Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 117

SMSFs and house and land packages

Property investment is gradually becoming more popular with SMSF investors, and I am often asked whether SMSFs can purchase house and land packages. Not only would the SMSF hopefully achieve some long term capital gain, it would also be entitled to claim some depreciation on the new asset as it ages. I always clarify first whether my clients want to purchase a house and land package or purchase a vacant block of land and then build a house on it. What is the difference? It can make a huge difference in the SMSF world, especially when there are borrowings involved.

Purchase as a single acquirable asset

An SMSF can borrow money to purchase a house and land package as long as it is purchased together in the one transaction as a single acquirable asset where the asset is identified up front as vacant land with a completed house on it.

But if an SMSF purchased a block of land with borrowings and then later built a house on the land, this would not be allowed under the limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA). The superannuation law does not allow the single acquirable asset, in this case the block of land, to be improved (by building a house on it) while the loan remains outstanding. There is a very good reason for this.

The borrowing rule is referred to as a limited recourse borrowing arrangement. It means the lender’s rights, on any default on the borrowing by the SMSF, are limited to the single asset acquired under the arrangement. This means, the lender does not have any claim over any of the SMSF’s other assets. The borrowing is quarantined to the single acquirable asset. The law is designed to protect the remaining assets within the SMSF in the event of its default.

So, if an SMSF borrows to purchase a block of land and later builds a house on the land, and then due to some unfortunate financial circumstances cannot repay the loan, the lender will take possession of the asset – which is now a property consisting of a house and land. The money that the SMSF spent building the house on the vacant land is lost as it cannot be recovered from the lender. To make matters worse, the SMSF has also contravened the LRBA and would be in trouble with the Tax Office.

Make sure the SMSF complies

The trustees of the SMSF must ensure that:

  • they identify up front that the single acquirable asset is the land with a completed house on it
  • the lender’s security on the borrowing is at all times over the land and the completed house
  • the LRBA with the lender allows for multiple draw-downs for the deposit, progress payments and the final payment at settlement.

House and land packages can offer investment opportunities for SMSFs, but if they don’t comply with the law, the investment could end up being a costly mistake.

 

Monica Rule is an SMSF Specialist Adviser and the author of ‘SMSFs and Properties’. See www.monicarule.com.au. This article is for general education purposes only and does not consider the personal circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   10 July 2015
  • 5
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Meg on SMSFs: How wide is the ban on LRBAs?

Sixteen steps in a typical SMSF borrowing

Heed my problems borrowing in my SMSF

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.