Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 220

Investment innovation beyond the status quo

Large super funds in Australia recently reported their eighth consecutive financial year of positive investment returns, with the median growth option delivering 10.7% over 2016-17 (source: Chant West). All investment options have met their long-term objectives since leaving behind the tough years of the GFC. While this is good news, our new research shows it is for investment success to breed complacency.

Larger funds have a great store of resources and experience, so it seems they are well-placed to search for, test and embed new investment ideas. But the irony is that large funds face innate headwinds in thinking innovatively and may in fact be leaving it to their smaller counterparts to develop the investment ideas of the future.

Status quo traps

These headwinds to investment innovation are identified in our research on ‘status quo thinking traps’. Larger funds have built knowledge and processes around the historical markets for their products. This includes investing a superannuation contribution stream on behalf of disengaged members to generate a lump sum payout to these members once they retire. Larger funds represent hold $1.3 trillion of superannuation capital which is no small investment pool!

So what’s the status quo?

1. Same investment processes

Current investment thinking starts with a strategic asset allocation framework, adds active or passive philosophies across the asset classes and a currency hedging belief, then selects managers across the asset classes to run slices of the investment portfolio, often with the help of an asset consultant. Funds may cite their post-GFC investment success as the reason to continue investing this way. There is an organisational impetus to continue investing this way which can make it difficult to adopt new investment ideas and genuinely innovate.

2. Familiarity of current structures

The larger the fund’s stake in the $1.3 trillion capital pool, the more its resources, processes, organisational structure and cultural values are built up around this existing way of investing. There is familiarity around these investment paradigms and it is easy to make decisions inside the paradigms that maintain the overall structure; for example, moving from active to passive, placing pressure on management fees, changing a manager or adjusting the fund’s currency hedging ratio.

3. Incremental changes only

Changes like these are no doubt valuable and funds think intelligently and then manage their governance processes well to implement these investment changes. But in our experience, what a large fund might call a ‘big’ or ‘innovative’ change is,say, changing the asset allocation, moving from pooled funds to separately managed accounts, or recognising a new asset class like private credit, US municipal bonds or emerging markets small caps. The problem is that these changes are fairly incremental, not really that big or innovative.

If the investable markets or investment problems of the future prove to be different from the past, these funds are only inching forward on the journey from ‘here’ to ‘there’.

Changing investment horizon

Our concern is that the horizon for large fund investing does suggest significant differences from the past, including:

  • Expected lower growth and yield in investment markets than historical averages
  • Flows to factor-based investing and other ‘smart beta’ trends
  • Ongoing nervousness about volatility, country shocks from political risk, climate change
  • Investment objectives focused on yield (not growth or total return)
  • Shift from mass accumulation to mass decumulation
  • Fragmenting investment risk appetite and, indeed, definitions of risk
  • New investment fees and costs transparency and accountability (RG 97)
  • The rise of Responsible Investing (ESG, values-based) approaches
  • The ageing population and governmental pressure to address longevity risk
  • Capital flows generated by ‘robo-advice’ and DIY investors
  • Insourcing of some investment management by funds
  • Capacity constraints due to the amount of capital in Australia’s superannuation system.

Investment innovation is needed to face these challenges

Meeting these (and other) investment challenges requires thinking not just within the existing paradigms, but beyond the paradigms themselves. Genuine innovation in investing could look at matters like:

  • Instead of an optimal investment risk/return blend, introduce investment efficiency and portfolio transparency as third and fourth dimensions.
  • Instead of dividing managers into active or passive, create a spectrum of manager strategies that span the continuum of possibilities between pure market-cap passive, enhanced passive, smart beta and ‘systematic alpha’ approaches, right through to active managers targeting pure ‘idiosyncratic risk’ from stock insights. There are additional levers to pull around active tax management (or not) within these possibilities.
  • Instead of choosing between investment outsourcing and insourcing, break up and re-optimise all sourcing arrangements based on their components. This includes thinking about re-positioning a fund as the ‘investment ideas generator’ and working with a specialist implementation partner.
  • Instead of slotting investment opportunities into asset class buckets, target common underlying risks or themes (for example, interest rates) that transcend asset classes.
  • Instead of investment trading done independently by each of the fund’s managers (sometimes in opposition to each other), centralise trading to eliminate redundant trading and create a whole-of-portfolio view for the fund rather than a collection of manager slices.
  • Instead of starting with a market-cap portfolio and introducing ‘tracking error risk’, start with a reference portfolio that reflects the real, asymmetric risk preferences of superannuation members (limited volatility and downside risk, full upside risk).

The potential payoffs from genuinely innovative ideas are lucrative because they will deliver over and over again. The long-term investment horizon of super funds and many other investors would powerfully leverage the value of any such rewards. The investment success of large super funds to date could help them think boldly and confidently about what is needed for the future … or it could trap them in the investment paradigms of the status quo.

 

Raewyn Williams is Managing Director of Research at Parametric Australia, a US-based investment advisor. This information is intended for wholesale use only. Parametric is not a licensed tax agent or advisor in Australia and this does not represent tax advice. Additional information is available at parametricportfolio.com.au.

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.