Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 399

Howard Marks on four riskiest words: No Price Too High

On 16 March 2021, Howard Marks spoke at an Australian Israel Chamber of Commerce webinar. Marks is well known to regular Firstlinks readers as the Co-Chairman of Oaktree Capital Management, which he co-founded in 1995 and is the world's largest distressed debt investor.


The moderator, Alicia Gregory from Australia’s Future Fund, started by asking Marks about the potential for inflation. He discussed the consequences of the steps taken by the US Federal Reserve and Treasury to rescue the economy in the face of COVID. 

Defining a bubble

“That was very strong action and it worked. It turned the economy and the markets around but lowering interest rates has a lot of strong impacts. It raises the value of assets, it reduces the competition that bonds pose for stocks, and lets the stock market rise. The low rate of interest on cash forces people to go out and buy assets, and also the low returns on safe investments force people to become more risk tolerant and move out to riskier investments to get a decent return. 

The impact on the price/earnings (P/E) ratio applied to stocks is particularly strong, and the lower interest rates go, the higher stock P/Es and stock prices that can go. That's the mechanical linkage. Now, today, after the stock market has risen roughly 80% from the March low, are we in a bubble?

First you have to say, what is a bubble?

It's not just any bull market, it's not just any rise. A bubble, to me, starts with a grain of truth. It might be that the internet will change the world or the tulips are beautiful back in 17th century Holland. It's usually about something new because when it's something new, the limitations have not been found and there's no past to hold it back. So, if this a grain of truth is taken to an extreme, the assumption is that every company in that field will be successful.

And finally, we have irrational optimism, and the four words that seal the deal: no price too high. And back in 1999 for example, they were saying the internet's going to change the world so there's no price too high for an e-commerce company. The internet did change the world, of course, but most of those e-commerce companies closed worthless."

Marks then switched to today's market, justifying high valuations due to historically low rates: 

"Are we in a bubble? I say compared to that definition, asset prices and particularly stock prices, and especially probably technology, are high, but not irrational. I think that as I described the mechanism through which lower interest rates produce higher stock prices, on that basis, today’s stock prices are justified and justifiable, albeit high. 

Now that's very important, because that means they are dependent for their current level on interest rates staying low for longer."

Can the Fed keep interest rates low forever?

Despite the actions of the Fed and Treasury pumping up the economy, Marks sees few signs of inflation, but he uses a fascinating analogy, with a warning:

"I think of the Fed actions as a kind of like a waterspout coming out of the sea and there's a ball on top. As long as the spout is coming out, the ball can stand suspended above the level of the water. As soon as the waterspout stops, the ball falls to earth because its former level was an artificial one. That's what I think about interest rates. The Fed can try to keep interest rates low for a long time, as it has direct control over short interest rates. But it does not have the same degree of control over the longer parts of the bond market, and from a low of 0.6% yield on the 10-year Treasury during the height of a COVID, we're already at 1.6%.

But if you ask me, can you pump trillions of new money into the economy, year after year with interest rates staying low for long? I'm not convinced. I'm not firm enough in my views about the future to say what will happen, but we have to give room in our portfolios for the occurrence of inflation and higher rates."

Private market premiums

Alicia Gregory then asked about his views on the existence of an illiquidity premium as an incentive (and reward) for investing in private markets.

“People always talk about the illiquidity premium or any risk premiums. Risk premiums are not naturally occurring. They're not part of nature, they only happen if people are risk averse. If people say, I don't want to tie up my money, and in order to do so, I have to be induced, then there'll be an illiquidity premium.

But if people say I'm eager to tie up my money, and they're all crowded into the illiquid markets, then you won't have a risk premium. Risk premiums exists to bribe people to do things that they don't want to do.

So I think it's very important to realise that. A lot of universities emulated Yale into the private markets and then when we had the global financial crisis, they were in a big jam because they had taken on more illiquidity than they could live with.

No investor needs 100% liquidity for all their portfolio. I think of it as like geological layers. As you dig down, you get to more and more illiquid assets, but you can have a layer of illiquid assets and partially liquid and semi liquid and meet your needs that way. But you have to accurately assess your ability to live with illiquidity, and I've seen people skip that."

Private markets are alpha, public markets are beta

Marks makes an interesting distinction between the skill needed to generate excess returns in private versus public markets, with what sounds like a criticism of active managers in listed securities.

