Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 149

Top tech queries driven by legislative change

  •   Minh Ly
  •   1 April 2016
  •      
  •   

Every month, the Challenger technical team receives hundreds of calls from financial advisers. Most recently, questions about how new and upcoming changes to social security means testing may affect their clients have dominated the calls.

These are the top three topic areas from adviser queries regarding legislative change:

1. Assets Test changes

What’s changing and how does it impact my clients?

From 1 January 2017 the Assets Test lower thresholds increase (Table 1) and the taper rate will double from $1.50 to $3 per $1,000 of assets per fortnight. The higher thresholds allow clients to hold more assets before their pension starts to reduce under the Assets Test, which can lead to higher pension entitlements.

However, the increased taper rate reduces pensions at a faster rate once assessable assets are above the new Assets Test thresholds, with the largest reduction in pension entitlements (estimated in Table 2) occurring at the new lower asset cut-off thresholds (Table 1).

What about other considerations that I should be mindful of?

  • Pensioners who lose their entitlement (and their pensioner concession card) will be provided with the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card (CSHC) without the need to satisfy the CSHC’s Income Test.
  • A reduced pension bonus (for those who are registered) as the amount of the pension bonus is based on the retiree’s means tested Age Pension entitlement at the time of claim.
  • A grandfathered account-based pension (ABP) becoming deemed where the client’s pension entitlement reduces to nil. When combined with the capping of deductible amounts for defined benefit pensions from 1 January 2016, the additional deemed income from the ABPs can lead to higher levels of assessable income.

What strategies can help?

To help enhance outcomes for their clients, advisers have been considering a combination of Assets Test friendly investment strategies. One strategy is the use of a lifetime annuity to support ongoing cash flow requirements and to help improve pension entitlements over the retiree’s lifetime. Other strategies include gifting within allowable limits; appropriate valuation of personal assets; funeral bonds up to $12,250; prepaying funeral expenses; and contributing funds to a spouse’s super fund who is under pension age.

2. Removal of the rental income exemption

What’s changing and how does it impact aged care residents?

New residents entering residential aged care from 1 January 2016 no longer have rental income from renting their former home excluded from their aged care income assessment.

Prior to 1 January 2016 where the former home was retained, rented out and the resident was liable for a periodic accommodation payment, the rental income was not assessable when working out their means tested care fee (MTCF).

While this strategy is still available to aged care residents from 1 January 2016 and continues to be beneficial from an Age Pension perspective, the rental income will no longer be exempt for aged care. This will generally lead to an increase in assessable income and the resident’s aged care fees.

What can people do in response?

Where this leads to the sale of the home, clients may seek advice on investments that specifically address their aged care needs. Some recent product innovations are now available which can help provide residents with regular cash flow and estate planning certainty.

Where the home is retained (e.g. occupied by a family member or previous carer), additional strategies might become critical. These can include deducting daily accommodation payments from lump sum accommodation payments, accessing equity in the home or seeking assistance from family members.

3. Estate planning for income streams

My client has died, what happens next?

The death of one spouse can have implications on the surviving spouse’s social security pension as they will be assessed using the single rate of pension and Income and Assets Test thresholds. As income stream products are fundamental to retirement income planning, the Centrelink and estate planning implications of these income streams on death are also critical.

Where an income stream reverts to a reversionary beneficiary, the assessable asset value of the income stream for Centrelink purposes will also pass to the beneficiary. For ABPs, this is the account balance, while for non-account based income streams such as annuities, it is the reduced asset value, worked out as:

Purchase price less (deduction amount x term elapsed)

The Centrelink/Department of Veterans’ Affairs assessment of these income streams will generally not change on reversion. That is, the income stream’s deduction amount remains unchanged and only the amount that exceeds the deduction amount is assessed as income. ABPs which commenced after 1 January 2015 or where grandfathered status has been lost, will have their income assessed using the deeming provisions.

In cases where the income stream pays a lump sum death benefit and is paid to a person other than the spouse, it will not form part of the surviving spouse’s assessable assets.

 

Minh Ly is a Senior Technical Services Analyst at Challenger. This general information is general and does not consider the needs of any individual.

 

  •   1 April 2016
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The distortions in our retirement system

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

Pension winners and losers from 1 January

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

Warren Buffett's final lesson

I’ve long seen Buffett as a flawed genius: a great investor though a man with shortcomings. With his final letter to Berkshire shareholders, I reflect on how my views of Buffett have changed and the legacy he leaves.

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

13 ways to save money on your tax - legally

Thoughtful tax planning is a cornerstone of successful investing. This highlights 13 legal ways that you can reduce tax, preserve capital, and enhance long-term wealth across super, property, and shares.

Why it’s time to ditch the retirement journey

Retirement isn’t a clean financial arc. Income shocks, health costs and family pressures hit at random, exposing the limits of age-based planning and the myth of a predictable “retirement journey".

The housing market is heading into choppy waters

With rates on hold and housing demand strong, lenders are pushing boundaries. As risky products return, borrowers should be cautious and not let clever marketing cloud their judgment.

Latest Updates

Interviews

AFIC on the speculative ASX boom, opportunities, and LIC discounts

In an interview with Firstlinks, CEO Mark Freeman discusses how speculative ASX stocks have crushed blue chips this year, companies he likes now, and why he’s confident AFIC’s NTA discount will close.

Investment strategies

Solving the Australian equities conundrum

The ASX's performance this year has again highlighted a persistent riddle facing investors – how to approach an index reliant on a few sectors and handful of stocks. Here are some ideas on how to build a durable portfolio.

Retirement

Regulators warn super funds to lift retirement focus

Despite three years under the retirement income covenant, regulators warn a growing gap between leading and lagging super funds, driven by poor member insights and patchy outcomes measurement.

Shares

Australian equities: a tale of two markets

The ASX seems a market split in two: between the haves and have nots; or those with growth and momentum and those without. In this environment, opportunity favours those willing to look beyond the obvious.

Investment strategies

Dotcom on steroids Part II

OpenAI’s business model isn't sustainable in the long run. If markets catch on, the company could face higher borrowing costs, or worse, and that would have major spillover effects.

Investment strategies

AI’s debt binge draws European telco parallels

‘Hyperscalers’ including Google, Meta and Microsoft are fuelling an unprecedented surge in equity and debt issuance to bankroll massive AI-driven capital expenditure. History shows this isn't without risk.

Investment strategies

Leveraged single stock ETFs don't work as advertised

Leveraged ETFs seek to deliver some multiple of an underlying index or reference asset’s return over a day. Yet, they aren’t even delivering the target return on an average day as they’re meant to do.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.