Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 117

SMSFs and house and land packages

Property investment is gradually becoming more popular with SMSF investors, and I am often asked whether SMSFs can purchase house and land packages. Not only would the SMSF hopefully achieve some long term capital gain, it would also be entitled to claim some depreciation on the new asset as it ages. I always clarify first whether my clients want to purchase a house and land package or purchase a vacant block of land and then build a house on it. What is the difference? It can make a huge difference in the SMSF world, especially when there are borrowings involved.

Purchase as a single acquirable asset

An SMSF can borrow money to purchase a house and land package as long as it is purchased together in the one transaction as a single acquirable asset where the asset is identified up front as vacant land with a completed house on it.

But if an SMSF purchased a block of land with borrowings and then later built a house on the land, this would not be allowed under the limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA). The superannuation law does not allow the single acquirable asset, in this case the block of land, to be improved (by building a house on it) while the loan remains outstanding. There is a very good reason for this.

The borrowing rule is referred to as a limited recourse borrowing arrangement. It means the lender’s rights, on any default on the borrowing by the SMSF, are limited to the single asset acquired under the arrangement. This means, the lender does not have any claim over any of the SMSF’s other assets. The borrowing is quarantined to the single acquirable asset. The law is designed to protect the remaining assets within the SMSF in the event of its default.

So, if an SMSF borrows to purchase a block of land and later builds a house on the land, and then due to some unfortunate financial circumstances cannot repay the loan, the lender will take possession of the asset – which is now a property consisting of a house and land. The money that the SMSF spent building the house on the vacant land is lost as it cannot be recovered from the lender. To make matters worse, the SMSF has also contravened the LRBA and would be in trouble with the Tax Office.

Make sure the SMSF complies

The trustees of the SMSF must ensure that:

  • they identify up front that the single acquirable asset is the land with a completed house on it
  • the lender’s security on the borrowing is at all times over the land and the completed house
  • the LRBA with the lender allows for multiple draw-downs for the deposit, progress payments and the final payment at settlement.

House and land packages can offer investment opportunities for SMSFs, but if they don’t comply with the law, the investment could end up being a costly mistake.

 

Monica Rule is an SMSF Specialist Adviser and the author of ‘SMSFs and Properties’. See www.monicarule.com.au. This article is for general education purposes only and does not consider the personal circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   10 July 2015
  • 5
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Meg on SMSFs: How wide is the ban on LRBAs?

Sixteen steps in a typical SMSF borrowing

Heed my problems borrowing in my SMSF

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation’s structural failings

Politicians are fighting over access to super, but they may be arguing about the wrong thing. The system’s three fundamental flaws have been hiding in plain sight for decades, costing Australians far more than they realise.

Planning

The great wealth transfer myth

Why do some families preserve wealth for generations while others struggle to? As the great wealth transfer unfolds, the determining factor is often not the structure of the estate, but the preparation of those who will inherit it.

Investment strategies

What comes after bank hybrids?

For years, bank hybrids have been a cornerstone of portfolio income. With tens of billions of dollars now disappearing from the market, investors face a critical question: what comes next, and are the obvious replacements enough?

Investment insights from the US

What happens when knowledge becomes a commodity? The latest themes emerging from the US tech sector suggest AI could reshape company moats, disrupt incumbents and create winners and losers in unexpected places.

Investing

Can Berkshire thrive without Buffett?

Warren Buffett's departure marks the end of an era. But the more important question for investors is whether Berkshire's culture, discipline and capital allocation framework can survive without the man who built them.

Retirement

The Bengen 4% Rule: Lost in translation

For years, retirees have been told to focus on withdrawal rates. But the real question is far simpler: how many dollars can you safely spend? The answer may be very different from what conventional retirement wisdom suggests.

Interest rates

Super low interest rates came with side effects

For more than a decade, investors lived through an era of near-zero interest rates. With bond yields now surging, it's worth asking whether cheap money solved economic problems, or introduced a much larger set of risks.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.