next-generation grid systems.

A focus on energy efficiency

Beyond clean energy generation, energy efficiency is key to reducing emissions in the US. This remains one of the most overlooked areas of climate investment. Unlike energy production, efficiency solutions reduce demand altogether, cutting costs and emissions in the process.

Buildings alone account for nearly 40 per cent of global energy use, making HVAC systems, insulation, and energy management software critical areas of investment. With short payback periods – often under two years – energy efficiency solutions represent one of the fastest-growing and most financially attractive areas of climate investment.

At the same time, industrial energy efficiency is becoming a major investment theme. Technologies such as industrial process optimisation, heat pumps, and waste heat recovery are improving operational efficiency in manufacturing, logistics, and data centres.

AI impacts

The rapid adoption of AI is reshaping global energy consumption. AI workloads are significantly more power-intensive than traditional computing, and as businesses deploy AI at scale, data centre electricity demand is set to surge. Data centres already contribute over 2.5 per cent of global emissions, a figure set to rise as AI expands. AI could increase the urgency of the energy transition, forcing companies to scale clean energy investment and grid infrastructure faster than previously expected.

Energy efficiency will become more important. Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), for example, leads in this area. As the world’s demand for AI grows rapidly, Nvidia is enabling more energy efficient data centres through its Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), which are as much as 20 times more energy efficient for certain AI and high-performance computing workloads versus Central Processing Units (CPUs). Newer computer chip products are continuing to achieve large energy efficiency gains per unit of computing.

Additionally, AI is playing a role in grid optimisation. Machine learning models are being used to improve electricity demand forecasting, enhance battery storage performance, and increase the efficiency of industrial and building energy systems. While AI is accelerating the need for clean power, it is also emerging as a key enabler of smarter energy use.

Circular economy – reducing waste, increasing sustainability

The transition to a sustainable economy is also about redefining how we use materials. The circular economy focuses on reducing waste, increasing recycling, and creating more sustainable production systems.

Plastics, industrial waste, and water scarcity present some of the biggest environmental challenges today. Companies involved in waste management, advanced recycling, and water treatment solutions are seeing rising demand, particularly as corporate and government policies push for higher sustainability standards in packaging and industrial processes.

Beyond traditional waste management, innovation in alternative materials, such as bio-based plastics, low-carbon cement, and synthetic fuels, are opening up new investment opportunities. These industries are still in the early stages, but they are set to grow as global supply chains adapt to increasing regulatory and consumer pressure.

We believe companies operating in clean energy, clean transport, energy efficiency, and the circular economy will be the winners of this structural shift. Climate change is a multi-decade investment opportunity, and as the world accelerates toward a low-carbon future, long-term investors who have positioned early in the climate thematic will be well placed for the next phase of growth.

 

James Tsinidis is a portfolio manager at Munro Partners. Munro Partners is a fund manager partner of GSFM, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is solely for information purposes and does not have any regard to the specific investment objective, financial situation and/or particular needs of any specific persons.

For more articles and papers from GSFM and partners, click here.

 

  •   14 May 2025
  • 6
  •      
  •   
6 Comments
Manfred S
May 16, 2025

Firstlinks has a lot of climate change denialists and I don't get it. Science is never definitive but it clearly points to a warming planet, linked to carbon emissions.

The better debate is how to go about decarbonising the world and it does seems that we've rushed into the likes of solar and wind power without enough preparatory work and thought.

Dudley
May 16, 2025

'The vast majority of the world's population resides in the Northern Hemisphere, with 87% of the global population living there compared to only 13% in the Southern Hemisphere.'

If all the world copied Australia there would be no carbon problem.

Paul
May 16, 2025

Australians CO2 per capita output in 2022 was about 15 Metric Tonnes per capita.
Global output per capita was 4.5 Metriic Tonnes of CO2.

Dudley
May 16, 2025

"Australians CO2 per capita output in 2022 was about 15 Metric Tonnes per capita.
Global output per capita was 4.5 Metriic Tonnes of CO2.":

Australia population 2022: 26M
Area Australian mainland km^2: 7.7M (not including territories and EEZ)
Australians per km^2: ~3.4
Australian emissions t/km^2: =3.4 * 15 = 51 (absorption ignored)

World population 2022: 8G
Area world land : 149Mkm^2
People per km^2: = 8,000,000,000 / 149,000,000 = 54
World emissions t/km^2: =54 * 4.5 = 243 (absorption ignored)

Independent source:
https://www.careourearth.com/the-list-of-countries-ranked-by-co2-emissions-per-square-kilometer/

James
May 16, 2025

"Australians CO2 per capita output in 2022 was about 15 Metric Tonnes per capita.
Global output per capita was 4.5 Metriic Tonnes of CO2."

This sort of useless statistic is often cited to justify Australia's somewhat overzealous transition to renewables.
What matters most, is the trade off between effort (cost) and result or reward.

The more important statistic, is whether or not Australia going especially hard on adopting renewables and decarbonising our economy, is really having an appreciable, consequential effect on world carbon emissions. When we in aggregate contribute so little carbon in absolute terms, tremendous effort (i.e. cost both in fiscal outlay and subsequent higher energy prices) for very little absolute contribution to world wide carbon reduction is somewhat absurd IMHO.

Society and Central left governments especially, have increasingly displayed a propensity for virtue signalling. But at what real cost to society, industry, standards of living and our Country? Are the world's biggest carbon emitters going as hard as Australia? Are they really honouring their "commitments? Are they actually reducing their emissions or are they continuing to grow (we know the answer to that especially in China and India's case)? If so, Australia's meagre absolute carbon emission reductions are dwarfed by other countries increases, and are thus statistically inconsequential!

As for the cost of this overzealous folly, history will be the judge. If we end up grossly indebted (be in no doubt the energy transition is on borrowed money with present & future tax payers liable), with very high electricity and other energy prices, with higher inflation and the loss of revenue because business and industry has migrated to countries where energy prices are more favourable, we will have to ask ourselves if the cost was worth it!

John
May 17, 2025

Duttons plan for 7 nuclear stations was stupid- far better to build one first at the most efficient site then follow up with more sites if deemed successful for many obvious reasons

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Electrification: Paving the road to emissions reduction

Aggressive climate targets spell opportunity for investors

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.