Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 404

Super funds must earn the right to higher contributions

I doubt our super will last long enough to outlive my wife, so I am changing the fields in a life expectancy calculator that has her surviving until 92. I now have her smoking two packs a day with a severe drinking problem. Unfortunately, there were no fields to have her addicted to Class A drugs or take up sky diving.

The good news for our superannuation is that my wife’s parents died in their sixties. While I am expected to live to 87 according to this calculator, my father died at 70 when he was my oldest living male relative.

Now that is one hell of an error margin when it comes to budgeting for our old age.

The superannuation industry wants me to contribute even more to my super, but the funds haven’t earned the right to more of my money. The industry has had many years to think about this longevity problem but it has produced nothing of note.

The way things are going, we will either leave a sizeable inheritance for the kiddies or be living in their spare room.

Risk capital is needed for risk products

A key reason why super funds fail to create longevity products is that every growing PFM (profit-for-member) fund has the wrong capital structure. They are ‘cooperatives’. A cooperative operates for the good of the members but has no defined equity base or shareholders. No one owns them, and as such, cooperatives cannot raise capital for new ventures or fresh capital in times of economic stress.

They are not just ill-suited for risk-based products (that is, products where capital is needed to manage balance sheet risk such as in a bank or life insurance company). They just plainly cannot develop them. The best they can do is form a joint venture with a ‘capital-based’ financial organisation. Regretfully, rule number one in life is never to share your client base with another company, especially a profit-seeking one.

Governance and disclosure standards

In addition, cooperatives frequently lead to poor governance as well as poor financial flexibility. Super fund boards of trustees may violently object to this comment, but there are areas where they fall behind minimum disclosure requirements expected from listed companies.

Listed companies are required to produce informative annual reports, which is backed up by an annual meeting of shareholders. At the annual meeting, shareholders vote on essential issues like executive and board remuneration and director representation. Superannuation funds’ annual reports resemble advertising brochures and fail to provide a solid disclosure on how the board sets remuneration for executives and directors. Since COVID, some super funds like AustralianSuper and UniSuper have had ‘inaugural’ annual member meetings. A good start, but currently, the meetings are more Q&A sessions. No resolutions are put to a member vote.

The number of times the word ‘remuneration’ is sighted in the most recent annual reports of Australia’s top 10 listed companies is on average 317 times. The number for Australia’s top 10 PFM super funds is 22. Six of the top 10 PFM super funds do not disclose remuneration for executives or directors in their annual report. While this information is legally disclosed elsewhere, it is no easy task for a member to find and interpret the data.

The industry needs to earn a rise in contributions

Before we automatically sign up to make more super contributions, here are some points:

  • Super funds complain about APRA’s moves to benchmark performance and provide heat maps, but they fail to produce solid performance criteria themselves. Where we can make objective performance analysis, the super industry is at best an average investor. Click here for the previous Firstlinks article on this point.
  • Members are entitled to more robust governance and disclosure, along with solving voting for directors and remuneration. There is no easy solution here. Perhaps APRA will need more authority to prescribe minimum requirements and have a remuneration veto. That being said, superannuation executives and directors are not, in my view, overpaid.
  • The longevity issue needs to be solved. I would happily contribute a further 2.5% if super funds could use that money to help me manage my super fund drawdowns. The government is on record as saying they want retirees to spend their super, but we need to know more about when we are going to die.

I am not suggesting we throw the baby out with the bathwater. I am not even saying the industry is doing a poor job overall. But we need to back the Government and APRA when they challenge the superannuation industry. No one else will. The industry must do more to earn the right to our extra dollars.

 

After a long career in banking including 10 years at National Australia Bank as Global Head of Financial Institutions, Funds and Insurance, Donald Hellyer is now CEO of BigFuture and Open Director. BigFuture is a tech development company specialising in building financial applications. OpenDirector is a database for the details of Australia's directors and executives. This article is general information based on public data and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

4 Comments
Trevor
April 22, 2021

Start a SMSF Donald , George and Robert......then you only have to worry about Government rules and regulations and auditors and changes........and.......and that extra worry will soon have you in a
premature grave , so you won't need to be concerned about any of your stated anxieties or fears :
"" they " seek to maintain control of your money movement
"Now that is one hell of an error margin when it comes to budgeting for our old age."
"The way things are going, we will either leave a sizeable inheritance for the kiddies
or be living in their spare room."
"Pushing-up-daisies" isn't necessarily preferable....but it is inevitable !

