Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

First Name required
Email invalid Email required
Register

21 May 2025

Recently trending

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries schemeHoward Marks: the investing game has changedWelcome to Firstlinks Edition 606 with weekend update4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoilAn enlightened dividend path
  • Sponsors
  • About
  • Register for free
  • Home
  • Search
  • Topics
    TaxationStrategy
    RetirementRisk managementSMSF strategiesSuperannuationStrategy
    Economics
    Interest rates
    Investing
    Fixed interestGoldInfrastructurePropertyResponsible investingShares
    Planning
    Financial planningInsurance
    Interviews
  • Previous Editions
  • Contributors
  • Education Centre
    Podcast: Wealth of Experience Australian ETF reviews LIC reports and updates ASX Listed Bonds and Hybrids ASX Listed Investments ASIC Resources eBooks
  • White Papers
    White Papers 2025 White Papers 2024 White Papers 2023 White Papers 2022 White Papers 2021 White Papers 2020 White Papers 2019 White Papers 2018 White Papers 2017 White Papers 2016 White Papers 2015

Reader: "Best innovation I have seen whilst an investor for 25 years. The writers are brilliant. A great publication which I look forward to."

David Goldschmidt, Chartered Accountant: "I find this a really excellent newsletter. The best I get. Keep up the good work!"

Australian Investors Association: "Australia's foremost independent financial newsletter for professionals and self-directed investors."

Reader: "I can quickly sort the items that I am interested in, then research them more fully. It is also a regular reminder that I need to do this."

Noel Whittaker, author and financial adviser: "A fabulous weekly newsletter that is packed full of independent financial advice."

Reader: "It's excellent so please don't pollute the content with boring mainstream financial 'waffle' and adverts for stuff we don't want!"

Reader: "Great resource. Cuffelinks is STILL the one and only weekly newsletter I regularly read."

John Pearce, Chief Investment Officer, Unisuper: "Out of the (many many) investmentrelated emails I get, Cuffelinks is one that I always open."

Don Stammer, leading Australian economist: "Congratulations to all associated. It deserves the good following it has."

Steve: "The best that comes into our world each week. This is the only one that is never, ever canned before fully being reviewed by yours truly."

Jonathan Hoyle, CEO, Stanford Brown: "A fabulous publication. The only must-read weekly publication for the Australian wealth management industry."

Reader: " Finding a truly independent and interesting read has been magical for me. Please keep it up and don't change!"

Reader: "An island of professionalism in an ocean of shallow self-interest. Well done!"

Andrew Buchan, Partner, HLB Mann Judd: "I have told you a thousand times it's the best newsletter."

Reader: "Love it, just keep doing what you are doing. It is the right length too, any longer and it might become a bit overwhelming."

Reader: "Congratulations on a great focussed news source. Australia has a dearth of good quality unbiased financial and wealth management news."

John Egan, Egan Associates: "My heartiest congratulations. Your panel of contributors is very impressive and keep your readers fully informed."

Ian Silk, CEO, AustralianSuper: "It has become part of my required reading: quality thinking, and (mercifully) to the point."

Reader: "Carry on as you are - well done. The average investor/SMSF trustee needs all the help they can get."

Reader: "I subscribe to two newsletters. This is my first read of the week. Thank you. Excellent and please keep up the good work!"

Reader: "Keep it up - the independence is refreshing and is demonstrated by the variety of well credentialed commentators."

Professor Robert Deutsch: "This has got to be the best set of articles on economic and financial matters. Always something worthwhile reading in Firstlinks. Thankyou"

Ian Kelly, CFP, BTACS Financial Services: "Probably the best source of commentary and information I have seen over the past 20 years."

Reader: "Is one of very few places an investor can go and not have product rammed down their throat. Love your work!"

Rob Henshaw: "When I open my computer each day it's the first link I click - a really great read."

Scott Pape, author of The Barefoot Investor: "I'm an avid reader of Cuffelinks. Thanks for the wonderful resource you have here, it really is first class."

Eleanor Dartnall, AFA Adviser of the Year, 2014: "Our clients love your newsletter. Your articles are avidly read by advisers and they learn a great deal."

Reader: "The BEST in the game because of diversity and not aligned to financial products. Stands above all the noise."

