Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 442

Let 'er rip: how high can debt-to-GDP ratios soar?

The ‘IMF crisis’ as South Koreans call the ‘Asia crisis’ of 1997 is the worst event to have hit South Korea since the civil war of 1950-53. Their focus on the IMF is because South Koreans, perhaps ungratefully, focus on the damage after the International Monetary Fund bailed out a country tormented by a currency-turned-banking crisis.

Even though South Korea’s economy rebounded quickly from IMF-imposed austerity, the crisis scarred South Koreans. One legacy was a consensus that Seoul must not let gross government debt exceed 40% of output.

No longer. The government of President Moon Jae-in in August 2021 vowed to use fiscal stimulus to counter the damage of the pandemic and, more broadly, fight poverty and inequality. Public debt is expected to reach 59% of GDP by 2025, from 36% when Moon took office in 2017.

Why not let government borrowing rip?

Does anyone care that government debt-to-GDP ratios (however imperfectly measured) are higher than seemed possible because interest rates are so low? US government debt is now at 103% of GDP. Eurozone public debt is at a near-record 98% of output. While Australia’s federal debt is only headed to 50% of GDP by 2025, Japan’s public debt stands at 257% of GDP, while for advanced countries the figure is 124% of output. Public debt in emerging markets extends to a record 64% of output. The IMF estimates ‘general’ government debt now reaches a record 99% of global output, from 83% in 2016.

An overarching question is: At what level might public debt become disruptive? History is replete with examples of when excessive debt triggered a crisis, from an inflationary economic collapse to endless stagnation.

Managing government debts

Governments have three standard options when it comes to tackling debt burdens.

The first conventional cure is to raise taxes and reduce spending. The handbrake of austerity is often politically fraught and undermines economies so much that it backfires and debt ratios rise.

A second, and the most appealing, option is to ensure economies flourish in a way that erodes real debt burdens over time. This is how the victors reduced their bills after World War II. The formula is to ensure nominal output (GDP unadjusted for inflation) grows at a higher rate than the average interest rate on public debt – a historic norm.

Over the pandemic, these formulas were met because interest rates were around record lows partly due to central bank asset purchases. A repeat of the post-World War II drawdown will be hard because back then pent-up demand, low regulation, favourable demographics and free trade drove economies, advantages lacking now.

Still, within this option, governments can choose to allow some inflation and suppress interest rates. The benefit of this approach is that rising nominal GDP growth offers governments tax windfalls. But artificially low rates would only encourage companies and consumers to add to their record debt loads that come primed with risks too.

Permitting inflation is tricky. Officials might lose control of prices and interest rates would rise. To counter that, governments might be tempted to pressure central banks not to raise rates. But that would demolish central-bank independence to fight inflation, perhaps the economic policy most responsible for recent prosperity.

The third option is to default. While no defaults in advanced countries with their own currencies are imminent, their governments can’t boost debt forever. Pressure will mount for authorities to control debt ratios to stop ratings downgrades, perhaps even engage in accounting tricks.

Where are the vulnerabilities?

Eurozone governments with high debt ratios are more vulnerable to default because they lack their own currencies, yet any default could bring down the European Monetary System. More crises from the euro area are likely, especially if bond yields rise after the European Central Bank stops its asset buying.

Emerging countries, which are inherently less stable economically and politically, are most likely to default. The candidates are many – the IMF in December 2021 estimated that 60% of low-income countries are at “high risk or already in debt distress” compared with 30% in 2015. Emerging countries that have borrowed in foreign currency (a diminishing percentage) and ones that have borrowed from foreigners rather than locals are the most at risk.

For indebted advanced and emerging countries, a world of record government debt could soon enough be a realm of hard choices and one of sporadic crises.

As the debt status quo appears unsustainable, any rise in US interest rates will signal trouble ahead.

Debt played a role, but there is a price

To be clear, government debt proved its worth during the pandemic and there’s nothing risky with it per se, especially when governments borrow in local currency from locals. As Japan shows, debt-to-GDP ratios can climb far higher than thought possible without any obvious damage to an economy. It’s true too that few indebted governments are struggling to sell debt at low rates. But, at some point, rising debt would trigger steeper borrowing costs and puncture the complacency that public debts are manageable because interest rates are low.

History shows that public debt ushers in its nemesis; higher interest rates. That reckoning one indeterminant day likely means a harsher, poorer, perhaps crisis-prone future awaits.

 

Michael Collins is an Investment Specialist at Magellan Asset Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only, not investment advice. For the full version of this article and to view sources, go to: https://www.magellangroup.com.au/insights/.

For more articles and papers from Magellan, please click here.

 

6 Comments
Francisco Flores
January 20, 2022

Although you touched on it briefly, you missed the most important factor in determining whether an economy is going to have true fiscal issues -- and that is whether they're debt, particularly their sovereign debt, is denominated in their own currency or a foreign currency. That is the key. A side element is the level of foreign denominated private sector debt. (See: Turkey) The truth is, a monetary sovereign that
-issues,
-borrows in, and
-floats its own currency,
can never run out of cash, and is not vulnerable to a hyperinflation.

