Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 611

Four ways to capitalise on a forgotten investing megatrend

Despite the Trump Administration’s retreat from global climate leadership, we nevertheless stand at the beginning of a larger structural shift – the transition to a net-zero economy. For investors, few themes have ever matched the scale and urgency of climate change. Climate change is a multi-decade investment opportunity, and one that will outlast the current four-year term of the Trump presidency.

Decarbonisation is not a distant goal but a process that is already well underway, driven by governments, corporations, and investors alike. Identifying the companies driving this transition requires an approach that goes beyond simply screening out high emitters. The real winners will be those delivering practical solutions to decarbonisation – whether by producing clean energy, reducing industrial emissions, or improving efficiency across sectors.

Opportunities in clean energy

There are investment opportunities in renewable energy producers, though investors should be more cautious with those producing solar and wind energy. China has oversupplied solar, and wind has industry-specific supply chain problems. Nuclear energy, on the other hand, is seeing greater support as a reliable, carbon-free power source.

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG), for example, is a leader in the field. The company owns the largest fleet of nuclear power stations in the US. Nuclear energy is a carbon-free source of electricity, and nearly 90 per cent of Constellation’s annual output is carbon-free. The company is likely to see rising demand for its clean energy.

Corporate investment, too, is turning nuclear climate ambition into reality. Some of the world’s largest companies – including Microsoft, Amazon, and Google – are making direct investments in nuclear power and signing long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) to ensure a stable supply of carbon-free energy. These investments are not just about sustainability, but about meeting demand. Demand is rapidly increasing, driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and data centres, as well as US reshoring and electrification of transport and industry.

At the same time, commercial real estate owners and industrial manufacturers are investing in HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) systems, insulation, and efficiency upgrades, which help cut costs while reducing emissions.

This shift marks a fundamental change in how businesses view climate solutions. Instead of simply offsetting emissions, companies are embedding decarbonisation into their operations, supply chains, and infrastructure. The result is a growing demand for technologies that enable net-zero goals, from energy storage to next-generation grid systems.

A focus on energy efficiency

Beyond clean energy generation, energy efficiency is key to reducing emissions in the US. This remains one of the most overlooked areas of climate investment. Unlike energy production, efficiency solutions reduce demand altogether, cutting costs and emissions in the process.

Buildings alone account for nearly 40 per cent of global energy use, making HVAC systems, insulation, and energy management software critical areas of investment. With short payback periods – often under two years – energy efficiency solutions represent one of the fastest-growing and most financially attractive areas of climate investment.

At the same time, industrial energy efficiency is becoming a major investment theme. Technologies such as industrial process optimisation, heat pumps, and waste heat recovery are improving operational efficiency in manufacturing, logistics, and data centres.

AI impacts

The rapid adoption of AI is reshaping global energy consumption. AI workloads are significantly more power-intensive than traditional computing, and as businesses deploy AI at scale, data centre electricity demand is set to surge. Data centres already contribute over 2.5 per cent of global emissions, a figure set to rise as AI expands. AI could increase the urgency of the energy transition, forcing companies to scale clean energy investment and grid infrastructure faster than previously expected.

Energy efficiency will become more important. Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), for example, leads in this area. As the world’s demand for AI grows rapidly, Nvidia is enabling more energy efficient data centres through its Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), which are as much as 20 times more energy efficient for certain AI and high-performance computing workloads versus Central Processing Units (CPUs). Newer computer chip products are continuing to achieve large energy efficiency gains per unit of computing.

Additionally, AI is playing a role in grid optimisation. Machine learning models are being used to improve electricity demand forecasting, enhance battery storage performance, and increase the efficiency of industrial and building energy systems. While AI is accelerating the need for clean power, it is also emerging as a key enabler of smarter energy use.

Circular economy – reducing waste, increasing sustainability

The transition to a sustainable economy is also about redefining how we use materials. The circular economy focuses on reducing waste, increasing recycling, and creating more sustainable production systems.

Plastics, industrial waste, and water scarcity present some of the biggest environmental challenges today. Companies involved in waste management, advanced recycling, and water treatment solutions are seeing rising demand, particularly as corporate and government policies push for higher sustainability standards in packaging and industrial processes.

Beyond traditional waste management, innovation in alternative materials, such as bio-based plastics, low-carbon cement, and synthetic fuels, are opening up new investment opportunities. These industries are still in the early stages, but they are set to grow as global supply chains adapt to increasing regulatory and consumer pressure.

We believe companies operating in clean energy, clean transport, energy efficiency, and the circular economy will be the winners of this structural shift. Climate change is a multi-decade investment opportunity, and as the world accelerates toward a low-carbon future, long-term investors who have positioned early in the climate thematic will be well placed for the next phase of growth.

 

James Tsinidis is a portfolio manager at Munro Partners. Munro Partners is a fund manager partner of GSFM, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is solely for information purposes and does not have any regard to the specific investment objective, financial situation and/or particular needs of any specific persons.

For more articles and papers from GSFM and partners, click here.

 

  •   14 May 2025
  • 6
  •      
  •   
6 Comments
Manfred S
May 16, 2025

Firstlinks has a lot of climate change denialists and I don't get it. Science is never definitive but it clearly points to a warming planet, linked to carbon emissions.

