Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 251

The merit of currency exposure if equity markets fall

Is the Australian dollar set to lose its shine for a prolonged period? Australian investors are concerned that the currency will come under downward pressure due to an eroding interest rate differential between US and Australian rates.

When investing in foreign assets, Australian investors are exposed to losses when the AUD appreciates against other global currencies, and make gains when the AUD depreciates. This currency exposure, or risk, can be neutralised through hedging. However, it is common for investors to retain some unhedged foreign currency exposure, particularly for more volatile assets such as global equities. Investors typically fully hedge their currency risk on more defensive assets, such as fixed income, to prevent currency volatility dominating returns.

The temptation now is to reduce this type of currency hedging, but we urge caution as this strategy also increases portfolio risk.

Traditional interest rate differential gone

The AUD has long been a preferred ‘carry trade’ (that is, borrow in one currency and invest in another) due to the higher interest rates in Australia compared with the record low rates in other developed countries. However, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) hiked rates to a target of 1.5-1.75% in March 2018, which is the sixth increase since the near-zero levels in December 2015. The Reserve Bank of Australia meanwhile has kept rates unchanged at a record low of 1.5% since 2016.

Traditionally, investors and analysts believe that the interest rate carry trade is an important driver of AUD performance. This current negative differential is therefore raising concerns that the AUD is set for a sustained period of weakness.

The AUD/USD carry impact is a complex story

Investors generally believe that AUD rates above USD rates deliver better returns from buying AUD/USD. An analysis of the monthly AUD/USD returns, conditional on the difference between Australian and US interest rates, suggests a more complex story, as shown below.

Historical AUD/USD monthly performance statistics (Jan 1995 to Dec 2017)

For low and medium interest rate differentials, the average historical monthly returns are 0.26% and 0.31% respectively. When there has been a negative interest rate differential, the average monthly return falls to -0.60%. Surprisingly, for high interest rate differentials the average historical monthly return is also negative at -0.25%.

A deeper dive into the statistics also reveals that as interest rate differentials have reduced historically, so has the volatility of monthly returns. In addition, under medium and high carry levels, the AUD tends to experience more large-negative moves, known as negative skew. This analysis leads to a reasonable hypothesis that the AUD/USD is a lower risk currency when carry is lower.

Correlation and diversification

If both AUD/USD returns and volatility are lower when carry is low or negative, then reducing the level of currency hedging for foreign-currency-denominated assets, in our view, could make sense in the current environment. However, it is important for investors to also consider the correlation between Australian dollar returns and the foreign assets they are hedging.

Our analysis of the data suggests investors need to proceed with caution.

The underlying assumption is that the unhedged currency exposure will provide a diversification effect at the total portfolio level. For this diversification effect to be present, there needs to be a high positive correlation between the returns on the Australian dollar and global equities.

By way of illustration, when equity markets have suffered periods of negative returns, these have tended to coincide with a weaker AUD. For example, the AUD/USD spot rate fell 19.7% in 2008, while the S&P 500 Index also lost 38.5%. If the investor was unhedged in terms of currency exposure, the S&P 500 Index loss in AUD terms was much lower, at 18.8%. In this case, the weaker AUD has added value to the portfolio, partly offsetting the losses suffered on foreign equity investments. Investors were better off unhedged.

This relationship depends on the correlation between the investor’s domestic currency and equity market performance. The chart below shows the rolling 12-month correlation between the monthly returns on the AUD and the MSCI World Equity Index in local currency terms. While the correlation is generally positive, it is not stable and was negative for most of 2017.

12-month rolling correlation between the Global Equities and AUD/USD exchange rate

Source: Bloomberg and Insight Investment as at 30 March 2018. *Global Equities = MSCI World Local Currency Index.

As interest rate differentials increase, the correlation between the performance of AUD/USD and global equities has also increased. By contrast, with low interest rate differentials correlation falls, while at negative levels, the correlation is close to zero. Investors may need to reassess their assumptions regarding correlation and the diversification effect in the current environment.

Conclusion on the merits of hedging

We believe, based on the above analysis, that low or negative interest rate differentials have two key implications for AUD investors with global equity exposures:

  1. The impact of carry on the AUD’s performance is more complex than analysts suggest. Our study shows that the AUD is a more risky currency during periods of high carry. As carry levels fall, monthly returns also fall and the temptation for investors is to lower their currency hedging.
  2. If the objective of lowering hedges is to improve returns on foreign equities, we suggest investors proceed with caution. Lower correlation could mean the worst-case scenario occurs where the AUD appreciates when global equity prices are falling. In this case, the investor will face losses both on the underlying assets and their currency translation.

 

Adam Kibble is a Product Specialist at Insight Investment. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

The positive FX hedge returns have now gone

3 reasons the Aussie dollar has not collapsed

Australian dollar follows commodity prices

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.