Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 63

Technical versus fundamental analysis in equity markets

Investors have many different characteristics. At one extreme, high frequency traders rely on technology to place orders with lightning speed and eke out a small percentage profit on huge numbers of small trades in the margin between buyer and seller. At the other extreme, patient, long-term value investors are happy to leave a good stock in the bottom drawer for years or decades, and allow compound returns to work their magic. In between these extremes, there are perhaps as many different investment styles as there are individual investors.

Work out where you sit

One of the major differences divides technical investors (or chartists), who work on the assumption that historical price movements reveal likely future movements, from fundamental (or value) investors, whose focus is future profitability and cash flow. Certainly, there are investors who employ both styles, but most people tend to identify with one or the other. Working out where you sit is one of the more important choices an investor makes.

The two approaches enjoy different levels of acceptance in different parts of the market. Charting can be a relatively simple way to assess the investment merits of a company. Time-poor investors can make decisions more easily and entrepreneurs can design trading ‘systems’ for such time-poor investors. As a result, charting enjoys good support amongst retail investors, and receives quite a few column inches in mainstream media.

In the professional funds management arena, the norm is for analysts and portfolio managers to spend large amounts of time studying the details of company financials and business models. Montgomery Investment Management, along with most of our colleagues in the industry, sits firmly in this fundamental camp. We do this with the expectation that investing time and effort into having deeper insight into a business will yield better investment decisions.

A good question for investors and fund manager clients to ask is: does this extra effort and cost add enough value to be worthwhile? If a simple approach delivers reasonable results, why bother with the hard way?

There may be no single right answer. Any investment approach needs to fit the personal style of the investor using it. For example, if you have perfectionist tendencies and time on your hands, you will want to follow a different path to someone with a short attention span and other things to do. However, there are some reference points that are relevant to all investors.

Firstly, returns. How much value can be delivered by charting? Many people have a strong view that it adds either: a) zero value, or b) quite a lot of value, but based on academic research, the correct answer is probably: c) neither (depending on exactly what we mean by charting).

A role for momentum and reversal

Over the years, charting has generally not enjoyed a high level of credibility in academic circles, but a seminal piece of work was published in August 2000 by Andrew Lo, Harry Mamaysky and Jiang Wang at MIT. Using sophisticated techniques, these researchers examined the merits of a wide range of shapes and patterns, and they found a few surprises.

Their work confirmed the widely-held view that traditional charting concepts like support and resistance do not have practical value. However, they showed that two technical indicators – momentum and reversal – do have value. Put simply, they (as well as other researchers) confirmed that stocks that have performed well in the recent past (typically up to 12 months) tend to perform well in the future, whereas stocks that have performed well over longer periods of time (3-5 years) tend to underperform in future. These so called ‘anomalies’ are now widely accepted as real, and it is possible to construct profitable trading strategies that exploit them.

On this basis, there is value in technical analysis. However, that value is somewhat limited. Different studies show different results, but as a general observation, after allowing for trading costs and risk it is not entirely clear that reversal strategies work in the real world, and there have been extended periods when momentum strategies haven’t worked, notably around the time of the GFC.

While esoteric concepts like ‘head and shoulders’ patterns are unlikely to help much in the real world, there probably is merit in the old adage ‘the trend is your friend’, and having a disciplined approach to trend-following appears to be a simple and legitimate way to generate returns that beat the market by a noticeable margin. However, the upside is less than compelling, and there is another saying about rich chartists being a very rare breed.

While it is easy to draw up a long list of spectacularly successful and wealthy fundamental investors, coming up with a list of comparable technical analysts would be rather more challenging. Accordingly, if your aspirations for investment success lie beyond ‘a noticeable margin’ then you may be better off putting in the hard yards of fundamental analysis, or find a good manager to do it for you.

 

Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller ‘Value.able

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Cheap stocks: how to find them and how to buy them

Technical analysis using four trading tools

A Christmas fireside chat

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.