Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 143

There’s still time for some SMSFs to use 'anti-detriment' provisions

Amid all the rumours about changes to superannuation, one of the hottest is that the government will soon abolish the anti-detriment provisions.

I am referring to the ability of some superannuation funds to refund a lump sum to the member’s estate on death, in compensation for the 15% contributions tax that was deducted from their contributions during their working life.

How did this generosity start?

To understand how this unusual burst of generosity came about, you need to cast your mind back to July 1988, when Federal Treasurer Paul Keating introduced a 15% tax on deductible contributions to superannuation. Until then, there was a tax of 30% on exit, but no tax on entry.

Keating had promised there would be no new taxes during that term of government, so his method of changing the taxes was to chop the 30% tax in half, and put 15% on the front, leaving 15% on the back. Of course, the government claimed the 15% tax was not a new tax, merely a reshuffling of the existing one.

The new contributions tax was called 'detrimental' to qualifying dependants and, to compensate them, legislation was passed to enable all contributions tax paid to be refunded to the estate – hence the term 'anti-detriment provision'.

An anti-detriment payment can be made only to a spouse or former spouse of the deceased, a child of any age, or to the estate provided the ultimate beneficiaries are the spouse, former spouse or a child. It can only be made when an accumulation death benefit is paid as a lump sum, or when a pension is commuted to a lump sum on the death of a pensioner (or reversionary pensioner) within the prescribed period. This is usually three months from grant of probate or six months from the date of death.

Payments could be substantial

The calculation of the payment is complex, but in many cases the fund may use a simple formula. This is between 13.68% and 17.65% of the taxable component (excluding insurance) if the eligible service period commenced before 1 July 1988, and 17.65% for service that commenced after that date. For example, for a fund of $600,000, the anti-detriment payment could be $105,900.

As always, the devil is in the detail. The payment does not come immediately from government revenue but is created by allowing the fund a tax deduction. This means it comes from future tax payable by the fund.

Even though SMSFs can make an anti-detriment payment, it seldom happens in practice, because the payment must be made before the tax deduction can be claimed. Usually this means the fund needs to pay a benefit that is greater than the member’s account balance, and the fund needs to have substantial reserves to do this. Most don’t have them.

A worthwhile option, if you are in a position to do so, would be to withdraw a large chunk of your superannuation tax free after you turn 60, and then re-contribute it as a non-concessional contribution. For our $600,000 fund, this could increase the non-taxable component by $540,000 and reduce the tax that would be payable if the superannuation was left to a non-dependent, by $91,800. This would reduce the negative impact of any changes in the law.

Factors such as conditions of release, contribution caps and work tests all need to be satisfied, which is why expert advice is essential before adopting this strategy.

Another option, if you have an SMSF and think you are close to death, would be to roll the balance into a large retail fund. This fund may well have the ability to make an anti-detriment payment because it would be able to use up the tax concessions generated.

For some people, there is really nothing you can do to protect yourself against the removal of the anti-detriment provisions except cash in your super before your day of passing. That just leaves you the challenge of predicting this day, which should be easy compared to keeping up to date with superannuation changes.

 

Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. His advice is general in nature and readers should seek their own professional advice before making any financial decisions. See www.noelwhittaker.com.au.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The case for the $3 million super tax

The mechanics of the $3 million super tax must be fixed

$5 million cap punishes 30 years of super saving

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.