  • Home
  • Topics
    • Taxation
      • Investment strategies
      • Retirement
      • Risk management
      • SMSF strategies
      • Superannuation
      • Strategy
      Strategy
      • Economy
      • Interest rates
      Economics
      • Exchange traded products
      • Fixed interest
      • Gold
      • Infrastructure
      • Property
      • Responsible investing
      • Shares
      Investing
      • Compliance
      • Financial planning
      • Insurance
      Planning
    • Interviews
  • Previous Editions
  • Contributors
  • Education Centre
    • Podcast: Wealth of Experience
    • Australian ETF reviews
    • LIC reports and updates
    • ASX Listed Bonds and Hybrids
    • ASX Listed Investments
    • ASIC Resources
    • eBooks
  • White Papers
    • White Papers 2025
    • White Papers 2024
    • White Papers 2023
    • White Papers 2022
    • White Papers 2021
    • White Papers 2020
    • White Papers 2019
    • White Papers 2018
    • White Papers 2017
    • White Papers 2016
    • White Papers 2015
Home / 260

How to sound smart watching the World Cup

  •   Graham Hand
  •   28 June 2018
  • 34
  •      
  •   

Russia 2018 is the first FIFA World Cup I have not attended since 2002. The treks around the world following the Aussies are now wonderful memories, with amazing games and sad exits from Germany 2006, South Africa 2010 and Brazil 2014.

My first game remains the highlight, after 32 years away from the World Cup for Australia. That extraordinary day in Kaiserslautern has entered our football folklore. Tens of thousands of Australians covered the town and stadium in a sea of green and gold, the music of Men at Work and The Angels blared through the streets, and we beat Japan in breathless style. Anton Tagliaferro sat behind me and I learned a few new swear words that day. In 2006, the glorious German summer sun shone over fan zones by the Rhine, the steins of beer flowed and sausages never tasted so good. I was hooked, although arduous criss-crossing of South Africa and Brazil to far-flung stadiums in deserts and jungles were more exhausting experiences.

In 2018, I'm watching the games from Russia in a lounge room in Sydney, with friends who see round ball football every four years. Oh dear, it shows. Explaining the offside rule is quite a distraction in the middle of the game.

From Timor Leste to Gibraltar

The 2018 FIFA World Cup qualifying started in Dili, Timor Leste on 12 March 2015, and 210 countries competed for final places, including Bhutan, South Sudan, Kosovo and Gibraltar making their debuts. Imagine that, a World Cup qualifying game on a rock in the Mediterranean. It's the sort of global coverage other football codes only dream of, with a larger audience than the Olympics. The World Cup brings nations across the globe to a standstill and unites their people. More Australian children play this type of football than any other, but they call it soccer.

It’s a time when followers of other codes make mistakes which confirm their ephemeral expertise. They jump on the global bandwagon, suddenly familiar with an eccentric Brazilian forward who a month earlier sounded like a brand of coffee.

For those people who steal the word football for sports that are predominantly played with the hands, here is an attempt to minimise the inevitable embarrassments.

Don't make these common mistakes

Criticism of a shortage of goals reveals a deep lack of understanding. The goal rarity is one of the strengths of the game. Any collector of stamps or coins knows that value comes from scarcity. A goal is a truly wonderful thing, a joy enhanced by its relative infrequency. The knowledge that there may be no other goal in the game heightens the thrill, while familiarity breeds contempt. Many 1-0 games are exciting to watch, nerves jangling at the closeness. Just one goal in open play from Australia against Denmark would have changed the way the nation thinks about this team and its performances at the World Cup.

No informed cricket follower believes a maiden over in a test match is boring because there are no runs. Contrast it with basketball. There is so much scoring, each basket is of little consequence. They even need loud music and a commentator at the stadium to build the excitement. No football fan can warm to basketball for this reason.

The inexperienced do not know how to talk about the game properly. Footballers do not 'kick' goals, they 'score' them. It is only a penalty inside the defending penalty area, otherwise, it is a free kick. Anyone who refers to a direct penalty has misunderstood. Never mention a 'Manchester' player, as the distinction between United and City is vital. There are no umpires, but it is fine to refer to linesmen, as hardened followers have no time for the politically correct 'assistant referees'. All measurements are in yards, not metres, because the English invented the game, not the French.

The rules are intuitive. It is a sport that follows natural instincts rather than creating silly devices like scrums, lineouts and mauls. Handling the ball is only an offence if it is deliberate. A player is not necessarily offside simply because he or she is in an offside position. A goalkeeper cannot pick up a back pass that has been kicked by his or her own player. That’s it. The rest is obvious.

Hints that give a chance to impress

A neat comment may impress. Observe that English players perform better for their clubs than their country, and any speculation on the reason why is acceptable. Express amazement that Italy, The Netherlands and the US did not qualify. Defend the referee’s decisions. It is so instinctive to criticise referees that doing otherwise unsettles everybody, and offers the beginner a chance.