"In the private markets of private debt or infrastructure or real estate, you become dependent on the managers. These are what we call alpha markets, where alpha is personal skill. And in these markets, you need personal skill.

And if you go into the stock market, in the long run, it doesn't make much of a difference who you hire because these are not alpha markets. These are what we call beta markets where most of the return comes from the performance of the market. So, which manager you choose is much less critical.

But if you go into a locked up, private illiquid investment fund, with a manager you're relying on for a skill, who turns out to have what we call negative alpha, which is the ability to hurt a portfolio, then you have manager risk. If you turn to the private markets you may get a higher return, some of them will be reward for illiquidity, some of it will be hopefully from picking a manager with skill."

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)

Marks is tolerant of SPACs, but as in private markets, he sees manager skill ultimately determining who will be successful:

"SPACs are a form of financial innovation and financial innovation can only take place when markets are optimistic. When markets are downcast and skeptical and depressed, you can't bring out something new. So the fact that SPACs have been so popular is an indicator, but that doesn’t mean they are fallacious.

They serve a purpose as a way to get companies public without the torturous process of going public through an IPO. And over time, just like with private equity, they'll sort out. And after there's been 1,000 SPACs, they'll say XYZ is somebody who has brought out SPACs that consistently have done well and ABC is somebody who was a fly-by-night and was unsuccessful. Right now, when there's a SPAC frenzy (as I said about bubbles), they are being treated as if everybody is likely to be successful."

Howard Marks released his latest memo to clients this week and it can be read here

Howard Marks spoke at an Australian Israel Chamber of Commerce webinar in partnership with Spire Capital. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.


March 25, 2021

Well of course he's right. But with money so easily created, people are piling it into hard assets, including stocks, in the hope of getting something back. And you might, but then they will tax you more. SPAC's some will be OK some will not. Good luck figuring out the difference.

March 19, 2021

Mr Marks is Right!. The 10yr treasury influences the price of assets.
The 10yr treasury yield has been in a declining downtrend since 1981 from a high of 15.0%. To break that trend, it would need to move sustainably past 2.5% (currently 1.7%).
The 12 mth historical PE for S&P 500 is 48 and the 12 mth forward estimate is 22
The 12 mth historical PE for Nasdaq 100 is 37 and the 12 mth forward estimate is 28
Source: Birinyi Associates
I agree that the bull market is not yet at crazy levels and will continue upward for the next 12-24 months.
Bull markets tend to gain a momentum and move way past what people think is possible. Then the crash that follows has the same effect (the bigger the party, the worse the hangover).
The crypto world is growing exponentially. It's sucking money from the real world into a fairytale land, where the evil empire is the Fed.
The collapse of crypto will be the match that ignites the next financial crisis.

Gary M
March 18, 2021

I always like Marks but in contrast to his comfort level implied here, I see in a previous article in June 2020, Marks said, “the fundamental outlook may be positive on balance, but with listed security prices where they are, the odds aren’t in investors’ favour.” And the markets have run strongly since. So as he says, he does not have much more foresight than the rest of us.


Leave a Comment:



The relationship between inflation and commercial property

Australia’s economic outlook robust, but risks are rising

Budget cash splash will do more harm than good


Most viewed in recent weeks

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

30 years on, five charts show SMSF progress

On 1 July 1992, the Superannuation Guarantee created mandatory 3% contributions into super for employees. SMSFs were an after-thought but they are now the second-largest segment. How have they changed?

Investment strategies

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.


Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

The end of the 2022 financial year is fast approaching and there are choices available to ensure you pay the right amount of tax. Watch for some pandemic-related changes worth understanding.

Financial planning

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.


Listed infrastructure: finding a port in a storm of rising prices

Given the current environment it’s easy to wonder if there are any safe ports in the investment storm. Investments in infrastructure assets show their worth in such times.

Financial planning

Power of attorney: six things you need to know

Whether you are appointing an attorney or have been appointed as an attorney, the full extent of this legal framework should be understood as more people will need to act in this capacity in future.

Interest rates

Rising interest rates and the impact on banks

One of the major questions confronting investors is the portfolio weighting towards Australian banks in an environment of rising rates. Do the recent price falls represent value or are too many bad debts coming?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.