Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 374

Survey on COVID-19's impact and management

The impact of COVID-19 continues to drag on, especially for Victorians at the moment, and while talk of a vaccine has ramped up in recent weeks, in reality the middle of 2021 would be a good outcome. 

Six months ago, when the Australian government introduced its stimulus measures, the confidence in a 'snap back' allowed a September end-date for initiatives such as JobKeeper. Suddenly, the economic cliff is here as the windback begins in two weeks, and initiatives are being extended into 2021. 

So how are you coping now versus when we were first affected by lockdowns and restrictions? In this survey, we pose some new questions as well as revisiting some questions from our April 2020 survey to compare changes.

What do you think of the government's policies in relation to JobKeeper and superannuation? How will the US election change things? What will the Australian stock market do? How is your portfolio performing? What are you investing in now? When do you think the crisis will end? How has your own life changed?

We have 12 questions which should take about five minutes to complete, and responses will always remain anonymous. We will publish the full results next week.


Click here for Firstlinks poll on
COVID-19 from snap back to road map


 

35 Comments
John
September 10, 2020

Labor's introduction of Medicare in 1984 caused many if not most surgeons to withdraw their services from NSW public hospitals, including obstetricians. Some left for 5 years (orthopods). A resultant medical delivery mishap meant we have only one child. I was resentful at the time, but more accepting now, as I don't know how we would have been able to insulate more children from the long term financial impact on them of the Covid pandemic.

Murray McLean
September 10, 2020

The incompetence and arrogance of the Victorian Labor Government and their bureaucrats has inflicted catastrophic damage upon the State and the entire country, yet, they will not be held accountable for their mis-deeds.

Chris
September 10, 2020

As Alan Jones in "This country is a mess" on 8 September 2020, "how can you handcuff a pregnant woman yet allow 10,000 people to protest (insert certain three letters here) ?".

Jack Mordes - "Never did I think that a pregnant woman would be handcuffed for merely saying she would protest against the Government. This is not the Australia with which my family sought refuge. My mother cannot believe that at 78, she again finds herself under effective house arrest in a democratic Australia".

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

There are limits to the ability of the government to keep paying out. In all states except Victoria it needs to be cut back, in Victoria it should be continued.

Grant
September 10, 2020

It needs to be cut back in Victoria as much as everywhere else, if not more. The idiots who support Dan Andrews will only realise the economic and social harm he is causing once they stop receiving handouts from the Federal government.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

Wage growth has been slow in recent years without any increase to the SG. In that time proportion of profit to shareholders has grown as compared to workers. The proposals to defer/cancel the SG rise is further evidence of declining worker bargaining power.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

I'm hoping that Australians will develop more of a savings culture rather than consuming for the sake of it. Some rigour and frugality would not go astray.

Michael GIUFFRIDA
September 10, 2020

Nothing further for the Socialist Republic of Victoria

SMSF Trustee
September 10, 2020

And if it goes too far would prolong the recession. Like it or not, modern society needs people to buy things or services to employ people to make or provide them. Consuming for the sake of it is a total misnomer. People consume what others produce in order to create the environment in which others will consume what they produce, so that everyone has a chance of feeding their families, providing a home, enjoying some entertainment, etc. Once you stop doing that, it all implodes and the number of people who struggle increases.
The seemingly 'righteous' approach of urging everyone to be frugal is actually a recipe for increased poverty. We see religious leaders all the time urging people to cut back on being 'consumerist' but they are also the first to call for governments to create jobs when recessions hit, little realising the inconsistency of their position.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

Post COVID, people will work from home much more than they did previously. This has lifestyle and environmental benefits. Children will see more of their parents. However, another consequence will be a mountain of public debt that our children will be required to repay one way or another. Also, hopefully the Ponzi scheme of housing in Australia will falter (though many many experience great hardship if this occurs).

