Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 251

The merit of currency exposure if equity markets fall

Is the Australian dollar set to lose its shine for a prolonged period? Australian investors are concerned that the currency will come under downward pressure due to an eroding interest rate differential between US and Australian rates.

When investing in foreign assets, Australian investors are exposed to losses when the AUD appreciates against other global currencies, and make gains when the AUD depreciates. This currency exposure, or risk, can be neutralised through hedging. However, it is common for investors to retain some unhedged foreign currency exposure, particularly for more volatile assets such as global equities. Investors typically fully hedge their currency risk on more defensive assets, such as fixed income, to prevent currency volatility dominating returns.

The temptation now is to reduce this type of currency hedging, but we urge caution as this strategy also increases portfolio risk.

Traditional interest rate differential gone

The AUD has long been a preferred ‘carry trade’ (that is, borrow in one currency and invest in another) due to the higher interest rates in Australia compared with the record low rates in other developed countries. However, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) hiked rates to a target of 1.5-1.75% in March 2018, which is the sixth increase since the near-zero levels in December 2015. The Reserve Bank of Australia meanwhile has kept rates unchanged at a record low of 1.5% since 2016.

Traditionally, investors and analysts believe that the interest rate carry trade is an important driver of AUD performance. This current negative differential is therefore raising concerns that the AUD is set for a sustained period of weakness.

The AUD/USD carry impact is a complex story

Investors generally believe that AUD rates above USD rates deliver better returns from buying AUD/USD. An analysis of the monthly AUD/USD returns, conditional on the difference between Australian and US interest rates, suggests a more complex story, as shown below.

Historical AUD/USD monthly performance statistics (Jan 1995 to Dec 2017)

For low and medium interest rate differentials, the average historical monthly returns are 0.26% and 0.31% respectively. When there has been a negative interest rate differential, the average monthly return falls to -0.60%. Surprisingly, for high interest rate differentials the average historical monthly return is also negative at -0.25%.

A deeper dive into the statistics also reveals that as interest rate differentials have reduced historically, so has the volatility of monthly returns. In addition, under medium and high carry levels, the AUD tends to experience more large-negative moves, known as negative skew. This analysis leads to a reasonable hypothesis that the AUD/USD is a lower risk currency when carry is lower.

Correlation and diversification

If both AUD/USD returns and volatility are lower when carry is low or negative, then reducing the level of currency hedging for foreign-currency-denominated assets, in our view, could make sense in the current environment. However, it is important for investors to also consider the correlation between Australian dollar returns and the foreign assets they are hedging.

Our analysis of the data suggests investors need to proceed with caution.

The underlying assumption is that the unhedged currency exposure will provide a diversification effect at the total portfolio level. For this diversification effect to be present, there needs to be a high positive correlation between the returns on the Australian dollar and global equities.

By way of illustration, when equity markets have suffered periods of negative returns, these have tended to coincide with a weaker AUD. For example, the AUD/USD spot rate fell 19.7% in 2008, while the S&P 500 Index also lost 38.5%. If the investor was unhedged in terms of currency exposure, the S&P 500 Index loss in AUD terms was much lower, at 18.8%. In this case, the weaker AUD has added value to the portfolio, partly offsetting the losses suffered on foreign equity investments. Investors were better off unhedged.

This relationship depends on the correlation between the investor’s domestic currency and equity market performance. The chart below shows the rolling 12-month correlation between the monthly returns on the AUD and the MSCI World Equity Index in local currency terms. While the correlation is generally positive, it is not stable and was negative for most of 2017.

12-month rolling correlation between the Global Equities and AUD/USD exchange rate

Source: Bloomberg and Insight Investment as at 30 March 2018. *Global Equities = MSCI World Local Currency Index.

As interest rate differentials increase, the correlation between the performance of AUD/USD and global equities has also increased. By contrast, with low interest rate differentials correlation falls, while at negative levels, the correlation is close to zero. Investors may need to reassess their assumptions regarding correlation and the diversification effect in the current environment.

Conclusion on the merits of hedging

We believe, based on the above analysis, that low or negative interest rate differentials have two key implications for AUD investors with global equity exposures:

  1. The impact of carry on the AUD’s performance is more complex than analysts suggest. Our study shows that the AUD is a more risky currency during periods of high carry. As carry levels fall, monthly returns also fall and the temptation for investors is to lower their currency hedging.
  2. If the objective of lowering hedges is to improve returns on foreign equities, we suggest investors proceed with caution. Lower correlation could mean the worst-case scenario occurs where the AUD appreciates when global equity prices are falling. In this case, the investor will face losses both on the underlying assets and their currency translation.

 

Adam Kibble is a Product Specialist at Insight Investment. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   3 May 2018
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The currency bet you didn’t know you made

The Aussie dollar was floated 40 years ago

Does currency hedging provide an edge?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.