Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 251

Rob Prugue’s spiritual super journey

Managing Editor's note: Rob Prugue is a leading figure in Australian funds management. He was most recently Senior Managing Director and CEO of Lazard Asset Management (Asia Pacific), responsible for the business across Asia. Rob is one of those executives and fund managers who always takes a broad view of the world. Conversations are not only about markets and economics but philosophy and social obligations, and he was actively involved in charity fund-raising. He retired after 15 years at Lazard to give himself a long sabbatical before considering his next role.

Part of this break from work includes an 800-kilometre walk along El Camino. The Camino de Santiago pilgrimage ends in the Spanish province of Galicia, believed to be the resting place of St James the Apostle. This has been a spiritual trail for pilgrims since medieval times and it has no real starting point. Rob thinks of his trip in thirds:

“The first third is one of physical exhaustion, or getting our bodies into its rhythm. The second third is about ‘letting go’, while the final third is about understanding what El Camino has taught us. I like this, not because I look forward to the final third, but because I too am learning to let go of certain things.”

This journey of self-discovery took a remarkable twist, as Rob describes in this extract from his blog (which can be followed here):

“As I entered this little stone chapel, I noticed it wasn’t a church after all, but a shrine. I asked the gardener to whom it was for, and he answered it was for Archangel Michael. Perfect, I thought. A place to pray for family and friends fighting for health.

A few hours later, I received a message from my brother-in-law in Lima, Peru. He said a few hours earlier, my 92-year-old mother’s heart just stopped. My beautiful mother, Norah Salkeld de Prugue, passed away on the morning of 24 April 2018 in Peru.

I now realise that my being compelled to enter the little stone chapel was no coincidence. My mother’s soul was speaking to me, asking me to come in to say goodbye. While my prayers were for family and friends, I interestingly enough did say an extra-long one for my lovely mother.

I still cannot believe this. As I later entered into Carrion, my final destination today, I immediately went to the lovely church, said a prayer, and lit a candle. A sister saw me weeping and asked if she could help. I told her the story and she said she would speak to the local priest. The nun made sure the evening service was in my mother’s honour. The priest and the town congregation were so very kind in giving that service in her name. The town people all came around to wish their sympathies. Truly generous hearts here in rural Spain.

Before you roll your eyes, I appreciate this is likely a coincidence. But perhaps, just perhaps, it’s my mother suggesting I continue and finish this 500-mile walk.” 

Then a few days later, this update:

“Clearly the Camino must think I’m one bad ass as only hours after my pulling myself up from my mother’s funeral half a world away, I learned that my sister-in-law, Paloma, had just passed away following her 13-year battle with breast cancer.” 

It's turning into quite a journey.

Earlier, Rob had sent me this email:

“Oddly enough, as well as reflecting on life, my reflections have been on superannuation. A recent article in The AFR about industry funds got me going. Here’s my thoughts from El Camino.”

As at 4 May, Rob had walked 590 kms, with another 210 to go. He's due to reach his destination by 11 May.

Superannuation: it should not be 'us versus them'

Coming to my second month of my three-month sabbatical, and now 200 kilometres into my 800-kilometre Way of St James (the Camino) here in Spain, I was hoping to find some sort of spiritual self-fulfilment through my daily routine of 30,000 steps. And while on this self-introspection, it took an opinion piece in The Australian Financial Review on 11 April 2018 titled Why Industry Funds Are Not So Super to remind me just how much superannuation is a part of me.

As Al Pacino said in Godfather 3, just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!

Peer rankings useless for superannuation

What bothered me most was less the continued division between industry and for-profit super providers, but the continued focus on peer rankings. In all my years of learning and working within superannuation, I have yet to find ANY academic book which suggests that the best way to immunise a pension liability (i.e. matching future assets to future pension liabilities) is by choosing a top quartile performer.

And while of course it’s true that returns do matter (to be precise, net of fees and net of taxes), pension liabilities are acyclical whilst asset returns are cyclical and subject to market forces. Peer performance rankings, therefore, are futile within superannuation.

Funds in net outflow compounds problem

This bee in my bonnet is equally founded on demographics, as an increasing number of both retail and industry funds are experiencing net outflows given baby boomers have already begun to retire. Once retired, pension immunisation is all the more important. The ability to forecast steady cash outflows off an increasingly cyclical economic environment is paramount in planning retirement years. Yet, the media and agents remain consumed on metrics that play no part in pension management. Perhaps this is due to the fact how within the financial services industry, wealth management is itself a big component therein.

Whatever the reason, superannuation is not wealth management, it’s about optimising assets around returns required to immunise pension liabilities. Pure wealth management, on the other hand, cares little about asset/liability immunisation.

Let’s move beyond political name-calling

My secondary beef is the obvious political affiliation intended behind their defining what is an ‘industry fund’ and what is a ‘for-profit fund’. Calling an industry fund a ‘union fund’ is naive. I neither belong to a union nor do I belong to a party, yet I have my super within a so called ‘union fund’. Having attended conferences run by both sides, I’ve always rolled my eyes when discourse turned to political affiliations. Who cares? If super fails, it will affect ALL tax payers as neither party will allow its retired voters to live in the streets. How we tax any fund may be politically aligned, but their policy for superannuation should be nonetheless apolitical.

I pose this piece not to continue to divide, but to hopefully remind us to challenge anyone who feels it necessary to divide superannuation funding into an ‘us versus them’ debate. What defines our industry isn’t ‘for profits vs not for profits’, but superannuation itself. Sadly, both sides are guilty of this division, and equally, both sides will need to come together if we are going to achieve our true purpose.

 

Rob Prugue was Senior Managing Director and CEO at Lazard Asset Management (Asia Pacific) for 15 years until March 2018. These opinions are his own.

 

3 Comments
Steve
May 06, 2018

David Whiteley would be thrilled by such comments. Meanwhile, out here in the real world, a lot of advisers are quite rightly sceptical about the tight relationship between asset consultants & industry funds (who direct members funds to Unions, unlike their competitors).

Maria
August 26, 2018

No, industry funds do not direct or syphon funds to unions as you suggest. What happens is that some directors are employee organisation nominated. These directors are paid directors fees, along with the employer nominated and independent directors. Once directors receive their directors fees they are free to do what they wish with the money. Some directors then give their fees to their affiliated trade-union or guild. It is their fees they receive and they are free to do with it as they wish, just as employer nominated directors are free to do as they wish with their directors fees.
Some employee nominated directors give their fees to the sponsoring trade unions, others keep the money. It is money they receive for performing directors duties, so why shouldn't they be allowed to hand it over to their sponsoring union, if that is what they choose?

Rod
May 03, 2018

Lovely to read and how valuable it is to get out of the usually stressful work routine and do such a walk... useful to be reminded that behind life and death is a BIG mystery!
Then perhaps we can come back to the old routine with a deeper insight, even a detachment, and perhaps do a better job overall.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

On franking, all public funds are not the same

Not all lifecycle funds are created equal

Should I pay off the mortgage or top up my superannuation?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.