Home / 189

Monica's Q&A on $1.6 million super rules

[Editor’s Note: Monica’s article last week generated many comments on the website and questions by email. She has kindly agreed to address most of these, but with her heavy workload due to the super changes, Monica will probably not be able to respond directly to further questions and Cuffelinks is not licensed to provide personal financial advice.

Readers are welcome to make further comments but those with specific issues should consider registering for Monica’s webinar (payment required) where more answers will be provided].

Monica’s responses to questions raised from her article “Navigating super law changes with confidence”.

Gary: I must be missing something. Many experts say things like “Amounts above the cap need to be moved to the accumulation phase or taken out as a lump sum.” I thought any amount could be left in an SMSF and if the balance is above $1.6 million, an actuary will determine how much tax is payable. There is no ability to segregate, but nor is there a requirement to move money out to an accumulation account. It can stay in one account.

Monica: It is the ATO that will calculate the notional earnings on the amount in excess of the $1.6 million transfer balance cap. The tax payable on the notional earnings is 15% for 2017/2018 and is imposed on the notional earnings from the date of the contravention until the date the excess is removed from the pension account. An SMSF member with a superannuation balance in excess of $1.6 million, who is receiving a pension, will not be permitted to use the segregated method. There is no restriction on the amount of money you can have in an accumulation account.

 

Gordon: From what I understand an SMSF member can have one accumulation account and multiple pension accounts. So I’m assuming any excess over $1.6 mil is transferred from the pension account(s) to the accumulation account. What I’m wanting to know is if new Pension documentation needs to replace the existing ones?

Monica: You are correct in that an SMSF member can have one accumulation account and multiple pension accounts where the combined total of the pension accounts do not exceed the $1.6 million transfer balance cap. New documentation will be needed if the capital amount in a pension account has changed due to the transfer balance cap.

 

Alan: Further to the above comment, if the amount in total is over the $1.6 million and not segregated, the process is the actuarial report to determine the tax payable each year. In this circumstance is the amount of $1.6 million capped and not allowed to be indexed each year?

Monica: Please be aware that you can only have up to $1.6 million in retirement phase from 1 July 2017. Only members with up to the $1.6 million superannuation balance can use the segregated method for their pension account. An actuary can be used to calculate the proportion of the unsegregated assets that are funding the accumulation phase and pay tax accordingly. Also, once a member has reached their $1.6 million transfer balance cap, they are not entitled to any increase in the indexed amount of the cap.

 

Rick: Firstly, if a SMSF currently has segregated accounts with two pensions which add up to more than $1.6m, the excess has to be transferred to accumulation. If one of those pensions is 100% tax free component, how is this accounted for in ensuing years? This is important because 100% tax free pensions are passed tax free to non dependants on death.

Monica: If you have multiple pension accounts, you can elect from which pension account you wish to move assets to your accumulation account. Therefore, members under the age of 60 may prefer to commute the pension with the higher taxable component to minimise the tax payable on their pension income. Just remember that once a member has more than the $1.6 million superannuation balance, they will not be able to apply the segregated method to their pension from 1 July 2017. The individual pension accounts can continue to maintain their own tax free and taxable components. The pension that is 100% tax free will remain that way from 1 July 2017.

 

Rick: Secondly, can a fund decide to transfer excess assets from pension to accumulation at any time up to 30 June and lock in the CGT concession (or not, if it is in a loss position), or must it be done on 30 June?

Monica: If your SMSF is using the segregated method, you can choose when you want to move an asset from the segregated pool to the accumulation pool. The CGT relief can apply from the date the asset is moved. The cost base of the elected asset will be reset on the date the asset is moved. If your SMSF is using the unsegregated method, then the CGT relief and cost base reset will apply on 30 June 2017.

 

Rick: Thirdly, if segregation is not allowed after 30 June, does the $1.6m increase/decrease in value in accordance with the overall fund’s performance? Are cash flows into (eg contributions) and out of (eg pension payments) taken into consideration when calculating the ongoing value of the $1.6m. Or does the $1.6m remain constant?

Monica: The contributions into your accumulation account and pension payments from your pension account do not alter your transfer balance account. They are not treated as credits or debits in the account.

 

RB: Is it correct that anything in excess of $1.6m pension cap after 1/7/17 i.e. in accumulation has to be removed from being held in superannuation on the death of a spouse if the reversionary beneficiary has in excess of the $1.6m already? I understand the $1.6m from the deceased spouse could be held in the remaining spouse’s accumulation account. Do you have to continue to take the minimum % from the deceased spouse’s pension?

