Home / 168

Low SMSF returns highlight value of retirement advice

Much has been made of the current low-return environment and its potentially long-lasting consequences. People using retirement projection tools might find their return assumptions are unlikely to materialise.

In light of this uncertainty, retirees need to factor risk into their retirement planning, and advisers should make them aware of a range of investment outcomes.

Retirees can then use this information to decide when they can afford to retire, or what level of spending they can sustain over the course of their retirement.

2015 SMSF returns and fund balances

Research conducted by Accurium and the SMSF Association of over 65,000 SMSFs looked at how the retirement adequacy of Australia’s SMSF trustees has changed over the 2015 financial year. The study found the median balance for two-member SMSFs increased by 3.0% over the year to $1.1 million, based on a median investment return of 4.2%. This is lower than the average return over the previous five years of 6.2% per annum for the SMSFs in the study.

Chart 1: Median SMSF balances and investment returns as at 30 June



Note: Imputed investment returns are calculated net of administration expenses and gross of income tax. These imputed investment returns should not be used in comparisons with other superannuation sectors.

Fewer SMSFs are large enough for comfortable standard

The research used Accurium’s healthcheck to determine retirement adequacy, a retirement projection model that considers 2,000 economic and demographic scenarios and provides estimates of the savings needed to afford different lifestyles with different levels of confidence.

The research found that a 65-year-old couple will need $702,000 in savings to be confident of affording the ASFA Comfortable Retirement Standard, which is currently $58,922 per annum for 65-year-old couples. This is at the 80% confidence level, meaning retirees still have a one in five chance of outliving their savings. It also assumes an asset mix consistent with the ATO average for SMSFs in pension phase. Age pension entitlements, tax and superannuation settings are allowed for.

The results are testament to the success of the SMSFs in the sample, given about 70% of the couples in the research have enough in their funds to afford this lifestyle. However, that comes with an important caveat. Lower-than-average returns in 2015, together with a weaker economic outlook, mean fewer SMSF couples are in this fortunate position compared with a year ago, where 75% were on track for a comfortable retirement.

Lower expected returns are also affecting those aspiring to a higher standard of retirement living. For example, the study found a 65-year-old SMSF couple will need $1,886,000 in savings to be reasonably confident of having an income of $100,000 p.a, as shown in Chart 2. The proportion of 65-year-old SMSF couples with sufficient assets in their SMSFs to support this lifestyle has fallen from 34% to 29% over the past year. (Spending levels are assumed to keep pace with inflation, and allow for changing circumstances as retirees age. Specifically, spending is assumed to reduce by 10% once retirees reach age 85 and to drop by 30% once one spouse passes away).

Chart 2: Savings needed for different spending levels with 80% confidence vs. median SMSF balance


SMSF retirees can also achieve higher retirement living standards with savings outside of superannuation. However, the study highlights the need for trustees either in or preparing for retirement to review their plans.

The research also analysed the sustainability of individual SMSF households’ retirement plans based on their desired spending levels and their savings, both inside and outside their SMSF. Of the 1,500 households in the study, three in five could be reasonably confident that their savings would last as long as they do.

Our study also found a clear correlation between wealth and sustainability. It might seem intuitive that those with more wealth are more likely to sustain their desired retirement spending levels. However, the study revealed that SMSF retirees do not automatically increase their spending in line with greater wealth.

Value of retirement risk advice

SMSF trustees and their advisers need to assess their plans before and during retirement, including how much trustees need to spend per annum, how to meet essential expenditure and how to adjust asset allocations as a response to lower-yielding markets.

To do this effectively, advisers, or those going it alone, need the right projection tools (such as Accurium’s retirement healthcheck) that don’t just use average returns and lifespans, to consider a range of outcomes. To access Accurium’s research paper SMSF Retirement Insights: Are trustees prepared for retirement?, prepared in conjunction with the SMSF Association, click here.


Melanie Dunn is SMSF Technical Services Manager at Accurium. This article is information only and illustrates the value of providing retirement risk advice to SMSF trustees and is not intended to be financial product advice, legal advice or tax advice, and should not be relied upon as such. Advisers and SMSF trustees may need to seek appropriate professional advice.


8 hints for any SMSF in both accumulation and pension modes

GPS Framework: A new way to think about SMSF retirement income

SMSFs and the pension cap: a case study



August 11, 2016

Like Paul, I am retired with a wife, and no family living with us. We own our own home worth nearly $1m, bought for cash, and have a dividend income from shares and other interest paying investments from our SMSF of about $300k/yr....tax free. The occasional profitable sales are also tax free.
We also own shares outside the SMSF environment, but could live very comfortably without these, while watching the SMSF portfolio increase in value by >15%/yr.
So we are one family which is very happy with the SMSF environment, and find it difficult to be too critical of the government's attempt to curb what is basically a rort.

Gen Y

August 12, 2016

Richard, it is great that someone is calling it for what it is. There's been a lot of bashing of the Government's proposed changes on this site based on vested interests.


August 11, 2016

Our SMSF is pretty much our sole source of retirement capital and income.
It is all invested in direct shares which I research. At 58 we are both retired and the fund now generates just over $100,000 in ff dividends and $43,000 in refunded franking credits; with both figures still growing thanks to some great mid & small cap businesses.
That's over $140,000 pa without selling one share.
We have a $150,000 term deposit 'insurance ' fund if divs get cut due to another GFC type event.
To be honest we are struggling to spend this annual income; let alone sell anything.
Very 'doable.'


August 11, 2016

^^^ Depends on where you live, as a 20 year Financial Planner we have bulk of our retired clients on or around this income level with combination of Private and DSS funded pensions. These people aren't traveling overseas each year, but are comfortable by their own definition.


August 11, 2016

I agree entirely with Ashley, on both counts.


August 11, 2016

I have never met anyone who has their SMSF as their sole source of retirement capital and income. I have never met any SMSF investor who is happy with the ASFA retirement income levels. – eg who would be ‘comfortable’ on $58,922 pa?


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

Most investors are wrong on dividend yield as income

The current yield on a share or trust is simply the latest dividend divided by the current share price, an abstract number at a point in time. What really matters is the income delivered in the long run.

My 10 biggest investment management lessons

A Chris Cuffe classic article that never ages. Every experienced investor develops a set of beliefs about how markets operate.

Seven major trends affecting Australians in retirement

Retirement planning will become increasingly complex in the face of trends in home ownership, wealth dispersion, life expectancy, health and aged care costs, work patterns and pension dependency.

Lessons from the Future Fund for retail investors

The Annual Report from Australia's sovereign wealth fund reveals new ways it is investing in fixed income and alternatives. The Fund considers its portfolio as one overall risk position with downside protection in one asset class allowing more risk in another.

Four companies riding the healthcare boom

There are strong demographic trends in ageing and consumer spending and investing in the right healthcare companies can ride this wave as well as produce better health outcomes for people. 

Five reasons SMSFs are making asset allocation changes

Substantial changes are underway in SMSFs which until recently held a narrow range of assets dominated by cash, term deposits and Australian equities. Trustees have never faced so many choices.




Special eBooks

Specially-selected collections of the best articles 

Read more

Earn CPD Hours

Accredited CPD hours reading Firstlinks

Read more

Pandora Archive

Firstlinks articles are collected in Pandora, Australia's national archive.

Read more