Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 76

Home equity release, the fourth pillar of retirement funding

There has been a lot of focus recently on retirement funding, across topics such as growing age pension payments, longevity, retirement age and costs of living. It is surprising not to hear more on the role that home equity could play in funding the retirement of senior Australians who own their homes.

Intergenerational wealth transfer

The family home is not just a place to live but also a store of wealth. The wealth could be released by simply selling the home, but this creates the problem of where to live. Downsizing is an option that might work for some people. Alternatively there are products which facilitate the separation of the ‘place to live’ and ‘store of wealth’ attributes. The most well-known home equity release product today is a debt product, known in Australia as a reverse mortgage. There are also equity products which involve selling a fixed share of the future sale proceeds of the home.

Our retirement income system is generally viewed as comprising three pillars: the age pension, compulsory superannuation and voluntary savings (including non-compulsory superannuation). Home equity represents a substantial additional pool of savings, and could be viewed as a fourth pillar of retirement funding.

Australian residential property assets have been estimated recently at $5 trillion, around triple the market capitalisation of the ASX. Housing wealth dominates retiree household wealth due to more than 85% of Australians aged 75 and over owning their homes. Substantial levels of housing wealth are bequeathed with annual intergenerational transfer of housing wealth projected at $20 billion in 2014, rising to $35 billion in 2025.

Borrowing to buy a home is effectively buying a large asset ‘brick by brick’ with the principal component of each mortgage repayment. Ideally, a home could be sold in the same way, to provide financial support in retirement. Home equity release products effectively facilitate this.

Retirees might release home equity for reasons such as unplanned medical expenses, home modification, a new car, in-home care services or simply to supplement income to fund a more comfortable retirement. Imagine the difference for some retirees if they could access their home equity to provide them with, say, $10,000 - $20,000 each year for the rest of their lives, rather than living on just the age pension then bequeathing their home when they die.

Tapping into home equity to fund retirement also provides a societal benefit, improving intergenerational equity, or fairness between older and younger generations of society.

The current system, where each generation funds the age pension costs of the previous generation, is breaking down because people are living longer in retirement, ratios of workers to retirees are falling, and the age pension is not well targeted.

The family home is fully exempt from the age pension assets test. This provides a disincentive to unlock housing wealth to fund retirement and worsens intergenerational equity. Many of those bequeathing wealth will have received a part or full age pension, and the benefits that come with that, during retirement. Intergenerational wealth transfer is generally not taxed (other than a tax on some components of inherited superannuation).

Changing public policy on housing wealth

Better targeting of the age pension would increase the likelihood that government can afford to pay pensions at adequate levels to those retirees with no other sources of financial support. Targeting should consider a retiree’s full wealth and means of financial support, including housing wealth. Removing all or part of the family home exemption from the age pension assets test would be politically sensitive - many voters view the age pension as an entitlement, not a safety net, and today around 80% of retirees access either a full or part age pension.

Critical in any change to the assets test is good public policy to avoid unintended adverse consequences. Senior Australians should not be forced to sell their homes. There would be a risk of this if the exemption were simply removed and the private sector did not step in to provide universally available home equity release solutions. Public policy must consider the availability and design of products on offer.

The home equity release market today is small. There are challenges on the demand side for a range of reasons including emotive issues relating to the family home, a lack of product providers and no promotion of the concept by government. The main challenges on the supply side are around capacity.

The November 2013 report by the Grattan Institute entitled “Balancing Budgets: tough choices we need” put forward one approach to utilising home equity to help fund retirement. It involves including the family home in the assets test but mitigating the impact on low-income retirees with high-value houses by allowing them to claim the pension and then repay the value of the pension drawn when the house is eventually sold. It is estimated that this would improve the budget by $7 billion per annum, without undesirable social consequences.

The issue was also touched on earlier this year when the Commission of Audit proposed capping the extent to which the family home is exempt from the age pension assets test, but interest in the topic waned when government rejected this proposal.

Retirement funding should be considered more holistically than it is today. There will be challenges in utilising home equity release and creating a framework that is fair. But as our population ages and our fiscal challenges continue, we must create mechanisms such as home equity release which become a meaningful fourth pillar of retirement funding.

 

Christine Brownfield is an actuary with 20 years’ experience in life insurance and wealth management, and is currently working at Homesafe Solutions, a provider of home equity release products.

RELATED ARTICLES

Five ways to use the family home for retirement income

Rethinking home equity and retirement funding

Reverse mortgages: short-term gain, long-term pain

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Four simple things to do right now

Markets have recovered in the last six months but most investors remain nervous about the economic outlook. Morningstar analysts provide four quick tips on how to navigate this uncertainty.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 373

It was a milestone for strange times last week when the company with the longest record in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) index, ExxonMobil, once the largest company in the world, was replaced by a software company, Salesforce. Only one company in the original DJIA exists today. As businesses are disrupted, how many of the current DJIA companies will disappear in the next decade or two?

  • 2 September 2020

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 374

Suddenly, it's the middle of September and we don't hear much about 'snap back' anymore. Now we have 'wind backs' and 'road maps'. Six months ago, I was flying back from Antarctica after two weeks aboard the ill-fated Greg Mortimer cruise ship, and then the world changed. So it's time to take your temperature again. Our survey checks your reaction to recent policies and your COVID-19 responses.

  • 9 September 2020

Reporting season winners and losers in listed property trusts

Many property trust results are better than expected, with the A-REIT sector on a dividend yield of 4.8%. But there's a wide variation by sector and the ability of tenants to pay the rent.

Every SMSF trustee should have an Enduring Power of Attorney

COVID-19 and the events of 2020 show why, more than ever, SMSF trustees need to prepare for the ‘unexpected’ by having an Enduring Power of Attorney in place. A Power of Attorney is not enough.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Shares

Have stock markets become a giant Ponzi scheme?

A global financial casino has been created where investors ignore realistic valuations in the low growth, high-risk environment. At some point, analysis of fundamental value will be rewarded.

Gold

Interview Series: Why it’s gold’s time to shine

With gold now on the radar of individual investors, SMSFs and institutions, here's what you need to know about the choices between gold bars, gold ETFs and even gold miners, with Jordan Eliseo. 

SMSF strategies

SMSFs during COVID-19 and your 14-point checklist

SMSFs come with an administration burden underestimated by many. For example, did you know trustees need to document a member’s decision to take the reduced pension minimum under the new COVID rules?

Retirement

Funding retirement through a stock market crash

On the surface, a diversified fund looks the same as an SMSF with the same asset allocations. But to fund retirement, a member must sell units in the fund, whereas the cash balance is used in an SMSF.

Australia’s debt and interest burden: can we afford it?

Australia has an ageing population and rising welfare and health costs, but it is still the best placed among its ‘developed’ country peers. Here's why the expected levels of debt are manageable.

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 375

There are many ways to value a company, but the most popular is to estimate the future cash flows and discount them to a present value using a chosen interest rate. Does it follow that when interest rates fall, companies become more valuable? Perhaps, but only if the cash flows remain unchanged, and in a recession, future earnings are more difficult to sustain. What do Buffett and Douglass and 150 years of data say?

  • 16 September 2020
  • 5

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.