Contrast the way players in other forms of football use their heads. That’s the part of the body that contains the brain. Rugby players are taught to stick it between other men's legs, turning ears to cauliflowers and noses to mash. Proper football players use it to rise high above others and score goals.

The sacred nature of football is confirmed by the official rule that prohibits advertising on the hallowed turf. What a scourge on other football codes that they allow sponsors to plaster their names directly on the pitch. Is it something to read during the game?

Team formations

Nothing baffles the novice more than the way teams are set up to play. When I was a boy, a hundred years ago, there was little variation from two fullbacks, three in the middle and five (yes, five!) forwards. This would be called 2:3:5 now (not counting the goalkeeper), although it is no longer used. Position descriptions such as centre-forward, inside-right and winger are left over from these days.

Then most teams switched to 4:4:2, with only two forwards and four in defense including two centre backs. These became known as a 'stopper', playing just in front of the other three defenders, and 'sweeper', cleaning up at the rear. A more attacking formation might be 4:3:3 pushing a midfielder forward, sometimes called 'playing in the hole'. Recently, three at the back has become more common (England is using this system in the World Cup), but it requires two 'wing-backs' to both attack and defend in a highly-demanding role. In this World Cup, some lower-ranked teams are using 5:4:1 in attempt to stifle strong opponents.

Watch the formation used by four midfielders. Sydney FC has been successful with a midfield diamond structure with one back, one forward and one wide on each side. A joy of attending live football is watching these formations take shape and vary.

What did Australia do under Bert van Marwijk before its group stage exit? It was 4:2:3:1. Four at the back, Sainsbury and Milligan in the middle and the two fullbacks, Risdon and Behich, defending but encouraged to go forward. Two midfielders, usually Jedinak and Mooy, protect the defense. Two wide men, Leckie and Kruse, are mainly attackers with Rogic behind the lone forward, Nabbout or Juric, hassling the opposing defenders in a thankless slog.

Talking about formations and how they change during the game will move anyone beyond the novice.

The World Cup glorifies the only global team sport

Remember what Sydney was like during the 2000 Olympics? It's like that in an entire country during the World Cup. When the lowest-ranked team in the competition, Russia, won its second game, the nation went into a frenzied celebration. When Mexico beat Germany, seismic disturbance was (apocryphally) detected in Mexico City. Argentina observed a one-minute silence following the 3-0 loss to Croatia. Every team is competitive, whereas the two rugby world cups are dominated by one-sided games.

Football is the only global team sport. We can cheer the Wallabies and the Kangaroos and the Baggy Greens and the Bombers all we like, but the rest of the planet is watching something else. Once every four years, Australians join them. We will rejoice in a glorious month of football, embracing the spectacle of the world playing its favourite sport. Only one of Messi, Ronaldo, Neymar, Ramos, Hazard, Pogba, Muller or Kane can win, and become a national hero forever.

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks and is not getting much sleep at the moment.

A different version of this article first appeared in the Crikey Magazine on 26 May 2002, under the title, 'Everything you need to know about real football'. Crikey's introduction said: "Graham Hand is better known to Crikey readers for his fabulous bank bashing book "Naked Among Cannibals" but he's also an expat Pom who has filed this entertaining preview to the biggest sporting event on earth."

 

football, World Cup
34 Comments
Warren Bird
July 06, 2018

How to win a penalty shoot out - a really good read:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-06/how-to-win-a-world-cup-penalty-shoot-out/9944642

Phil Kneale
July 05, 2018

Warren - being the conscientious type, I felt obliged to go to uni on the day of the mid-week Manly-Parra replay. Although, I think I might have snuck a radio into my Economic Optimisation & Dynamics lecture.

Warren Bird
July 05, 2018

Phil, I had an advantage - I lived at College on the Sydney Uni and could get to the SCG quickly after lectures finished in the morning! A mate of mine drove cabs so he had one for the afternoon that he drove out there and we went together.

Phil Kneale
June 29, 2018

I remember watching our high school girls hockey team lose a zone final by coin toss when all other avenues had apparently been exhausted. The coin toss was exciting.

The worst scenario is to come back later and play again. That's a horrible anti-climax. I saw a Manly-Parramatta semi-final in '78 (I think) which ended in a draw. They had to come back mid-week to do it all again. We left the ground feeling empty.

