Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 186

Investing in 2017 and beyond

If you are concerned about your returns, you should brace for an end of the residential construction boom. You should also be very cautious about the excessive prices of high-yielding stocks (those paying dividends that are unlikely to grow), and you should be most enthusiastic about high-quality mid cap and small cap stocks that have been punished recently with share price declines of up to 50%.

Let’s start with property

Courtesy of UBS and the RLB Crane Index, we recently learned that the residential crane count in Australia skyrocketed by 313% between September 2013 and September 2016. There were more residential construction cranes along the east coast of Australia than across New York, Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Toronto and Calgary combined.

Property doyens are selling. Harry Triguboff tried to sell Meriton and the ‘For Sale’ shingle has been placed on the century-long held Soul Pattinson building in Sydney’s Pitt Street Mall by one of Australia’s most successful and respected investors and patriarch of listed investment firm Washington H Soul Pattinson (ASX:SOL) Rob Millner. John Symond has listed his waterfront mansion on Sydney Harbour and John Gandel realised a large profit exiting Charter Hall in a $500 million sale.

There has been stunning growth in the number of practising real estate agents. Australia’s population is growing at 1.6% per annum, so the number of real estate agents required to service the population does not need to grow at a rate in excess of this. Yet in 2016, Victoria, NSW and Queensland have experienced growth in the numbers of real estate agents of 8.7%, according to the NSW Office of Fair Trading, Consumer Affairs Victoria, and Queensland Office of Fair Trading.

And notice the preponderance of property developers making the rich lists and in particular the mushrooming number of property developers under 40 who were still at school during the last recession.

According to a UBS survey, more than a quarter of 1,228 Australian home buyers who had taken out a mortgage over the past two years admitted they misrepresented some information on their loan application. Bank shares anyone?

A relationship between residential dwelling commencements and full time employment, produced by our friend and equity researcher Douglas Orr, reveals peaks in commencements have foreshadowed large drops in full time employment in Q3-1999, Q1-1995, Q2-2000, and Q2-2008. There are signs this decline is happening now.

Acutely expensive real estate

Australian residential real estate, despite being on the cusp of oversupply, is some of the most expensive in the world on a house price-to-income ratio basis.

Record prices and oversupply cannot co-exist for very long. At the same time that house prices are rising stratospherically, debt is being accumulated at an alarming rate. Of course mortgage debt to income and mortgage debt to GDP ratios are at records.

There is always, without exception, one common precedent to the vast number of crises the world has experienced — excessive debt accumulation. Quite simply, Australians have taken on more debt, typically to chase more expensive houses, and have less money to pay for it.

John Kenneth Galbraith in The Great Crash defined a bubble thus;

“… at some point in a boom all aspects of property ownership become irrelevant except the prospect for an early rise in price. Income from the property, or enjoyment of its use, or even its long-run worth is now academic … What is important is that tomorrow or next week, market values will rise, as they did yesterday or last week, and a profit can be realised …”

Australia’s east coast capitals are facing a tidal wave of apartment supply and developers will not be able to sell all their inventory at current prices. Indeed, they are already offering carrots to lure potential buyers. These carrots, such as millions of frequent flyer points, holidays to Asia or 10-year rental guarantees, are forms of discounts designed to preserve the ticket price. As supply increases, however, the discounting will become more aggressive simply because the developers owe their lenders money and need to pay back the loans, many of which have also capitalised interest (something to think about when owning bank shares too).

Investors who borrowed to buy an investment apartment are at particular risk. Take a look at Brisbane where in the first nine months of 2016 just 5200 apartments were completed in the inner 5 kilometre ring from the CBD. Investors who purchased outside that inner ring, five to 15 kilometres from the CBD, have seen aggregate vacancy rates climb from 2.3% to 4.7%. And that number can only keep rising when another 13,000 apartments are due to be completed over the next 18 months. A unit without a tenant has a yield of 0%, and where a mortgage is attached, it could put its owner under financial stress.

Some shares don’t look great either

With record levels of mortgage and credit card debt in Australia, we expect there will be some financial stress ahead. We think investors should be cautious on companies like the banks, Telstra, the supermarkets, BHP and RIO. Either they are being disrupted, have challenges to their growth, are cyclical or have increased their payout ratios to such an extent that they are thwarting their own ability to grow future income and dividends.

In a low interest rate environment, purchasing power from fixed income streams are eroded. If bond rates rise, as they have begun to, the outcome for any bond-like security paying a fixed income will be even worse.

What other investments look better?

