Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Government caps tax exemption on pension earnings


On Friday 5 April 2013, the Government announced a range of superannuation changes, and here's the full Media Release.

Here is an extract:

The Government will better target the tax exemption for earnings on superannuation assets supporting income streams, by capping it to the first $100,000 of future earnings for each individual.

Under current arrangements, all new earnings (such as dividends and interest) on assets supporting income streams (superannuation pensions and annuities) are tax-free. This is in contrast to earnings in the accumulation phase of superannuation, which are taxed at 15 per cent.

From 1 July 2014, earnings on assets supporting income streams will be tax free up to $100,000 a year for each individual. Earnings above $100,000 will be taxed at the same concessional rate of 15 per cent that applies to earnings in the accumulation phase. An individual with $100,000 of tax-exempt earnings typically receives more government assistance than someone on the maximum rate of the Single Age Pension. This reform will help make the superannuation system fairer and more sustainable, and will help restore a number of the original intentions of the system.

For superannuation assets earning a rate of return of 5 per cent, this reform will only affect individuals with more than $2 million in assets supporting an income stream. Treasury estimates that around 16,000 individuals will be affected by this measure in 2014-15, which represents around 0.4 per cent of Australia’s projected 4.1 million retirees in that year. This reform will save around $350 million over the forward estimates period.

The changes build on the superannuation reforms announced in last year’s Budget. The Government’s Superannuation Concession Reduction for contributions by very high income earners announced in the 2012-13 Budget, together with this reform of earnings on assets supporting income streams, will improve the fairness and long-term sustainability of the superannuation system. These two measures combined will save over $10 billion over the next decade.




April 08, 2013

Thanks for that observation Rick.

However, gains can be realised from trading even in a modest market move, or a market that ends up flat, so in that case it's not just a matter of having a rising market.

I haven't seen any data on whether there is an increase in realised gains in unit trusts in strongly rising markets - if that's available, it would be interesting to see if there's a higher degree of such gains.

If so, then I'd regard that as quite irresponsible management by the fund manager as it isn't necessarily in the unit holders interests to generate all that taxable income. And one of the reasons why I know a lot of investors who prefer index funds, where trading doesn't take place.

April 06, 2013

Warwick, you are talking about returns not investment earnings. Unrealised capital gains from an increase in share prices won't figure in the calculation of the amount that is to be compared with $100k.

The reason the government is only using 5% is because the world is in deep, deep trouble. Interest rates - the basis of all investment returns - are near zero in most countries and look locked in around 3% in Australia for a while to come. Long term bond rates are trading in the region of 3.5%. Dividend yields will eventually come down from their current lofty heights unless the world heals much faster than I expect it to.

Personally, I'm more worried that the 5% estimate is too HIGH, not too low.

I'm also worried the number of people who seem to have no idea how bad the world economy is doing and what that means for the long term outlook for investment returns. All those 'experts' still thinking about 6-7% that you refer to, for instance.

I hope like crazy I'm wrong, but everyone should be working out how they will live in a world of very low investment returns. The government may well raise much less revenue from this policy change than they expect to!

Graham Hand
April 06, 2013

Hi Daniel, you raise a good issue, but let's consider some of the numbers. We have $1.5 trillion in super, and about 35% is in listed Australian equities. Call it $500 billion. The total market cap of the ASX200 is $1.3 trillion, so purchases of Australian equities by super funds are having a major impact on supporting the market. But the balances are not going to fall, they will only rise, to a predicted $6 trillion (in future dollar terms) in superannuation by 2030. This will probably be far greater than the size of the ASX200.

So in my view, the issue is not about the baby boomers withdrawing their money and creating more sellers than buyers in future, but how does the ASX support the demand for equities without pushing up prices to unrealistic valuations? It's one reason for the call to add new assets to the exchange, such as infrastructure stocks.

Daniel Jeffares
April 09, 2013

Thanks Graham, That makes sense. One way or another prices won't reflect value then? It would be interesting to hear from Chris Cuffe.

Cheers, Dan.

Warwick Moyse
April 06, 2013

The estimate that only 16,000 people will be affected by the new rules is unrealistically low.

In a good year - like the past 12 months - share-based super plans could achieve 30%+ growth. On that basis, the new tax rule would affect everyone holding a mere $333,000 or more. Rather than benefiting from these good years to compensate for GFC-like events, the average growth rate of relatively small holdings will be choked by the new tax.

Most experts use an average growth figure of 6-7% p.a. to forecast the adequacy of super holdings - why has the Government used only 5% to estimate the impact of the tax?

Daniel Jeffares
April 06, 2013

Can you explain how (given there hasn't been a sufficiently significant IPO I can recall) the 9% SGL going into the market each week isn't simply bidding up the price of existing shares for which there are more buyers than sellers? What happens when the tide reverses and the baby boomers withdraw what they're currently putting in to fund their lavish lifestyles, tax free (ish) in retirement?


Leave a Comment:



10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

How retirees might find a retirement solution in future

Ralston responds on super balances of older Australians


Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates


Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.


Hey boomer, first home buyers and all the fuss

What is APRA worried about? Most mortgagees can easily absorb increases in interest rates without posing a systemic threat to the banking system. Housing lending is a relatively risk-free activity for banks.


Residential Property Survey Q3 2021

Housing market sentiment has eased from record highs and confidence has ticked down as house price rises slow. Construction costs overtook lack of development sites as the biggest impediment for new housing.

Investment strategies

Personal finance is 80% personal and 20% finance

Understanding your own biases and behaviours is even more important than learning about markets. Overcome four major cognitive biases that may be sabotaging your investing and recognise them in others.

Where do stockmarket returns come from over time?

Cash flow statements differ from income statements and balance sheets, and every company must balance payments to investors versus investing into the business. Cash flows drive the value of the business.

Fixed interest

How to invest in the ‘reopening of Australia’ in bonds

As Sydney and Melbourne emerge from lockdown, there are some reopening trades in the Australian credit market which 'sophisticated' investors should consider as part of their fixed income portfolios.


10 trends reshaping the future of emerging markets

Demand for air travel, China’s growing middle-class population, Brazil’s digital payments take-up, Indian IPOs, and increased urbanisation are just some of the trends being seen in emerging economies.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.