Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Government caps tax exemption on pension earnings

 

On Friday 5 April 2013, the Government announced a range of superannuation changes, and here's the full Media Release.

Here is an extract:

The Government will better target the tax exemption for earnings on superannuation assets supporting income streams, by capping it to the first $100,000 of future earnings for each individual.

Under current arrangements, all new earnings (such as dividends and interest) on assets supporting income streams (superannuation pensions and annuities) are tax-free. This is in contrast to earnings in the accumulation phase of superannuation, which are taxed at 15 per cent.

From 1 July 2014, earnings on assets supporting income streams will be tax free up to $100,000 a year for each individual. Earnings above $100,000 will be taxed at the same concessional rate of 15 per cent that applies to earnings in the accumulation phase. An individual with $100,000 of tax-exempt earnings typically receives more government assistance than someone on the maximum rate of the Single Age Pension. This reform will help make the superannuation system fairer and more sustainable, and will help restore a number of the original intentions of the system.

For superannuation assets earning a rate of return of 5 per cent, this reform will only affect individuals with more than $2 million in assets supporting an income stream. Treasury estimates that around 16,000 individuals will be affected by this measure in 2014-15, which represents around 0.4 per cent of Australia’s projected 4.1 million retirees in that year. This reform will save around $350 million over the forward estimates period.

The changes build on the superannuation reforms announced in last year’s Budget. The Government’s Superannuation Concession Reduction for contributions by very high income earners announced in the 2012-13 Budget, together with this reform of earnings on assets supporting income streams, will improve the fairness and long-term sustainability of the superannuation system. These two measures combined will save over $10 billion over the next decade.

 

 

 

6 Comments
Warren
April 08, 2013

Thanks for that observation Rick.

However, gains can be realised from trading even in a modest market move, or a market that ends up flat, so in that case it's not just a matter of having a rising market.

I haven't seen any data on whether there is an increase in realised gains in unit trusts in strongly rising markets - if that's available, it would be interesting to see if there's a higher degree of such gains.

If so, then I'd regard that as quite irresponsible management by the fund manager as it isn't necessarily in the unit holders interests to generate all that taxable income. And one of the reasons why I know a lot of investors who prefer index funds, where trading doesn't take place.

Warren
April 06, 2013

Warwick, you are talking about returns not investment earnings. Unrealised capital gains from an increase in share prices won't figure in the calculation of the amount that is to be compared with $100k.

The reason the government is only using 5% is because the world is in deep, deep trouble. Interest rates - the basis of all investment returns - are near zero in most countries and look locked in around 3% in Australia for a while to come. Long term bond rates are trading in the region of 3.5%. Dividend yields will eventually come down from their current lofty heights unless the world heals much faster than I expect it to.

Personally, I'm more worried that the 5% estimate is too HIGH, not too low.

I'm also worried the number of people who seem to have no idea how bad the world economy is doing and what that means for the long term outlook for investment returns. All those 'experts' still thinking about 6-7% that you refer to, for instance.

I hope like crazy I'm wrong, but everyone should be working out how they will live in a world of very low investment returns. The government may well raise much less revenue from this policy change than they expect to!

Graham Hand
April 06, 2013

Hi Daniel, you raise a good issue, but let's consider some of the numbers. We have $1.5 trillion in super, and about 35% is in listed Australian equities. Call it $500 billion. The total market cap of the ASX200 is $1.3 trillion, so purchases of Australian equities by super funds are having a major impact on supporting the market. But the balances are not going to fall, they will only rise, to a predicted $6 trillion (in future dollar terms) in superannuation by 2030. This will probably be far greater than the size of the ASX200.

So in my view, the issue is not about the baby boomers withdrawing their money and creating more sellers than buyers in future, but how does the ASX support the demand for equities without pushing up prices to unrealistic valuations? It's one reason for the call to add new assets to the exchange, such as infrastructure stocks.

Daniel Jeffares
April 09, 2013

Thanks Graham, That makes sense. One way or another prices won't reflect value then? It would be interesting to hear from Chris Cuffe.

Cheers, Dan.

Warwick Moyse
April 06, 2013

The estimate that only 16,000 people will be affected by the new rules is unrealistically low.

In a good year - like the past 12 months - share-based super plans could achieve 30%+ growth. On that basis, the new tax rule would affect everyone holding a mere $333,000 or more. Rather than benefiting from these good years to compensate for GFC-like events, the average growth rate of relatively small holdings will be choked by the new tax.

Most experts use an average growth figure of 6-7% p.a. to forecast the adequacy of super holdings - why has the Government used only 5% to estimate the impact of the tax?

Daniel Jeffares
April 06, 2013

Can you explain how (given there hasn't been a sufficiently significant IPO I can recall) the 9% SGL going into the market each week isn't simply bidding up the price of existing shares for which there are more buyers than sellers? What happens when the tide reverses and the baby boomers withdraw what they're currently putting in to fund their lavish lifestyles, tax free (ish) in retirement?

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

How retirees might find a retirement solution in future

Ralston responds on super balances of older Australians

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 455 with weekend update

The resolve of many investors to focus on the long term with their share portfolios is increasingly tested as the list of negatives lengthens. There is a lack of visionary policies during an election campaign and stimulatory spending is contradicting the aims of tighter monetary policy.

  • 28 April 2022

Latest Updates

In praise of our unique democracy and its sausage

For all the shortcomings of our political campaigns, our election process is the best. We are blessed with honest administrators and procedures that we all trust to hand over power peacefully, with a big snag. 

Investment strategies

Is the investing landscape really different this time?

Many market analysts argue that the pandemic has changed everything but we must judge whether the circumstances are as drastic as billed. A quick review of four major events helps decide if this time is different.

Economy

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Retirement

When will I retire? Economic impact of an ageing population

About 39% of the labour force is aged over 45. Intergenerational reports highlight the challenges of an ageing population and the impacts on consumption patterns, dependencies, public finances and economic growth.

The real story behind the crypto crash

The recent sell-off in the crypto market and its trigger - the collapse of the Terra UST coin - has affected many institutions either holding or trading crypto assets, including crypto fund managers.

Investment strategies

Cash is the nightingale, the bird in the hand

The bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, and it's an apt metaphor for investment choices. In 2021, as investors hunted in the bush for decent returns, demand overwhelmed supply. Cash is the bird in the hand.

Strategy

Book review of 'Putin’s People' and his motivation for war

Author Catherine Belton argues Putin’s sole ambition is to hold onto power. Her book seeks to understand why Putin invaded Ukraine after he became isolated and out of touch with reality during the pandemic.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.