As for my previous comment about the parallels between Brexit and banks separating from their wealth management arms, I'm patenting the term "Wexit" (Wealth-exit). I can hear those fund managers bursting into song, channelling Charles Wesley with those stirring lines: "my chains fell off, my heart was free".

Warren Bird
July 04, 2018

Ah, Phil, but I got to go to the mid-week replay and it was a great game! Ray Price got all fired up, Graham Eadie was bulldozing and the crowd was into it all afternoon!
Although at the time I cheered for Parramatta, I could look back on that as a key moment in an amazing run to the premiership by the Sea Eagles, who had another replay to contend with when they drew with the Sharks in the GF as well.
Yes, it was 1978.

Graham, come on - you've got to admit that seeing England get the penalty shoot out monkey off its back this morning was pretty exciting and emotional stuff, far more dramatic than a game that reduces team sizes gradually. Just reduce it to 1 on 1 and take the kick!

Graham Hand
June 29, 2018

Hi Warren, having qualified as a referee and officiated for a few seasons, I can say that the judgement for a yellow card is highly subjective. For example, on every 'incident' the referee must decide on the severity:

1. Minor infringement, such as two players colliding accidentally, play on.

2. Minor foul play, direct free kick.

3. More serious infringement of the laws, yellow card.

4. Serious foul play, red card.

When does it cross the line? Subjective assessment in many cases.

On the 'fair play' rule, it's the first time in WC history they have resorted to this, which only comes after several other tests (most points, goal difference, most goals). At some point, you probably need an arbitrary rule in a game like football where results are so close. Ultimately, it would have been the toss of a coin, which is even worse.

Ideally, playing some type of game between the two relevant teams would be better, but it's probably a logistical nightmare to squeeze in an extra game at an event like this.

My solution, therefore, would be to go back to the qualifying records and run the same tests (points, goal difference, goals) so at least the outcome is determined by game results.

Warren Bird
June 28, 2018

Graham, after Senegal's exit this morning, I'm interested in what you think of the 'fair play' countback rule that eliminated them. Is it so clear cut when a yellow card is issued or is there subjectivity by the referee? In that case, it would violate one of your very first responses to my comments on the penalty shoot out, viz that you prefer outcomes to be decided by a football match not an artifice.

Phil Kneale
June 28, 2018

These threads are more interesting than those ones about superannuation and banks.

The theatrical faking of injuries is undoubtedly a grotesque blight on the game but human nature is what it is, I suppose.

But I can see a day when soccer is not only the global game but also the main football code in Australia.

Soccer is not constrained by the things that constrain the others. NRL and rugby are basically played in 2 states and AFL in the others. The two rugby codes also suffer from something of a class divide (private school educated union supporters and public school educated league supporters). These tribal backgrounds create great loyalty from the already-committed but inhibit expansion. Soccer has no such thing to worry about.

Soccer's other advantage is that anyone can understand it and almost anyone can play it. The rules are simple. A first-time viewer can easily understand what's going on. But someone watching their first game of NRL, rugby, AFL or American football are bound to be puzzled. They are more rule-bound games and it helps to have grown up in the culture that surrounds them.

So, Graham - do not despair. Globalisation will help your dream come true, perhaps even in Australia.

By the way, have you noticed the parallels between the bank/wealth management divorces and Brexit - escaping from the bureaucratic straitjacket, being in charge of your own destiny etc? I was trying to think of a good xxxexit name but came up with nothing.

Jonathan Hoyle
June 28, 2018

Graham, ive always felt guilty about bequeathing to my football-mad son a love of the England football team. However, watching Australia at world cups makes being an England fan seem positively Teutonic. About to watch Belgium vs England in an English pub in London’s sunny 29C skies. Perfect. Harry Kane is the new Messi.

Kevin
June 28, 2018

Hiya Graham,

Good article,shame on you for being happy Germany are out. Great country to live in,great food and beer.

When I lived there in the 1970s watching Rumminegge et all it was great

My team came up last year ( Hannover 96) and this year the local derby went down ( Hamburg)./

Warren good reply for penalty shootouts,I hate them though.The pressure for all that money these days.Didn't mind them when I was young,heart attack material now. I now realise why not many old people went to the games way back when..

I see walking football is coming,I'd like to have a day off the bike and have a trundle around at that.Hope it takes off.

