Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 63

How much money do you need to retire?

A common question is “how much do I need to retire?” Unfortunately, it’s impossible to give a simple answer because the amount of money needed depends on a wide range of variables that include how long you will live, the state of your health, the rate of inflation, the earnings on the assets you own and how often your children put their hands out for help.

A rule of thumb

A good rule of thumb is that you need capital of 15 times your planned expenditure. For example, if you require $40,000 a year when you retire, you should be trying to accumulate $600,000 in financial assets.

A bonus is our generous welfare system, that allows a couple to live in a luxury mansion, have more than $700,000 in other assets and still get a part age pension and all the fringe benefits.

Furthermore, as your assets diminish, you qualify for a larger pension, which tends to reduce the rate at which you run down your portfolio.

One of the best ways to boost the money you will have in retirement is to work a little longer and because of the way compounding works the benefits can be dramatic. Consider a person who is aged 58 and who has $300,000 in superannuation. If they retired immediately they would be lucky if their superannuation lasted to age 66 if they withdrew $40,000 a year and it earned 7%. However, working just two more years full time to age 60 would mean two more years of growth and contributions – by age 60 the balance could be $400,000. Their money may then last till age 72, or six years longer for working another two.

That is probably still way short of what they will need, so let’s recalculate the numbers on the assumption they will work to age 65. If they started with $400,000 at age 60, and salary sacrificed the maximum allowable of $35,000 a year, they should have $750,000 at age 65.

This would probably last them for life.

Other benefits of working longer

There is a growing consensus that working longer is not just good for your pocket, it’s also good for your health. A recent study by the UK-based Institute of Economic Affairs and the Age Endeavour Fellowship, titled, Work Longer, Live Healthier: The Relationship Between Economic Activity, Health And Government Policy, shows there is a small boost in health immediately after retirement but that, over the longer term, there is a significant deterioration.

It suggests retirement increases the likelihood of suffering from clinical depression by 40% and the chance of having at least one diagnosed physical condition by about 60%. The probability of taking medication for such a condition rises by about 60% as well, according to the findings. People who are retired are 40% less likely than others to describe themselves as being in very good or excellent health.

At first glance this recent research appears to contradict the work done by Sing Lin, Ph.D, which was based on the number of pension cheques sent to retirees of Boeing Aerospace. It showed that the average lifespan for people who retired at 50 was 86, whereas those who retired at age 65 had an average lifespan of 66.8. This apparent paradox is not hard to explain. The Boeing study pointed out that those who resigned at a relatively young age did not sit around and do nothing. They worked at a slower pace at jobs they found fulfilling and stimulating.

There is a wealth of other research that shows that happy and active retirees have emotional and financial security as well as a broad range of interests. A person who is confident enough in their future to leave a career with a major corporation at age 50 is more likely to have this than one who hangs on to age 65 because there is nothing else in their life. In life, and in your investment portfolio, diversification is the key. And making sure you have enough money to enjoy it.

 

Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. His website is www.noelwhittaker.com.au. His advice is general in nature and readers should seek their own professional advice before making any financial decisions.

 

5 Comments
Andrew
May 24, 2014

These factors assume a constant rate of return. Returns are hugely variable, a condition made more acute by the sequence of returns risk. If you want to ensure your assets aren't exhausted before you are, you need upwards of 30x (based on research regarding safe withdrawal rates in Australia). However, if you are fortunate enough to be born in the right year (which determines the market you retire in to), then it can be as low as 8x. Einstein said 'make things simple, but not too simple', Friedman said 'never try to walk across a river because it is, on average, only four feet deep'. Our use of averages makes things too simple, and leads us to unknowingly accept risks. 15? Could be half that, could be twice that.

Jason
May 23, 2014

Using multiples of 15 16 17 etc is too simplistic and is technique left over from the 1980's. There are a range of online calculators that can be used these days. Used realistic assumptions and be exact on living expenses and you'll get a result closer to your own individual circumstances. A far better approach is to seek independent advice and a financial planner should be easily able to tell you the "number" required.

Michael
May 25, 2014

Andrew, I think Noel may have included access to the pension in his figures, he is never far off the mark, we would need to know what the assumptions were

Ramani Venkatramani
May 23, 2014

Noel's article rightly steers us away from the monetary fixation that has long ailed the adequacy debate. Granted that the wealth management and advisory sectors are behaviourally programmed to focus on money, it is time we considered factors no less critical to a contented - as distinct from merely materially enriched - twilight life.

While money is necessary, it is not sufficient. Health, family and friends dominate the scene. Inability to cope with declining faculties, potential and actual loss of near and dear ones, the trusted busting the trust, grasping relatives more interested in inheritance: the prospective retiree is exposed to risks when physically and emotionally vulnerable.

Our system prepares the young for getting into the bandwagon of work. The old are left to fend for themselves getting off it.

A holistic system will assist in developing core friendships and interests beyond work, and help manage expectations around the inevitable volatility of outcomes.

My 94-year old mother’s face lights up when friends and family visit. Money has nothing to do with it.

Mangling the famous one liner, 'In retirement, it is just not the money, stupid!'

Mary McLaughlin
May 23, 2014

I don't wish to argue against the joys of retirement but the Sing Lin "work" is not a credible reference; Boeing issued a debunk in 2004.

www.boeing.com/companyoffices/empinfo/benefits/pension/seminars/Rumor.pdf

Kind regards.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

20k now or 50k later? What’s driving decisions to withdraw super?

Retirement adequacy: COVID means we need to work longer

How to improve retirement outcomes for women

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.