Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 143

There’s still time for some SMSFs to use 'anti-detriment' provisions

Amid all the rumours about changes to superannuation, one of the hottest is that the government will soon abolish the anti-detriment provisions.

I am referring to the ability of some superannuation funds to refund a lump sum to the member’s estate on death, in compensation for the 15% contributions tax that was deducted from their contributions during their working life.

How did this generosity start?

To understand how this unusual burst of generosity came about, you need to cast your mind back to July 1988, when Federal Treasurer Paul Keating introduced a 15% tax on deductible contributions to superannuation. Until then, there was a tax of 30% on exit, but no tax on entry.

Keating had promised there would be no new taxes during that term of government, so his method of changing the taxes was to chop the 30% tax in half, and put 15% on the front, leaving 15% on the back. Of course, the government claimed the 15% tax was not a new tax, merely a reshuffling of the existing one.

The new contributions tax was called 'detrimental' to qualifying dependants and, to compensate them, legislation was passed to enable all contributions tax paid to be refunded to the estate – hence the term 'anti-detriment provision'.

An anti-detriment payment can be made only to a spouse or former spouse of the deceased, a child of any age, or to the estate provided the ultimate beneficiaries are the spouse, former spouse or a child. It can only be made when an accumulation death benefit is paid as a lump sum, or when a pension is commuted to a lump sum on the death of a pensioner (or reversionary pensioner) within the prescribed period. This is usually three months from grant of probate or six months from the date of death.

Payments could be substantial

The calculation of the payment is complex, but in many cases the fund may use a simple formula. This is between 13.68% and 17.65% of the taxable component (excluding insurance) if the eligible service period commenced before 1 July 1988, and 17.65% for service that commenced after that date. For example, for a fund of $600,000, the anti-detriment payment could be $105,900.

As always, the devil is in the detail. The payment does not come immediately from government revenue but is created by allowing the fund a tax deduction. This means it comes from future tax payable by the fund.

Even though SMSFs can make an anti-detriment payment, it seldom happens in practice, because the payment must be made before the tax deduction can be claimed. Usually this means the fund needs to pay a benefit that is greater than the member’s account balance, and the fund needs to have substantial reserves to do this. Most don’t have them.

A worthwhile option, if you are in a position to do so, would be to withdraw a large chunk of your superannuation tax free after you turn 60, and then re-contribute it as a non-concessional contribution. For our $600,000 fund, this could increase the non-taxable component by $540,000 and reduce the tax that would be payable if the superannuation was left to a non-dependent, by $91,800. This would reduce the negative impact of any changes in the law.

Factors such as conditions of release, contribution caps and work tests all need to be satisfied, which is why expert advice is essential before adopting this strategy.

Another option, if you have an SMSF and think you are close to death, would be to roll the balance into a large retail fund. This fund may well have the ability to make an anti-detriment payment because it would be able to use up the tax concessions generated.

For some people, there is really nothing you can do to protect yourself against the removal of the anti-detriment provisions except cash in your super before your day of passing. That just leaves you the challenge of predicting this day, which should be easy compared to keeping up to date with superannuation changes.

 

Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. His advice is general in nature and readers should seek their own professional advice before making any financial decisions. See www.noelwhittaker.com.au.

 

  •   18 February 2016
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The case for the $3 million super tax

The mechanics of the $3 million super tax must be fixed

$5 million cap punishes 30 years of super saving

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

2 billion reasons to fix retirement income

A proposal to address Australia's 'stranded balances' in retirement by requiring super funds to transition members to pension phase at 65, boosting retirement income and reframing super as a source of income.

The ultimate superannuation EOFY checklist 2026

Here is a checklist of 28 important issues you should address before June 30 to ensure your SMSF or other super fund is in order and that you are making the most of the strategies available.

Do super funds need a massive wake up call?

UK retirement expert, Guy Opperman, believes super funds are failing at supporting members in deaccumulation. Here is what Australia should do about it. 

Two months into retirement

A retirement researcher's take on retirement and her focus on each of her six resource buckets to stay engaged during the transition and beyond.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 662 with weekend update

The debate over the budget is increasingly shaped by frustration and perceptions of unfairness, rather than clear-eyed assessment of policy outcomes.

Reforming the taxation of wealth and wealth transfers

As the budget approaches debate continues about the need and method for addressing wealth inequality. Could reinstating wealth transfer taxes be the answer?

Latest Updates

Back to the future - Why indexing CGT is a good idea

A return to indexation of capital gains would be a fairer way to compensate households for the effects of inflation than the current discount. Importantly, it opens the door to future, broader reforms to stop the taxation of inflation.

Australia has no death duties. Technically.

Australia may not levy formal death duties, but a growing web of tax measures is quietly shaping what wealth passes between generations. Now, the 2026 budget adds another layer.

Strategy

The folly of the Iran war

From oil shocks to fractured alliances, the Iran war carries the hallmarks of a historic policy misstep - one that could tip an already fragile global economy into crisis.

Taxation

Noel Whittaker’s take on the budget

Marketed as a fix for inequality and housing affordability, the latest budget instead delivers a tangle of tax changes that leave everyday Australians worse off.

Investment strategies

The red metal's long game

Copper has had a rough few weeks but investors should not ignore the potential for future price increases as supply increasingly falls behind demand.

Taxation

The lesser-known effects of changed property taxes

The budget’s property tax reforms are being framed as fairness measures, but they risk splitting the housing market, penalising lower‑income investors and introducing distortions that may prove costly.

Latest from Morningstar

Why stocks sometimes fall for no obvious reason

The vast and opaque world of private assets is a powerful gravitational force - and when trouble hits, it's the more liquid public equities that often the feel it first.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.