Garry Mackrell
June 28, 2018

Graham's observations about low scores adding to the drama,also has another more insidious dimension.
The premium on scoring goals in general play,has witnessed a significant increase in the number of penalty goals.
The relevant "skill" that has not been mentioned but which has been elevated to an art form is euphemistically called by round ball players as "simulation".
Faint touches on players by opposing players, or in many instances no contact at all, produces astonishing agonies that necessitate immediate stoppage of play,an avalanche of medical assistance,stretcher bearers etc invading the pitch,which after distressing discussions and arm waving and beseeching entreaties to the referee from both teams,the pitifully wounded hero manfully regathers himself from the veritable edge of death (but only after the opposing "offending" player receives a yellow or hopefully a red card).
If no penalty arises,the player takes even longer to recover,but when the ball moves elsewhere,surreptitiously sidles back to his position,bent on improving his acting skills at the next opportunity.
I haven't seen the scorecard for this World Cup,but I recall that at about the same time in the Cup four years ago,there had been nearly 180 stoppages of play for injury,but only 11 actually required medical assistance.
I know people will say defenders are able to scrag and generally make life difficult for attacking players,and therefore the attacking player is entitled to exaggerate( and vice versa),but the action is for the referee to adjudicate, not for the players to provide mimed commentaries.
Why "simulation",especially the frenetic over-acting that now goes on inside the penalty box, is not dealt with for what it is-blatant cheating-is beyond a farce. Now that the VAR can closely review incidents,serial offenders should be redcarded via post game review.
PS.Contrast these behaviours with the other football codes where broken jaws are mere trivialities!

Graham Hand
June 28, 2018

Hi Garry, of course the rolling around feigning injury is bad, and as frustrating is the fact that FIFA has the tools to eliminate it. If players were suspended after games for their simulation, it would be significantly reduced.

But let me make two points:

1. Players in other football games, especially league and union, spend half their training in gymnasiums bulking up their weight and strength. I heard former Australian Wallabies captain Sterling Mortlock say that he could not be competitive as an international rugby player at less than 100kg, and preferred 110kg. These games focus on physical contact and sheer brutality.

In soccer, all the training time is spent on fitness and technique, the players are normally much lighter and thinner. They are like Formula 1 cars versus rugby's trucks. And what happens when Formula 1 cars collide? They are more fragile and feel the hit far more than a truck. Now, I'm not defending feigning injury, but I know I would snap like a matchstick in a game of rugby, but I don't need to be a strong brute to play soccer.

2. The amazing thing about soccer is that the world comes together under one set of rules, usually to compete harmoniously. Even countries at war with each other play football if the draw requires it. So soccer is 210 countries (more than the UN) from vastly different cultures and backgrounds meeting on a football field. The world is not a perfect place, and it's filled with prejudice, inequality, unfairness, hatred, jealousy, connivance - all the human emotions. And of course some of these surface on the pitch. Soccer must reflect global society to some extent, and so we have people who seek to gain advantage for whatever reason. Guess what ... that's life, and soccer reflects life.

Contrast this with the other football codes. AFL is one country, so it's easy to define the standards. Rugby league is, what, a few countries (the World Cup has a team called Lebanon where the players come from Campsie and Lakemba), so that's easy. Union is more global but realistically less than a dozen countries.

Soccer is the major sport in 90% of the countries in the world, and it comes with all the cultural strengths and weaknesses as a result. You see far less of the injury faking in Australian soccer than most other countries because it's not our way. In fact, you hardly ever see Sydney FC players doing the things you describe, because it's not the team's culture.

So while I also hate the simulation, I love that Senegal will play Colombia and Nigeria and South Korea and Gibraltar, and it will be a civilised, competitive game under an agreed set of rules, and the standard will be good everywhere. It does not require great physical strength and stature to be the best in the world.

Ted Brailey
June 28, 2018

Dear Graham,

I quite liked your "sound smart" world cup article however I think you left out the two most important differences between football and other codes which account for its universal appeal.

1. Skill level required. The number of skills required exceed the other codes substantially. Some players exhibit such extreme motor skills and dexterity as to put others in the shade. Only AFL has any claim on skills, mind you the athleticism of AFL does approach that required by football.
2.I've always thought of football as the thinking man's(or woman's) game. The strategizing on the run and by coaches as exemplified in your descripfion of team formations (and South Korea's second goal this morning) shows the degree of thought that is brought to bear on how to play.

Cheers Ted Brailey

Phil Kneale
June 28, 2018

Graham - sorry to hear that you're a lapsed League fan. I drifted away during the ridiculous Super League years but had a re-conversion experience soon after that. I love the game itself - my only real annoyance is that many of the commentators are former players who struggle to put together a grammatically correct sentence.

