Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 174

Achieving real returns in a low growth world

This article looks at how investors can realistically assess current market challenges and what they can do to achieve meaningful returns with reasonable risk levels.

Overview

The idea that we have entered a ‘low-return’ world now seems to be a consensus. The arguments are based on a combination of fundamental macro factors (a low growth world) and extended structural valuations in both equity and debt markets that suggest both bond and equity market returns face significant headwinds.

Achieving solid real returns consistently in this environment will be arduous. That said, at Schroders we believe beating inflation with a 5% excess real return over the medium term is still an appropriate and achievable objective. This view is based on several key ideas:

  • the structural valuation challenges in equity markets are not uniform nor are they extreme (either in absolute terms or by historic standards).
  • markets rarely move in straight lines, especially when conditions are challenging; it is reasonable to expect considerable cyclical volatility.
  • flexible asset allocation ranges and active management are essential.
  • approaches that embed the structural risk of either equities or bonds will likely struggle to deliver consistently. This includes balanced funds, with fixed strategic asset allocations or embedded duration risk (leverage) in the strategy, as the risk around bonds becomes increasingly asymmetric.

A low-return world

The concept of a ‘low-return’ environment is underpinned by a structurally weak global economy with consequences for growth rates, inflation, interest rates, bond yields, and earnings. The bleak growth outlook is due to a number of factors such as:

  • high debt levels and pressure to de-lever across the broader global economy
  • demographic influences (especially in China, Japan and Europe)
  • moderating productivity growth and the potential ‘normalisation’ of a structurally high US profit share
  • in Australia’s case, the additional unwinding of the China/commodity induced terms of trade boom, placing significant structural pressure on national income.

Compounding these factors are doubts about policy makers’ ability to effectively manage pressure from a number of areas including:

  • the extent to which monetary policy options have already been largely (arguably) exhausted (Europe, US and Japan)
  • Chinese debt and overcapacity against the backdrop of an economy undergoing a structural transformation
  • fiscal and structural policy that has effectively been side-lined by high global debt levels (both public and private sector) and the absence of clear political mandates
  • rising global income and wealth inequality and associated rises in social and political instability.

Valuations matter more than global growth

The correlation between economic factors and market performance is often over-emphasised. Strong economic growth does not necessarily mean strong market performance, whereas the link between valuations and future returns is significant – particularly over the medium to longer term. This is true for both equity and bond markets.

While there is no unique and absolute valuation metric for equities, research shows a strong relationship between longer run, cycle adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) multiples and subsequent 10-year returns for US equities (see graph below).

US CAPE Ratio and 10 year Real Returns for US equities since 1900

Source: GFD, Yale, Schroders. The Shiller PE or Cyclically Adjusted PEs are calculated as price divided by 10 year trailing earnings, adjusted for inflation.

There are two main points to highlight:

  • high CAPE ratios have consistently been followed by structurally low returns. The current CAPE ratio of around 23x, while high in an historic context, is well below the 45x level that prevailed at the end of the tech boom of the 1990s, which was subsequently followed by a decade of negative real returns
  • while current structural valuations in the key US equity market are extended and consistent with longer-run returns below long-run averages, there is not the same downward pressure on returns that prevailed at past extremes (like the 1970s or 1980s).

This relationship also broadly holds for other markets, but structural valuations are moderately extended in the US, consistent with relatively low (albeit not extremely low) prospective returns. However, in the UK, Europe and Australia, structural valuations are reasonable (around long-run averages) and therefore consistent with longer run rates of return.

While it will be challenging in some areas (especially the US), we expect a positive longer run trend (unlike in Japan over the past two-and-a-half decades or in the US through the 2000s.)

The problem with bonds

Bond markets are potentially more difficult, with record low bond yields implying low/negative returns from sovereign bonds and for assets priced directly from bond yields. This issue has become particularly more acute, with negative yields prevailing across large swathes of the global sovereign bond market (especially Europe and Japan), with extremely low yields in the residual, as shown in the figure below.

Negative yields don’t auger well for future bond returns

Negative yields don’t auger well for future bond returns

Source: Bloomberg, June 2016

While bond returns will vary in the short run as expectations about the future course of interest rates ebb and flow, over the longer term we know with some certainty (in nominal terms anyway) what returns will be. Holding negative yielding bonds to maturity will generate negative returns.

