Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 486

Hold fire on your fund manager over short-term declines

Who hasn’t wanted to be Biff Tannen in the 1980s cult classic movie, Back to the Future Part II?

As an old man in 2015, Biff discovers Grays Sports Almanac. It shows the outcome of every sporting event from 1950 to 2000. Biff hops in the DeLorean time machine and travels back to 1955. He gives the magazine to his young self. Young Biff places bets on sporting events listed in the Almanac. He quickly builds his evil financial empire from the guaranteed profits.

This doomsday timeline is only extinguished by Marty McFly and Doc going back in time to steal the Almanac from Young Biff, masterfully aided by Marty’s hoverboard from the future. (An aside: thanks Mattel for not delivering on that promised future tech by 2015!). Marty then eventually burns the Almanac, much to the collective sigh of sports betting fans everywhere.

An investor’s dream

What if you had an Almanac for the share market?

That’s what US based investment group Alpha Architect took a look at a few years ago. In their study, they looked at the question: “What if you had perfect (God-like) foresight and knew exactly which stocks would be the best and worst performers over the next 5 years?”.

Their conclusion: Even God would get fired as an active investor.

CAGR by ranking decile (1927 to 2016)

Source: Alpha Architect.

The chart above shows the outcome of having God-like skills and investing in the top-performing 10% of US stocks over every 5-year period since 1927. In terms of performance, you would have knocked it out of the park, returning just shy of 30% per annum. Eat your heart out Warren Buffett.

Dramatic drawdowns

But there is a catch.

As you can see in the chart below, to get that 30% per annum return, investors in the hypothetical ‘perfect’ long-term active share fund would have suffered extreme gut-wrenching drawdowns (peak-to-trough falls).

Source: Alpha Architect.

Between 1929 and 1932, the fund would have lost nearly 76% of its value before staging a recovery. Drawdowns of -20% to -40% were routine, including 40% falls during the GFC and the 2000’s tech-wreck.

How does this happen? Because even the best stocks don’t go up in a straight line over the long term. The share market is a volatile place, even if God is picking the stocks.

The spectacular success story of Amazon is a prime example. It has returned over +119,873%, or over 32% per annum, since listing in 1997. Yet its share price fell 94% in 2001. It took 10 years to recoup that loss. During that decade, it suffered falls of 45% in 2005, 63% in 2008, and also fell 34% in 2018. It is currently down 52%.

The lesson is that even if you possess godlike skills, you can’t avoid big drawdowns.

Amazon share price drawdown

Source: Factset

The danger of focusing on short-term fund manager performance

This has serious implications for how investors judge performance. High-performing active fund managers don’t post strong returns or outperformance day in, day out. Or even year in, year out. They suffer drawdowns and periods of underperformance.

Investors, therefore, need to back the long-term track record of their fund manager through the shorter-term volatility. If they don’t, they risk jumping from manager to manager and missing the inevitable rebound from skilful managers – and long-term outperformance.

(For our suggestions of what to look for in a fund manager instead, please read our Investment Strategy notes on the topic here and here.)

Myopic investors can drive fund managers to focus short term

If enough investors pull their money when short performance falls, they are ultimately incentivising the fund manager to focus on short-term performance too.

Most share funds disclose that the minimum investment time horizon for their fund is 5+ years. Industry investor funds flow data, however, suggests many investors don’t wait around that long for a fund manager to recover if they are suffering a significant drawdown. In that scenario, even some of the top performing fund managers can be fired. The natural consequence is managers are focussed on the short term and ensuring portfolio company results keep beating short-term expectations.

Shares, however, are a long-term asset class. They benefit from the ingenuity of businesses in raising productivity, creating new products or services, or improving existing ones. This takes time, often at least 3-5 years.

This has led to CEOs the world over lamenting how fund managers are so intently focussed on the next quarterly result, whilst they are generally focussed on setting and implementing business strategy for the next 3-5+ years. We have seen this too, many times over the years. Our response is unless investors’ time horizons become longer in their decision making, then fund managers are unlikely to focus more exclusively on the long term too.

Why investors need to understand their fund’s investment horizons

As we have seen, even a fund manager with perfect ‘God-like’ foresight would suffer major short-term falls. Investors need to accept the best-performing funds over the long-term can also post significant drawdowns.

It is terribly damaging for fund managers if lots of investors redeem during tough times. This is magnified for small caps. Fund managers have to sell less-liquid companies at fire sale prices to fund these investor withdrawals.

Sometimes, of course, investors are justified in withdrawing their capital. But short-term declines shouldn’t be one of those reasons.

Investors need to understand the investment horizon for the fund, and ensure they are aligned with that horizon. Long-term investors are one of the most valuable assets a fund manager can possess. At Ophir, we deeply value ours.


Andrew Mitchell is Director and Senior Portfolio Manager at Ophir Asset Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

Read more articles and papers from Ophir here.


