Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 270

Fund managers may use or abuse algorithms

In this era of ‘big data’, it is not the data itself that is transforming how we live, but the algorithms employed to collect, make sense of and exploit this data. Many sophisticated investment managers have learnt to use algorithms as a powerful tool in their investment armoury, and for quantitative (quant) managers, algorithms are a powerful differentiator of their style and a cornerstone of their investment approach.

The power and limitations of algorithms

An algorithm is a set of step-by-step instructions, written in computer coding language, to use a set of inputs (data) to produce one or more outputs. Given data about investment markets and a specific investment idea, an investment manager can design an algorithm to filter and sort the specific data inputs relevant to the idea, perform the appropriate calculations using the data and produce a set of portfolio constituents, trade list or other output reflecting the investment idea. For example, a manager attracted to large-cap Australian equities with price momentum may purchase the S&P/ASX 200 constituents as a time series data set and write an algorithm that calculates the price momentum of the different stocks, creating a suggested holdings list of higher-momentum stocks, comparing this list to the current stocks and weights in the portfolio and generating a trade list to move to the new target portfolio. While all this could be done manually (without algorithms), it is easy to see how the investment process becomes faster and less prone to error when algorithms do the hard work. Using algorithms instead of investment professionals can also reduce costs and (sometimes) aid transparency.

The thought discipline that coding up an investment idea requires is also very useful – one must be very precise in articulating the idea (in an ‘objective function’), the variables that impact it and the degree of influence (‘weighting coefficient’) of each variable. The algorithm also helps the investment manager adhere to the manager’s investment philosophy and does not allow fear, greed or any other human sentiment into the equation. For large fund investors who increasingly want a custom rather than ‘one size fits all’ solution, it is relatively easy to adapt the algorithms to reflect the personal preferences of the investor (although not all managers are willing to do it). For example, for a superannuation fund who likes the abovementioned momentum strategy but not the added concentration risk, the manager could introduce a step into the algorithm which more equally weights the desired stocks. Or, by adding a risk model to the S&P/ASX data set (inputs), the manager could limit the algorithm’s potential outputs to portfolios which do not breach upper bounds in relation to particular portfolio risks, say, by capping higher momentum stocks in the financial sector at a 20% overweight of the benchmark weight to financials.

Three investment problems observed in the market

However, the dazzling power of algorithms should not blind us to their limitations. The ‘flash crash’ of May 2010, where the Dow Jones Industrial Average crashed 1,000 points in a few minutes, is thought to have been caused by High Frequency Trading algorithms which competed to drive trade bids lower and lower because … well, they did what they were programmed to do.

1. Performance dispersion between similar quantitative strategies

Part of the reason may be that the algorithms that drive many strategies are fitted to the back tests that worked, not the ones that didn’t. For example, in the new breed of systematic alternative risk premia harvesting (global macro) strategies, one of the fundamental factor risks de-emphasised in many live strategies is the 'Value' factor, notwithstanding its academic support and intuitive appeal, simply because of its recent poor performance. Algorithms can be the contagion that transmits research data-mining (the selective use of data to fit an idea) into a live portfolio.

Managers of strategies need a sensible narrative about what is, and what is not, in the algorithms that drive their portfolios.

2. Unintended bets driving a portfolio’s outcomes

Algorithms can be used to specify a ‘maximise return’ objective function. These algorithms can seem elegantly simple but equity strategies which use them to tilt to specific factor bets like Value, Growth, Size and Yield often suffer from a large amount of their portfolio risk not coming from these intended bets, but other unintended bets. The algorithms do exactly what they are coded to do. There is no risk awareness if risk inputs are not included in the algorithm. If an investor is surprised to find their income-tilted portfolio loaded with Australian financials or US utilities, a diversification risk-oblivious algorithm may be to blame.

3. Outperformance dragged down by complexity and transaction costs

The power of algorithms is such that sometimes a manager wants every aspect of the investment idea captured in and exploited by the algorithm (just one more data input, one more variable …). This can lead to a strategy inundated with trade signals. It is hard to find an algorithm adept in balancing the expected performance contribution of a signal against the transaction costs of trading. It is even rarer to find an algorithm that accurately calculates the tax costs of trading and balances these against the merits of trading on each and every signal.

Transparency required

Due diligence on managers who use algorithms should not ‘stop at the door’. Any manager who won’t answer reasonable questions about their algorithms on the basis that it is a proprietary ‘black box’ is out of step with need of large fiduciary investors to address opaqueness in their investment portfolios. Transparency equips fiduciaries to better understand and justify the risks of the investment, whether the rewards are sufficient compensation and whether the fees are sensible.

Our experience is that investment professionals (the human kind!) are key partners to the coders who build algorithms for investment portfolios. They can check the reliability of the data inputs and how secure the software and systems are. They can provide a wise reality check over the output produced by algorithms before the investment recommendations hit the market.

 

Raewyn Williams is Managing Director of Research at Parametric Australia, a US-based investment advisor. This is general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Additional information is available at parametricportfolio.com.au.


 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Are they the four most-costly words in investing?

A surprisingly high percentage of respondents believe 'This Time is Different'. They may be in for a tough time if history repeats as we have seen plenty of asset bubbles before. Do we have new rules for investing?

Investment strategies

Firstlinks survey: the first 100 tips for young investors

From the hundreds of survey responses, we have compiled a sample of 100 and will publish more next week. There are consistent themes in here from decades of mistakes and successes.

Strategy

What should the next generation's Australia look like?

An unwanted fiscal drain will fall on generations of Australians who have seen their incomes and wealth stagnate, having missed the property boom and entered the workforce during a period of flatlining real wages.

Shares

Bank results scorecard: who deserves the gold stars?

The forecasts were wrong. In COVID, banks were expected to face falling house prices, high unemployment and a lending downturn. In the recovery, which banks are awarded gold stars based on the better performance?

Exchange traded products

In the beginning, there were LICs. Where are they now?

While the competing structure, ETFs, has increased in size far quicker in recent years, LICs remain an important part of the listed trust sector. There are differences between Traditional and Trading LICs.

Shares

Should you bank on the Westpac buy-back?

Westpac has sent out details of its buy-back and readers have asked for an explanation. It is not beneficial for all investors and whether this one works for some depends on where the bank sets the final price.

Investment strategies

Understanding the benefits of rebalancing

Whether they know it or not, most investors use of version of a Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA) to create an efficient portfolio mix of different asset classes, but the benefits of rebalancing are often overlooked.

Shares

Six stocks positioned well for a solid but volatile recovery

The rotation to economic recovery favouring value stocks continues but risks loom on the horizon. What lessons can be drawn from reporting season and what are the trends as inflation appears in parts of business?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.