Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 509

Aggressive climate targets spell opportunity for investors

Most countries are on a net-zero emissions crusade. Whether the goal is 2050 or later, there is no escaping the global push to reduce carbon emissions and combat climate change.

This transition presents a huge opportunity for investors to invest in those companies building or adapting the technology and infrastructure to reach this target. We believe there is $US50 trillion to be spent over the next 30 years in this transition across a diverse range of industries and companies.

The potential

As the chart below highlights, investment will not just be on passenger electric vehicles (EVs), but also on the infrastructure - such as charging stations - needed to support EVs. Likewise, investment also needs to be made in energy efficiency, renewable energy, battery manufacturers and the power grids to support the transition.

Ultimately this will translate to $US50 trillion in revenue to the companies that are going to enable the transition.

Figure 1: This is how much de-carbonisation is going to cost

Source: Goldman Sachs, Munro Partners Estimates (31 December 2020)

At Munro, we've been investing in this space for 15 years, but in the last few years we've seen momentum shift to the point where there is consensus around the need to decarbonize the planet.

Our focus is to find the solution providers for this transition. We seek to invest in these enablers because they are the companies positioned to secure the spending and therefore revenue, which will ultimately lead to earnings and share price growth.

The year ahead - three themes

1. EV penetration

EV penetration is accelerating for a number of reasons. Manufacturers have been cutting prices and Tesla is leading the market with price drops of between 15-29% in the US.

Importantly, the US's Inflation Reduction Act included a potential $7,500 tax credit for Americans cars that qualify, bringing the EVs in reach of many more potential consumers.

At the same time as price reductions, input costs for EVs are also decreasing. Lithium is down close to 70% from its peak, freight costs are also down, as are many other raw materials needed to manufacture these vehicles.

2. Gridlock

'Electrify everything' is an easy catchphrase but there is a potential bottleneck to this process when it comes to grid capacity and capability. Power grids need to be able to cope with the extra power that is being put on them. Whilst the grid is a solution to climate change because it enables electric vehicles and other things to be electrified, the grid itself is actually at risk because of climate change.

If we look at the US, 70% of the grid is now over 25 years old. Electricity demand is going to nearly triple by 2050 and grids need to be able to work in a more bi-directional way than they did historically. To do this, money needs to be spent on their development and advancement, an issue we believe is going to come to a head this year.

3. Globalisation reversing

Recent geopolitical conflict and tensions have put a question mark over the last 30 years of globalisation. This was highlighted with Russia's invasion of the Ukraine, when Europe quickly realised that the question of energy security and decarbonisation were more aligned than they originally thought.

China is also one of the main manufacturers of many of the components in solar panels and has increased its penetration in the production of these components over the past decade. As the geopolitical tensions between the China and the West intensifies, there are opportunities for companies to offer solutions to their governments around that industrial base to enable countries to continue that decarbonisation journey in a more self-sufficient way. This should help US and European companies in the clean energy space compete domestically after decades of losing share to China.

Under the hood - Waste Management

Recently we were asked why, if there is so much potential for growth, is the market not pricing transition companies accordingly. We believe that is because the market continues to price the companies we seek out - i.e., the solution providers - on what they are doing currently instead of what they could do in the future.

A good example of this is the waste management space and Texas-based Waste Management, the largest solid waste management company in the US.

Figure 2: Waste Management

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P 24 April 2023

The market models Waste Management on its traditional business, which is going around the homes in the US and picking up the trash, sorting it and then sending it to landfill. It owns the landfill sites, the trucks, the transfer stations, and gets paid well for the services it offers. It's a good defensive company in a sector with high barriers to entry.

What the market is unable to currently price for because it's a new opportunity, is the increased EBITDA it can get from expanding into two new areas. The first one is recycling, which the US has been very poor at. The company is now putting in automation to be able to generate revenues from this recycling opportunity by selling the product back to consumer companies. But Wall Street analysts are not taking this into account yet because it's not yet visible in the next 1-2 years.

The other, even larger opportunity is the Landfill Gas To Energy (LFGTE) potential. Waste Management is trying to capture the renewable natural gas off its landfill sites and sell that back to other companies or use it in its own fleets.

These two activities offer a material upside to the EBITDA estimates in the market, which we predict are 10-15% too low versus what the company could generate 5 years out.

Hiding in plain sight

By looking beyond the headlines and delving deeper into some of the newer technologies that companies are exploring, investors can buy before share prices of many of these businesses take off.

 

James Tsinidis is a Partner and Portfolio Manager with Munro Partners, a specialist investment manager partner of GSFM Funds Management. GSFM is a sponsor of Firstlinks. Munro Partners may have holdings in the companies mentioned in this article. This article contains general information only and has been prepared without taking account of the objectives, financial situation or needs of individuals.

For more articles and papers from GSFM and partners, click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Electrification: Paving the road to emissions reduction

Four ways to capitalise on a forgotten investing megatrend

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.