Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 448

Smart beta funds complement active without key person risk

Some of the best movies have an ensemble, where each actor brings their unique skills to make the story work. Likewise, with a sports team, a single player cannot always lift a whole team to glory. In both of these instances, an idea to achieve the outcome gestates until either success, mediocrity or failure occur.

The same is true in funds management

Last month, the LA Rams won the 2022 Super Bowl. Coach Sean McVeigh built a team with a deep bench of superstars. Wide receiver Odell Beckham Jr went down with an injury in the second quarter but he was one of many skilful catchers in the Rams line-up. Any one of a dozen players could have been MVP in the big game. By building a team with a deep bench, McVeigh reduced his key person risk.

Other teams in the NFL rely on a franchise player, usually the quarterback. This person becomes the face of the franchise. The risk, of course, is if that one player is injured or has a run of bad form the team suffers more.

In sports, talent costs money. The same is true in funds management, hence the willingness of investors to pay premiums of active management. With active management, investors pay for the expertise of the star fund manager and/or the deep bench of analysts. The industry is rife with fund managers and investment gurus that live and breathe markets. Some genuinely have talent identifying opportunities while for others the self-belief is misplaced and they were just lucky, in the right place at the right time.

The difficulty for investors is determining if their active fund is managed by a deep bench of stars that are skilful, not lucky. This is easier said than done, as many fund managers are not transparent. It is difficult to get a complete list of holdings to determine how they are outperforming.

Global research house Morningstar in its biennial Global Investor Experience Report repeatedly ranks Australia last out of 26 global markets in terms of investment disclosure.

Ideally, investors should be able to assess performance over a long period. They should be able to look at the holdings and determine whether a fund outperformed because its managers were skilled at choosing the best securities, or were they just more heavily weighted into growth assets or those asset classes that have done best over recent periods?

Performance should come from multiple sources, across sectors, not just a single idea. In addition, outcomes should be persistent and consistent with stated expectations and marketing.

If a fund manager says their skill is identifying ‘value’, investors should expect when value shines, as it is now, so should they. Likewise, when a manager says they specialise in identifying ‘quality’ companies, expect they would fall less and recover faster during a downturn, as that is a key characteristic of quality.

It would be naïve to think any manager can outperform every month. Fund managers are human after all, so they will make mistakes. In investing, mistakes include selling too soon, holding a stock for too long and overlooking opportunities. Making mistakes can make some fund managers better investors but mistakes can lead to underperformance. As humans, they may become impatient and try to chase returns, or hold that stock they’ve fallen in love with, a stock which is cheap for a reason. Investors are human too, so persistent underperformance may lead to a run for the exit.

What is an investor to do?

There is of course a way to eliminate key person risk: passive management. It aims to replicate the returns of an index as opposed to active management that aims to outperform an index.

The days of outperforming the market are not gone. Investors that still want to achieve an outcome different from the market benchmark index and to take the ‘human element’ out of their portfolios could turn to smart beta ETFs.

Smart beta is at the intersection of active and passive management. It can explain a considerable portion of an active manager’s risk and return characteristics but it is not subservient to the human condition and our vulnerabilities. It does not ‘fall-in-love’ with stocks, is not impacted by what else is going on in its life and it does not retire or resign to work for a competitor. But there is a human behind the research and design of smart beta indices, and over the last 50 years, it has become more sophisticated. Smart beta ETF strategies are fully transparent so investors can see the holdings on a daily basis. 

Forewarning the rise of smart beta was a 2016 scholarly article published in the CFA Institute's Financial Analysts Journal. In their paper, ‘The Asset Manager's Dilemma: How Smart Beta is Disrupting the Investment Management Industry', authors Ronald Kahn and Michael Lemmon described smart beta as:

a disruptive financial innovation with the potential to significantly affect the business of traditional active management.” 

Their paper illustrated that current fee levels in the global equity universe were inconsistent with the performance outcome because the fees are too high. Over 35% of global equity managers, according to Kahn and Lemmon’s analysis, will be disrupted by smart beta.

The disruption is happening in Australia

Each year VanEck conducts a smart beta survey. Last year, the Sixth Annual Smart Beta Survey was the biggest survey of its kind worldwide.

A question directed at financial advisers demonstrated that the most important factor for an adviser selecting smart beta is not fees but performance.

Source: VanEck Smart Beta Survey, 2021

Active managers should take note. Each half year when S&P releases its SPIVA report for Australian funds it does not make good reading for active fund managers. During the most recent (half year 2021), the summary states:

“For longer measured periods (3, 5, 10, and 15 years), the majority of active funds underperformed their respective benchmark indices across categories.”

More worrying for active managers, the VanEck Smart Beta Survey indicates over 50% of advisers are using smart beta to replace active managers. The main reason is increased performance.

Source: VanEck Smart Beta Survey, 2021

The survey also found 99% of smart beta users are satisfied with their strategy. This finding has been consistent in every year of the survey. 

No fund manager, and for that matter, no index strategy will offer absolute returns all of the time. Investing involves risks. Key person risk is one such risk. Prudent investing means not just diversifying your bench across asset classes but also across investment styles.

The key for investors is to diversify and seek those strategies that endure through the cycle and the complex gauntlet that capital markets exhibit time and time again. It is common now to see smart beta as the core of a portfolio supported by high conviction active funds, or to see a core active manager blended with a complimentary smart beta strategy.

For more information on smart beta, click here.


Arian Neiron is CEO and Managing Director - Asia Pacific at VanEck, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This is general information only and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from VanEck, click here. VanEck's smart beta funds include an equal-weighted Australian equity fund (ASX:MVW) and global quality (ASX:QUAL).



Who dares loses: Buffett on luck, taxes and a challenge

Investment forecasts: foresight or folly?

$100 billion! Five reasons investors are flocking to ETFs


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates


Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?


Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.


Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.