Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 553

The potential and perils of increasing franking credits

We have all borrowed to fund large purchases, and, sometimes, not so large. We are told that debt is bad. We try and pay back our loans and credit cards as quickly as possible. But not all debt should be considered bad. With careful planning, debt has the potential to be ‘good’.

In Australia, investors who borrow to buy property benefit from a tax regime that allows them to reduce their taxable income by losses they incur from interest payments and other investment costs for the property they have borrowed to invest in. This tax benefit has been in the news recently, as it always seems to be following a change to tax laws or whenever there is an election.

Like these property investors, Australian equity investors can also borrow to invest. This gearing combines the investors’ funds with borrowed funds making the amount available for investing larger, so thereby magnifying returns (in both directions). Gearing is not suitable for everyone, and we recommend you speak with your financial adviser. Below we provide two potential benefits of gearing as well as introducing a simple and convenient way to gear Australian equities.

But first let’s understand gearing and its impact on an Australian equity portfolio.

The modelled table below illustrates how gearing can affect investment gains and losses in comparison to a fund that is not geared.

Table 1: Modelled performance of a geared and ungeared fund

The table above considers gains and losses in the value of the underlying assets. It does not consider income or associated franking credits. The table assumes that the loan is not increased or decreased as the asset values change.

If you also consider income, you can see another potential benefit of gearing Australian equities. Because you have increased the amount invested, you also increase the amount of dividends you receive, thereby increasing your franking credits.

Table 2: Modelled dividends of a geared and ungeared fund

Now, if we consider the costs of borrowing, which the simple examples above do not, when gearing the dividends are used for interest payments associated with the costs of borrowing. It is important to note that for tax purposes these costs are deducted from the dividends received and do not impact the associated franking credits. The franking credits associated with the dividends received remain. In the example above, irrespective of the borrowing costs, the franking credit would still be $60. In the example above, if the borrowing costs were $150. The taxable dividend would be reduced to $50, but the franking credit would still be $60, making the grossed-up dividend $110.

These are simple examples. Gearing is complex, but you can see the potential benefits it can provide, albeit with additional costs and an increased risk of losing money.

We think there are two ways investors can use gearing and fund managers are helping all types of investors including SMSFs increase their exposure to Australian equities. 

Potential benefit 1 – Wealth accumulation strategy

You can see above in Table 1 that gearing provides greater exposure to the share market and thus potential increased gains or losses compared to an ungeared portfolio. Additionally, geared Australian equity investors receive more associated franking credits than if they were not geared. There is no doubt gearing is riskier and has additional costs, so it is not for everyone, but with careful planning, it can be used as a part of an overall portfolio solution.

Potential benefit 2 - As a portfolio diversification tool

By gearing your Australian equities exposure, capital may be freed up to invest in other asset classes.

Think about an investor with $10,000. Putting all your eggs in one ‘asset’ basket may not be prudent risk management. Gearing allows investors to put a portion of their funds in one asset class, enhancing that exposure to the asset class, meaning they can use the leftover funds to invest in other asset classes.

In the table below, investor A retains their $10,000 allocation to Australian equities, but because they have geared, they have spare capital to allocate elsewhere.

Gearing can be difficult, but some fund managers do the work for you, creating ‘geared’ versions of their Australian equity funds. These funds combine investors' funds and borrow funds to invest in an underlying Australian equities strategy.

Gearing Australian equities may not be suitable for all investors. While it can have benefits, including the tax benefits associated with franking credits, undertaking a gearing and the potential associated benefits will also depend upon your attitude to risks and your personal situation.

 

Recently, VanEck launched the VanEck Geared Australian Equal Weight Fund (Hedge Fund) (ASX: GMVW) on the ASX. 

Russel Chesler is Head of Investments and Capital Markets at VanEck, a sponsor of Firstlinks. Russel is responsible for managing VanEck's Australian ETFs. This is general information only and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs. Any views expressed are opinions of the author at the time of writing and is not a recommendation to act.

For more articles and papers from VanEck, please click here.

 

  •   27 March 2024
  • 6
  •      
  •   
6 Comments
Neil
March 28, 2024

I would be interested to know what margin a geared Fund has to pay on the BBSW (and also, is the manager getting an extra fee on the work done to finance the loan). How does the cost compare with doing the gearing yourself by, for example, re-mortgaging your home? I have always avoided margin loans for this reason (plus the fact you are forced to sell when the market drops and you think the portfolio is still right for you).

Lyn
March 29, 2024

Russel, compliments on simple, concise article, well laid out charts. So straightforward 16-18yr old Maths students could understand if on Maths syllabus or young adults starting out to undertand just the Ungeared column re franking credit. Good using eg $5000 in Table 1 & 2, for young it's attainable from part-time job saving to make start with Share Lot, fees higher/share immaterial to principle of start on ladder, always figure used with mine once 16 on how to make shares work for them, and importantly, attainable. Put label of 'divide by 70 x 30' on calculator so got ingrained to quickly calculate franking credit on 'what if they pay .27c/share more next div? " sticking to 100% franked for ease, loving the Fr credit refund when legal control at 18 and the snowball rolled. Your charts would have been gem to stick above their desk.

NR
March 29, 2024

I've been using the CFS Geared Share fund for years (run by First Sentier Investors). The fund is internally geared with borrowing of approx cash + 1% (so says my adviser) and has delivered since inception (1997) c14%pa about 6% pa above the ASX100....and plenty of franked credits along the way. I've looked at other geared funds and ETFs and they haven't got anywhere near the returns of this fund...an ETF version would version would be great.

Steve Dodds
March 29, 2024

GEAR has had a total return of 14.8% over the past 10 years, vs 12.5% for CFS and 10% for the benchmark.

So it may be worth a look.

Dudley
March 30, 2024

"GEAR has had a total return of 14.8% over the past 10 years":

From: https://www.betashares.com.au/fund/geared-australian-equity-fund/#performance
= ((165.85% + 100%) / 100%) ^ (1 / ((DATEVALUE("27/03/2024") - DATEVALUE("30/04/2014")) / 365.25)) - 1
= 10.37% (using start and end values)

Similar result from: https://www.marketindex.com.au/asx/gear/advanced-chart

Note change of value around february 2020.

tom taylor
April 01, 2024

The reason most people are comfortable with gearing in property is if the market falls, provided you can meet the monthly repayments it is rare the bank will forclose or even demand you stump up more equity. Contrast that with shares and margin calls. If your shares lose all its value you have a total loss. Contrast that with real estate not REIT's.
The property retains some value even though it is essentially a nonfungible asset class.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why investors should consider adding private equity to portfolios

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

Why I dislike dividend stocks

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.