Typically, bonds have been held in portfolios to help diversify equity risk. Structurally low yields limit the ability of bonds to perform this function. The exception is in the context of deflation where the risk to nominal bond yields would still be to the downside. That said, it does have implications for portfolio construction.

Long-run returns

The issues outlined above are factored into our long-run return forecasts for key asset classes. These are primarily derived from a combination of the broader macro-economic backdrop and an adjustment for long-run valuations. While we expect modest long-term returns from equities, they should nonetheless still be positive in real terms, as shown below.

schroders-pt1-figure-3

In summary, while the structural valuation backdrop is challenging, it is not uniform, nor in the case of equities as extreme as it has been historically. For example, while US equities look structurally the most extended of the major equity markets they are far from the extremes that prevailed at the end of the 1990s tech boom. Australian equities, on the other hand, having devalued against the collapse in commodity prices, look like reasonable long-term value. The situation in bond markets is more problematic given prevailing negative nominal and real yields.

 

Simon Doyle is Head of Fixed Income & Multi-Asset at Schroder Investment Management Australia. Opinions, estimates and projections in this article constitute the current judgement of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any member of the Schroders Group. This document should not be relied on as containing any investment, accounting, legal or tax advice.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

How inflation impacts different types of investments

Achieving real returns in a low-growth world (part 2)

Value of tax-aware investment management

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever, updated

This time last year, I highlighted 16 ASX stocks that investors could own indefinitely. One year on, I look at whether there should be any changes to the list of stocks as well as which companies are worth buying now. 

2025-26 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ABS recently released figures which are used to determine key superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2025. This outlines the rates and thresholds that are changing and those that aren’t.  

Is Gen X ready for retirement?

With the arrival of the new year, the first members of ‘Generation X’ turned 60, marking the start of the MTV generation’s collective journey towards retirement. Are Gen Xers and our retirement system ready for the transition?

Why the $5.4 trillion wealth transfer is a generational tragedy

The intergenerational wealth transfer, largely driven by a housing boom, exacerbates economic inequality, stifles productivity, and impedes social mobility. Solutions lie in addressing the housing problem, not taxing wealth.

What Warren Buffett isn’t saying speaks volumes

Warren Buffett's annual shareholder letter has been fixture for avid investors for decades. In his latest letter, Buffett is reticent on many key topics, but his actions rather than words are sending clear signals to investors.

The 2025 Australian Federal election – implications for investors

With an election due by 17 May, we are effectively in campaign mode with the Government announcing numerous spending promises since January and the Coalition often matching them. Here's what the election means for investors.

Latest Updates

World's largest asset manager wants to revolutionise your portfolio

Larry Fink is one of the smartest people in the finance industry. In his latest shareholder letter, the Blackrock CEO outlines his quest to become the biggest player in private assets and upend investor portfolios.

Economy

Australia's economic report card heading into the polls

Our economy grew by a nominal rate of 7% per annum from 2017 to 2024, but it benefited from the largesse of fiscal and monetary policies, both of which are now fading. We need a new, credible economic growth agenda.

Preference votes matter

If the recent polls are anything to go by, we are headed for a hung parliament at the upcoming federal election. So more than ever, Australians need to give serious consideration to their preference votes.

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Tips for the last member standing

It’s common for people as they age to seek more help in running their SMSF if their capacity declines. An alternate director may be a great solution for someone just planning for short-term help in the meantime.

Wilson Asset Management on markets and its new income fund

In this interview, Matthew Haupt from Wilson Asset Management discusses his outloook for the ASX, sectors such as REITs that he likes, and his firm's launch of a new income-oriented listed investment company.  

Planning

‘Life expectancy’ – and why I don’t like the expression

Life expectancy isn't just a number - it's a concept that changes with survival rates over time. This article breaks down how age, survival, and societal factors shape our understanding of life expectancy, especially post-Covid. 

The shine is back on gold, and gold miners

Gold mining stocks outperformed in 2024 and are expected to do well in 2025. At this point in the rally, it's worth considering what has driven gold prices higher and why miners could still have some catching up to do.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.