Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 165

Innovation offers opportunities for investors

Australia’s National Innovation and Science Agenda appears to have sharpened the focus on companies perceived as ‘innovative’ in nature. From an investment perspective, innovation represents opportunity. It also present risks, however, primarily for incumbents whose margins or market shares are threatened by new entrants or more innovative competitors.

By understanding the breadth of opportunities for new entrants in an industry, as well as the threats to incumbents, professional long-short investors are able to profit from opportunities on both sides of the ledger. In this article, we consider what innovation means in the Small Companies sector and how innovation and disruption can drive investment decisions in this often under-researched space.

What does disruption mean for small company investors?

The information technology age in which we live means many people associate innovation with something digital or online. Consider how innovative products like Uber and iTunes have revolutionised the taxi and music businesses. In fact innovation, and therefore disruption, is occurring in all kinds of businesses in Australia, across a wide range of sectors.

From an investment perspective, you need to consider much more than the innovation itself. Many other factors will determine whether an innovative company is a good investment such as the size of the market for the product or service. Then there are questions like:

  • are there barriers to entry or lack thereof?
  • how many years a product has been in development?
  • is it meaningfully different from competitors?
  • is it patented?
  • how much money has been invested in research and marketing?
  • how broad is the distribution footprint?

All of these considerations determine whether a company has competitive advantages and, importantly, the sustainability of those advantages over time.

There are also investment considerations for incumbent operators. Some of these established, listed companies may have been operating successfully in an industry for many years, with earnings streams that were previously deemed defensive and sustainable. For long-short investors, the potential negative effects of disruption can be as appealing as the potential benefits of innovation.

Innovation in established industries

In any industry, there is almost always some level of product development or innovation occurring. The car industry is one of the most established and competitive in the world and there is an astonishing level of innovation underway, including the development of electric motors and the release of prototype driverless vehicles.

For Australian small cap investors, there are exciting earnings opportunities from companies with innovative products and services in rather less futuristic areas.

In the 1970s, owners of 4x4 vehicles relied on homemade or ill-fitting equipment for use in rural or outback regions. At that time, ARB Corporation was established and the company started designing and producing a range of 4x4-related accessories. Following more than 40 years of product development and innovation, the company is a global market leader in the manufacture and supply of bull bars and other accessories. The 4x4 market is growing at a double-digit pace due to the ever-increasing popularity of SUVs and utility vehicles.

ARB currently exports to more than 100 countries, has a vast distribution footprint and owns its own outlets to service the aftermarket for additional, non-standard accessories. The global reach of this business model is not easily replicated. The company is on a strong financial footing, too. ARB is in a net cash position and earnings margins in the 20% range are the envy of companies in many other industry sectors.

Whilst many of ARB’s products are perceived to be innovative, the key appeal for us as investors is the sustainability of the competitive advantages developed over more than four decades.

Innovators completing Initial Public Offerings (IPOs)

Many of the most innovative companies are relatively immature, unlisted companies. Some of these go on to complete IPOs, crystallising gains for founders and seed investors and raising capital to fund future growth. An example in the Australian small cap sector is Reliance Worldwide Corporation, a recent IPO of a company operating in plumbing, an established and ‘old fashioned’ industry.

Among the company’s main products is a ‘push-to-connect’ pipe fitting. The product offers plumbers and DIY users an efficient, less labour-intensive solution to repairs following pipe leaks. While Reliance Worldwide has about 80% share in the push-to-connect market in the US, Canada and Australia, the real attraction is that push-to-connect currently only accounts for about 10% of the plumbing supply market in the US. The growth opportunity is significant and the company is experiencing sales growth of more than 10% per annum.

Reliance Worldwide has been distributing plumbing products into the US for more than 16 years and has market-leading positions in primary locations. Trademark protection of the product provides another important competitive advantage. Market share is protected from imitation products and, importantly, means Reliance Worldwide can maintain decent pricing power with stockists.

Will we continue to see innovative companies in Australia?

Given the National Innovation and Science Agenda of the Federal Government, we expect to see a steady stream of start-up companies threatening incumbent operators in many industries. Some of these companies will have aspirations to list and will go on to complete IPOs.

As pioneers such as REA Group (in real estate digital advertising) and TPG Telecom (in both internet and telephony services) have proved, disruptive companies with innovative products and services – combined with the right focus from a capable management team – can generate handsome returns for investors.

On the other hand, there have been countless examples of companies whose products and services have not lasted the test of time, resulting in a permanent loss of capital for investors. The challenge is to identify the key differences between the two and position your investment portfolio accordingly.

 

Dawn Kanelleas is Senior Portfolio Manager at Colonial First State Global Asset Management. This article is general information and does not consider the investment needs of any individual.

 

  •   21 July 2016
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Unearthing small and mid-cap gems

Thinking small to win big

Bounce back delivers super second-half for IPOs

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.