Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 461

Is the speculative fever in 'hot stocks’ over?

Over two years from the Covid crisis in March and April 2020 to now, the market delivered price jumps in hundreds of tech stocks followed by a harsh reality check. The reasons for the surge in prices were simple: trillions of dollars sprayed around by governments, deficit spending their way to wartime-like debts, to boost incomes, save jobs, and encourage spending.

On top of this, central banks threw away their textbooks and set about to deliberately create inflation, cutting rates to zero (negative in Europe and Japan), and resorting to straight-out money-printing, to entice people to gear up to the hilt and spend. People everywhere threw their free or ultra-cheap money at just about anything, especially online retailing, tech, renewables, ‘crypto’ currencies, ‘NFTs’, and even boring old housing.

The days of reckoning

Here is a quick snapshot of the rise and fall (thus far) of the post-Covid tech fever. Below are price charts for a couple of dozen stocks since the start of 2020 – ie just prior to the February-March 2020 Covid sell-off. At the top we start with the broad US S&P 500 and NASDAQ indexes, then several US tech/online stocks, and some key stocks in other markets, including Australia. We also include some crypto’s, including the terraUSD ‘stable coin’.

We have used no charting trickery to make price moves appear greater than they actually are. On each chart, the left scale starts at zero at the bottom, so if a price looks like it has doubled, or trebled or risen ten-fold (like Tesla and Bitcoin), or has fallen by more than half (most of them), then they have.

This is not intended to be exhaustive. It is to illustrate that the patterns are virtually the same in each case, regardless of the circumstances or merits of each individual company (or crypto).

As almost none of them pay dividends, half make losses, and most of the rest make only tiny profits relative to their prices, the charts reflect the rise and fall of mass hysteria – first surging in, and then fleeing.

Will the hysteria return to drive prices higher?

Is this just a temporary dip that will recover, or will the mass-selling continue, or pause?

Sentiment changed in early 2022, and the reasons are also clear. It was the sudden realisation that the era of free and ultra-cheap money is over. Inflation surged well before Russia’s invasion, and central banks finally started to end QE money printing, and raise interest rates back toward more ‘normal’ levels. There is much debate about exactly where ‘normal’ is for cash rates in each country, but it is certainly much higher than where they are now.

The bell at the top of the market was probably the January 2022 Superbowl, dubbed the ‘crypto Superbowl’, which featured slick ads showing famous movie stars spruiking cryptos as a sure way to get rich. (This is fitting, as the bell at the top of the late 1990s ‘dot com’ boom was the January 2000 Superbowl, dubbed the ‘dot-com Superbowl’. It featured TV ads for 14 profit-less ‘dot-com’ start-ups that promptly crashed in the 2001-2002 ‘tech wreck’).

Will central banks suddenly switch back to rate cuts and QE? Not while inflation is running well above target, unless there is another major economic contraction (deep recession with high unemployment, like the in 2020). If that does occur, share markets would have already fallen and started to rebound by then. 

On the ‘fiscal’ (government spending and taxes) front, governments are still deficit spending, but the pace of spending increases has slowed significantly, and many programs have ended. Governments are under pressure to scale back spending, and are even talking of raising taxes (eg. tax hikes in Joe Biden’s election policy agenda).

Is pricing now more reasonable?

Has the recent sell-off brought prices back down to levels that are now ‘fair’ or reasonable (or perhaps even cheap?). Here are the price/earnings ratios and dividend yields for the broad market and for our tech/online stars:

On the left, we can see that price/earnings ratios are a not-too-expensive 21 for the US market as a whole. As a general rule of thumb, a P/E ratio above the high teens is getting expensive, and is only justifiable if the company can generate and sustain above-market profit growth well into the future. Here we see that the P/E ratios of the tech and online stars are well above that in almost all cases. Half of them make losses, so they don’t even have any ‘E’ (earnings) for us to calculate the P/E.

The current high pricing relies on assumptions of continued boom-time rates of profit growth, and many of these are going to be a lot more difficult to sustain as monetary and fiscal support is withdrawn, and as higher inflation and interest rates constrain spending, revenues, margins and profits.

The right chart highlights that there is almost a complete absence of cash dividends. This is important for the broader market, as the top half dozen stocks on the list are not just large tech/online stocks. They are the largest companies in the US market, and the largest in the entire world, so they drive global returns. (Australia’s Domino’s Pizza is seen as a hot tech stock for some bizarre reason, but it is by far the biggest dividend payer).

These numbers suggest profits need to remain strong (with inflation and interest rates not rising too high) or prices have further to fall.

 

Ashley Owen is Chief Investment Officer at advisory firm Stanford Brown and The Lunar Group. He is also a Director of Third Link Investment Managers, a fund that supports Australian charities. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   8 June 2022
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Bull and bear case for Australian equities for FY25

Why stock prices are a distraction

Gullible travels, or are Aussies more sceptical?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

2 billion reasons to fix retirement income

A proposal to address Australia's 'stranded balances' in retirement by requiring super funds to transition members to pension phase at 65, boosting retirement income and reframing super as a source of income.

The ultimate superannuation EOFY checklist 2026

Here is a checklist of 28 important issues you should address before June 30 to ensure your SMSF or other super fund is in order and that you are making the most of the strategies available.

Do super funds need a massive wake up call?

UK retirement expert, Guy Opperman, believes super funds are failing at supporting members in deaccumulation. Here is what Australia should do about it. 

Two months into retirement

A retirement researcher's take on retirement and her focus on each of her six resource buckets to stay engaged during the transition and beyond.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 662 with weekend update

The debate over the budget is increasingly shaped by frustration and perceptions of unfairness, rather than clear-eyed assessment of policy outcomes.

Reforming the taxation of wealth and wealth transfers

As the budget approaches debate continues about the need and method for addressing wealth inequality. Could reinstating wealth transfer taxes be the answer?

Latest Updates

Back to the future - Why indexing CGT is a good idea

A return to indexation of capital gains would be a fairer way to compensate households for the effects of inflation than the current discount. Importantly, it opens the door to future, broader reforms to stop the taxation of inflation.

Australia has no death duties. Technically.

Australia may not levy formal death duties, but a growing web of tax measures is quietly shaping what wealth passes between generations. Now, the 2026 budget adds another layer.

Strategy

The folly of the Iran war

From oil shocks to fractured alliances, the Iran war carries the hallmarks of a historic policy misstep - one that could tip an already fragile global economy into crisis.

Taxation

Noel Whittaker’s take on the budget

Marketed as a fix for inequality and housing affordability, the latest budget instead delivers a tangle of tax changes that leave everyday Australians worse off.

Investment strategies

The red metal's long game

Copper has had a rough few weeks but investors should not ignore the potential for future price increases as supply increasingly falls behind demand.

Taxation

The lesser-known effects of changed property taxes

The budget’s property tax reforms are being framed as fairness measures, but they risk splitting the housing market, penalising lower‑income investors and introducing distortions that may prove costly.

Latest from Morningstar

Why stocks sometimes fall for no obvious reason

The vast and opaque world of private assets is a powerful gravitational force - and when trouble hits, it's the more liquid public equities that often the feel it first.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.