Graham Wright
December 03, 2022

LICs can easily demonstrate the situation in this current economic environment, re fundmanager's best interests and investor best interest and the principle extrapolates into all fund environments. Easily visible watching monthly statements of NTA and shareprice movements.
NTAs are generally trending downwards at the moment due to investment values falling as a generalisation. At the same time shareprices of LICs are falling as a generalisation. If both moved relative to each other the gap would remain the same. This gap consistency remains relatively constant with unlisted funds/trusts/etfs because managers contrive to maintain the gap consistency. With LICs, there is no market price control, just market free forces so that investors can walk away faster or buy in quicker than NTA changes as is their whim. The gap shows the difference between investor expectations and the fund managers expectations/expertise.
In today's market, outperformance means the fundmanagers investment selections are losing less than the goalpost performance. A wonderful claim, "I'm good because I am not as bad as the rest". For the investor, any loss could mean unpaid bills, sold (other) assets, changed education arrangements for kids. Fund managers can protect their fund by changing investments without telling the investor instantly that the change occurs and they can close the fund to withdrawals. The investor can only follow the manager blindly and faithfully or withdraw from the fund. Today, in LICs, we see investors selling with prices falling and the gap widening in most instances. Of course there are always a few exceptions to every circumstance.

Peter Voight
December 02, 2022

There seems to be some cynicism towards fund managers among the comments. For balance, I think that while it's correct that most fund managers do underperform the index, there are some who can outperform over long-term periods. For example, recent data from S&P Dow Jones Indices shows that for Australian mid and small caps managers, 47% outperformed over a 3 year period, 40% over a 5 year period and 49% over a 15 year period. Consistent outperformance can happen and there are some good managers out there if you do your homework.

December 02, 2022

More and more research highlights that active fund managers underperform their benchmarks over the long-term and as a result investors are turning to lower cost ETFs and other passive investments. As a result we continue to see fund managers trying to justify their existence in defensive articles such as this. Unless they radically re-think their business model their days are numbered.

November 30, 2022

Surely god would have the ability to go to cash, since god knows what is going to happen.

Graham Wright
November 30, 2022

The perpetual argument with another set of supporting data to show that long, long term investing will be profitable. An argument well established to support fund-managers and other professional "administration types" living off the investment industry with no care for the possible alternative needs of the investor.
The investor has only one factor within his/her control re the investment: 1) remain invested and take the consequences good or bad, 2) withdraw the invested funds and preserve the capital from deterioration that he/she expects could occur if the investment continues. If you have no control, you are relying on faith.
The investor has one further consideration. "If I lose any or all of the investment funds, am I losing funds I will need for my future living and will I have time and opportunity to recover the funds by the time I need them?
The investors self needs prevail over those of the fund needs as far as the investor must be concerned.
Finally, there is a weighted factor available to many fund managers, to protect the fund and that is the ability to close the fund to withdrawals, beneficial to the fund but detrimental, sometimes seriously detrimental to retiree investors. Thus the fund manager is far better self-protected than the investor.


Leave a Comment:



Bigger fall, bigger bounce: small caps into and out of recessions

Bear markets don't go paw-in-paw with recessions

7 truths of volatility, but are they friends or foes?


Most viewed in recent weeks

Where Baby Boomer wealth will end up

By 2028, all Baby Boomers will be eligible for retirement and the Baby Boomer bubble will have all but deflated. Where will this generation's money end up, and what are the implications for the wealth management industry?

Are term deposits attractive right now?

If you’re like me, you may have put money into term deposits over the past year and it’s time to decide whether to roll them over or look elsewhere. Here are the pros and cons of cash versus other assets right now.

Uncomfortable truths: The real cost of living in retirement

How useful are the retirement savings and spending targets put out by various groups such as ASFA? Not very, and it's reducing the ability of ordinary retirees to fully understand their retirement income options.

How retiree spending plummets as we age

There's been little debate on how spending changes as people progress through retirement. Yet, it's a critical issue as it can have a significant impact on the level of savings required at the point of retirement.

Meg on SMSFs: $3 million super tax coming whether we’re ready or not

A Senate Committee reported back last week with a majority recommendation to pass the $3 million super tax unaltered. It seems that the tax is coming, and this is what those affected should be doing now to prepare for it.

How much do you need to retire comfortably?

Two commonly asked questions are: 'How much do I need to retire' and 'How much can I afford to spend in retirement'? This is a guide to help you come up with your own numbers to suit your goals and needs.

Latest Updates


Is 'The Great Australian Dream' a sham?

Peter Dutton has made housing a key issue for the next election, pledging to “restore the Australian dream” of home ownership. It got me thinking about what this dream represents, how it originated, and whether it’s still relevant today.


Clime time: Taxing unrealised capital gains – is there a better idea?

The efficacy and fairness of establishing an unrealised gains tax regime will hopefully be hotly debated at the next election. We need better ideas on how to use the strategic and unique benefits of our massive super funds.


How long will you live?

We are often quoted life expectancy at birth but what matters most is how long we should live as we grow older. It is surprising how short this can be for people born last century, so make the most of it.

Investment strategies

What poker can teach us about investing

So-called ‘resulting’ is what poker players call the tendency to judge a decision based on its outcome rather than its quality. It's something that happens a lot in investing, though should be avoided at all costs.

Latest from Morningstar

Should you buy and hold an Artificial Intelligence portfolio?

For those with the patience to own an investment as volatile as the AI sector, buying and holding a stock basket might make sense. However, based on internet stocks’ history, you need not rush to do so.


The bull market in commodities may be just starting

The world is entering a higher cost environment which will hit the profits of companies in many sectors. A key beneficiary will be commodities, where supply shortages are meeting increasing demand from AI and green energy.


The challenges facing electric vehicles

Slowing demand and profit warnings from the EV manufacturers has seen analysts revise down their EV penetration forecasts. What's behind the slowdown, and are the issues a blip or something more serious?



© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.