The better debate is how to go about decarbonising the world and it does seems that we've rushed into the likes of solar and wind power without enough preparatory work and thought.

Dudley
May 16, 2025

'The vast majority of the world's population resides in the Northern Hemisphere, with 87% of the global population living there compared to only 13% in the Southern Hemisphere.'

If all the world copied Australia there would be no carbon problem.

Paul
May 16, 2025

Australians CO2 per capita output in 2022 was about 15 Metric Tonnes per capita.
Global output per capita was 4.5 Metriic Tonnes of CO2.

Dudley
May 16, 2025

"Australians CO2 per capita output in 2022 was about 15 Metric Tonnes per capita.
Global output per capita was 4.5 Metriic Tonnes of CO2.":

Australia population 2022: 26M
Area Australian mainland km^2: 7.7M (not including territories and EEZ)
Australians per km^2: ~3.4
Australian emissions t/km^2: =3.4 * 15 = 51 (absorption ignored)

World population 2022: 8G
Area world land : 149Mkm^2
People per km^2: = 8,000,000,000 / 149,000,000 = 54
World emissions t/km^2: =54 * 4.5 = 243 (absorption ignored)

Independent source:
https://www.careourearth.com/the-list-of-countries-ranked-by-co2-emissions-per-square-kilometer/

James
May 16, 2025

"Australians CO2 per capita output in 2022 was about 15 Metric Tonnes per capita.
Global output per capita was 4.5 Metriic Tonnes of CO2."

This sort of useless statistic is often cited to justify Australia's somewhat overzealous transition to renewables.
What matters most, is the trade off between effort (cost) and result or reward.

The more important statistic, is whether or not Australia going especially hard on adopting renewables and decarbonising our economy, is really having an appreciable, consequential effect on world carbon emissions. When we in aggregate contribute so little carbon in absolute terms, tremendous effort (i.e. cost both in fiscal outlay and subsequent higher energy prices) for very little absolute contribution to world wide carbon reduction is somewhat absurd IMHO.

Society and Central left governments especially, have increasingly displayed a propensity for virtue signalling. But at what real cost to society, industry, standards of living and our Country? Are the world's biggest carbon emitters going as hard as Australia? Are they really honouring their "commitments? Are they actually reducing their emissions or are they continuing to grow (we know the answer to that especially in China and India's case)? If so, Australia's meagre absolute carbon emission reductions are dwarfed by other countries increases, and are thus statistically inconsequential!

As for the cost of this overzealous folly, history will be the judge. If we end up grossly indebted (be in no doubt the energy transition is on borrowed money with present & future tax payers liable), with very high electricity and other energy prices, with higher inflation and the loss of revenue because business and industry has migrated to countries where energy prices are more favourable, we will have to ask ourselves if the cost was worth it!

John
May 17, 2025

Duttons plan for 7 nuclear stations was stupid- far better to build one first at the most efficient site then follow up with more sites if deemed successful for many obvious reasons

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Electrification: Paving the road to emissions reduction

Aggressive climate targets spell opportunity for investors

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

Family trusts: Are they still worth it?

Family trusts remain a core structure for wealth management, but rising ATO scrutiny and complex compliance raise questions about their ongoing value. Are the benefits still worth the administrative burden?

13 ways to save money on your tax - legally

Thoughtful tax planning is a cornerstone of successful investing. This highlights 13 legal ways that you can reduce tax, preserve capital, and enhance long-term wealth across super, property, and shares.

Warren Buffett's final lesson

I’ve long seen Buffett as a flawed genius: a great investor though a man with shortcomings. With his final letter to Berkshire shareholders, I reflect on how my views of Buffett have changed and the legacy he leaves.

Latest Updates

Retirement

Why it’s time to ditch the retirement journey

Retirement isn’t a clean financial arc. Income shocks, health costs and family pressures hit at random, exposing the limits of age-based planning and the myth of a predictable “retirement journey".

Financial planning

How much does it really cost to raise a child?

With fertility rates at a record low, many say young people aren’t having kids because they’re too expensive. Turns out, it’s not that simple and there are likely other factors at play.

Exchange traded products

Passive ETF investors may be in for a rude shock

Passive ETFs have become wildly popular just as markets, especially the US, reach extreme valuations. For long-term investors, these ETFs make sense, though if you're investing in them to chase performance, look out below.

Shares

Bank reporting season scorecard November 2025

The Big Four banks shrugged off doomsayers with their recent results, posting low loan losses, solid margins, and rising dividends. It underscores their resilience, but lofty valuations mean it’s time to be selective. 

Investment strategies

The real winners from the AI rush

AI is booming, but like the 19th-century gold rush, the real profits may go to those supplying the tools and energy, not the companies at the centre of the rush.

Economy

Why economic forecasts are rarely right (but we still need them)

Economic experts, including the RBA, get plenty of forecasts wrong, but that doesn't make such forecasts worthless. The key isn't to predict perfectly – it's to understand the range of possibilities and plan accordingly.

Strategy

13 reflections on wealth and philanthropy

Wealth keeps growing, yet few ask “how much is enough?” or what their kids truly need. After 23 years in philanthropy, I’ve seen how unexamined wealth can limit impact, and why Australia needs a stronger giving culture.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.