Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 343

Future Fund’s latest asset changes as CEO moves on

The Future Fund’s asset allocation changes are worth watching as they reveal the investment decisions of a well-resourced team in a large sovereign wealth fund. It's a unique snapshot, as most professional managers do not break up their diversified asset allocations in such detail.

Even better, the Future Fund has a long-term capital preservation emphasis which mirrors the desires of many retirees and SMSF trustees who rightly plan for their money to last for decades, not years.

We explored how retail investors could go some way to replicating the Future Fund’s investments in this article.

It's also a pointer to where industry funds may head as the CEO of the Future Fund, David Neal, this week announced he is moving to the industry fund-owned, IFM Investors. Neal joined the Future Fund in 2007 and was promoted from Chief Investment Officer to CEO in 2014. His decision after 12 years signals ambitious plans by IFM to grow its business.  

How has the asset allocation changed?

As the table shows, the Future Fund made important changes to its risk and market exposure during calendar 2019.

The most notable was the move into public global equities, with an increased allocation from 23.6% to 29.2%, a material 5.6%. Australian equities was also up 1%, while every other asset class was down. David Neal said the switch from private to public markets gave greater flexibility and allowed the Fund to "adjust the portfolio quickly to respond to emerging opportunities and risks."

Future Fund asset allocations (% of total portfolio)

Asset class

31 December 2018

31 December 2019

% Change

Australian equities

5.8

6.8

+1.0%

Developed markets global equities

16.3

19.0

+2.7%

Emerging markets global equities

7.3

10.2

+2.9%

Private equity

15.8

14.9

-0.9%

Property

7.2

6.3

-0.9%

Infrastructure & timberland

8.5

7.0

-1.5%

Debt securities

10.1

8.6

-1.5%

Alternatives

14.6

13.4

-1.2%

Cash

14.5

13.7

-0.8%

TOTAL

100%

100%

 

The Future Fund has always held a relatively high proportion of non-traditional assets, often in private markets, which makes a material contribution to its claims of lower volatility, as discussed later. Few other institutions, SMSFs or private portfolios match their private equity and alternatives allocations, although down over the year from 30.4% to 28.3%. 

The strong rally in bond, interest rate and credit markets may also have driven the lower allocations to cash, debt, infrastructure and property, although there are still gains to be made in the ‘bond proxies’ with interest rates so low. High cash allocations match the SMSF experience.

The Future Fund is a believer in paying up for active management, with around 120 fund managers represented in its portfolio. The Fund looks for managers who can produce uncorrelated returns less influenced by economic and macro factors than traditional equity managers. Hedge funds, private equity and infrastructure managers often charge the highest fees. David Neal said:

“We are also focused on identifying and taking advantage of our managers’ skill so that we can add additional return or reduce risk. This includes our focus on strategies that have low correlation with risk assets.”

Focus on risk as well as return

The media coverage of the latest results focussed on the strong returns generated. Most investors would sign up immediately for 9.9% per annum over a decade and 14.3% last year from a diversified portfolio. The Future Fund's result was at the top end of the best super fund performance, and well ahead of its target of CPI plus 4% to 5%.

However, what should matter most are risk-adjusted returns, and the Future Fund also does well on this score. Everybody should prefer returns of 10% per annum with 4% volatility rather than 8% volatility. Or put another way, returns of 10% might be better than 12% if the latter comes with a lot of extra risk.

The aim of investing should be maximising returns (that is, as far up the y-axis as possible) while minimising risk (that is, as far to the left of the x-axis as possible) in the chart below. The Future Fund’s numbers in the top left are impressive. A stated volatility of half that of the top quartile growth fund with similar returns would help more people sleep at night, especially those who worry about loss of their capital to live off.

What is this thing called volatility?

While volatility and risk mean different things to different people, the most common measurement of risk is the standard deviation or variance of results around a mean. This is the measurement in the x-axis above.

However, for investors who can ride out short-term volatility, a permanent loss which is more worrying, as many prominent investors have argued:

  • Howard Marks: “The risk that matters most is the risk of permanent loss”.
  • Warren Buffett: “We will attempt to bring the risk of permanent capital loss (not short-term quotational loss) to an absolute minimum by obtaining a wide margin or safety in each commitment and a diversity of commitments.”
  • John Maynard Keynes: An intrinsic loss of capital was “in an altogether different category from fluctuating securities, since there is no particular reason to expect a subsequent recovery.”