Kym Bailey
September 10, 2020

I question what people needed their super capital for given the government largess, along with the generosity displayed by banks re loan commitments and landlords re rental properties. If there was a desperate need for this capital, it feels like it was present before CV-19. Now with some balances decimated, the call for the SGC increase to proceed seems inappropriate. If super is "your money", tax concessions should be examined. Perhaps a better strategy is to allow low income people to take the equivalent of the SGC in wages and save the unnecessary administration associated with the super system for those individuals. Having your cake and eating it is not the real purpose of super.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

Living in retirement and being financially "OK" is not going to get easier.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

The world is going to take some time to drag itself out of the damage caused by CV19. World trade will diminish with weaker economies and rising protectionism/nationalism.This will result in a period of consolidation and change which will affect the markets.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

The whole virus situation is here to stay forever and we need to plan for the next incursion by a virus and put in place a sensible plan both at a personal level and government level. We can all take steps to help ourselves and thereby lessening the aid needed by governments.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

JobKeeper has delayed the worst of the recession to date and may have reduced the permanent closure of many businesses, but will leave an awful debt for future generations. It's a tough question.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

Jobkeeper probably needs some re-engineering to work in the scenario that it is required for much longer.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

The government (ie other taxpayers) have provided a safety net which allows individuals and businesses to determine future employment and opportunities. Zombie businesses cannot be supported indefinitely.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

Some people unfortunately use the benefit as a hammock rather than a safety net.

Chris
September 10, 2020

It's an absolute joke, is what it is. You have two sorts of people - those of us who are still working (regardless of salary) and those who earn LESS than $1500 a fortnight who are now getting the full whack (if you don't believe me, read Scott Pape's column from a few weeks ago, where a uni student was getting it and had gone from earning $100 a week to this, and didn't know what to do with the extra cash).

My wife works in a bank and the amount of people who have been coming in to deposit their cash, then spend it all on smokes, grog and gambling is amazing.

Why would you ever want this to end so that you had to go back to work, if someone is paying you $1,500 a fortnight to sit around with the guarantee that your job is safe ?!

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

So many new investors coming into the market without experience leads eventually to last stage of bull market.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

There is no likelihood of a vaccine for at least another year and a half. Therefore we are not likely to see a recovery back to pre-Covid days before two years.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

We are retired not worried about our health, not worried about investments, not educating our kids, not caring for elderly parents (they live on a different continent). What we are worried about is the impact on our young working children (in their 20s) and the increased need for the Bank of Mum and Dad to help out due to their loss of income.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

There has been no wage growth for years so you cannot say that the SGC increase would stop any wage growth. The increase has already been delayed various times as it seems there is never a 'right' time to introduce it.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

I have friends who lost their workforce because of generosity of job keeper. I agree with jobkeeper, but some distortion of economy occurs. Austerity great failure in Greece, need to learn from it, and act carefully.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

we are going to have to manage and live with Covid19. Eradication is not a realistic objective

Steve
September 10, 2020

Fully agree. What has become clear is that while govts can ask for people to "do the right thing" a not insignificant proportion of the population only care about themselves. Future planning needs to accept, even if we don't like it, that people WILL continue to spread this when things open up. All the stats are based only on those who have presented for testing, I expect many of those who are self-centered will not likely get tested even with reasonably severe symptoms, and I would be surprised if any of these likely spreaders have the covid safe app on their phones. We need to focus on the most vulnerable; nearly all deaths are those over 70/80 who fortunately can be isolated with minimal impact on jobs & the economy. Locking down the whole population because a small subset needs protection simply cannot go on forever. We need a big dose of pragmatism.

Bill Leuner
September 13, 2020

Absolutely right. There needs to be a focus on where the problems lie. Mainly workers in the medical and aged care sectors subject of course to proper management of new arrival lock down situations.
For the rest, we need to get back to normal working and living conditions with a clear focus on common sense. Why would one need to wear a mask in the middle of a sports oval when the nearest person is twenty or more metres away! Sure, you need to have a mask with you and to wear it if you are within, say, three metres from others. Has there been one golfer go down with the virus? I have not heard of one. The damage to business, mental health and small business in particular is way out of proportion to the few lives saved.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

Hardship provisions exist in Super - and that is the mechanism that should have been used.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

Australia's early access scheme was simple but, in not asking some further questions, undermined the long term purpose of super.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

Personal debt levels have decreased in the whole, which is a good thing. But recessions bring unemployment and business and consumer confidence could be down for years.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

Re super access: People needed money and had to be given the right to take control of their future.

