Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 351

Avoid complacency with your SMSF's investment strategy

Your SMSF is required to have an investment strategy which is a plan for making, holding and realising investments in line with the fund’s investment objectives. It’s a common misunderstanding that the strategy should be a mere statement of the types of investments your SMSF will invest in.

There's more to it than many trustees think

But that’s not enough. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO), as a regulator of SMSFs, has recently said that trustees need to explain why the fund has made the investments. They also are interested in how the strategy provides benefits to each fund member on retirement or how it will provide for their dependants after the member’s death.

Don’t be surprised if the auditor of your SMSF takes greater interest in the investment strategy because it’s a requirement that it is reviewed regularly.

If your SMSF’s investment strategy is general and has not considered the risks in making, holding and realising investments in addition to the likely returns, it may have a problem complying with the superannuation law. As trustee, you need to consider the objectives of the fund and any cash flow requirements plus the members’ insurance requirements.

The superannuation law requires that a fund trustee must consider:

  1. The fund’s investments as a whole and include the extent to which those investments are diverse or involve exposure of the fund to risks from inadequate diversification.
  2. The liquidity of the fund’s investments, having regard to its expected cash flow requirements.
  3. The ability of the fund to discharge its existing and prospective liabilities.
  4. Whether the trustees have considered insurance cover for one or more fund members.

You may be the sole member of your SMSF or have recently become the sole member of an SMSF because of a change in membership. Your adviser may recommend a review of your SMSF’s investment strategy to fine tune any change in the fund’s cash flow requirements, investments and maybe the insurance needs of members. If you don’t have an adviser, then it could be time for you to review it.

Investment strategy and fund audits

During the last six months, the ATO has focussed especially on SMSFs that have high concentrations of investments in one asset class such as property, shares, cash or fixed deposits. It sent out around 18,000 letters to remind SMSF trustees that the fund’s investment strategy should justify the is a lack of diversification.

In the first instance, they require the fund auditor and you as trustee to make any changes. We have seen a renewed interest by auditors in closely examining funds to ensure the investments are consistent with the fund’s investment strategy. This is usually brought to the attention of the trustees in the auditor’s Management Letter but in the worst cases may be brought to the ATO’s attention.

If your SMSF’s investment strategy doesn’t adequately demonstrate what the law requires, you probably have one of two options:

  • Replace your SMSF’s current investment strategy with one that meets the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act, or
  • Provide an amendment to the current investment strategy which provides additional information on how the trustee(s) have considered the above requirements.

In most situations, auditors have accepted an amendment that includes the extra information required. This usually covers how the trustee has considered the SIS requirements and why investments have been made to provide the required benefits. 

What you need to do if there is a change

Your SMSF’s investment strategy must adequately reflect changes. This is especially true following recent stockmarket falls, where asset allocations may have fallen outside defined bands. A good SMSF administrator should advise you when this happens, as we do with clients of SuperConcepts. Other changes include where:

  • the cash flow requirements of the fund alter if you decide to start or stop an income stream
  • a lump sum is to be paid in cash,
  • someone has joined or ceased as a fund member.

The law requires a regular review and the trustee’s confirmation that it has taken place, usually each year.

 

Graeme Colley is the Executive Manager, SMSF Technical and Private Wealth at SuperConcepts, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider any individual’s investment objectives.

For more articles and papers from SuperConcepts, please click here.

 

  •   1 April 2020
  • 1
  •      
  •   
1 Comments
Greg McKay
April 06, 2020

Begs the question: who is running your SMSF.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Meg on SMSFs: Tips for the last member standing

Meg on SMSFs: Where are the risks in our major super sectors?

A guide to valuing SMSF assets correctly

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Latest Updates

Shares

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Superannuation

When you can withdraw your super

You can’t freely withdraw your super before 65. You need to meet certain legal conditions tied to your age, whether you’ve retired, or if you're using a transition to retirement option. 

Retirement

A national guide to concession entitlements

Navigating retirement concessions is unnecessarily complex. This outlines a new project to help older Australians find what they’re entitled to - quickly, clearly, and with less stress. 

Property

The psychology of REIT investing

Market shocks and rallies test every investor’s resolve. This explores practical strategies to stay grounded - resisting panic in downturns and FOMO in booms - while focusing on long-term returns. 

Fixed interest

Bonds are copping a bad rap

Bonds have had a tough few years and many investors are turning to other assets to diversify their portfolios. However, bonds can still play a valuable role as a source of income and risk mitigation.

Strategy

Is it time to fire the consultants?

The NSW government is cutting the use of consultants. Universities have also been criticized for relying on consultants as cover for restructuring plans. But are consultants really the problem they're made out to be?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.