Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 35

Painful transition to FOFA will pay off in the long term

The Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms have overhauled the way financial advisors operate, to the long term benefit of financial advisors and the major banks. FOFA came into effect on 1 July 2013, and aims to reduce conflicts of interest within the financial planning and investment advice industry. The legislation has fundamentally changed the way financial advisors are remunerated for their services. Consequently, some advisors have come under significant pressure, while others have capitalised on opportunities to strengthen their business models and emphasise value propositions. Meanwhile, the major banks are following developments closely, ready to pick up the pieces – as they tend to do when a part of the financial sector is set to disintegrate.

The basics of FOFA

FOFA has introduced a ban on commission payments. Previously, financial advisors would receive a commission on the sale of retail financial products, such as investment schemes and insurance policies, to retail clients. This commission would be paid by the product provider. Thus, retail customers themselves did not have to pay directly for financial advice. Rather, the financial advisor would inform them on a product, sign the clients up and receive a commission from the upstream institution. Essentially, the advisors were part of the upstream cost structure and were incentivised to push through as many products as they could, regardless of a client’s financial situation. The ban on commission payments, along with the introduction of a fiduciary duty, has changed this. Subject to grandfathering on some existing payments, financial advisors now have to receive upfront payments for their services directly from clients, and it is now law that they act in the best interest of clients.

The fundamentals of financial planning and investment advisory operations have not changed. The success of these businesses is still underpinned by the quality of advice and the established relationships between clients and advisors, and between advisors and financial institutions. The FOFA reforms only apply to advisors working with retail clients — that is, clients that are not classified as wholesale or sophisticated investors. What has changed is the remuneration of retail advisors. The model will now largely move towards a salary-based package for advisors. The days of cap-free and trailing commissions are all but over.

Effect of fee-for-service

Financial advisors have had over a year to adjust their platforms. In early 2012, the Federal Government announced that the reforms would be compulsory from July 2013. Many firms implemented the fee-for-service model much earlier (notably NAB, which began implementation in 2008). The performance of advisors that introduced a fee-for-service model before FOFA became mandatory suggests that demand is unlikely to plummet due to the reforms. However, the demographics of the markets for financial advisors are expected to change, and the long-term effects of the legislation on the financial planning and investment advice industry remain unclear.

The reforms create an opportunity for savvy advisors with established reputations. The legislation improves the quality of financial advice because it removes the patent conflict of interest that existed previously. It also attracts clients previously put off by the feeling that a financial advisor was just another salesman. Overall, IBISWorld expects the industry to continue its healthy growth path over the five years through 2018-19.

The changing pay structure is spooking some advisors, who have turned to the big banks for security. The banks have started to consolidate their financial planning businesses by acquiring smaller boutique advisories that depended on the commission structure. The Big Four banks are still able to offer free financial advice as part of their overall value proposition, spreading the related costs across their traditional products. Furthermore, some advisors with strong ties to particular institutions, such as superannuation firms or insurance underwriters, have been able to find refuge with these establishments. The FOFA reforms offer the banks an opportunity to further diversify their businesses and reduce their dependence on mortgage lending.

Although it may be painful, FOFA demands higher professionalism, improves client confidence and presents opportunities for the banking sector and reputable advisors. The cleansing effects of the legislation are expected to outweigh the costs in the long term, especially as the wealth of the general public continues to grow.

 

Andrei Ivanov is Industry Analyst, IBISWorld, and Tim Stephen is Industry Research Manager, IBISWorld. IBISWorld is Australia’s best-known business information corporation. Related industry reports include K6419b Financial Planning and Investment Advice.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The state of play in the funds management industry

The dynamics of the Australian superannuation system

Managed funds reign over noisy neighbours, the SMSFs

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.