Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 143

There’s still time for some SMSFs to use 'anti-detriment' provisions

Amid all the rumours about changes to superannuation, one of the hottest is that the government will soon abolish the anti-detriment provisions.

I am referring to the ability of some superannuation funds to refund a lump sum to the member’s estate on death, in compensation for the 15% contributions tax that was deducted from their contributions during their working life.

How did this generosity start?

To understand how this unusual burst of generosity came about, you need to cast your mind back to July 1988, when Federal Treasurer Paul Keating introduced a 15% tax on deductible contributions to superannuation. Until then, there was a tax of 30% on exit, but no tax on entry.

Keating had promised there would be no new taxes during that term of government, so his method of changing the taxes was to chop the 30% tax in half, and put 15% on the front, leaving 15% on the back. Of course, the government claimed the 15% tax was not a new tax, merely a reshuffling of the existing one.

The new contributions tax was called 'detrimental' to qualifying dependants and, to compensate them, legislation was passed to enable all contributions tax paid to be refunded to the estate – hence the term 'anti-detriment provision'.

An anti-detriment payment can be made only to a spouse or former spouse of the deceased, a child of any age, or to the estate provided the ultimate beneficiaries are the spouse, former spouse or a child. It can only be made when an accumulation death benefit is paid as a lump sum, or when a pension is commuted to a lump sum on the death of a pensioner (or reversionary pensioner) within the prescribed period. This is usually three months from grant of probate or six months from the date of death.

Payments could be substantial

The calculation of the payment is complex, but in many cases the fund may use a simple formula. This is between 13.68% and 17.65% of the taxable component (excluding insurance) if the eligible service period commenced before 1 July 1988, and 17.65% for service that commenced after that date. For example, for a fund of $600,000, the anti-detriment payment could be $105,900.

As always, the devil is in the detail. The payment does not come immediately from government revenue but is created by allowing the fund a tax deduction. This means it comes from future tax payable by the fund.

Even though SMSFs can make an anti-detriment payment, it seldom happens in practice, because the payment must be made before the tax deduction can be claimed. Usually this means the fund needs to pay a benefit that is greater than the member’s account balance, and the fund needs to have substantial reserves to do this. Most don’t have them.

A worthwhile option, if you are in a position to do so, would be to withdraw a large chunk of your superannuation tax free after you turn 60, and then re-contribute it as a non-concessional contribution. For our $600,000 fund, this could increase the non-taxable component by $540,000 and reduce the tax that would be payable if the superannuation was left to a non-dependent, by $91,800. This would reduce the negative impact of any changes in the law.

Factors such as conditions of release, contribution caps and work tests all need to be satisfied, which is why expert advice is essential before adopting this strategy.

Another option, if you have an SMSF and think you are close to death, would be to roll the balance into a large retail fund. This fund may well have the ability to make an anti-detriment payment because it would be able to use up the tax concessions generated.

For some people, there is really nothing you can do to protect yourself against the removal of the anti-detriment provisions except cash in your super before your day of passing. That just leaves you the challenge of predicting this day, which should be easy compared to keeping up to date with superannuation changes.

 

Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. His advice is general in nature and readers should seek their own professional advice before making any financial decisions. See www.noelwhittaker.com.au.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The case for the $3 million super tax

The mechanics of the $3 million super tax must be fixed

$5 million cap punishes 30 years of super saving

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Which generation had it toughest?

Each generation believes its economic challenges were uniquely tough - but what does the data say? A closer look reveals a more nuanced, complex story behind the generational hardship debate. 

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

The best way to get rich and retire early

This goes through the different options including shares, property and business ownership and declares a winner, as well as outlining the mindset needed to earn enough to never have to work again.

A perfect storm for housing affordability in Australia

Everyone has a theory as to why housing in Australia is so expensive. There are a lot of different factors at play, from skewed migration patterns to banking trends and housing's status as a national obsession.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Latest Updates

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 628 with weekend update

Australian investors have been pouring money into US stocks this year, just as they start to underperform the rest of the world. Is this a sign of things to come? This looks at 50 years of data to see what happens next.

  • 11 September 2025
Exchange traded products

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement

We need a better scheme to help superannuation victims

The Compensation Scheme of Last Resort fails families hit by First Guardian and Shield losses, as well as advisers who are being wrongly blamed for the saga. It’s time for a fair, faster, universal super levy solution.

Investment strategies

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Economy

How bread vs rice moulded history

Does a country's staple crop decide elements of its destiny? The second order effects of being a wheat or rice growing country could explain big differences in culture, societal norms and economic development.

Investment strategies

Small caps are catching fire - for good reason

Small caps just crashed the party like John McClane did in the movie, Die Hard - August delivered explosive gains. With valuations at historic lows, long-term investors could be set for a sequel worth watching.

Defensive growth for an age of deglobalisation, debt and disorder

Today’s new world order appears likely to lead to a lower return, higher risk investment environment. But this asset class looks especially well placed to survive, thrive, and deliver attractive returns to investors.

Economy

Will we choose a four-day working week?

The allure of a four-day week reflects a yearning for more balance in our lives. Yet the reliability of studies touting a lift in productivity is questionable and society may not be ready for such a shift anyway.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.