Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 611

Four ways to capitalise on a forgotten investing megatrend

Despite the Trump Administration’s retreat from global climate leadership, we nevertheless stand at the beginning of a larger structural shift – the transition to a net-zero economy. For investors, few themes have ever matched the scale and urgency of climate change. Climate change is a multi-decade investment opportunity, and one that will outlast the current four-year term of the Trump presidency.

Decarbonisation is not a distant goal but a process that is already well underway, driven by governments, corporations, and investors alike. Identifying the companies driving this transition requires an approach that goes beyond simply screening out high emitters. The real winners will be those delivering practical solutions to decarbonisation – whether by producing clean energy, reducing industrial emissions, or improving efficiency across sectors.

Opportunities in clean energy

There are investment opportunities in renewable energy producers, though investors should be more cautious with those producing solar and wind energy. China has oversupplied solar, and wind has industry-specific supply chain problems. Nuclear energy, on the other hand, is seeing greater support as a reliable, carbon-free power source.

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG), for example, is a leader in the field. The company owns the largest fleet of nuclear power stations in the US. Nuclear energy is a carbon-free source of electricity, and nearly 90 per cent of Constellation’s annual output is carbon-free. The company is likely to see rising demand for its clean energy.

Corporate investment, too, is turning nuclear climate ambition into reality. Some of the world’s largest companies – including Microsoft, Amazon, and Google – are making direct investments in nuclear power and signing long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) to ensure a stable supply of carbon-free energy. These investments are not just about sustainability, but about meeting demand. Demand is rapidly increasing, driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and data centres, as well as US reshoring and electrification of transport and industry.

At the same time, commercial real estate owners and industrial manufacturers are investing in HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) systems, insulation, and efficiency upgrades, which help cut costs while reducing emissions.

This shift marks a fundamental change in how businesses view climate solutions. Instead of simply offsetting emissions, companies are embedding decarbonisation into their operations, supply chains, and infrastructure. The result is a growing demand for technologies that enable net-zero goals, from energy storage to next-generation grid systems.

A focus on energy efficiency

Beyond clean energy generation, energy efficiency is key to reducing emissions in the US. This remains one of the most overlooked areas of climate investment. Unlike energy production, efficiency solutions reduce demand altogether, cutting costs and emissions in the process.

Buildings alone account for nearly 40 per cent of global energy use, making HVAC systems, insulation, and energy management software critical areas of investment. With short payback periods – often under two years – energy efficiency solutions represent one of the fastest-growing and most financially attractive areas of climate investment.

At the same time, industrial energy efficiency is becoming a major investment theme. Technologies such as industrial process optimisation, heat pumps, and waste heat recovery are improving operational efficiency in manufacturing, logistics, and data centres.

AI impacts

The rapid adoption of AI is reshaping global energy consumption. AI workloads are significantly more power-intensive than traditional computing, and as businesses deploy AI at scale, data centre electricity demand is set to surge. Data centres already contribute over 2.5 per cent of global emissions, a figure set to rise as AI expands. AI could increase the urgency of the energy transition, forcing companies to scale clean energy investment and grid infrastructure faster than previously expected.

Energy efficiency will become more important. Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), for example, leads in this area. As the world’s demand for AI grows rapidly, Nvidia is enabling more energy efficient data centres through its Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), which are as much as 20 times more energy efficient for certain AI and high-performance computing workloads versus Central Processing Units (CPUs). Newer computer chip products are continuing to achieve large energy efficiency gains per unit of computing.

Additionally, AI is playing a role in grid optimisation. Machine learning models are being used to improve electricity demand forecasting, enhance battery storage performance, and increase the efficiency of industrial and building energy systems. While AI is accelerating the need for clean power, it is also emerging as a key enabler of smarter energy use.

Circular economy – reducing waste, increasing sustainability

The transition to a sustainable economy is also about redefining how we use materials. The circular economy focuses on reducing waste, increasing recycling, and creating more sustainable production systems.

Plastics, industrial waste, and water scarcity present some of the biggest environmental challenges today. Companies involved in waste management, advanced recycling, and water treatment solutions are seeing rising demand, particularly as corporate and government policies push for higher sustainability standards in packaging and industrial processes.

Beyond traditional waste management, innovation in alternative materials, such as bio-based plastics, low-carbon cement, and synthetic fuels, are opening up new investment opportunities. These industries are still in the early stages, but they are set to grow as global supply chains adapt to increasing regulatory and consumer pressure.

We believe companies operating in clean energy, clean transport, energy efficiency, and the circular economy will be the winners of this structural shift. Climate change is a multi-decade investment opportunity, and as the world accelerates toward a low-carbon future, long-term investors who have positioned early in the climate thematic will be well placed for the next phase of growth.

 

James Tsinidis is a portfolio manager at Munro Partners. Munro Partners is a fund manager partner of GSFM, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is solely for information purposes and does not have any regard to the specific investment objective, financial situation and/or particular needs of any specific persons.