Chris
September 10, 2020

Triple M had a phone-in a few weeks ago, people went and spent it on gambling, paying down debt and speculating on the sharemarket. One person got cosmetic chest surgery and another person bought a used car because they viewed it as "their money" and they spent it on rubbish. They weren't starving to death.

Geoff
September 10, 2020

Many people do not save anything - and Super is the only savings they have (because it is "forced" on them). And now we have allowed them to go and raid that for dubious purposes. The money taken from Super should have been treated as a "loan" that they needed to automatically repay much like a student HECS/HELP debt so that their super balances eventually recover.

Survey comment
September 10, 2020

The legacy of the federal government putting the economy ahead of the lives of the elderly, will stain the country forever.

Greg
September 11, 2020

The evidence is that they have been doing the exact opposite and prioritising health over the economy. How is that the lives of the elderly are so neglected when total deaths in nursing homes are actually less this year than last year.

 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Four simple things to do right now

Markets have recovered in the last six months but most investors remain nervous about the economic outlook. Morningstar analysts provide four quick tips on how to navigate this uncertainty.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 374

Suddenly, it's the middle of September and we don't hear much about 'snap back' anymore. Now we have 'wind backs' and 'road maps'. Six months ago, I was flying back from Antarctica after two weeks aboard the ill-fated Greg Mortimer cruise ship, and then the world changed. So it's time to take your temperature again. Our survey checks your reaction to recent policies and your COVID-19 responses.

  • 9 September 2020

Reporting season winners and losers in listed property trusts

Many property trust results are better than expected, with the A-REIT sector on a dividend yield of 4.8%. But there's a wide variation by sector and the ability of tenants to pay the rent.

Have stock markets become a giant Ponzi scheme?

A global financial casino has been created where investors ignore realistic valuations in the low growth, high-risk environment. At some point, analysis of fundamental value will be rewarded.

How the age pension helps retirees cope with losses

It's often overlooked how wealthier couples can fall back on the age pension if a market loss hits their portfolio. The reassurance is never greater than in a financial (and now epidemic) crisis.

Latest Updates

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 376

The US tech index, the NASDAQ, peaked on 2 September 2020 at 12,058 and three weeks later closed at 10,632. On the same days, Apple hit US$137.98 and then fell to US$107.12. These falls of over 10% and 20% seem high but both were simply returning to their early August levels. It's hardly a rout when a month's gains are given back. The bigger issue is whether such stock corrections will scare off the retail 'Robinhood' traders.

  • 24 September 2020
  • 2
Interviews

Interview on new technologies with more potential to grow

For many global tech companies, COVID has boosted their revenues and pushed share prices to all-time highs. We are on the cusp of amazing technical advances and there are plenty of new opportunities.

Shares

Five reasons why Tesla is the everything bubble

As fewer professionals actively research the merits of a company’s prospects, stocks become disproportionately driven by capital flows. Prices disconnect from fundamentals and there's no better example than Tesla.

Retirement

Three retirement checks for when you have enough

Not every retiree needs to gun for higher returns, but a conservative portfolio can court its own risks, especially with bond rates so low. But some retirees prefer to settle for a lower income.

Shares

Hide and seek: the FX impact on global equity investments

As more Australians tilt their investments to global equities, they often overlook the exchange rate risk and fees. The move from US57 cents to US73 cents in six months shows the unhedged impact.

Economy

When America sneezes, the world catches a ...

The recovery from COVID-19 is looking more like a K-shape, with some companies doing well while others struggle. The pandemic seems more akin to a black swan, exogenous shock than a structural downturn.

Retirement

How the age pension helps retirees cope with losses

It's often overlooked how wealthier couples can fall back on the age pension if a market loss hits their portfolio. The reassurance is never greater than in a financial (and now epidemic) crisis.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.