I can see how you're disappointed about support levels for Sydney FC (especially from your own team-mates) but there has never been a great connection between what one likes to play and what one likes to watch. Soccer has been the most popular football code for kids in Australia to play for over 50 years, largely because it's the easiest and safest to play. But it's a different story when it comes to what you'd want to go and watch. Punters in the Roman Empire may have enjoyed the grisly entertainment at the Colosseum but probably weren't up for it with their mates at the local park.

On penalty shoot-outs - I love them because of the drama and tension. If you need a result it's as good a way as any. Alternatives that drag things out and potentially create new rule complexities probably aren't worth it.

Alex Erskine
June 28, 2018

Today I'm enjoying the schadenfreude of Germany sharing with Australia the ignominy of an early exit. And wondering if Lionel Messi can propel Argentina further despite his Panama Papers distractions.

Graham Hand
June 28, 2018

Exactly, Alex. Pleased the Germans are gone, because there's always a feeling they will find something extra when they need to.

As the BBC headline said today: "What's German for schadenfreude?"

Paul Brown
June 28, 2018

A terrific post Graham.
I'm old enough to remember playing in a 2-3-5 formation as "inside right".
I fell in love with the World Cup in 1978 after watching that epic final between Argentina & Netherlands.
A few years back, I was awarded life membership of my local Club, Buderim Wanderers FC, after years of service as a junior coach and administrator. Very proud to make my contribution to help kids develop an appreciation of the beautiful game.
In terms of junior participation, football (or soccer) is well ahead of any other football code. I believe we are seeing a gradual cultural shift in tribal support for football (soccer) at grassroots levels. I an now involved in our local FQPL (NPL2) Club and we are seeing strong support for home matches - similar to the support Rugby League enjoyed in decades past in regional Qld.
I grew up playing soccer but supporting my favourite rugby league teams. Now kids are growing up playing soccer, their "non-soccer" parents are learning more about the game - and then supporting their local NPL soccer teams. I have see fervent AFL/NRL parents converted to soccer supporters.
The A-League is not receiving the support it deserves at that level though - not sure why? But I think there are structural changes needed - pro/rel, more teams, lower ticket prices, etc.
Anyway, enjoy the rest of the World Cup. With Germany now out, I have no clue on who will win the final. Maybe England :)

Mark Adams
June 28, 2018

Great piece, Graham. Fascinating to see how technology is "disrupting" the game of football too with the introduction of the video assistant referee (VAR) certainly having a significant impact at the World Cup with VAR providing the main post-game talking point.

Fundie
June 28, 2018

Personally I watch the goals – the rest is just - well its just the time between the goals!

Watching soccer and waiting for goals is like watching and waiting for ‘emerging markets’ to ‘emerge’! – very rarely happens - but good when one finally does – a rare exception to the rule

Vinay Kolhatkar
June 26, 2018

At the cost of “showing my ignorance” by suggesting rule changes that would increase goals (or not, by taking solace in “Pele said”), even the immortal Pele also recommended changes to the great game. One was to replace arm throw-ins with free kicks because defenders can kick the ball out to slow down strikers, so why not kick the ball in. I believe Pele even said the goal size should increase as goalies have got a lot taller over the years. https://www.socceramerica.com/publications/article/36032/kick-in-fraught-with-problems.html

Warren Bird
June 25, 2018

Not when Plugger kicked one in the prelim final in 1996!

Or when Barry Breen kicked one in St Kilda's last premiership 30 years before that.

Or on other occasions as shown in this clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhZ43LmzrPU

Joy for one side, despair for the other. Your definition of the value of a goal in soc ... er football.

Warren Bird
June 24, 2018

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2gJamguN04

Warren Bird
June 24, 2018

You didn't say anything about penalty shootouts to decide tied games in the knock-out stage. Interested in your thought on them, but for mine I think they're great.

A common criticism is that they're just a lottery crap-shoot, so unfair. But during the game when opportunities to score goals are created it's the same thing. Some great shots are saved, some just sail over or wide of the bar, some go into the net. What can be fairer if, after 2 hours of play the teams haven't been separated, to strip it down to the bare minimum of setting up the shot on goal and making it between the kicker and the keeper?

I used to think that shootouts were random, until I attended two great games decided in that fashion, First was the Final in the 2000 Olympics in Sydney. A magnificent game in which Cameroon fought back from 2-0 down to be level with Spain at the end of regulation time. 30 minutes of exhilarating football later and it was still 2-2. Then, right in front of where I was sitting, a gripping, exciting penalty shoot out that tested nerves and delivered the right result, a victory to the African side over the dirty tactic Latinos'.

