Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 225

Quality ingredients improve both cooking and investing

The patient preparation of a home-cooked meal with carefully selected ingredients is a rewarding endeavor. Knowing what’s in the meal should make it healthier and well-balanced. Pre-packaged takeaway is convenient but usually less satisfying beyond the immediate need to relieve hunger.

Trends in investing are similar. Indices are essentially investment shopping lists prepared by someone else that save passive investors time and effort in deciding what to buy, or they give benchmark-aware fund managers a starting point to decide what to put in their trolleys.

Changes in investing habits

Yet in 2017, the number of stock market indices exceeded the number of stocks in the US, expanding the proverbial supermarket of investment ‘takeaway’ offerings.

Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-12/there-are-now-more-indexes-than-stocks

What does it say about our investment eating habits when the number of shopping lists exceeds the number ingredients? In our rush to embrace convenience, are we losing sight of selecting quality underlying ingredients and carefully preparing healthy, well balanced portfolios?

Many products in the new financial supermarket are built on the assumptions and ‘theories’ of markets, including that humans make rational economic decisions and that price should always reflect the intrinsic value of the investment. Yet humans, and therefore markets, are not perfectly rational, particularly in the short term.

The 2017 Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, awarded to Richard Thaler, recognised this as much, acknowledging his research which demonstrated,

“…that, unlike members of homo economicus, members of the species homo sapiens make predictable mistakes because of their use of heuristics, fallacies, and because of the way they are influenced by their social interactions.

Holding period returns

Value investing, like cooking, should be an exercise in careful selection, patience and conscious avoidance of biases. To this end, compelling research released last year from active management academics Martijn Kremers and Ankur Pareek looked at the relationship between holding period (duration), degree of ‘activeness’ and returns for thousands of US retail and institutional funds over nearly three decades. This sample set included US equity retail mutual funds from the largest database of returns, the Centre for Research in Security Prices (CRSP), and a sample of all aggregated institutional investor US equity portfolios as inferred from their quarterly 13F statements. It covered a 24-year period from 1990 to 2013 for retail and 1984 to 2012 for institutions.

Among high ‘active share’ mutual funds, those with patient investment strategies (average holding periods of more than two years) were able to generate average alpha of 2.05% per year in the study.

At the other end of the spectrum, irrespective of how dissimilar their portfolios were relative to their benchmarks, highly-traded mutual funds with short stock holding periods underperform, with average annual net alpha of negative 1.44%.

The lesson is that active investors must have conviction and be patient. What is good takes time to prepare and is best savoured, not quickly devoured. And the key to the success of high conviction, patient value investors is, funnily enough, … valuations.

Valuations at time of entry remain key

According to Bank of America Merrill Lynch analysis from 1971 to today, valuations at the time of purchase have explained 80-90% of returns from the S&P 500 over a 10-year horizon. The research, ironically, comes from a major investment bank which is part of an industry that prospers by encouraging short-term trading.

True value investors should focus on valuation as it maximises the chance of outperforming the market on a long-term basis. This can be hard to justify to investment oversight committees where peer comparison and human bias demand immediate action and results. It is understandable why so much of the retail and institutional funds management industry trends towards career-risk driven mediocrity and hugs the benchmark. Good investing, like good cooking, doesn’t benefit from having too many chefs in the kitchen. Too many investors trade too frequently, do not properly anchor assessments in fundamental, long-term reasoning, or fire their fund managers too quickly.

Cooking at home is more challenging as we become time poor, yet it is increasingly satisfying for the same reason. We believe patience and high conviction as sources of excess return and they are likely to persist due to the unchanging nature of human psychology.

 

Sam Morris is an Investment Specialist at Fidante Partners and Adrian Warner is CEO/CIO of Avenir Capital. Fidante is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Index funds invest in the bad and the good

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.