Keynes, Marks and Buffett are correct if an investor can look beyond short-term losses. The reality is that people living on their savings are devastated by falls of 20% to 50% and often sell before there is a recovery. For most investors, volatility matters and they cannot be as dispassionate about their losses as these luminaries espouse. 

A National Seniors Survey in March 2019 found that 73% of retired investors keep some or all of their savings out of the sharemarket because they cannot tolerate losses. For them, volatility certainly matters.

Professional fund managers are judged quarter-by-quarter, and a year or two of poor performance can jeopordise their business. Try telling them that risk is only a ‘permanent loss of capital’. 

The ASX offers a ‘market sentiment indicator’, A-VIX, which is a real-time volatility index, to provide “insights into investor sentiment and expected levels of market volatility.” A relatively high level of the A-VIX implies the market expects large changes in the S&P/ASX200 index.

The chart below shows the A-VIX for the last five years, with enough spikes to unsettle investors although the market has risen strongly overall in this period.

For example, the market falls at the end of 2018 were accompanied by a spike in volatility, with more-settled periods for most of 2018 and then most of 2019 after February. While there was no permanent loss of capital, December 2018 spooked many investors.

Source: VIX index chart from Market Index, 4 February 2020.

The Future Fund's way to manage risk

Many non-professional investors manage their risk by making large allocations to cash and term deposits. This strategy may have been acceptable in the past, but it guarantees a lack of income and erosion in real capital when rates do not even match inflation.

The Future Fund points to other ways to manage risk while generating returns, including:

  • Diversifying among many types of assets
  • Finding managers who produce uncorrelated returns
  • Investing in lower-volatility funds
  • Buying infrastructure with inflation-protected assets
  • Moving down the risk spectrum in debt securities.

The intent is to hold a resilient portfolio that falls much less than the market in tough times.

A qualification on volatility

It should be acknowledged, however, that private assets are not necessarily less price volatile than public assets simply because their value is not measured regularly. They are often the same assets (a listed versus unlisted airport does not change the nature of the asset or its long-term value).

The Future Fund's portfolio has a low measured volatility because it holds cash, property, private equity, alternatives, infrastructure, timberland and even debt securities which are revalued less frequently than the constant trading of listed equities.

Notwithstanding this qualification, there are useful lessons in defensive portfolio construction for all investors.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

4 Comments
Ahmad Haqqani
February 13, 2020

How can a retail retiree investor tap into private equity? Are their private equity funds available for small investors?

Carlos
February 15, 2020

There are private equity assets available to retail, such as Pengana private equity trust (PE1 on the ASX), an ASX listed global private equity fund, managed by Grosvenor Capital.

SMSF Trustee
February 06, 2020

Leath, there's a link within the article to another FirstLinks piece that shows how smaller investors can access some of the asset classes that the Future Fund gets into. Go there.

As for your comment about returning the money to taxpayers - it's not money that taxpayers are entitled to. It's money that the government, as an employer, is obligated to pay to its employees when they retire. They've provided a super fund, like many other employers. (It's not a pork barrel type of fund, it's just an old fashioned defined benefit fund.) Even if that money isn't put into an investment structure like the Future Fund, the government is obligated to pay the public servants that have provided them services. The reason the Future Fund was set up was so that the government's obligations into the future could be properly and professionally invested to grow a capital base, so that future taxpayers don't have to fork out.

It would be wrong for the FF to pay current politicians, because the FF is about investing to meet future obligations, not to pay current salaries.

leath hunt
February 05, 2020

yes, the future fund is great for public servants and poli's but how do small investors get into those areas of investing .that they are in. Perhaps the future fund could help us small investors by returning the $ 60 billion of tax payers money to us, instead of the fund being told by the government they can have it until 2026.
While I am on it why not have the future fund pay all poli's including PM $100k per year. They say we smsf should not have any money left when we die. How much will this mob accumulate in their post political life?

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Lessons from the Future Fund for retail investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.