Over the past year or two, a lack of growth in the banks (credit growth is expected to slow given maturing residential development as well as record mortgage and credit card debt) and resource companies meant large institutional fund managers fuelled a boom in the prices of smaller high-quality growth companies, as they migrated down the market capitalisation spectrum, looking to boost returns. High quality, mid and small capitalised company shares, those with bright prospects and economics, benefitted.

More recently, the perceived prospects of the banks and resource companies have improved and those same institutions, finding themselves underweight, were forced to sell down their holdings in smaller, high-quality growth companies to fund their purchases of the banks, BHP, RIO et al.

As those large institutional funds unwound their positions, we have witnessed corrections, if not crashes, in the share prices of smaller high-quality, high-growth companies. ISentia has declined more than 30% as has APN Outdoor and Vita Group. Healthscope has fallen 32% from a high of $3.14 to a low of $2.15, while REA Group and Carsales are down 27 and 28% respectively from their highs.

Our inability to identify good value earlier in the year resulted in The Montgomery [Private] Fund building cash to more than 30% of the fund’s value. This allows it to take advantage of lower prices, and in some cases, the first opportunity to acquire value in a long time.

Surprisingly, some companies that score highest on our quality matrix have been the worst performers. Conversely, some of the lowest quality companies – those with no track record of adding shareholder value – have been the best share price performers. This cannot last and the eventual reversal of these trends will deliver more reassuring results.

We maintain a database covering the entire ASX300, scoring every business in terms of its pricing power, barriers to entry, industry structure, switching costs, and a myriad of other factors. Our objective is to rank businesses by the sustainability of their propensity to create shareholder value by investing incremental capital at rates of return above the cost of capital.

This is a long-term dynamic. Value creation only reveals itself over a number of years and as the business reports growing shareholder equity while sustaining a high return on that growing equity. Over shorter periods, the share prices for good businesses can decline and the prices for inferior businesses can surge, and we believe we are currently witnessing just such a period.

As shown below, the businesses with our highest quality scores (at the left of the chart) delivered the worst returns between 1 August and 22 November, 2016. Meanwhile, the strongest returns have been towards the lower end of the quality scale.

Just as record apartment prices cannot coexist for long with record supply, high quality and strong earnings growth cannot coexist with poor share price performance for long.

 

Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller ‘Value.able’. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   15 December 2016
  • 12
  •      
  •   
12 Comments
Ashley
December 15, 2016

Great story but Brisbane unit market figures look significantly under-done. I have seen much higher numbers on upcoming supply from reliable sources.

David Knife
December 15, 2016

It is clear the oversupply in Brisbane has already arrived and will get worse over the next 18 months however in terms of pipeline, there are a lot of approvals that have yet to commence, ie: approval to build but not yet financed. Reality is, a lot of these projects won't get funding therefore won't go ahead.

Peter Turnbull
December 15, 2016

Graham, wishing you all the Best for the coming year. I keep all Cuffelinks reports and from time to time refer to back issues. May we ride out any Black Swan events that occur in 2017. I am just trying to work out what a 0.25% rise by the Fed Reserve has to do with our market I think losing Triple AAA would be more significant Peter Turnbull

Michael
December 15, 2016

The test for the Banks will be in the effectiveness, or otherwise, of their portfolio management activities including their home & investment residential property books.
As an aside, based on the numbers, maybe there is something not quite right with your 'quality matrix' ?

Stan
December 15, 2016

Some possible explanations of the quality/performance results-;
A Four months is too short a period to overcome the effect of random events.
B The quality classification is inherently flawed and there is no correlation.
C The classification concept is sound but needs refinement in terms of the factors measured OR the weightings applied to the separate elements.
Roger may prefer A ?
.

Umberto Mancinelli
December 15, 2016

An enjoyable read from Mr Montgomery's article. Would it be possible to know whether his funds have any holdings in the companies mentioned? Thank you for the newsletter and best wishes for a healthy and prosperous 2017.

Rohan
December 15, 2016

Hi Roger,
Appen (APX) is an absolute standout growth stock. For the August 2016 Reporting Season you previously highlighted SRX (Sirtex), ISD (Isentia) and ALU (Altium) as producing winning results. These 3 companies have also been well down, especially the first. Thanks for your valuable insight and all the best to you and the MontInvest team in 2017. Cheers, Rohan

Greg
December 16, 2016

I agree with Umberto, a declaration of interest would be appropriate.

Dee
December 18, 2016

Nonsense.
Regardless of stocks going up or down at any point in time, its the quality (or intrinsic value) of your portfolio that counts
While the nervous nellies sold out in 2008, those who bought quality then made a killing

Besides Greg, Roger has ethics.

