Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 143

There’s still time for some SMSFs to use 'anti-detriment' provisions

Amid all the rumours about changes to superannuation, one of the hottest is that the government will soon abolish the anti-detriment provisions.

I am referring to the ability of some superannuation funds to refund a lump sum to the member’s estate on death, in compensation for the 15% contributions tax that was deducted from their contributions during their working life.

How did this generosity start?

To understand how this unusual burst of generosity came about, you need to cast your mind back to July 1988, when Federal Treasurer Paul Keating introduced a 15% tax on deductible contributions to superannuation. Until then, there was a tax of 30% on exit, but no tax on entry.

Keating had promised there would be no new taxes during that term of government, so his method of changing the taxes was to chop the 30% tax in half, and put 15% on the front, leaving 15% on the back. Of course, the government claimed the 15% tax was not a new tax, merely a reshuffling of the existing one.

The new contributions tax was called 'detrimental' to qualifying dependants and, to compensate them, legislation was passed to enable all contributions tax paid to be refunded to the estate – hence the term 'anti-detriment provision'.

An anti-detriment payment can be made only to a spouse or former spouse of the deceased, a child of any age, or to the estate provided the ultimate beneficiaries are the spouse, former spouse or a child. It can only be made when an accumulation death benefit is paid as a lump sum, or when a pension is commuted to a lump sum on the death of a pensioner (or reversionary pensioner) within the prescribed period. This is usually three months from grant of probate or six months from the date of death.

Payments could be substantial

The calculation of the payment is complex, but in many cases the fund may use a simple formula. This is between 13.68% and 17.65% of the taxable component (excluding insurance) if the eligible service period commenced before 1 July 1988, and 17.65% for service that commenced after that date. For example, for a fund of $600,000, the anti-detriment payment could be $105,900.

As always, the devil is in the detail. The payment does not come immediately from government revenue but is created by allowing the fund a tax deduction. This means it comes from future tax payable by the fund.

Even though SMSFs can make an anti-detriment payment, it seldom happens in practice, because the payment must be made before the tax deduction can be claimed. Usually this means the fund needs to pay a benefit that is greater than the member’s account balance, and the fund needs to have substantial reserves to do this. Most don’t have them.

A worthwhile option, if you are in a position to do so, would be to withdraw a large chunk of your superannuation tax free after you turn 60, and then re-contribute it as a non-concessional contribution. For our $600,000 fund, this could increase the non-taxable component by $540,000 and reduce the tax that would be payable if the superannuation was left to a non-dependent, by $91,800. This would reduce the negative impact of any changes in the law.

Factors such as conditions of release, contribution caps and work tests all need to be satisfied, which is why expert advice is essential before adopting this strategy.

Another option, if you have an SMSF and think you are close to death, would be to roll the balance into a large retail fund. This fund may well have the ability to make an anti-detriment payment because it would be able to use up the tax concessions generated.

For some people, there is really nothing you can do to protect yourself against the removal of the anti-detriment provisions except cash in your super before your day of passing. That just leaves you the challenge of predicting this day, which should be easy compared to keeping up to date with superannuation changes.

 

Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. His advice is general in nature and readers should seek their own professional advice before making any financial decisions. See www.noelwhittaker.com.au.

 

  •   18 February 2016
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The case for the $3 million super tax

The mechanics of the $3 million super tax must be fixed

$5 million cap punishes 30 years of super saving

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Latest Updates

Planning

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Superannuation

There's a reason why your super is locked up until your 60s

For decades, it seemed settled. Then one controversial idea reignited a debate that could reshape the financial future of millions. The real question isn’t who’s right or wrong, but whether a long-held assumption deserves another look.

Property

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Retirement

Under-retiring: The greatest retirement risk in a generation

Two retirees. Similar savings. Completely different lives. New research from Challenger reveals why some Australians confidently spend in retirement while others hold back and the overlooked factor shaping retirement decisions.

Five risks to watch in markets

Things you may often hear are: a recession is around the corner, markets are overpriced, the AI sector is about to flop at any moment. It’s like the never-ending laundry pile that sits in my house, it never really disappears.

Investment strategies

Do you qualify as ‘rich’?

What does it mean to be 'rich'? For something so universally desired, it is surprisingly difficult to define. That ambiguity creates a challenge for investors and raises a bigger question about what financial success really looks like.

Investment strategies

If you’re worried about your bond portfolio, you’re missing the point

Most investors think they know what bonds are for. But when markets turn volatile, a surprising misunderstanding can lead to costly decisions. Here’s the overlooked lesson that could change how you view your portfolio.

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.