Monica: A death benefit pension received by a reversionary, dependant beneficiary will count towards the dependant’s transfer balance account. It will count 12 months after the deceased’s date of death if it is a reversionary pension. If it is a non-reversionary pension, then it will count on the date the death benefit is paid to the dependant. If the combined value of the dependant’s pension account and the reversionary death benefit pension account exceeds $1.6 million, then the dependant can reduce either of the pensions and pay the excess as a lump sum benefit. If the deceased’s superannuation has to be reduced/commuted to accumulation phase, then it cannot remain in the dependant’s accumulation account. It must be paid out otherwise it will contravene the regulatory requirement to cash the death benefit as soon as practicable. If the dependant’s pension account has already reached $1.6 million, then the dependant cannot receive a reversionary death benefit pension without reducing their pension account to below $1.6 million. This means any excess of the death benefit must be paid out as a lump sum and cannot be maintain in the dependant’s accumulation account.

In answer to your second question, you will have to continue to meet the minimum pension payment requirement of both pensions.

 

John: Does the deceased’s pension remain in pension mode (ie zero tax) for the 12 months after death?

Monica: Yes, if the deceased was in receipt of a pension that will revert to a nominated dependant beneficiary.

 

Bruce: Hi Monica, My future investment plans depend greatly on the following:

a) Excluding partial commutations, post 2017 if the value of assets in my pension account fall below $1.6m (e.g. another GFC) under what circumstances can I transfer money in from my accumulation account to bring the balance back to $1.6m?

Monica: You cannot top-up your $1.6 million transfer balance in any way if your pension account experiences poor investment performance or is reduced due to pension drawn downs. Partial commutation is the only way that your transfer balance cap can be reduced. Of course, situations such as fraud, bankruptcy claw backs, and family law splits can also reduce your transfer balance account.

b) Can I segregate my superannuation holdings into two separate accounts – pension and accumulation – so that they are treated independently?

Monica: From 1 July 2017, you can only use the segregation method if your superannuation account balance is below $1.6 million and your pension account balance is also below $1.6 million.

If (a) is not possible I shall need to adopt a very conservative investment policy for funds in the pension phase.

If (b) is possible, I can consider stable income investments in my pension account and growth investments such as equities in my accumulation account.

Monica: Perhaps speak to a financial adviser on how to position your assets.

Given that members of defined benefit schemes are guaranteed no reduction in their pension payments during their lives, it would seem unfair for the government to treat self funded retirees differently. There is a good chance that some pension accounts will be adversely affected by financial events over the next 30 years or so.

 

Monica Rule is an SMSF Specialist and she will be running a webinar on the superannuation changes on 23 February 2017. For more information, see www.monicarule.com.au. This article is an understanding of the rules current at the time of writing, this article is not personal financial advice and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

RELATED ARTICLES

Final sprint to three major super changes

Five urban myths about super changes

Navigating super law changes with confidence

14 Comments

Mark

April 16, 2017

Hi, if a grandchild that is a minor receives a death benefit pension as a financial dependent on a grandparent (ie not a child pension) Is the grandchilds tranfer balance cap impacted given there is no requirement to cash the pension out at age 25?

Tim Lane

February 13, 2017

With regard to real property assets in an SMSF and total balance inclusive of property close to or exceeding $1.6M cap, would it be preferable this year to have an independent valuation of the property on file assessing the value and the market rent?

@SMSFCoach

February 14, 2017

Not only preferable but possibly compulsory as you have to value assets at current market value for $1.6m limit. The ATO will be watching the valuations of property closely.

John Wilson

February 12, 2017

Monica,
I'm not sure I agree with your response to Rick's question about selecting which pension is reduced to transfer excess over $1.6m to accumulation.

You answered the question with a reference to an under 60, and said to commute the pension with highest % pre-tax.

However, I think it is irrelevant how much pretax there is in a pension or accumulation while the "owner" is alive. It only becomes relevant in calculating death duties when the funds are passed to a non-dependant beneficiary. It seems to me that it would be preferable to leave the maximum pre-tax funds within pension mode where they will be decreased each year by the compulsory minimum % pension. That would ultimately reduce the death duties payable.

My comment above assumes that both accumulation and pension funds are treated the same way in the hands of a beneficiary. Is that the case?

John Wilson

@SMSFCoach

February 14, 2017

John remember that earnings on funds in accumulation phase get added to the taxable component so this may defeat your strategy. Depends if earnings rate of your investments exceeds your minimum drawdown %.