For more articles and papers from GSFM and partners, click here.

 

  •   14 May 2025
  • 6
  •      
  •   
6 Comments
Manfred S
May 16, 2025

Firstlinks has a lot of climate change denialists and I don't get it. Science is never definitive but it clearly points to a warming planet, linked to carbon emissions.

The better debate is how to go about decarbonising the world and it does seems that we've rushed into the likes of solar and wind power without enough preparatory work and thought.

Dudley
May 16, 2025

'The vast majority of the world's population resides in the Northern Hemisphere, with 87% of the global population living there compared to only 13% in the Southern Hemisphere.'

If all the world copied Australia there would be no carbon problem.

Paul
May 16, 2025

Australians CO2 per capita output in 2022 was about 15 Metric Tonnes per capita.
Global output per capita was 4.5 Metriic Tonnes of CO2.

Dudley
May 16, 2025

"Australians CO2 per capita output in 2022 was about 15 Metric Tonnes per capita.
Global output per capita was 4.5 Metriic Tonnes of CO2.":

Australia population 2022: 26M
Area Australian mainland km^2: 7.7M (not including territories and EEZ)
Australians per km^2: ~3.4
Australian emissions t/km^2: =3.4 * 15 = 51 (absorption ignored)

World population 2022: 8G
Area world land : 149Mkm^2
People per km^2: = 8,000,000,000 / 149,000,000 = 54
World emissions t/km^2: =54 * 4.5 = 243 (absorption ignored)

Independent source:
https://www.careourearth.com/the-list-of-countries-ranked-by-co2-emissions-per-square-kilometer/

James
May 16, 2025

"Australians CO2 per capita output in 2022 was about 15 Metric Tonnes per capita.
Global output per capita was 4.5 Metriic Tonnes of CO2."

This sort of useless statistic is often cited to justify Australia's somewhat overzealous transition to renewables.
What matters most, is the trade off between effort (cost) and result or reward.

The more important statistic, is whether or not Australia going especially hard on adopting renewables and decarbonising our economy, is really having an appreciable, consequential effect on world carbon emissions. When we in aggregate contribute so little carbon in absolute terms, tremendous effort (i.e. cost both in fiscal outlay and subsequent higher energy prices) for very little absolute contribution to world wide carbon reduction is somewhat absurd IMHO.

Society and Central left governments especially, have increasingly displayed a propensity for virtue signalling. But at what real cost to society, industry, standards of living and our Country? Are the world's biggest carbon emitters going as hard as Australia? Are they really honouring their "commitments? Are they actually reducing their emissions or are they continuing to grow (we know the answer to that especially in China and India's case)? If so, Australia's meagre absolute carbon emission reductions are dwarfed by other countries increases, and are thus statistically inconsequential!

As for the cost of this overzealous folly, history will be the judge. If we end up grossly indebted (be in no doubt the energy transition is on borrowed money with present & future tax payers liable), with very high electricity and other energy prices, with higher inflation and the loss of revenue because business and industry has migrated to countries where energy prices are more favourable, we will have to ask ourselves if the cost was worth it!

John
May 17, 2025

Duttons plan for 7 nuclear stations was stupid- far better to build one first at the most efficient site then follow up with more sites if deemed successful for many obvious reasons

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Electrification: Paving the road to emissions reduction

Aggressive climate targets spell opportunity for investors

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Latest Updates

A speech from the Prime Minister on fixing housing

“Fellow Australians, I want to address our most pressing national issue: housing. For too long, governments have tiptoed around problems from escalating prices, but for the sake of our younger generations, that stops today.”        

Taxation

Family trusts: Are they still worth it?

Family trusts remain a core structure for wealth management, but rising ATO scrutiny and complex compliance raise questions about their ongoing value. Are the benefits still worth the administrative burden?

Exchange traded products

Multiple ways to win

Both active and passive investing can work, but active investment doesn’t in the way it is practised by many fund managers and passive investing doesn’t work in the way most end investors practise it. Here’s a better way.

Economy

The Future Fund may become a 'bad bank' for problem home loans

The Future Fund says it will not be paying defined benefit pensions until at least 2033 - raising as many questions as answers. This points to an increasingly uncertain future for Australia's sovereign wealth fund.

Investment strategies

Managed accounts and the future of portfolio construction

With $233 billion under management, managed accounts are evolving into diversified, transparent, and liquid investment frameworks. The rise of ETFs and private markets marks a shift in portfolio design and discipline. 

Property

Commercial property prospects are looking up

Commercial property is seeing the same supply issues as the residential market. Given the chronic undersupply and a recent pickup in demand, it bodes well for an upturn in commercial real estate prices.

Infrastructure

Private toll roads need a shake-up

Privatised toll roads in Australia help governments avoid upfront costs but often push financial risks onto taxpayers while creating monopolies and unfair toll burdens for commuters and businesses.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.