The other was the famous play off game at Olympic Park in 2005. After two whole games, the Socceroos and Uruguay were 1-1, then still after 30 minutes of extra time. Had to split them somehow and the penalty shoot out showed, if nothing else, that the Australians believed they had to earn the win, whereas the Uruguayans thought it was their divine right to go to the World Cup. Hard work won out and Australia scored one more pressure goal than the South Americans.

So I'm all for the thrill and excitement of an aspect of the game that takes it right back to basics - kick the ball into the back of the net or save it.

Graham Hand
June 24, 2018

Hi Warren, ah penalty shootouts. Great when you win, unfair when you lose. They are exciting because they are used to decide crucial games, and the Aloisi penalty to beat Uruguay must be the most replayed sporting event in Australian history.

But I don't like them because they are a device to determine a winner, when it should be decided by a football game. I think the solution is easy, fairer and a far better spectacle (and this is not my original thought). At the end of extra time, the game recommences with nine players on each side for a further 10 minutes. Then seven players for 10 minutes. Then five players for 10 minutes. Then three players until someone scores. It would be so exciting. Imagine the speculation and arguments about who should be taken off. Do you keep a goalkeeper? Your quickest players? Your fittest players? Attack or defend? It would be a game of football, not a few pop shots.

Warren Bird
June 25, 2018

Or you could change the rules and give 6 points for a goal and 1 point for each time you make the opposing goal keeper touch the ball (save or deflection over or to the side). Maybe call the second situation a 'behind' and then you're half way towards the improvement that we Aussies developed many years ago!

That way Australia would surely have beaten Denmark in this World Cup! They dominated, but weren't rewarded at all. The goal that each team scored retains it's rarity value, but the opportunities otherwise created get counted.

Graham Hand
June 25, 2018

But a 'behind' is a reward for missing. A point is scored for a bad kick, and although it's a score, the crowd moans and the players are disappointed. It's like the horrible 'participation certificates' they give at schools. My daughters thought they were embarrassing.

Graham Hand
June 25, 2018

And my other favourite solution - at the end of extra time, throw on another ball and play with two, first team to score wins. Great fun.

At football training, we often practice with two small goals at one end and the usual goal at the other. Forces creative thinking and flexibility.

Phil Kneale
June 24, 2018

Great article, Graham.

I know you'll accuse me of heresy, but I still insist (as many do) on calling the game soccer. We have no choice, since there are more prominent codes in Australia (rugby league and AFL) that are referred to as football by their fans. The USA is in the same boat - do they change the name of their own brand of football just to accommodate the gods of the "global game"? Rugby union isn't a problem as it just goes by the name "rugby".

Soccer has been the main game for kids in Australia for a very long time. It certainly was when I played my first game in 1968. I played about 23 seasons, but I have to admit that through all that time, and still now, rugby league is my favourite football code to watch. I hope you will forgive me.

I still like watching soccer but it's mainly World Cups, grand finals and so on. It's hard to find the time to follow too many sports closely. But I have to say I was riveted by the Australia/Denmark match (the 90-odd minutes seemed to fly by) and I agree with you that the rarity of scoring is what makes it special.

Graham Hand
June 24, 2018

Hi Phil, unlike many football (round ball) fans, I don't mind calling it soccer. I understand the primacy of AFL and League in Australia, and calling them all football is confusing.

In my teenage years, I lived in Engadine and went to every Cronulla (League) game, at the time of Rogers, Bishop, Pierce, Watson. I was a member of Cronulla Leagues Club for many years. But like many people will say about soccer, I became bored by the game. Six tackles, kick, six tackles, kick, and the farcical scrums. SOO still holds its charm and aura.

What bemuses me the most, in a city where more people play soccer than any other sport by far, is how few people watch Sydney FC. I seriously love it, yet in the squad of 32 players I play in (Northbridge Over 45s), only one or two others go. Sydney FC has had a great team and played wonderful football in the last two years and crowds are down. Heaven help us now we will play away from Allianz for three years. I think it's terrible for the club.

David FootballTragic
June 28, 2018

Phil, you are in the minority....at least in global terms. It is only soccer in USA, Canada, NZ and Australia. i.e. less than 7% of the world's population.

It is the global game, the global game is called football and it the feet are used on a ball.

Every other code the hands are predominantly used and its not a ball, it's an egg. I would therefore deem these sports to be called handegg perhaps?