AlanB
December 19, 2016

If I had a system, that was designed to identify top performing companies for the purpose of enhancing investor returns, and that system produced underperforming stocks that diminished my investor returns, then I would be looking at the criteria for selecting companies and questioning the validity of my system. Investors who chose stocks based on a minimum yield and proven reliability of dividend income streams would not have chosen SRX, APO, VTG, REA, CAR etc and consequently would not have seen their portfolio values fall or stagnate. Choosing companies for their growth potential is a form of speculation and also riskier because such companies are more price sensitive when their potential for growth is threatened or questioned. Speculating for growth, using other people's funds, is a luxury that small investors and SMSFs don't have and must avoid in their quest for capital and income security. Demand for solid, sustainable dividend producing companies like banks and Telstra will support their share prices. The best companies are those whose price and dividends trend upwards over the long term. Like EVT and SHL.

Sue
March 10, 2017

That's what the herd mentality follows & that's what's supporting the price rises. It'll tumble soon enough though.

SMSF Trustee
December 19, 2016

There's a difference between forming a view about future share price changes and forming a view about a company's business strategy, customer base, product range, etc to assess the potential for its earnings to grow - whether or not it's going to pay those earnings out as dividends.

The former is speculation. The latter is analysis. I presume, AlanB, that you have done some of the latter to decide that the companies you invest in are, in fact, 'sustainable dividend producing companies'. Or are you just relying upon the fact that they've delivered that outcome for many years past? And you are hoping like crazy that they keep on doing so in the future. That is just as speculative as anything else, especially in a world where regulators want the banks to focus on depositor security over and above shareholder value.

I'm perfectly happy to have managed equity funds as the core of my SMSF.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Winners and losers in sharemarkets, 2017/18

AFIC on the speculative ASX boom, opportunities, and LIC discounts

Why August company reporting season was poor

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Warren Buffett's final lesson

I’ve long seen Buffett as a flawed genius: a great investor though a man with shortcomings. With his final letter to Berkshire shareholders, I reflect on how my views of Buffett have changed and the legacy he leaves.

13 ways to save money on your tax - legally

Thoughtful tax planning is a cornerstone of successful investing. This highlights 13 legal ways that you can reduce tax, preserve capital, and enhance long-term wealth across super, property, and shares.

The housing market is heading into choppy waters

With rates on hold and housing demand strong, lenders are pushing boundaries. As risky products return, borrowers should be cautious and not let clever marketing cloud their judgment.

Why it’s time to ditch the retirement journey

Retirement isn’t a clean financial arc. Income shocks, health costs and family pressures hit at random, exposing the limits of age-based planning and the myth of a predictable “retirement journey".

Taking from the young, giving to the old

Despite soaring retiree wealth, public spending on older Australians continues to rise. The result: retirees now out-earn the young, exposing structural flaws in the tax system and challenges for fiscal sustainability.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 637 with weekend update

What should you do if you think this market is grossly overvalued? While it’s impossible to predict the future, it is possible to prepare, and here are three tips on how to best construct your portfolio for what’s ahead.

  • 13 November 2025

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Howard Marks: AI is "terrifying" for jobs, and maybe markets too

The renowned investor says there’s no shortage of speculative investors chasing AI riches and there could be a lot of money lost in the process. His biggest warning goes to workers and the jobs which will be replaced by AI.

Property

The 3 biggest residential property myths

I am a professional real estate investor who hears a lot of opinions rather than facts from so-called experts on the topic of property. Here are the largest myths when it comes to Australia’s biggest asset class.

Retirement

Australia's retirement system works brilliantly for some - but not all

The superannuation system has succeeded brilliantly at what it was designed to do: accumulate wealth during working lives. The next challenge is meeting members’ diverse needs in retirement. 

Retirement

Retirement affordability myths

Inflated retirement targets have driven people away from planning. This explores the gap between industry ideals and real savings, and why honest, achievable benchmarks matter. 

Retirement

Can you manage sequencing risk in retirement?

Sequencing risk can derail retirement, but you’re not powerless. Flexible withdrawals, investment choices and bucketing strategies can help retirees navigate unlucky markets and balance trade-offs.    

Retirement

Don’t rush to sell your home to fund aged care

Aged care rules have shifted. Selling the family home may no longer be the smartest option. This explains the capped means test, pension exemptions and new RAD exit fees reshaping the decision.

Shares

US market boom-bust cycles - where are we now?

This gives comprehensive data on more than 100 years of boom and bust cycles on the US stock market - how the market performed during these cycles, where the current AI uptick sits, and what the future may hold.

Property

A retail property niche offers a lot more upside

Retail real estate is outperforming as a cyclical upswing, robust demand and constrained supply drive renewed investor interest. This looks at the outlook and the continued rise of convenience assets. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.