Keith Ralph

February 10, 2017

I hold both defined benefit and pension type superannuation with the total of both well over the 1.6M cap, how do I value the defined benefit portion as a lump sum?

@SMSFCoach

February 14, 2017

Keith I believe the rule will to multiply your DB annual pension by a factor of 16 to get the capital value to be counted in the $1.6m. Ask your provider for clarification.

Bruce

February 09, 2017

Hi Graham
Looking forward to the answer to CF's question. For investors whose pension accounts are over $1.6m I am struggling to understand the legislation.

On the one hand by 30 June 2017 we are required to move any balance above $1.6m into an accumulation account. On the other hand your experts are saying that if you have over $1.6m in your pension account you cannot segregate the assets into a pension and an accumulation account.

Furthermore, in order to achieve the $1.6m cap may be difficult if you have several pension accounts and a defined benefit pension. If your assets are in equities and there is a sharemarket correction on 30 June you could find that your pension fund ends up being only $1.4m.

CF

February 09, 2017

'Can I segregate my superannuation holdings into two separate accounts – pension and accumulation – so that they are treated independently?'

Is this assertion correct?
What can be done is to establish a separate fund for the accumulation amount and leave the $1.6m in the pension fund. I.E. Two funds as opposed to two accounts in the same fund.
In this way one can 'segregate' the funds?

Wit ha low cost SMSF admin provider being less than $1,000 PA it could make sense to consider this. I'm surprised that there has been little comment about this strategy. Maybe I'm mistaken?

Graham Hand

February 09, 2017

Hi CF, we expect to publish an article on this subject next week.

Graham Hand

February 05, 2017

Thanks for the question, JK. Monica is especially busy with all the changes underway, and may not be able to respond directly to more questions for a while.

JK

February 05, 2017

With reference to Monica's statement 'reversionary pensions are not counted towards the cap until 12 months after the deceased member's death', would it be possible to advise what will happen in the following circumstances-similar to our own and I suspect many others where a couple both have DB pensions and both have smsf accounts.

Assume John has a DB pension of $60k and $1m in super whilst partner Mary has a DB pension of $40k and $800k in super. On the death of the first partner, the surviving partner gets 60% of the passing partner's DB pension.

Regardless of which partner dies first, there is ZERO capacity for any of the passing partners smsf super to remain in pension phase.

So the question is that if the surviving partner can continue with a reversionary pension for the next 12 months, can the passing partner's super then be rolled back into accumulation phase or must it leave super altogther? Since super is an individual account then my core asumption is that there is no way that the passing partner's super can remain in super.

The answer has obvious implications for Estate planning, at least in my circumstances where our current wills and Death benefit nominations are directed to each other whilst the idea was to pass any remaining super to our adult non dependent children with options for them to establish discretionary testamentary trusts.

Of course I will be seeking advice of this from my financial planner but your opinion would be appreciated please.

@SMSFCoach

February 14, 2017

Jk, there are some strategies now being explored to keep more of the deceased spouses benefit in super. One is for the surviving spouse to comute their non-DB pension to accumulation so they can receive the pension benefit from the deceased spouse and keep as much as possible in Super. Please seek personal advice.

Tasha

May 11, 2018

Hi Monica

What happen if a pension account hold more than $1.6m after the 30th of June 2017.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirees facing steep increases for basic items

ASFA has updated its tables on how much money is needed for a 'comfortable' or 'modest' lifestyle in retirement, but there are some prices rising well ahead of inflation.

Adele Ferguson on ‘Banking Bad’ and weaving magic

The journalist most responsible for the calling of the Royal Commission takes care not to be roped in by everyone with a complaint to push. It takes experienced judgement to gather the right information.

Let’s stop calling them ‘bond proxies’

With cash and term deposit rates at all-time lows, and fixed interest bonds not much better, investors are looking for ‘bond proxies’ to deliver more income. But is ‘proxy’ a misnomer, and what are they anyway?

Six warning bells against property spruikers

Property spruikers use common techniques, and con men will increasingly target older people who feel they do not have enough financial independence for their retirement years.

Helping your children build their super

It has become more difficult to build large superannuation balances with contribution caps and more people paying off home loans for longer. How can wealthy parents help their adult children?

RateSetter

banner

Sponsors

Alliances

Special eBooks

Specially-selected collections of the best articles 

Read more

Earn CPD Hours

Accredited CPD hours reading Firstlinks

Read more

Pandora Archive

Firstlinks articles are collected in Pandora, Australia's national archive.

Read more