Andrew Varlamos
June 24, 2018

Thanks Graham, puts the World Cup into its proper context. I went to Italia '90 - and loved the joy of being part of a global celebration of football and our common humanity (excluding the bit where we got "Teargassed in Turin"). And you're right; who would devalue and trivialise their sport such that they would paint a sponsor's logo on the pitch?! Sad.

Deborah
June 24, 2018

I almost feel informed enough to venture a comment while enjoying the next game with my somewhat opinionated partner. Agree that the field looks much cleaner without advertising on it, but what can we do about the annoying scrolling billboards around the pitch?

Gary M
June 24, 2018

And rugby followers complaining about the lack of goals should measure their own game by tries not total score. Penalties in rugby are just free kicks that go over the bar. For example, in last nights game Wallabies v Ireland, the score was 1-1, although recorded as a high-scoring 20-16 for meaningless penalty offences such as joining the ruck from the side.

David FootballTragic
June 23, 2018

Great post Graham. It is hard for most Aussies to appreciate the beautiful game, we are spoilt for choice here.

Thanks so much for explaining the joy or despair associated with a goal, you are so right and yes I can’t stand basketball either.

Getting out of our group looks like a mountain but anything is possible.

One thing you missed though. Real football fans don’t do Aussie Aussie Aussie oi oi oi. They do Aussie Aussie Olle Olle Olle (I can’t write the difference in tune though)

Planning my catchup sleep later today. Not even in the round of 16 yet.....

 

Leave a Comment:

Comment is required Name is required Email is required

RELATED ARTICLES

John Oliver Destroys FIFA In Every Way Possible

  • Graham Hand
  • 12 June 2014
Firstlinks is sponsored by:
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

  • Noel Whittaker
  • 23 April 2025

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

  • James Gruber
  • 9 April 2025

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 606 with weekend update

The boss of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, UniSuper’s John Pearce, says Trump has declared an economic war and he’ll be reducing his US stock exposure over time. Should you follow suit?

  • 10 April 2025

4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoil

Every crisis throws up opportunities. Here are ideas to capitalise on this one, including ‘overbalancing’ your portfolio in stocks, buying heavily discounted LICs, and cherry picking bombed out sectors like oil and gas.

  • James Gruber
  • 16 April 2025

An enlightened dividend path

While many chase high yields, true investment power lies in companies that steadily grow dividends. This strategy, rooted in patience and discipline, quietly compounds wealth and anchors investors through market turbulence.

  • Jen Nurick, Josh Veltman
  • 23 April 2025

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

  • John Abernethy
  • 14 May 2025

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

  • James Gruber
  • 14 May 2025
  • 23
Investment strategies

Does dividend investing make sense?

Dividend investing offers steady income and behavioral benefits, but its effectiveness depends on goals, market conditions, and fundamentals - especially in retirement, where it may limit full use of savings.

  • Geoff Warren
  • 14 May 2025
  • 42
Economics

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

  • John Abernethy
  • 14 May 2025
  • 29
Strategy

Ageing in spurts

Fascinating initial studies suggest that while we age continuously in years, our bodies age, not at a uniform rate, but in spurts at around ages 44 and 60.

  • Don Ezra
  • 14 May 2025
  • 2
Interviews

Platinum's new international funds boss shifts gears

Portfolio Manager Ted Alexander outlines the changes that he's made to Platinum's International Fund portfolio since taking charge in March, while staying true to its contrarian, value-focused roots.

  • Ted Alexander, James Gruber
  • 14 May 2025
  • 3
Investment strategies

Four ways to capitalise on a forgotten investing megatrend

The Trump administration has not killed the multi-decade investment opportunity in decarbonisation. These four industries in particular face a step-change in demand and could reward long-term investors.

  • James Tsinidis
  • 14 May 2025
  • 6
Strategy

How the election polls got it so wrong

The recent federal election outcome has puzzled many, with Labor's significant win despite a modest primary vote share. Preference flows played a crucial role, highlighting the complexity of forecasting electoral results.

  • Tony Dillon
  • 14 May 2025
  • 6

Sponsors

Alliances

Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

First Name required
Email invalid Email required
Register

Site Map

  • Home
  • Contents
  • Our Sponsors
  • Previous Editions
  • Education Centre
  • Trove Archive

About Firstlinks

  • About Us
  • Editorial Guidelines for Writers
  • Who curates Firstlinks?
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact Us
  • Australia's Best Investment Site
  • Community Rules Policy
  • Financial Services Guide (AU)
  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Guide

Keep updated

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.