Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 547

Are record market highs bullish or bearish?

For the majority of Australian investors, the prospect of a new high for the ASX has been a long time coming, a slow grind rather than a heady and rapid climb. For those with exposure to the US, and particularly to the Magnificent Seven, however, share prices have rocketed. If you only look at your super fund returns a couple of times a year, or hold ETFs with broad market exposure, the picture is pretty rosy, but it’s always interesting to see which stocks are doing the heavy lifting, and how broad the performance of your portfolio really is. A few charts below put recent returns into perspective, and may give you cause for reflection.

The S&P500 has more than doubled since its Covid lows

Figure 1: S&P500 over five years

Source: nabtrade

While new highs make sense – one would hope that companies are growing their earnings and share prices appreciate over time – the S&P500 is now 15% higher than it was when the Fed started hiking rates in March 2022. This isn’t really what’s ‘supposed’ to happen. Even more incredibly, the index has closed higher 14 out of the last 15 weeks, the first time this has happened since 1972[1].

At the same time, the concentration of shares delivering strong performance has narrowed significantly. In 2023, more than 70% of stocks in the S&P500 underperformed the index – the highest proportion, by a substantial margin, this century[2].

The Nasdaq has also doubled but is only just retouching its highs

Figure 2: Nasdaq performance over five years

Source: nabtrade

Narrowing leadership

The primary reason for the incredible resilience of the S&P500 index – which is up 5% in the first six weeks of 2024 alone – is the Magnificent Seven group of stocks, which have been driving returns over the last 12 months. This group includes sector leaders Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet (formerly Google), Meta (formerly Facebook), Tesla, Apple and Nvidia, all of which are found in the NDQ as well as the broader index. Since Microsoft invested in ChatGPT, the Mag7 have actually delivered more than 100% of the market return[3].

The performance – and size – of these companies is incredible. Nvidia, seen as a leader in the AI mania that hit the market in 2023, has gained over 50% in the last three months; given the recent falls in Chinese stocks, it is now more valuable than the entire market capitalisation of the Chinese stock market. In one week, the stock added the entire market capitalisation of Intel. Even so, with rapid earnings upgrades, its price to earnings (PE) ratio has actually fallen, although it is far from cheap. At a market cap of more than US$3 trillion, Microsoft is now worth double the entire S&P500 Energy sector but remains a strong buy or a buy among all but 4 of 55 analysts surveyed. The remaining four have the stock as a hold.[4]

Many have argued that the astonishing rise in the Mag7, which now comprise more than 28% of the S&P500, is a largely technical rally, driven by passive funds being forced to buy in as prices keep rising. Others have pointed out that the rally in mega tech was originally driven by the commencement of an earnings upgrade cycle in late 2022, and there has been divergent performance even within the leaders based on earnings outlook – after all, Tesla has fallen 22% in 2024.

So what’s going on in the rest of the market? As noted above, the S&P493 have been a significant drag on the market. According to Goldman Sachs, while the Mag7 are estimated to have added 14% year-on-year in sales for Q4, revenue growth for the remainder of the index was just 2%, while margins were contracting.

Small cap stocks in particular have failed to recover their post Covid highs. Early in US reporting season, nearly 400 small cap companies that had reported, had an aggregate Q4 earnings growth of more than -50%.[5]

The Russell 2000 has also doubled, but remains in bear market territory since 2022 highs

Figure 3: Russell 2000 performance over five years

Source: nabtrade

A note of caution

So, six stocks have been doing terribly well, and the rest have been doing poorly, on average. While this is ‘just’ the US market, it is worth remembering the US comprises more than 70% of the MSCI World index, the index to which your global super portfolio is probably benchmarked[6]. At the end of January, Apple and Microsoft alone comprised more than 9% of that index[7].

As an investor, you don’t – necessarily – need to worry about this. Concentration in markets – and in sectors – is not uncommon, as successful businesses grow, and less successful businesses shrink or fail altogether. That said, this level of concentration is highly unusual. As noted above, less than 30% of the index is currently outperforming that index. The last time that happened was 1998-2000, after which the market fell 53%[8].

 

[1] Source: Standard and Poors
[2] Source: Macrobond, TheDailyShot
[3] Source: Refinitiv
[4] Source: Refinitiv
[5] Source: Refinitiv, GLJ Research
[6] Source: MSCI.com
[7] Source: MSCI.com
[8] Source: Fidelity International

 

Gemma Dale is Director of SMSF and Investor Behaviour at nabtrade, a sponsor of Firstlinks. Index charts as at 12 February 2024. This material has been prepared as general information only, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from nabtrade, please click here.

Full Disclaimer: The content is produced and distributed by WealthHub Securities Limited (WSL) (ABN 83 089 718 249)(AFSL No. 230704). WSL is a Market Participant under the ASIC Market Integrity Rules and a wholly owned subsidiary of National Australia Bank Limited (ABN 12 004 044 937)(AFSL No. 230686) (NAB). NAB doesn’t guarantee its subsidiaries’ obligations or performance, or the products or services its subsidiaries offer. This material is intended to provide general advice only. It has been prepared without having regard to or taking into account any particular investor’s objectives, financial situation and/or needs. All investors should therefore consider the appropriateness of the advice, in light of their own objectives, financial situation and/or needs, before acting on the advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Any comments, suggestions or views presented do not reflect the views of WSL and/or NAB. Subject to any terms implied by law and which cannot be excluded, neither WSL nor NAB shall be liable for any errors, omissions, defects or misrepresentations in the information or general advice including any third party sourced data (including by reasons of negligence, negligent misstatement or otherwise) or for any loss or damage (whether direct or indirect) suffered by persons who use or rely on the general advice or information. If any law prohibits the exclusion of such liability, WSL and NAB limit its liability to the re-supply of the information, provided that such limitation is permitted by law and is fair and reasonable. For more information, please click here.

 

  •   14 February 2024
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The Magnificent Seven's dominance poses ever-growing risks

Howard Marks warns of market froth

The value of ‘value’ and Benjamin Graham’s three core beliefs

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.