Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 351

Avoid complacency with your SMSF's investment strategy

Your SMSF is required to have an investment strategy which is a plan for making, holding and realising investments in line with the fund’s investment objectives. It’s a common misunderstanding that the strategy should be a mere statement of the types of investments your SMSF will invest in.

There's more to it than many trustees think

But that’s not enough. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO), as a regulator of SMSFs, has recently said that trustees need to explain why the fund has made the investments. They also are interested in how the strategy provides benefits to each fund member on retirement or how it will provide for their dependants after the member’s death.

Don’t be surprised if the auditor of your SMSF takes greater interest in the investment strategy because it’s a requirement that it is reviewed regularly.

If your SMSF’s investment strategy is general and has not considered the risks in making, holding and realising investments in addition to the likely returns, it may have a problem complying with the superannuation law. As trustee, you need to consider the objectives of the fund and any cash flow requirements plus the members’ insurance requirements.

The superannuation law requires that a fund trustee must consider:

  1. The fund’s investments as a whole and include the extent to which those investments are diverse or involve exposure of the fund to risks from inadequate diversification.
  2. The liquidity of the fund’s investments, having regard to its expected cash flow requirements.
  3. The ability of the fund to discharge its existing and prospective liabilities.
  4. Whether the trustees have considered insurance cover for one or more fund members.

You may be the sole member of your SMSF or have recently become the sole member of an SMSF because of a change in membership. Your adviser may recommend a review of your SMSF’s investment strategy to fine tune any change in the fund’s cash flow requirements, investments and maybe the insurance needs of members. If you don’t have an adviser, then it could be time for you to review it.

Investment strategy and fund audits

During the last six months, the ATO has focussed especially on SMSFs that have high concentrations of investments in one asset class such as property, shares, cash or fixed deposits. It sent out around 18,000 letters to remind SMSF trustees that the fund’s investment strategy should justify the is a lack of diversification.

In the first instance, they require the fund auditor and you as trustee to make any changes. We have seen a renewed interest by auditors in closely examining funds to ensure the investments are consistent with the fund’s investment strategy. This is usually brought to the attention of the trustees in the auditor’s Management Letter but in the worst cases may be brought to the ATO’s attention.

If your SMSF’s investment strategy doesn’t adequately demonstrate what the law requires, you probably have one of two options:

  • Replace your SMSF’s current investment strategy with one that meets the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act, or
  • Provide an amendment to the current investment strategy which provides additional information on how the trustee(s) have considered the above requirements.

In most situations, auditors have accepted an amendment that includes the extra information required. This usually covers how the trustee has considered the SIS requirements and why investments have been made to provide the required benefits. 

What you need to do if there is a change

Your SMSF’s investment strategy must adequately reflect changes. This is especially true following recent stockmarket falls, where asset allocations may have fallen outside defined bands. A good SMSF administrator should advise you when this happens, as we do with clients of SuperConcepts. Other changes include where:

  • the cash flow requirements of the fund alter if you decide to start or stop an income stream
  • a lump sum is to be paid in cash,
  • someone has joined or ceased as a fund member.

The law requires a regular review and the trustee’s confirmation that it has taken place, usually each year.

 

Graeme Colley is the Executive Manager, SMSF Technical and Private Wealth at SuperConcepts, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider any individual’s investment objectives.

For more articles and papers from SuperConcepts, please click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Is your SMSF ready for SuperStream?

Avoid these top five errors in your SMSF annual return

New bankruptcy rules may have a domino impact on SMSF pensions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.