Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 209

Share investors should protect the downside

The possibility of rising interest rates, uncertainty about President Donald Trump’s policy directions, rapidly rising government debts and the risk of a ‘hard’ Brexit have given Australian stock investors plenty of worries in 2017. Added to this is the threat of an Australian housing bust, with UBS recently calling the top of the market.

How can investors, particularly those nearing retirement, protect themselves and their portfolios against such market volatility?

Unrealistic return expectations

The ASX Australian Investor Study 2017 revealed a disconnect between investor risk profiles and their return expectations, with 60% of retirees wanting ‘stable or guaranteed returns’, but an even higher 81% of younger investors seeking the same. Yet 21% of the most risk-averse investors still expect annual returns over 10%.

A December 2016 report by State Street Global Advisors predicted a long-term (10 years plus) return from global equities of only 6.2%, with just 1.3% from global government bonds, while US inflation is expected to average 2%.

For a typical balanced portfolio comprising 60% equities and 40% bonds, this equates to an after-inflation return of just 2.24%, which is insufficient for most investors’ investment objectives.

Added to this is the risk of a significant stock market downturn. Long-term US data shows a bear market occurs once every 3.5 years, with an average fall of 35%.

Another such plunge now, as seen during the GFC, would devastate the retirement savings of millions of Australians, with those nearing retirement and existing retirees not having the luxury of extra working decades to recoup such losses.

Property may not be a safe haven either, given that the Sydney and Melbourne residential property markets have been rated among the world’s most overpriced. Any crash in this sector would inflict further woes on a banking sector already reeling from the budget’s recent bank levy and increased capitalisation requirements.

Bank deposits, while protected by government guarantee up to certain limits, are not offering sufficient returns, given the current inflation rate. And while bond yields spiked on Trump’s election, yields have since eased back on concerns over whether Trump’s planned infrastructure spending and tax cuts will get through Congress (let alone if he is impeached).

Unfortunately, in the search for yield in the current low interest rate environment, as the GFC has slowly faded from investors’ minds, there has been a worrisome return to riskier growth assets by older investors, who should be seeking lower volatility investments.

Lower volatility solution

Combining a low-return investment, such as cash, with high-risk investments such as shares and property, does not necessarily produce a high overall risk-adjusted return, particularly since falling share prices can flow on to property prices if overall economic conditions deteriorate.

Many of the world’s leading investors, such as Yale University’s endowment fund, have pursued an alternative approach not heavily dominated by share market risk, such as in alternative investments, leading to Yale’s superior performance.

To guard against increasing volatility, investors should consider allocating part of their portfolio to a highly diversified ‘all-weather’ investment strategy, such as a market neutral fund. This has the ability to perform equally well in both rising and falling markets. It should have little or no net exposure to global equity markets, with an overarching focus on capital preservation, a high level of diversification, and little or no leverage, with the aim of producing a high risk-adjusted return.

The theory behind a market neutral investment is that rather than the risk and return being reliant upon the overall market’s movement, it is dependent instead on individual share selection, a risk that the investment manager has greater control over.

In a broad market crash such as seen during the GFC, even highly diversified portfolios of blue chip shares suffered substantial losses. As Warren Buffett famously said, “Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.” Australian investors, particularly those in their 50s, simply cannot afford to be caught out in a market storm.

 

Glenn Rushton is Executive Director of Rushton Financial Services, and Investment Manager of the Rushton Conservative Global Market Neutral Fund and the Rushton Global Market Neutral Fund. In his other life, he is the trainer of boxer Jeff Horn who stunned the sporting world with his victory over the legendary Manny Pacquiao in front of a crowd of over 50,000 and a global television audience of millions.

 

  •   6 July 2017
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.