Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 319

Helping your children build their super

For many years, superannuation has provided significant tax benefits for retirees. However, recent changes in legislation will limit the amount that can be placed into super, and investment returns may not be as good as in the past. As a result, future generations will pay more tax in retirement as they will hold more of their wealth outside super.

This problem can only be minimised with long-term planning.

What is the problem the next generation is likely to face?

Many future retirees will not able to transfer adequate funds into superannuation because:

  • On average, mortgages are higher and take longer to pay off. Superannuation is not the main financial priority for many people until well into their 50s.
  • There has been a progressive reduction in the amount that an individual can contribute to super. The graph below shows how the maximum annual non-concessional (after-tax) contribution has fallen in recent years (and to zero if the $1.6 million Total Superannuation Balance (TSB) has been reached).



    It is Labor policy to reduce the annual amount to $75,000. These rules disadvantage individuals who obtain wealth later in life.
  • A steady increase in life expectancy means that many children will not receive an inheritance until they are in their 60’s. Given that an individual cannot contribute to super after the age of 64 unless they are working, this will give little time to make more contributions.

So, while the $1.6 million TSB may be a concern of many retirees of the current generation, it will not be a concern for the next as many will not get even close to this level.

Helping a child make a concessional (tax-deductible) contribution

There are many different views on whether parents who have money available to help their children should do so. This is a discussion for another time. However, it is my view that the child’s tax position should be considered if assistance is provided. Superannuation should be a factor.

The major benefit received from making tax deductible superannuation contributions is the compounding effect of paying a lower tax rate. This can be shown by a simple example:

Bryce is 40-years-old and earns $100,000 a year. His employer contributes the minimum required superannuation guarantee (SGC) of 9.5% or $9,500. Including the SGC, he is entitled to make a deductible contribution of $25,000 but does not have the financial resources to use his full limit.

He expects to retire at age 65. His mother would like to help Bryce build some wealth in a tax-effective way. Note that:

  • Bryce’s marginal tax rate is 39%
  • Contributions to super are taxed at 15%

So there is a 24% tax saving if assistance is added to his super. As shown in the graph below, the long-term effect of this tax saving is substantial. Assuming future earnings are taxed at 15% inside super, compared to 39% outside and the investment return is 7%, the value of this $10,000 will be worth over double if held inside super compared with outside. Bryce will also have more in super at 65 resulting in a more tax-effective retirement.

Helping a child to make non-concessional (after-tax) contributions

Given that there is no initial tax deduction, lending money to a child to make a non-concessional contribution is not so beneficial in the short term. However, it still may be considered by high net worth individuals. For example, an individual who is 75 with children who are 50 may take the opportunity to add to their child’s super progressively knowing that they may otherwise be left with considerable funds outside superannuation when they receive an inheritance.

Overall it is becoming increasingly difficult to maximise the benefits of superannuation. More thought needs to be put into not only how much wealth is transferred to the next generation but also how it is transferred.

Two final points of caution.

Firstly, the contribution must be made by the child. In other words, the parent would need to deposit the money in the child’s bank account and the child will need to make the contribution. It cannot come directly from the parent.

Secondly, a strategy like this may have significant tax, family and estate planning consequences. As a result, it should not be entered into without first receiving both financial and legal advice.

 

Matthew Collins is a Director of Keystone Advice Pty Ltd and specialises in providing superannuation tax, estate tax and structural advice to high net wealth individuals and their families. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual investor. It is based on a current understanding of related legislation which may change in future.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Who does compulsory superannuation really benefit?

Don’t allow a BoMaD to ruin your retirement

7 Comments
KG
September 26, 2019

Just wondering where the requirement is that a contribution has to come from the member. We've been trying to find evidence anywhere of where a non-concessional contribution for a member can come from and have struggled to find any leading us to believe that anyone can make a contribution on behalf of another. Thanks

Dee
August 15, 2019

As a parent I already EFT an after tax contribution in my child's super account. And yes strictly speaking it should come from an a/c in her name. All her super system sees is a 'donor' bsb and a/c no. so all good so far.

I tell her to claim this amount on her tax return by contacting her super fund ( Australian Super) and completing a form.

The effect of a making an after tax contribution is that the money is ''housed in an after tax account but when the form is processed this after tax amount is transferred by the super fund and resides with her salary sacrificed amounts and SGC amounts.

John
August 15, 2019

In the example, it would also be clearer if you used the full amount of the additional concessional contribution ie $15,500 rather than bringing in a new amount of $10,000.

Chris
August 15, 2019

Bryce’s parents can’t give him money to salary sacrifice..... I though it has to come from money he earns? I am missing something?

Matthew Collins
August 15, 2019

In the past he would have to salary sacrifice. However, under current legislation an individual can "salary sacrifice" AND make a "member deductible contribution". The only requirement is that the total combined deduction claimed is less than $25,000.

So in this example, Bryce would take the following steps:

- make a member contribution into the fund
- send in a form called "notice of intention to claim a deduction" to the fund
- claim the deduction in his personal tax return.

Graham
August 15, 2019

Thanks, Geoff. You're right, the example includes his SG, we'll make this clearer in the article. G

Geoff
August 15, 2019

How is Bryce, earning $100K and having $9,500 added to his super by his employer entitled to make a $25,000 deductible super contribution? $15,500 by my calculations.


 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The 20 Commandments of Wealth for retirees

To mark his 80th, we publish a Noel classic plus his timeless commandments for retiree wealth, based on decades of advising clients, writing bestsellers and reaching millions of people every week.

Are you caught in the ‘retirement trap’?

Our retirement savings system is supposed to encourage financial independence but there is a ‘Retirement Trap’ due to the reduction of age pension entitlements as assets and income rise.

The power of letting winners run

Handling extreme winners is a complex task. Conventional wisdom such as “you never go broke taking a profit” often leaves a lot of money on the table as strong growth stocks continue to run.

Tony Togher on why cash isn’t just cash

An active manager of cash and fixed interest funds can achieve higher returns than the cash rate through a selection of other securities while managing both liquidity and income for clients.

'OK Boomer' responses keep on coming

Our sincere thanks for the amazing personal stories of how wealth was built by hard work or where some were not as fortunate. Another 600 readers have taken part in the survey since the last update.

NAB hybrid: one says buy, one says sell, you decide

Differences of opinion make a market, and hybrid specialists disagree on the likelihood that NAB will call one of its hybrids early. It makes a major difference to the expected return on NABHA.

Latest Updates

Should your equity manager hold lots of cash?

An investment with any fund manager should be part of an asset allocation decision, but what happens when your equity manager decides to do a major switch to cash? It messes up your plan.

Superannuation

The moral hazard of a national super fund

If billions of dollars of retirement savings were lost by a government agency in a national super scheme, the cost and risk would be passed back to the government and ‘caveat emptor’ would be history.

Investment strategies

Dispelling the disruption myth

We tend to call any change a 'disruption', but the vast majority of so-called disruptive technologies are variations on a theme. Many innovations are really high-risk, low-probability investments.

Compliance

Watch your SMSF’s annual return this year

The best way to preserve your SMSF’s favoured status is to make sure the fund’s annual return reaches the ATO on time. There are new rules this year that every SMSF trustee should know.

SMSF strategies

SMSFs have major role but not for everyone

Arguments between segments of the super industry do not foster public confidence. SMSFs are suitable for many who seek control of their own financial destiny, but it's not a competition. 

Sponsors

Alliances