Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 529

Does currency hedging provide an edge?

A growing number of Australians are investing in global equities, largely thanks to the wide array of locally listed Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) that make it easy to tap into offshore markets. In August 2023 for example, according to Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) data, close to $200 million flowed into  ETFs in the global equity category.

Around half of those inflows were into products that are hedged (or tied) to the Australian dollar instead of to the currencies that underlie the international equities within the ETF (unhedged). In other words, the investors behind those inflows had opted to neutralise the potential impact of future foreign currency movements on their investment to remain in Australian dollars.

Currencies can be volatile 

While sharemarkets can be highly volatile from day to day, so too can currencies in response to economic factors and geopolitical events.

Keep in mind that the Australian dollar was trading above US70 cents in late February this year and has since dropped back to its current trading level of around 64 cents. A decade ago, it was trading above parity with the US dollar, or about 30% higher than now.

It's anyone’s guess whether the Australian dollar will hold its ground against other currencies, move higher based on more positive domestic economic news, or drift lower again as other world economies accelerate their own economic recovery phases.

Many global ETFs offer both hedged and unhedged versions of the same fund. There’s no right or wrong choice. It comes down to personal preference, but the ongoing effect of currency movements on international assets is often overlooked by investors. And that’s where currency hedging really comes into play as a strategy.

How currency hedging works

Currency hedging involves fund managers using forward exchange rate contracts to effectively lock in fixed currency rates on a rolling basis, to remove the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on the value of non-Australian dollar assets for an Australian investor.

Think of hedging as being similar to converting your Australian dollars into US dollars before you head to the United States, for example, because you want to lock in the current exchange rate in case the Australian dollar drops further in value before you take off for your holiday. It’s a form of insurance policy.

Buying that insurance typically comes at a cost. Hedged investment products often have a slightly higher management fee than unhedged ones.

The cost of hedging and the risks associated with execution are small, but the impact hedging can have on your portfolio can be significant depending on the relative movements in markets and currencies.

The right strategy for you

A good framework for reviewing whether or not to hedge your currency exposure is to consider first your appetite for risk and your investment time horizon and then to understand the individual nuances of exposures to international equities and bonds.

If you have a long way to go to retirement, you may be comfortable taking on the currency risk and accept the short-term currency volatility that unhedged exposures to international shares can bring.

Vanguard research studies have shown that currency movements tend to be neutral over the longer term.

Using hedging to screen out the currency fluctuations that affect international asset prices can be beneficial for investors seeking less volatility in the asset value.

Those closer to retirement, and those who are just more risk averse than others, will likely have a greater allocation to fixed income (bonds) already. Bonds are an effective ballast against equity market declines, and international bonds are no exception.

Currency hedged gains can also result in higher taxable distributions, so investors in hedged products should expect higher than average distributions.

It is generally accepted that in order to maintain international bonds’ defensive characteristics in a portfolio, they should be hedged, as their benefits could otherwise be overwhelmed by currency movements.

The decision on whether to hedge international equity exposures is not so straightforward, however.

Consider when global equity markets fall, and the Australian dollar weakens. If unhedged, you may experience smaller losses than a hedged portfolio. If the opposite scenario unfolds (markets rise and the dollar strengthens), the hedged portfolio appears ‘better’ than the unhedged version.

Currency movements, and how they move with equities, are difficult to predict, so investors should treat currency hedging as a way to manage risk, not to add return.

 

Duncan Burns is Chief Investment Officer for Asia-Pacific at Vanguard Australia, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

For more articles and papers from Vanguard Investments Australia, please click here.

 

  •   4 October 2023
  • 2
  •      
  •   
2 Comments
Julian
October 05, 2023

In sum, consider hedging if you have a short-term horizon, otherwise don't bother.

Warren Bird
October 08, 2023

Perhaps an article I wrote a while back might help people understand what hedging is and how it works.
https://www.firstlinks.com.au/managing-foreign-exchange-risk

The main skill that a fund manager needs in managing a hedged versus an unhedged fund is in relation to cash flow management. Knowing that a forward contract is coming up to be rolled and whether it is going to realise a gain or a loss is part of the overall management of the cash flows within a fund. Maybe a basis point or two in that, but of your manager is charging more for a hedged versus an unhedged fund then ask them why!

In any case, it's not hedging itself that costs you anything. As my article explains, for Australians almost all of the time currency hedging has made you money. That's not as clear cut these days as it used to be, but the point is that the difference between the local currency returns of global markets and hedged returns to A$ is the difference in short term interest rates between us and foreign markets. The hedging process itself doesn't cost anything other than the very small skill I noted earlier.

100% agree with the last comment in the article. Hedging or leaving unhedged is a risk management decision not a return enhancing decision. You don't make money from currency as such. An exchange rate is merely a number at which two currencies are exchanged.

How that exchange rate fluctuates is fairly unpredictable, particularly over the short to medium term (weeks and months out to 3-5 years in my thinking). But, historically, having some exposure to foreign currencies provides diversification benefits. We've seen this just recently, As global markets have been weak, the A$ has fallen which has cushioned the fall in value experienced by Australian investors in overseas shares.

To my mind that is the most important thing to research.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Understanding foreign exchange risk

Currency hedging for international equity portfolios

To hedge or not to hedge?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.