Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 114

Understanding foreign exchange risk

Investing overseas, whatever the asset, brings with it the reality of foreign currency exposure. Your return as an Australian investor comes from the performance of the asset in its local market and currency plus changes in the exchange rate versus the Australian dollar. Those changes can work against you or for you.

While some investors are happy to accept exchange rate fluctuations, for some it is an unwelcome source of volatility and uncertainty. That’s where currency hedging comes in. Most global bond funds are currency hedged, and many global share funds are also offered with hedged as well as unhedged options. This article explains how fund managers go about hedging exchange rate risk and the impact it has on how a portfolio performs.

There are two main ways of hedging foreign currency exposure in a managed fund: long term currency swaps or more commonly, foreign exchange forwards. This article focusses on the latter.

Hedging exchange rate risk

Let’s say a fund has A$100 to invest in a US$ asset. To do this it sells A$ and buys US$ to pay for the asset. At the time of writing the US$/A$ exchange rate was 77.5 cents, so the fund would buy US$77.50.

At the same time, the fund enters a contract to sell US$77.50 and buy back A$ at a date in the future, usually 3 to 12 months ahead. The exchange rate that is locked in will not be the same as today’s rate, but the difference is easy to calculate.

At present, the 3 month interest rate in the US is 0.2% pa, while in Australia it’s 2.2% pa. That’s an interest differential of 2.0% pa. So for a 3 month forward contract, the forward exchange rate is 0.5% lower (a quarter of 2.0%), which is 77.1 cents (I’ll explain why later).

Therefore, in addition to the US$ asset our fund also has a second asset, the forward currency contract. The combination means it doesn’t matter what the Australian dollar does over the next 3 months, the fund has locked in an exchange rate in 3 months’ time that differs from today’s rate by only 0.4 cents.

If over the next 3 months the A$ appreciates, say to 80 cents, then the value of the US asset to the fund will fall by 3.1% to A$96.88 (US$77.5 divided by 0.8). The US$ asset is worth less because the $A has appreciated. However, the forward contract will appreciate in value. In effect, the forward contract means that the fund could sell the US asset for cash and use the US dollars to buy A$ at the pre-agreed rate of 77.1 cents. For simplicity assume that the asset has not changed in value in US$ terms. Converting US$77.50 back to A$ at 77.1 cents means that the fund now has A$100.52 in it (77.5/77.1=1.005188).

The hedge has worked. Despite the rise in the A$ (fall in the US$), which would cause a 3.1% loss for an unhedged investment in US$, the hedged fund has experienced a return of +0.5%.

That figure is the interest differential between Australia and the US over the quarter. Some people are under the misconception that hedging costs you, but that’s not necessarily the case. Because the forward points are based on interest differentials, when you are hedging from a low rate country like the US to a higher yielding country like Australia, the hedged investor earns the positive interest differential.

Of course, if the A$ were to depreciate over the next 3 months – say to 70 cents – the hedge means the fund would not enjoy the rise in the A$ value of the US asset it has purchased. The unhedged value of the asset goes up to A$110.71, but the forward contract requires revaluation of the asset at 77.1 cents. Therefore, the fund value at the end of the period is once again A$100.52. Hedging means that you not only are protected against the downside that results from A$ appreciation, but you also miss out on the upside from currency depreciation. Your return is simply the change in foreign currency value of the asset (in this simple example that’s zero) and the forward points you locked in under your hedging contract.

Why the connection with interest rate differentials?

The way to hedge any risk is to have an offsetting liability against the asset that gives rise to the risk. An asset in US$ needs a liability in US$ to ensure no net exposure to changes in the value of the US$.

You could do this by borrowing money in US$, keeping your A$ in cash at home. You would pay the overseas interest rate on that debt, and earn the Australian interest rate on your cash.

A forward currency contract has the same economic impact. It creates a short term debt in US$ (you are obliged to make a payment when the contract expires) on which you pay the US short term interest rate; it also creates a short term asset in A$ (the currency you will be paid at expiry) on which you earn the Australian interest rate.

Rolling the hedging contract

In practice you don’t want to sell your foreign assets after only 3 months. Instead, the contract is closed out and settled based on the difference between the forward rate and the new spot rate after the initial 3 month period. In the example above where the A$ rises to 80 cents, the contract to sell US$77.50 at an exchange rate of 77.1 cents is closed out at a profit of A$3.64. The fund now holds the foreign asset revalued to A$96.88 and A$3.64 in cash – ie a portfolio value of $100.52.

In the situation of a fall in the A$, the end result is once again a portfolio valued in A$ at A$100.52. However, the fund needs to cover a loss on the forward contract, which at a 70 cent exchange rate amounts to A$10.20. In this case the fund would need to sell some of the US asset to get the cash to make this payment.

In reality, managed funds will keep a domestic bank account to have funds available to settle forward contracts. They also have a portfolio of foreign assets, which are paying income or have maturing assets that provide liquidity when needed.

Hedging through the use of forwards thus requires liquidity management, to ensure that the fund has cash available when needed to settle on forward contracts that go ‘out of the money’.

Final comment

A real world example may help to demonstrate how forward hedging plays out. Over the past 12 months the global government bond market has returned 4.1% measured in the local currency of each market. Unhedged, that is in A$ terms, global bonds delivered 12.2%, because the depreciating A$ has added 8.1% over the 4.1%. The same portfolio hedged into A$ has not enjoyed that currency appreciation, but has still returned 6.7%, well above the foreign currency outcome. The difference reflects the average +2.6% interest differential between Australia and global markets over the past year which is picked up via the hedging process.

Far from costing you, currency hedging for an Australian investor is a value-enhancing process.

 

Warren Bird is Executive Director of Uniting Financial Services, a division of the Uniting Church (NSW & ACT). He has 30 years’ experience in fixed income investing, including 16 years as Head of Fixed Interest at Colonial First State. He also serves as an Independent Member of the GESB Investment Committee. This article is general education and does not consider any investor’s personal circumstances.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Does currency hedging provide an edge?

To hedge or not to hedge?

Benefits of holding gold in Australian dollars

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.