Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 65

Raising the pension age is no reason to panic

The raising of the pension age to 70 has caused quite a stir, indeed outrage, amongst working Australians. Is it really as bad as everyone is saying or are some important points being missed in this debate?

Just to be clear, I am not defending the Government or the Budget,  nor making a political statement, nor providing an opinion on policy. I am merely discussing how to work within a proposed framework.

Pension age set to go to 67

The age pension age is already legislated to increase to 67 over the next 10 years for those born after 1 January 1957, so if you are currently 57 or under, your pension age is 67 – that’s a fact.

Under the new proposal , those aged between 49 and 56 will see their pension age lifted to somewhere between 67.5 and 69.5 years of age, and it is anyone currently 48 or under who will cop the full three year increase in their pension age to 70.

Let me focus on this group. The oldest of this age range, the 48-year-olds, have 22 years until they turn 70. That’s 22 years to plan for this extra three years they will have to wait for their age pension.

A 48-year-old who has been working since, say, age 18 joined the workforce in 1984. Two years later in 1986, new industrial awards were established by the National Wage Case resulting in superannuation coverage for public sector employees of around 79%, and 68% for private sector employees by 1991. Then, in July 1992, in came the Superannuation Guarantee (SG) forcing employers to make super contributions on behalf of their employees, or pay a penalty.

Granted, it took 10 years for the contribution rate to move from an inadequate 3% to a better 9%, but suffice to say that most ‘employees’ currently in their 40s have been beneficiaries of the SG system for a large chunk of their working lives. Employees currently in their 30s have almost certainly been in receipt of some superannuation support all their working lives. And the 20-somethings – they’ve been getting the full 9% since the day they started work.

Point being, many 48-year-olds in the workforce today will, at the age of 67, have superannuation savings that has been accumulating for over 40 years. They are not like the 70-year-olds of today who haven’t had many years to benefit from the compulsory super system.

It’s your money, take charge

For those who do fall under the SG system, this Budget was a wakeup call; it’s time to stop ignoring your super and get interested in it. You have 22 or more years to turbo-charge your superannuation so that it can fund that extra three years before the age pension kicks in.

What do you need to do? Here’s a start:

  • Research or get advice to find the super fund that is best for you, taking into account investment options, fees and charges, insurance options and costs. You have the right to choose which fund your superannuation goes into.
  • Find any lost accounts, there are websites that assist with this. Once they have been found, claim it back and roll it into your fund of choice.
  • Amalgamate all your small accounts into one fund of choice.
  • Seek advice on appropriate asset allocation for your age and goals. Are you happy to outsource all investment decisions to fund managers, or do you prefer more control or to know exactly where your money is invested thus focussing on direct share investment? It is your money and you do have the choice.
  • Educate yourself.
  • Explore the possibility of salary sacrifice strategies with your adviser or accountant.

Superannuation, for many Australians under the age of 50, is likely to be their biggest pool of wealth other than their home by the time they retire and yet it still receives little attention.

Of course, there are many who are not covered by the SG system – self-employed people (sole traders, some contactors, partners in partnerships), those unable to work due to disability, illness or family commitments and the unemployed to name a few.

The superannuation system includes incentives for the self-employed to contribute by way of tax concessions. Some do, some don’t. Some put all profits and excess cash back into the business, effectively building an asset that becomes their retirement fund. For those self-employed who do not do anything to plan for their retirement, this Budget might be a reason to start thinking about it.

However, for those who are just unable to work or contribute to super for whatever reason, it is true this feels like a tough Budget. They will either be forced to work an additional three years - which at the age of 67 I imagine would feel like an eternity – or go on unemployment benefits. The system must look after these people.

But for the many employed people who ignore the additional 9-10% salary they receive in the form of superannuation contributions, and allow it to be either not paid at all, or lost, or all the decisions on it made by complete strangers, this Budget is a clear message to start taking an active interest in it.

Access age for superannuation

There have been a lot of reports and rumours swirling in the media that the Abbott Government is planning to raise the access age of superannuation. Joe Hockey has stated that there won’t be changes to superannuation in ‘this term’ of Government, but they are not promising no changes ever.

I think it is likely that taking lump sums from super will eventually be either disallowed or discouraged through tax penalties, or the age for access uplifted to 70. However, I would be very surprised if there wasn’t some sort of access in the form of an income stream for those in their 60s. This is merely my prediction, and if there were proposals to raise income stream access to age 70, I’d be writing to my local member in protest.