Robert
April 22, 2021

Really?
The aim of the game is " they " seek to maintain control of your money movement.
" They " are very good at that game, because " they " make the rules.

George
April 22, 2021

Maybe the reason there are no retirement income products - except annuities at tiny rates - is it's a silver bullet impossible to build. The risk free bond rate is 1%. Everything else involves risk, and who's going to pay for that? It's all talk and no action for a simple mathematical reason.

Donald Hellyer
April 22, 2021

There is that George, but there have been environments when the risk free rate was much higher. Could we use the extra 2.5% to create a deferred annuity. I am making this up, but if you live beyond the age of say 85, then you get more support from someone (say the Future Fund). Then I could plan my expenditure to 85. The Future Fund can have the extra 2.5% as an "longevity insurance premium".

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

Consumers need an effective super performance test

Three reasons why super performance test fails

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 little-known pension traps prove the value of advice

Most people entering retirement do not see a financial adviser, mainly due to cost. It's a major problem because there are small mistakes a retiree can make which are expensive and avoidable if a few tips were known.

Check eligibility for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card

Eligibility for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card has no asset test and a relatively high income test. It's worth checking eligibility and the benefits of qualifying to save on the cost of medications.

Hamish Douglass on why the movie hasn’t ended yet

The focus is on Magellan for its investment performance and departure of the CEO, but Douglass says the pandemic, inflation, rising rates and Middle East tensions have not played out. Vindication is always long term.

Start the year right with the 2022 Retiree Checklist

This is our annual checklist of what retirees need to be aware of in 2022. It is a long list of 25 items and not everything will apply to your situation. Run your eye over the benefits and entitlements.

At 98-years-old, Charlie Munger still delivers the one-liners

The Warren Buffett/Charlie Munger partnership is the stuff of legends, but even Charlie admits it is coming to an end ("I'm nearly dead"). He is one of the few people in investing prepared to say what he thinks.

Should I pay off the mortgage or top up my superannuation?

Depending on personal circumstances, it may be time to rethink the bias to paying down housing debt over wealth accumulation in super. Do the sums and ask these four questions to plan for your future.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Three ways index investing masks extra risk

There are thousands of different indexes, and they are not all diversified and broadly-based. Watch for concentration risk in sectors and companies, and know the underlying assets in case liquidity is needed.

Investment strategies

Will 2022 be the year for quality companies?

It is easy to feel like an investing genius over the last 10 years, with most asset classes making wonderful gains. But if there's a setback, companies like Reece, ARB, Cochlear, REA Group and CSL will recover best.

Shares

2022 outlook: buy a raincoat but don't put it on yet

In the 11th year of a bull market, near the end of the cycle, some type of correction is likely. Underneath is solid, healthy and underpinned by strong earnings growth, but there's less room for mistakes.

Gold

Time to give up on gold?

In 2021, the gold price failed to sustain its strong rise since 2018, although it recovered after early losses. But where does gold sit in a world of inflation, rising rates and a competitor like Bitcoin?

Investment strategies

Global leaders reveal surprises of 2021, challenges for 2022

In a sentence or two, global experts across many fields are asked to summarise the biggest surprise of 2021, and enduring challenges into 2022. It's a short and sweet view of the changes we are all facing.

Shares

2021 was a standout year for stockmarket listings

In 2021, sharemarket gains supported record levels of capital raisings and IPOs in Australia. The range of deals listed here shows the maturity of the local market in providing equity capital.

Economy

Let 'er rip: how high can debt-to-GDP ratios soar?

Governments and investors have been complacent about the build up of debt, but at some level, a ceiling exists. Are we near yet? Trouble is brewing, especially in the eurozone and emerging countries.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.