Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 220

Investment innovation beyond the status quo

Large super funds in Australia recently reported their eighth consecutive financial year of positive investment returns, with the median growth option delivering 10.7% over 2016-17 (source: Chant West). All investment options have met their long-term objectives since leaving behind the tough years of the GFC. While this is good news, our new research shows it is for investment success to breed complacency.

Larger funds have a great store of resources and experience, so it seems they are well-placed to search for, test and embed new investment ideas. But the irony is that large funds face innate headwinds in thinking innovatively and may in fact be leaving it to their smaller counterparts to develop the investment ideas of the future.

Status quo traps

These headwinds to investment innovation are identified in our research on ‘status quo thinking traps’. Larger funds have built knowledge and processes around the historical markets for their products. This includes investing a superannuation contribution stream on behalf of disengaged members to generate a lump sum payout to these members once they retire. Larger funds represent hold $1.3 trillion of superannuation capital which is no small investment pool!

So what’s the status quo?

1. Same investment processes

Current investment thinking starts with a strategic asset allocation framework, adds active or passive philosophies across the asset classes and a currency hedging belief, then selects managers across the asset classes to run slices of the investment portfolio, often with the help of an asset consultant. Funds may cite their post-GFC investment success as the reason to continue investing this way. There is an organisational impetus to continue investing this way which can make it difficult to adopt new investment ideas and genuinely innovate.

2. Familiarity of current structures

The larger the fund’s stake in the $1.3 trillion capital pool, the more its resources, processes, organisational structure and cultural values are built up around this existing way of investing. There is familiarity around these investment paradigms and it is easy to make decisions inside the paradigms that maintain the overall structure; for example, moving from active to passive, placing pressure on management fees, changing a manager or adjusting the fund’s currency hedging ratio.

3. Incremental changes only

Changes like these are no doubt valuable and funds think intelligently and then manage their governance processes well to implement these investment changes. But in our experience, what a large fund might call a ‘big’ or ‘innovative’ change is,say, changing the asset allocation, moving from pooled funds to separately managed accounts, or recognising a new asset class like private credit, US municipal bonds or emerging markets small caps. The problem is that these changes are fairly incremental, not really that big or innovative.

If the investable markets or investment problems of the future prove to be different from the past, these funds are only inching forward on the journey from ‘here’ to ‘there’.

Changing investment horizon

Our concern is that the horizon for large fund investing does suggest significant differences from the past, including:

  • Expected lower growth and yield in investment markets than historical averages
  • Flows to factor-based investing and other ‘smart beta’ trends
  • Ongoing nervousness about volatility, country shocks from political risk, climate change
  • Investment objectives focused on yield (not growth or total return)
  • Shift from mass accumulation to mass decumulation
  • Fragmenting investment risk appetite and, indeed, definitions of risk
  • New investment fees and costs transparency and accountability (RG 97)
  • The rise of Responsible Investing (ESG, values-based) approaches
  • The ageing population and governmental pressure to address longevity risk
  • Capital flows generated by ‘robo-advice’ and DIY investors
  • Insourcing of some investment management by funds
  • Capacity constraints due to the amount of capital in Australia’s superannuation system.

Investment innovation is needed to face these challenges

Meeting these (and other) investment challenges requires thinking not just within the existing paradigms, but beyond the paradigms themselves. Genuine innovation in investing could look at matters like:

  • Instead of an optimal investment risk/return blend, introduce investment efficiency and portfolio transparency as third and fourth dimensions.
  • Instead of dividing managers into active or passive, create a spectrum of manager strategies that span the continuum of possibilities between pure market-cap passive, enhanced passive, smart beta and ‘systematic alpha’ approaches, right through to active managers targeting pure ‘idiosyncratic risk’ from stock insights. There are additional levers to pull around active tax management (or not) within these possibilities.
  • Instead of choosing between investment outsourcing and insourcing, break up and re-optimise all sourcing arrangements based on their components. This includes thinking about re-positioning a fund as the ‘investment ideas generator’ and working with a specialist implementation partner.
  • Instead of slotting investment opportunities into asset class buckets, target common underlying risks or themes (for example, interest rates) that transcend asset classes.
  • Instead of investment trading done independently by each of the fund’s managers (sometimes in opposition to each other), centralise trading to eliminate redundant trading and create a whole-of-portfolio view for the fund rather than a collection of manager slices.
  • Instead of starting with a market-cap portfolio and introducing ‘tracking error risk’, start with a reference portfolio that reflects the real, asymmetric risk preferences of superannuation members (limited volatility and downside risk, full upside risk).

The potential payoffs from genuinely innovative ideas are lucrative because they will deliver over and over again. The long-term investment horizon of super funds and many other investors would powerfully leverage the value of any such rewards. The investment success of large super funds to date could help them think boldly and confidently about what is needed for the future … or it could trap them in the investment paradigms of the status quo.


Raewyn Williams is Managing Director of Research at Parametric Australia, a US-based investment advisor. This information is intended for wholesale use only. Parametric is not a licensed tax agent or advisor in Australia and this does not represent tax advice. Additional information is available at


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

Critics of franking credits are missing the main point. The taxable income of shareholders/taxpayers must also include the company tax previously paid to the ATO before the dividend was distributed. It is fair.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 424 with weekend update

Wet streets cause rain. The Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect is a name created by writer Michael Crichton after he realised that everything he read or heard in the media was wrong when he had direct personal knowledge or expertise on the subject. He surmised that everything else is probably wrong as well, and financial markets are no exception.

  • 9 September 2021

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Joe Hockey on the big investment influences on Australia

Former Treasurer Joe Hockey became Australia's Ambassador to the US and he now runs an office in Washington, giving him a unique perspective on geopolitical issues. They have never been so important for investors.

Investment strategies

The tipping point for investing in decarbonisation

Throughout time, transformative technology has changed the course of human history, but it is easy to be lulled into believing new technology will also transform investment returns. Where's the tipping point?

Exchange traded products

The options to gain equity exposure with less risk

Equity investing pays off over long terms but comes with risks in the short term that many people cannot tolerate, especially retirees preserving capital. There are ways to invest in stocks with little downside.

Exchange traded products

8 ways LIC bonus options can benefit investors

Bonus options issued by Listed Investment Companies (LICs) deliver many advantages but there is a potential dilutionary impact if options are exercised well below the share price. This must be factored in.


Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Investment strategies

Three demographic themes shaping investments for the future

Focussing on companies that will benefit from slow moving, long duration and highly predictable demographic trends can help investors predict future opportunities. Three main themes stand out.

Fixed interest

It's not high return/risk equities versus low return/risk bonds

High-yield bonds carry more risk than investment grade but they offer higher income returns. An allocation to high-yield bonds in a portfolio - alongside equities and other bonds – is worth considering.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.