Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 553

The potential and perils of increasing franking credits

We have all borrowed to fund large purchases, and, sometimes, not so large. We are told that debt is bad. We try and pay back our loans and credit cards as quickly as possible. But not all debt should be considered bad. With careful planning, debt has the potential to be ‘good’.

In Australia, investors who borrow to buy property benefit from a tax regime that allows them to reduce their taxable income by losses they incur from interest payments and other investment costs for the property they have borrowed to invest in. This tax benefit has been in the news recently, as it always seems to be following a change to tax laws or whenever there is an election.

Like these property investors, Australian equity investors can also borrow to invest. This gearing combines the investors’ funds with borrowed funds making the amount available for investing larger, so thereby magnifying returns (in both directions). Gearing is not suitable for everyone, and we recommend you speak with your financial adviser. Below we provide two potential benefits of gearing as well as introducing a simple and convenient way to gear Australian equities.

But first let’s understand gearing and its impact on an Australian equity portfolio.

The modelled table below illustrates how gearing can affect investment gains and losses in comparison to a fund that is not geared.

Table 1: Modelled performance of a geared and ungeared fund

The table above considers gains and losses in the value of the underlying assets. It does not consider income or associated franking credits. The table assumes that the loan is not increased or decreased as the asset values change.

If you also consider income, you can see another potential benefit of gearing Australian equities. Because you have increased the amount invested, you also increase the amount of dividends you receive, thereby increasing your franking credits.

Table 2: Modelled dividends of a geared and ungeared fund

Now, if we consider the costs of borrowing, which the simple examples above do not, when gearing the dividends are used for interest payments associated with the costs of borrowing. It is important to note that for tax purposes these costs are deducted from the dividends received and do not impact the associated franking credits. The franking credits associated with the dividends received remain. In the example above, irrespective of the borrowing costs, the franking credit would still be $60. In the example above, if the borrowing costs were $150. The taxable dividend would be reduced to $50, but the franking credit would still be $60, making the grossed-up dividend $110.

These are simple examples. Gearing is complex, but you can see the potential benefits it can provide, albeit with additional costs and an increased risk of losing money.

We think there are two ways investors can use gearing and fund managers are helping all types of investors including SMSFs increase their exposure to Australian equities. 

Potential benefit 1 – Wealth accumulation strategy

You can see above in Table 1 that gearing provides greater exposure to the share market and thus potential increased gains or losses compared to an ungeared portfolio. Additionally, geared Australian equity investors receive more associated franking credits than if they were not geared. There is no doubt gearing is riskier and has additional costs, so it is not for everyone, but with careful planning, it can be used as a part of an overall portfolio solution.

Potential benefit 2 - As a portfolio diversification tool

By gearing your Australian equities exposure, capital may be freed up to invest in other asset classes.

Think about an investor with $10,000. Putting all your eggs in one ‘asset’ basket may not be prudent risk management. Gearing allows investors to put a portion of their funds in one asset class, enhancing that exposure to the asset class, meaning they can use the leftover funds to invest in other asset classes.

In the table below, investor A retains their $10,000 allocation to Australian equities, but because they have geared, they have spare capital to allocate elsewhere.

Gearing can be difficult, but some fund managers do the work for you, creating ‘geared’ versions of their Australian equity funds. These funds combine investors' funds and borrow funds to invest in an underlying Australian equities strategy.

Gearing Australian equities may not be suitable for all investors. While it can have benefits, including the tax benefits associated with franking credits, undertaking a gearing and the potential associated benefits will also depend upon your attitude to risks and your personal situation.

 

Recently, VanEck launched the VanEck Geared Australian Equal Weight Fund (Hedge Fund) (ASX: GMVW) on the ASX. 

Russel Chesler is Head of Investments and Capital Markets at VanEck, a sponsor of Firstlinks. Russel is responsible for managing VanEck's Australian ETFs. This is general information only and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs. Any views expressed are opinions of the author at the time of writing and is not a recommendation to act.

For more articles and papers from VanEck, please click here.

 

6 Comments
tom taylor
April 01, 2024

The reason most people are comfortable with gearing in property is if the market falls, provided you can meet the monthly repayments it is rare the bank will forclose or even demand you stump up more equity. Contrast that with shares and margin calls. If your shares lose all its value you have a total loss. Contrast that with real estate not REIT's.
The property retains some value even though it is essentially a nonfungible asset class.

NR
March 29, 2024

I've been using the CFS Geared Share fund for years (run by First Sentier Investors). The fund is internally geared with borrowing of approx cash + 1% (so says my adviser) and has delivered since inception (1997) c14%pa about 6% pa above the ASX100....and plenty of franked credits along the way. I've looked at other geared funds and ETFs and they haven't got anywhere near the returns of this fund...an ETF version would version would be great.

Steve Dodds
March 29, 2024

GEAR has had a total return of 14.8% over the past 10 years, vs 12.5% for CFS and 10% for the benchmark.

So it may be worth a look.

Dudley
March 30, 2024

"GEAR has had a total return of 14.8% over the past 10 years":

From: https://www.betashares.com.au/fund/geared-australian-equity-fund/#performance
= ((165.85% + 100%) / 100%) ^ (1 / ((DATEVALUE("27/03/2024") - DATEVALUE("30/04/2014")) / 365.25)) - 1
= 10.37% (using start and end values)

Similar result from: https://www.marketindex.com.au/asx/gear/advanced-chart

Note change of value around february 2020.

Lyn
March 29, 2024

Russel, compliments on simple, concise article, well laid out charts. So straightforward 16-18yr old Maths students could understand if on Maths syllabus or young adults starting out to undertand just the Ungeared column re franking credit. Good using eg $5000 in Table 1 & 2, for young it's attainable from part-time job saving to make start with Share Lot, fees higher/share immaterial to principle of start on ladder, always figure used with mine once 16 on how to make shares work for them, and importantly, attainable. Put label of 'divide by 70 x 30' on calculator so got ingrained to quickly calculate franking credit on 'what if they pay .27c/share more next div? " sticking to 100% franked for ease, loving the Fr credit refund when legal control at 18 and the snowball rolled. Your charts would have been gem to stick above their desk.

Neil
March 28, 2024

I would be interested to know what margin a geared Fund has to pay on the BBSW (and also, is the manager getting an extra fee on the work done to finance the loan). How does the cost compare with doing the gearing yourself by, for example, re-mortgaging your home? I have always avoided margin loans for this reason (plus the fact you are forced to sell when the market drops and you think the portfolio is still right for you).

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

An alternative asset class for income-seeking retirees

The pros and cons of short-term versus long-term investing

5 charts that should give investors hope amidst market turmoil

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.