Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 180

Achieving real returns in a low-growth world (part 2)

If you believe we are in a low-growth world, as we do, the attainability of real-return objectives will be difficult in an environment where bonds (and their proxies) are likely to be more challenged than equities. The response largely comes down to asset allocation.

In this article, we look at the part that cyclical volatility plays in achieving real returns, providing clues on how well-timed asset allocation can capture the upside of this cyclical volatility while attempting to avoid losses.

Cyclical considerations for decent returns

Cyclical volatility is normal in markets and can be significant in magnitude and can endure for relatively extended periods (three to five years in some cases). Returns are not linear. Even within structural ‘bear’ markets, significant rallies are likely. Investors who participate in the cyclical rallies but who can avoid the inevitable downswings can achieve decent returns. In contrast, in structural bull markets, cyclical volatility is less relevant as set and forget (i.e. beta alone) will deliver.

The critical question is can this cyclical volatility be managed and captured? It’s easier said than done.

This cyclical volatility is, in broad terms, driven by two interrelated factors: changes in valuations and the rotation of the business cycle. Our approach is to condition the long-run structural trend return in assets with shorter-run valuation dynamics to produce return forecasts over our investment horizon (three years), and to overlay this with an assessment of where we are in the cycle, and what this means for asset-price behaviour and policy. While by no means perfect, this provides a disciplined framework to buy when risk is low and sell when risk is high.

The key here clearly is the ability to capture the upswing but not ride the reverse. A summary of our cyclical (three-year) return forecasts is shown in the following chart and these are compared to our longer-run numbers.

It highlights that equity markets can be expected to deliver reasonable returns to investors over the next few years (albeit not necessarily in a linear fashion), whereas bond markets, and asset values that have been driven primarily from the decline in bond yields, could be expected to struggle or deliver negative returns. The numbers in the table exclude the impact of currency and active security selection, which over time we would expect to contribute to returns.

Expected three-year and longer-run returns

There are significant implications from an investment perspective:

1. Which market and when will be crucial: Market performance (beta) will be crucial in order to deliver real returns in coming years. Appropriate and potentially aggressive shifts in asset allocation will be essential to capturing upside, and more significantly, avoiding giving away gains as markets decline.

2. Sovereign bond outlook looks poor: Until appropriate risk premia in bond markets are restored and monetary policies move towards more normal settings (albeit probably a ‘new normal’), the sovereign bond outlook looks poor (at best). Equity markets are more likely to be significant contributors to returns (albeit will likely struggle if/when bond markets re-rate).

3. Assets structurally linked to declining bond yields are at risk: The most problematic assets are likely to be strategies where performance is structurally linked to the decline in bond yields. At an asset-class level, these include sovereign bonds, infrastructure and REITs.

4. Be cautious around structured/alternative betas and complex financial engineering: We remain cynical about alternatives, particularly when market pricing has been heavily distorted by central bank policies. Alternatives such as hedge funds have historically over-promised and under-delivered, particularly after fees. While it is logical in a world where returns from equities and bonds (the predominant market betas) are likely to be constrained, this path is unlikely to solve the low-return problem in the medium to longer term.

5. Leverage brings additional risk and may not solve the fundamental problem of low returns: Non-directional alpha strategies are for the most part relative value trades, requiring leverage, potentially bringing additional risk. The current environment is not one conducive to leverage. There’s also often more beta in these strategies than what appears on the surface.

6. Transparency, liquidity and the ability to hold cash will be important elements of a successful strategy: The implications of low bond yields on portfolio diversification may mean less aggregate equity positions, higher cash weightings than would be traditionally the case or more aggressive use of lower-risk equity substitutes.

7. Active asset allocation (in fact, active management generally) will be incredibly important. Capturing the upside of this cyclical volatility will be crucial, but more crucial will be avoiding the losses on the other side.

There is no doubt that achieving CPI+5% consistently will be tough. Investors will likely be episodically biased to equities over bonds, need to be aggressive in managing asset allocation around these trends, and use active management at the asset-class level to gain higher returns. The risk to delivering return objective consistently is to the downside.

 

Simon Doyle is Head of Fixed Income & Multi-Asset at Schroder Investment Management Australia Ltd. Opinions, estimates and projections in this article constitute the current judgement of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any member of the Schroders Group. This document should not be relied on as containing any investment, accounting, legal or tax advice.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Achieving real returns in a low growth world

Hold the champagne, that’s not a recovery yet

Managing for real returns

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.