Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 121

Greece: Scylla and Charybdis

In Greek mythology, Scylla was a seven-headed monster that lived on one side of the Straits of Messina, a narrow strip of water separating the island of Sicily from the Italian mainland. On the other side lay Charybdis, a deadly whirlpool that led to many a watery graveyard for passing ships.

In Homer’s Odyssey, Circe advises Odysseus to sail closer to Scylla,

“A large fig tree in full leaf grows upon it, and under it lies the sucking whirlpool of Charybdis. Three times in the day does she vomit forth her waters, and three times she sucks them down again; see that you be not there when she is sucking, for if you are, Neptune himself could not save you; you must hug the Scylla side and drive ship by as fast as you can, for you had better lose six men than your whole crew.”

Modern Greece faces its own dilemma; should it too sail within reach of Scylla, the 28-headed monster that lives in Brussels to avoid Charybdis, the ‘sucking whirlpool’ that is the return of the drachma?

Golden Rule No. 1 in Stanford Brown’s 10 Golden Rules of Investment is Mark Twain’s prophetic comment that “history doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme”. Greece isn’t technically in default but the probability of it being able to repay its 340 billion euro debt load is zero. This is actually not an unusual situation for Greece as it has been in default for 48 of the past 210 years.

The Greek Parliament has recently passed a much harsher austerity Budget than was rejected by its own people in a recent referendum. Prime Minister, Mr. Tsipras, elected to end austerity, has bizarrely agreed to a tightening of the austerity noose. Greece, reeling under the weight of its burgeoning debt mountain, has been given an additional 86 billion euros in debt. The IMF has said it won’t participate as it believes it has no chance of ever getting repaid. And the Greek people want to stay in the euro, but reject the austerity that membership requires. In this topsy-turvy world of contradictions, catch-22s and nonsense, the Mad Hatter could not have put it any better,

“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrariwise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?”

Pour encourager les autres

David Zervos, chief strategist at research house, Jeffries, never doubted the outcome,

“The Greeks now stand as poster children for European profligacy. And they are being paraded through every town in the EU, in shackles, as the bell tolls near the gallows for their leader… The Portuguese, the Italians, and Spanish are surely taking notice… With no real way to ensure fiscal discipline through the treaty, they resorted to killing one of their own in order to keep the masses in line.”

There has always been widespread support in Europe for the Union, but the single currency has never been popular. The euro was the price demanded by France for the re-unification of Germany in 1990; such was their fear of a strong neighbour to the east. The French believed that binding Germany into the corset of monetary union would curb her power. What a colossal mistake.

Whilst tragic for Greece, the fallout for investors across the globe is not going to resemble a ‘Lehman moment’ – even in the worst case of a messy Greek exit from the single currency. There are four key reasons for our complacency. First, Greece is very small, accounting for just 0.25% of the global economy; the European banking system is now much less exposed to a Greek default, having swapped its Greek debt with the IMF and the Eurozone; the other vulnerable European economies of Portugal, Spain, Italy and Ireland are in much better economic shape than during the last Eurozone sovereign debt crisis in 2011; and finally, Europe has now established robust defence mechanisms with sufficient firepower to handle future crises. These include a bailout fund called the European Stability Mechanism (despite being expressly banned by the Maastricht Treaty), cheap funding for banks from the European Central Bank, and the ECB’s mammoth Quantitative Easing program, which has so far contained any rise in bond yields of the peripheral countries (see chart below).

JH Figure3 070815

The disastrous experiment that was the European Single Currency will serve as a classic case study for generations of future Business School graduates. The lesson learnt is that economics always trumps politics, no matter how hard you wish it wasn’t so. If only we had all listened to the great economist, Milton Friedman, who in 1997, two years prior to the establishment of the single currency, had this to say,

“The drive for the Euro has been motivated by politics not economics. The aim has been to link Germany and France so closely as to make a future European war impossible, and to set the stage for afederal United States of Europe. I believe that adoption of the Euro would have the opposite effect. It would exacerbate political tensions by converting divergent shocks that could have been readily accommodated by exchange rate changes into divisive political issues. Political unity can pave the way for monetary unity. Monetary unity imposed under unfavorable conditions will prove a barrier to the achievement of political unity.”

The image at the start of this article depicts Greece sailing within reach of Scylla (the euro), to avoid Charybdis, the ‘sucking whirlpool’ that is Grexit. But have we mixed our monsters? Returning to the drachma would give Greek businesses an immediate competitive boost, albeit with much associated turmoil, and buy the country precious time to make necessary reforms. Perhaps Grexit is the modern-day Scylla, resulting in the loss of six years, whilst the whirlpool of Charybdis represents the continued membership of the European single currency and a lost generation. In this case, it’s better the devil you don’t know.

 

Jonathan Hoyle is Chief Executive Officer at Stanford Brown. Any advice contained in this article is general advice only and does not take into consideration the reader’s personal circumstances.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Three reasons high inflation may trigger a European crisis

Germany will do the minimum to support the euro ... and Europe

Coronavirus and the fragilities of Italy and the eurozone

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.