Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 126

How are the returns on your equity?

Through the volatility of recent weeks, the adverse impact on the market value of our portfolios has been minimised by a focus on high quality businesses, a margin of safety in the difference between price and valuation, and the ability to hold large amounts of cash when opportunities are unavailable. An extraordinary business must have bright prospects for sales and profits, a high rate of return on equity - driven by sustainable competitive advantages, solid cash flow, little or no debt - and be run by first-class managers who think like owners and treat their shareholders as such.

A good business to own is one that produces growing profits. That seems obvious. Indeed it’s what the vast majority of analysts and equity investors are looking for.

What is the ideal business to own?

Perhaps less obvious is that the best business also requires the least amount of capital invested in it to generate those profits. There is a yawning chasm in the worth of a business that grows and requires lots of additional capital, and the business that grows and doesn’t need any additional capital.

A perfect business might be one that requires no staff and thus has no labour costs; no machinery and so does not require any equipment to be maintained or replaced; and no inventory, so there’s no need for trucks, warehouses or stock management systems and no chance that you will be left holding products that are obsolete or out of fashion. When these things are required by a business, there is less cash to distribute to investors or less cash available to be invested elsewhere. First prize is a business that generates high returns with all of those profits available to be distributed or reinvested as the owner sees fit.

Importance of ‘return on equity’

Perhaps the single most important factor in the identification of a wonderful business is a number, a simple ratio, the return on equity. That is, the level of net income as a percentage of shareholders’ equity. The actress Mae West once said, “Too much of a good thing is wonderful”, and return on equity is like that. It is a measure of the earning power of a business and while accounting focuses on providing an estimate of the business’s performance and position, the economics reveals the true picture.

The wealthiest man alive today, Warren Buffett, is an enormous fan of return on equity as demonstrated by the statements: “Except for special cases (for example, companies with unusual debt-equity ratios or those with important assets carried at unrealistic balance sheet values), we believe [a more appropriate measure] of managerial economic performance to be return on equity capital.” And: “The best business to own is one that over an extended period can employ large amounts of incremental capital at very high rates of return.”

The return on equity ratio tells us many things. First, it is a measure of the quality of a company’s business. Many people wrongly believe that strong growth in profits over the years is an indication of a superior business. It isn’t. Companies like ABC Learning displayed strong growth in earnings yet still collapsed. ABC Learning had low and falling returns on equity. Economic returns, as measured by return on equity, are a better indication of business quality than earnings growth. Return on equity helps tell us which companies display ‘good’ growth. It sorts the wheat from the chaff. A company with strong earnings growth prospects and high rates of return on equity is the sort of business in which you should buy shares.

Using ABC Learning as an example, the company’s reported profits revealed spectacular growth, and it was not unusual for sell-side analysts to slap ‘strong buy’ recommendations on the shares. But ABC Learning’s earnings were growing because more and more money was being tipped into the company by shareholders. You can get more earnings each year if you tip money into a regular bank account. There is nothing special about that. Because the company was asking shareholders for money to help it ‘grow’, the profits coming out of the business, when compared to the money going into it, showed the returns from the business were declining, as Chart 1 displays.

Chart 1. ABC Learning’s Declining Returns on Equity

By 2006, the returns on the nearly $2 billion that shareholders had stumped up were about 5%. This was even less than the returns available from a bank term deposit at the time, which harbours a lot less risk than a listed business.

Would you put $2 billion of your money into a business if I told you that the best you could expect was 5%? Of course you wouldn’t. And if you aren’t prepared to own the whole business, you shouldn’t be prepared to own even a few shares. The stock market can sometimes be a slow learner, and while share prices tend to follow returns on equity rather than the earnings, it can take a long time. So in 2006 there was plenty of warning.

Second, high rates of return on equity can also suggest sound management, although a great managerial record is often the result of the boat the managers get into – the existing quality of the business. Indeed, high returns on equity are more likely to be the result of a great business than great management. Some excellent businesses may have a combination of both - a wonderful vessel and a great skipper.

Third, high returns on equity may be an indication that the business is operating as a monopoly or in an industry with high barriers to entry. Something unique that prevents others from competing directly or successfully with the business is known as a sustainable competitive advantage.

Fourth, the return on equity can also tell us whether the company should reinvest its profits or pay the earnings out as a dividend. Because this decision is made by management and the company’s board of directors, return on equity can help show us which teams understand how to allocate capital properly, and therefore those that treat their shareholders like owners.

Fifth, return on equity can tell us something about whether the auditors and the board of directors are realistic when it comes to what they think their assets are worth. If the return on equity is consistently very low, it may suggest that the assets on the balance sheet are being valued artificially high. Investors lose millions when companies announce write-downs, and write-downs usually follow a period of low returns on equity - for example, after the company paid too much for an acquisition and the promised ‘synergies’ failed to materialise. If a company makes a big acquisition and projected returns on equity are low, it’s usually wise to sell your shares.

Finally, return on equity is an essential ingredient in establishing the true worth of a company and its shares. Ultimately, investing is about buying something for less than it is worth. Do this consistently, over a long period of time, and you will beat the market and the majority of other investors. And at the heart of working out what a company is truly worth is the return on equity ratio.

Return on equity can tell us much, and it is a very powerful ratio essential for success in the stock market.

 

Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller ‘Value.able’. This article is for general educational purposes and does not consider the specific needs of any investor.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Feel the fear and buy anyway

Why stock prices are a distraction

If I get kicked out of the value investors’ club, so be it

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.