Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 207

When no decision is the right one for super

Superannuation is awash with choices and opportunities to engage with your retirement savings.

You can usually choose which fund you want to contribute to. You can choose from an array of investment options, salary sacrifice extra contributions or make voluntary contributions from your take home pay. You can even choose to split your super contributions with your spouse, perhaps the ultimate test of a successful domestic partnership.

Or, you can choose to do nothing … and let the default MySuper option of an established super fund do the work for you.

The majority of Australian workers actually choose the last option and accept the super fund selected by their employer.

Insights into super members

Vanguard recently partnered with one of Australia's largest multi-employer super funds, Sunsuper, on a major research project titled How Australia Saves. This research uses the same methodology that underpins a benchmark research publication in the US titled How America Saves which has been published for the past 17 years.

How Australia Saves covered the 1.1 million members of Sunsuper using member level transactional data for the five years ended June 2016. The objective of the research programme is to provide deeper insights into the member experience.

Given that it is mandatory for all employers to contribute 9.5% to super for their staff earning at least $450 per month, it is no surprise that the majority of people in the study did just that. The study showed 83% were invested in the Sunsuper lifecycle default option at June 2016 compared to 5% in the diversified balanced options. Only 12% took the self-directed route and selected their portfolio from the 30+ options on the menu.

Our super system is often questioned for what is perceived to be the lack of engagement of the majority of members.

The comparison is made with the system in the US called ‘401(k)’, which is a voluntary system - both for employers and employees - and hence US workers ostensibly need to be more ‘engaged’ in the decision to both join the fund and select their level of contributions. As a result, employers in the US and the retirement plan sponsors put a lot of effort into designing the 401(k) plan including options such as auto enrolment and auto escalation of contributions. Both of these options are on the rise in the US system and somewhat paradoxically rely on the inertia of investors to be increasingly effective.

Different outcomes from investment options

One of the key pieces of analysis in How Australia Saves was to understand how individual members fared within their various investment options.

For the majority of members invested in the default lifecycle option, the return was a very uniform 8.3% p.a. over the five years. The returns that members received were tightly clustered as you would expect from a pooled fund where most members had the same asset allocation. Any dispersion came from the Sunsuper option managing members’ risk as they get closer to retirement. People over age 55 receive a progressively more conservative asset allocation (less equities, more fixed income) in order to reduce their market risk as they approach retirement.

The second category of investment options was a single diversified fund that suited members' risk profile, including conservative, balanced or growth. These members had a wider range of returns from 5.9% to 8.3%.

The third category of investors were those who had opted to take the self-directed route.

The choice architecture of the super system is fundamentally important in a mandatory system as it gives people the ability to tailor their super portfolios based on their individual circumstances. But with this level of engagement comes responsibilities and risks, demonstrated with a much wider dispersion of returns from 5.1% to 8.4% p.a. for the self-directed members in our research sample.

The members who opted to select their own investment options may well have had good reasons for doing so and are comfortable with their decision. However, when looked at on a risk/return spectrum and in aggregate across the whole membership, the stark result is that the default lifecycle option delivered higher returns at a lower risk than those achieved by nearly all self-directed investors.

DIY super takes time

While involvement and engagement with your super fund are generally regarded as a fundamentally good thing there is a flip side, as people who set up a self-managed super fund understand all too well. The onus is on you to monitor and adjust your portfolio as markets inevitably move around.

One of the advantages of the default and the diversified options of large super funds is that the portfolios are implemented and monitored by the investment professionals that work for the fund. The asset allocation is regularly rebalanced, for example, to stay within the tolerances the fund has set.

When you take the self-directed route the portfolio management responsibilities rest with you. And managing your super portfolio is not most people's full-time job and neither should it be. There are plenty of life's short-term priorities - the day job, raising families, studying, taking holidays - that can easily turn the attention away from the super portfolio.

Not all default funds are created equal, so it pays to understand how your default fund compares and what the costs are. But one of the lessons out of the How Australia Saves research is that, if taking a direct hand in managing your investment portfolio inside super doesn’t appeal to you, letting the MySuper default system work for you may be one of the best decisions you never have to make.

 

Robin Bowerman is Head of Market Strategy and Communications at Vanguard Australia. This article is general information and does not address the circumstances of any individual.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to enjoy your retirement

Amid thousands of comments, tips include developing interests to keep occupied, planning in advance to have enough money, staying connected with friends and communities ... should you defer retirement or just do it?

Results from our retirement experiences survey

Retirement is a good experience if you plan for it and manage your time, but freedom from money worries is key. Many retirees enjoy managing their money but SMSFs are not for everyone. Each retirement is different.

A tonic for turbulent times: my nine tips for investing

Investing is often portrayed as unapproachably complex. Can it be distilled into nine tips? An economist with 35 years of experience through numerous market cycles and events has given it a shot.

Rival standard for savings and incomes in retirement

A new standard argues the majority of Australians will never achieve the ASFA 'comfortable' level of retirement savings and it amounts to 'fearmongering' by vested interests. If comfortable is aspirational, so be it.

Dalio v Marks is common sense v uncommon sense

Billionaire fund manager standoff: Ray Dalio thinks investing is common sense and markets are simple, while Howard Marks says complex and convoluted 'second-level' thinking is needed for superior returns.

Fear is good if you are not part of the herd

If you feel fear when the market loses its head, you become part of the herd. Develop habits to embrace the fear. Identify the cause, decide if you need to take action and own the result without looking back. 

Latest Updates

Economy

The paradox of investment cycles

Now we're captivated by inflation and higher rates but only a year ago, investors were certain of the supremacy of US companies, the benign nature of inflation and the remoteness of tighter monetary policy.

Shares

Reporting Season will show cost control and pricing power

Companies have been slow to update guidance and we have yet to see the impact of inflation expectations in earnings and outlooks. Companies need to insulate costs from inflation while enjoying an uptick in revenue.

Shares

The early signals for August company earnings

Weaker share prices may have already discounted some bad news, but cost inflation is creating wide divergences inside and across sectors. Early results show some companies are strong enough to resist sector falls.

Property

The compelling 20-year flight of SYD into private hands

In 2002, the share price of the company that became Sydney Airport (SYD) hit 80 cents from the $2 IPO price. After 20 years of astute investment driving revenue increases, it sold to private hands for $8.75 in 2022.

Investment strategies

Ethical investing responding to some short-term challenges

There are significant differences in the sector weightings of an ethical fund versus an index, and while this has caused some short-term headwinds recently, the tailwinds are expected to blow over the long term.

Investment strategies

If you are new to investing, avoid these 10 common mistakes

Many new investors make common mistakes while learning about markets. Losses are inevitable. Newbies should read more and develop a long-term focus while avoiding big mistakes and not aiming to be brilliant.

Investment strategies

RMBS today: rising rate-linked income with capital preservation

Lenders use Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities to finance mortgages and RMBS are available to retail investors through fund structures. They come with many layers of protection beyond movements in house prices. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.