Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 319

Helping your children build their super

For many years, superannuation has provided significant tax benefits for retirees. However, recent changes in legislation will limit the amount that can be placed into super, and investment returns may not be as good as in the past. As a result, future generations will pay more tax in retirement as they will hold more of their wealth outside super.

This problem can only be minimised with long-term planning.

What is the problem the next generation is likely to face?

Many future retirees will not able to transfer adequate funds into superannuation because:

  • On average, mortgages are higher and take longer to pay off. Superannuation is not the main financial priority for many people until well into their 50s.
  • There has been a progressive reduction in the amount that an individual can contribute to super. The graph below shows how the maximum annual non-concessional (after-tax) contribution has fallen in recent years (and to zero if the $1.6 million Total Superannuation Balance (TSB) has been reached).



    It is Labor policy to reduce the annual amount to $75,000. These rules disadvantage individuals who obtain wealth later in life.
  • A steady increase in life expectancy means that many children will not receive an inheritance until they are in their 60’s. Given that an individual cannot contribute to super after the age of 64 unless they are working, this will give little time to make more contributions.

So, while the $1.6 million TSB may be a concern of many retirees of the current generation, it will not be a concern for the next as many will not get even close to this level.

Helping a child make a concessional (tax-deductible) contribution

There are many different views on whether parents who have money available to help their children should do so. This is a discussion for another time. However, it is my view that the child’s tax position should be considered if assistance is provided. Superannuation should be a factor.

The major benefit received from making tax deductible superannuation contributions is the compounding effect of paying a lower tax rate. This can be shown by a simple example:

Bryce is 40-years-old and earns $100,000 a year. His employer contributes the minimum required superannuation guarantee (SGC) of 9.5% or $9,500. Including the SGC, he is entitled to make a deductible contribution of $25,000 but does not have the financial resources to use his full limit.

He expects to retire at age 65. His mother would like to help Bryce build some wealth in a tax-effective way. Note that:

  • Bryce’s marginal tax rate is 39%
  • Contributions to super are taxed at 15%

So there is a 24% tax saving if assistance is added to his super. As shown in the graph below, the long-term effect of this tax saving is substantial. Assuming future earnings are taxed at 15% inside super, compared to 39% outside and the investment return is 7%, the value of this $10,000 will be worth over double if held inside super compared with outside. Bryce will also have more in super at 65 resulting in a more tax-effective retirement.

Helping a child to make non-concessional (after-tax) contributions

Given that there is no initial tax deduction, lending money to a child to make a non-concessional contribution is not so beneficial in the short term. However, it still may be considered by high net worth individuals. For example, an individual who is 75 with children who are 50 may take the opportunity to add to their child’s super progressively knowing that they may otherwise be left with considerable funds outside superannuation when they receive an inheritance.

Overall it is becoming increasingly difficult to maximise the benefits of superannuation. More thought needs to be put into not only how much wealth is transferred to the next generation but also how it is transferred.

Two final points of caution.

Firstly, the contribution must be made by the child. In other words, the parent would need to deposit the money in the child’s bank account and the child will need to make the contribution. It cannot come directly from the parent.

Secondly, a strategy like this may have significant tax, family and estate planning consequences. As a result, it should not be entered into without first receiving both financial and legal advice.

 

Matthew Collins is a Director of Keystone Advice Pty Ltd and specialises in providing superannuation tax, estate tax and structural advice to high net wealth individuals and their families. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual investor. It is based on a current understanding of related legislation which may change in future.

 

7 Comments
KG
September 25, 2019

Just wondering where the requirement is that a contribution has to come from the member. We've been trying to find evidence anywhere of where a non-concessional contribution for a member can come from and have struggled to find any leading us to believe that anyone can make a contribution on behalf of another. Thanks

Dee
August 15, 2019

As a parent I already EFT an after tax contribution in my child's super account. And yes strictly speaking it should come from an a/c in her name. All her super system sees is a 'donor' bsb and a/c no. so all good so far.

I tell her to claim this amount on her tax return by contacting her super fund ( Australian Super) and completing a form.

The effect of a making an after tax contribution is that the money is ''housed in an after tax account but when the form is processed this after tax amount is transferred by the super fund and resides with her salary sacrificed amounts and SGC amounts.

John
August 14, 2019

In the example, it would also be clearer if you used the full amount of the additional concessional contribution ie $15,500 rather than bringing in a new amount of $10,000.

Chris
August 14, 2019

Bryce’s parents can’t give him money to salary sacrifice..... I though it has to come from money he earns? I am missing something?

Matthew Collins
August 14, 2019

In the past he would have to salary sacrifice. However, under current legislation an individual can "salary sacrifice" AND make a "member deductible contribution". The only requirement is that the total combined deduction claimed is less than $25,000.

So in this example, Bryce would take the following steps:

- make a member contribution into the fund
- send in a form called "notice of intention to claim a deduction" to the fund
- claim the deduction in his personal tax return.

Graham
August 14, 2019

Thanks, Geoff. You're right, the example includes his SG, we'll make this clearer in the article. G

Geoff
August 14, 2019

How is Bryce, earning $100K and having $9,500 added to his super by his employer entitled to make a $25,000 deductible super contribution? $15,500 by my calculations.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

2025-26 super thresholds – key changes and implications

A guide to excess non-concessional super contributions

Retirement and Antarctica: start early in setting your goals

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.