Dudley
January 20, 2022

'and is not vulnerable to a hyperinflation':

100 Trillion $ Zimbabwe note:
https://compote.slate.com/images/d315bc41-2074-4adf-86f1-4d108c5e4bce.jpg

Trevor G
January 19, 2022

It seems to me that the currency is being debased. This is my impression based on the rise in the price of assets such as residential real estate for example. Lots of cash chasing a limited supply of assets.

James
January 19, 2022

This article is a textbook example of conventional economic wisdom with respect to the risks surrounding elevated government debt. The problem is, conventional wisdom has been at a loss to explain much of what has been happening in macroeconomics, especially in the post-GFC period.
How is it that countries can steadily increase their debt to GDP ratios and yet bond rates have consistently declined and currencies have not been debased? How is it possible government bond yields can be negative? Conventional economics has no answer.
As a wealth manager and economics graduate, macroeconomic views help shape ideas about financial markets and portfolio construction. I became frustrated that the economics I learned, and that is still espoused by the vast majority of academics and journalists, was at a loss to explain what was happening in the real world and so I went in search of answers.
The only framework I have found that offers a logical explanation of what is happening and why (and indeed foresaw each of those events), is Modern Monetary Theory, aka MMT, which is simply the application of the rock solid rules of accounting to how money works in an economy where the government issues its own currency. It is not a policy framework and is politically agnostic, it simply explains how things work.

May I suggest you publish some articles explaining what MMT is and why it is so significant?

I think Firstlinks is a fabulous resource and carries a host of valuable content, but I believe you are doing your readers a disservice by not at least explaining what MMT is, given its increasing profile that is backed by an ever-growing body of academic literature.

Graham Hand
January 19, 2022

Thanks, James, we have run articles on MMT but appreciate the suggestion and we will source another. Important subject.

Dudley
January 19, 2022

"only framework":

Why QE? 'cause inflation rate & wages growth rate small in developed economies - but not in China where wages have boomed.
Made In China Price lower than Made In West Price due to cheap Chinese wages due to much larger previously unexploited labour.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

What the Federal Budget means for you

How the Intergenerational Report misleads on super

Are debt and its servicing cost serious worries?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The nuts and bolts of family trusts

There are well over 800,000 family trusts in Australia, controlling more than $3 trillion of assets. Here's a guide on whether a family trust may have a place in your individual investment strategy.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 581 with weekend update

A recent industry event made me realise that a 30 year old investing trend could still have serious legs. Could it eventually pose a threat to two of Australia's biggest companies?

  • 10 October 2024

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 583 with weekend update

Investing guru Howard Marks says he had two epiphanies while visiting Australia recently: the two major asset classes aren’t what you think they are, and one key decision matters above all else when building portfolios.

  • 24 October 2024

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

How have so many wealthy families through history managed to squander their fortunes? This looks at the lessons from these families and offers several solutions to making and keeping money over the long-term.

A big win for bank customers against scammers

A recent ruling from The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may herald a new era for financial scams. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount they were scammed.

The quirks of retirement planning with an age gap

A big age gap can make it harder to find a solution that works for both partners – financially and otherwise. Having a frank conversation about the future, and having it as early as possible, is essential.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Warren Buffett is preparing for a bear market. Should you?

Berkshire Hathaway’s third quarter earnings update reveals Buffett is selling stocks and building record cash reserves. Here’s a look at his track record in calling market tops and whether you should follow his lead and dial down risk.

Economy

US election implications for investors and Australia

The return of Donald Trump to the US presidency brings the prospect of more US tax cuts and deregulation, but also more tariff hikes, trade wars and policy uncertainty. Here's what it means for markets going forward.

Retirement

The rising tension between housing debt and retirement balances

Australians are taking more mortgage debt into their 60s than ever before. Retirement planning assumptions haven’t adapted and could result in future income projections that ultimately disappoint retirees.

Investment strategies

Why megatrends can deliver big upside (and downside)

The magnitude and duration of society's most important trends are often underestimated. While these trends are usually touted as a tailwind, one in particular could have dark consequences for many assets.

Property

Fixing the construction industry house of cards

Australia needs to build new homes like never before but construction firms keep going belly up. Unless regulators act now, consumers will continue to carry the can.

Investment strategies

How investor portfolios have become riskier versus history

Risk in portfolios has dramatically increased as time horizons have shortened and investors have piled into equities. It's resulted in a growing disconnect between what investors need and what the financial industry is delivering.

Shares

The abacus, big data and a brief history of indexing

Equity indices have evolved over time, led by step-changes in our ability to manipulate data. Despite the rise of passive investing, they weren't initially meant to be investment tools.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.