It’s important to remember that the age pension system is not there as a reward for a lifetime’s hard work, it is a safety net for those who - for whatever reason – are in need of it. We have a world class superannuation system; use it, don’t squander it.

 

Alex Denham was Head of Technical Services at Challenger Financial Services and is now Senior Adviser at Dartnall Advisers.

 

4 Comments
Martin
June 07, 2014

I think it's obvious that super should form a core part of anyone's retirement planning, however you've left me far from convinced that it's safe to set aside the sovereign risks inherent in SMSFs for anyone who wants to build enough wealth to let them retire early. General commentary is that early may soon mean before 65!

If I want to retire at 55 like my father (who only enjoyed 17 years of retirement despite the statistics), the safest strategy is to assume I need to fund 10 years retirement outside super. I have to pay 30% tax on sacrifices into super and frankly that is now too high for the risks that our current self centred bread of politicians find the super honey pot just too tastey to ignore for their tax and spend mentality.

Ramani
June 06, 2014

Thanks Alex for pooping the panic party peddled by short-term focused commentators (an extreme form being the media).
In preparing for the inevitable change following changes in longevity, we need to be careful not to resort to extreme fixation with averages, but also cater for those ill-served by our system (casuals, as pointed out; self-employed who are NOT subject to compulsion; those who by past occupations or poor health cannot wait some more for accessing their own nest eggs). Provided we introduce some flexibility (with stringent checks against abuse, of which there will be no shortage) we will be covering the field.
I think letting the self-employed determine their retirement destiny without compulsion is goofy at best and rank discrimination at worst. Imagine the pressures they have in building their business and managing short-term cash flows. It is like exempting some road users from compulsory road rules like speed limits. The inevitable collateral damage would be all the users, and public confidence.
Mandatory lobotomy for those who make policy, by removing their short term electoral cycle orientation, anyone?

Graham Wright
June 06, 2014

You present a great case for all but the casually employed. My concern is that casual employment may become a growth industry. Those casuals who can work the full week in multiple jobs will have to closely manage their super to ensure all entitlements are received and go to a single superannuation account. Those who work only a few hours/week/employer may not work sufficiently with one employer to get an entitlement.

You make the important point for all workers getting superannuation entitlements, it is time to take a greater interest in super accumulation and manage it for their own best long-term benefit. Govt provided retirement benefits ensure we can have a bed (hard mattress and thread-bare blankets) and a feed, no cigarettes, no beer and not too much take-away, and most certainly no wine or other good times.

Peter Grace
June 05, 2014

Spot on Alex, well written. Can you get the daily media circus to take notice.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Should access to super and pensions depend on life expectancy?

Longevity awareness and the three pillars

Do you plan to be a ‘have’ or a ‘have not’?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 606 with weekend update

The boss of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, UniSuper’s John Pearce, says Trump has declared an economic war and he’ll be reducing his US stock exposure over time. Should you follow suit?

  • 10 April 2025

4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoil

Every crisis throws up opportunities. Here are ideas to capitalise on this one, including ‘overbalancing’ your portfolio in stocks, buying heavily discounted LICs, and cherry picking bombed out sectors like oil and gas.

An enlightened dividend path

While many chase high yields, true investment power lies in companies that steadily grow dividends. This strategy, rooted in patience and discipline, quietly compounds wealth and anchors investors through market turbulence.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Investment strategies

Does dividend investing make sense?

Dividend investing offers steady income and behavioral benefits, but its effectiveness depends on goals, market conditions, and fundamentals - especially in retirement, where it may limit full use of savings.

Economics

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

Strategy

Ageing in spurts

Fascinating initial studies suggest that while we age continuously in years, our bodies age, not at a uniform rate, but in spurts at around ages 44 and 60.

Interviews

Platinum's new international funds boss shifts gears

Portfolio Manager Ted Alexander outlines the changes that he's made to Platinum's International Fund portfolio since taking charge in March, while staying true to its contrarian, value-focused roots.

Investment strategies

Four ways to capitalise on a forgotten investing megatrend

The Trump administration has not killed the multi-decade investment opportunity in decarbonisation. These four industries in particular face a step-change in demand and could reward long-term investors.

Strategy

How the election polls got it so wrong

The recent federal election outcome has puzzled many, with Labor's significant win despite a modest primary vote share. Preference flows played a crucial role, highlighting the complexity of forecasting electoral results.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.