Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 47

Standing on the shoulders of giants

This little journey through fund analysis history provides some background to modern portfolio analysis and reporting techniques. Although the work of these pioneers in our industry is up to 60 years old, it is still taught in universities and finance courses as the foundation of modern funds management.

Portfolio diversification

In 1990, William F. Sharpe was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics, along with Harry Markowitz and Merton Miller “for their pioneering work in the theory of financial economics”. Markowitz, often referred to as the father of Modern Portfolio Theory, did not invent the idea of portfolio diversification, which can be traced back to Shakespearean times (see The Merchant of Venice, Act I, Scene I). His key contribution was the idea that while risk can be reduced through diversification, it cannot be completely eliminated. In his seminal 1952 paper 'Portfolio Selection', he was the first to formulate a mathematical model for the diversification of investments. This model demonstrated that what was important was not the riskiness of any individual investment, but rather the contribution that the asset made to the risk of the overall portfolio.

Sharpe built upon this foundation to develop the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) in 1964. This model utilised a linear regression approach with Beta as a measure of the sensitivity of an asset's return to the return of the market and Alpha as a measure of the excess return for the risk incurred. Both parameters were used to calculate a fair-value rate of return of a risky asset.

Like all good ideas in finance, it wasn't long before others contributed to improvements. Indeed, Sharpe was not alone in formulating such ideas as Jack Treynor, John Lintner and Jan Mossin had independently come to similar conclusions. In 1972 Fischer Black (of Black-Scholes option-pricing fame) improved the CAPM model and it became widely used as a model for pricing individual securities. Later the Black-Litterman model was introduced which incorporated an investor’s subjective views on the market trends which may influence return levels.

Attribution analysis

In 1988, William Sharpe took the ideas to the next level in the article 'Determining a Fund’s Effective Asset Mix'. In this article, Sharpe introduced the idea of ‘attribution analysis’, later dubbed returns-based style analysis (RBSA). In the CAPM model, we can look at the return of an asset with respect to the return of the market. If we consider that any single index is a representation of the 'market' for this 'style' of investment, we can thus calculate exposure to this market. If we then use a number of indices to represent different markets, we can assess the exposure to various markets based on the returns of our portfolio. From here, we can assemble a 'style portfolio' being a portfolio of our indices, weighted by the exposure we have determined that we have to each. The style portfolio will usually not explain 100% of the fund returns (as the fund might hold a mix of assets in each market different to that of each index), however a well-fitted style portfolio should explain the returns to a high level.

The immediate practical applications for this model were obvious, as it allowed an investor to analyse a fund’s underlying exposures. If the underlying holdings are unknown, this can help the investor understand what the fund is doing and where it is exposed. If on the other hand the holdings are known, the analysis can uncover ‘hidden’ exposures (for example the share prices of an Australian company that imports food could be exposed to the Brazilian market).

In 2002, Michael Markov developed and patented a new version of RBSA called ‘Dynamic Style Analysis’. This innovation was designed to improve the capture of changing weights in the portfolio (i.e. a fund will generally not have static holdings throughout the year, but will rebalance the portfolio in response to market conditions). Such changing asset weights add a further level of complexity to the style analysis, as we now have to explain not only which exposures are present in the portfolio, but also how these exposures have changed over time.

Building on past research

Although research continues in the development of new modelling techniques, such research is often based on the work done by those mentioned above. We now have available to us some sophisticated tools to gain an understanding of funds for which we do not have full disclosure of holdings, to perform due diligence of funds we are considering investing in, to break funds down to their component exposures and even to identify hidden exposures in portfolios.

In the words of Sir Isaac Newton, “If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.”

 

Joe Maisano is a Director and Dr. Alex Radchik is a Project Consultant at Trading Technology Australia (TTA). TTA is the Australian representative of Markov Processes International, the developers of MPI Stylus Pro™.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.