Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 63

Technical versus fundamental analysis in equity markets

Investors have many different characteristics. At one extreme, high frequency traders rely on technology to place orders with lightning speed and eke out a small percentage profit on huge numbers of small trades in the margin between buyer and seller. At the other extreme, patient, long-term value investors are happy to leave a good stock in the bottom drawer for years or decades, and allow compound returns to work their magic. In between these extremes, there are perhaps as many different investment styles as there are individual investors.

Work out where you sit

One of the major differences divides technical investors (or chartists), who work on the assumption that historical price movements reveal likely future movements, from fundamental (or value) investors, whose focus is future profitability and cash flow. Certainly, there are investors who employ both styles, but most people tend to identify with one or the other. Working out where you sit is one of the more important choices an investor makes.

The two approaches enjoy different levels of acceptance in different parts of the market. Charting can be a relatively simple way to assess the investment merits of a company. Time-poor investors can make decisions more easily and entrepreneurs can design trading ‘systems’ for such time-poor investors. As a result, charting enjoys good support amongst retail investors, and receives quite a few column inches in mainstream media.

In the professional funds management arena, the norm is for analysts and portfolio managers to spend large amounts of time studying the details of company financials and business models. Montgomery Investment Management, along with most of our colleagues in the industry, sits firmly in this fundamental camp. We do this with the expectation that investing time and effort into having deeper insight into a business will yield better investment decisions.

A good question for investors and fund manager clients to ask is: does this extra effort and cost add enough value to be worthwhile? If a simple approach delivers reasonable results, why bother with the hard way?

There may be no single right answer. Any investment approach needs to fit the personal style of the investor using it. For example, if you have perfectionist tendencies and time on your hands, you will want to follow a different path to someone with a short attention span and other things to do. However, there are some reference points that are relevant to all investors.

Firstly, returns. How much value can be delivered by charting? Many people have a strong view that it adds either: a) zero value, or b) quite a lot of value, but based on academic research, the correct answer is probably: c) neither (depending on exactly what we mean by charting).

A role for momentum and reversal

Over the years, charting has generally not enjoyed a high level of credibility in academic circles, but a seminal piece of work was published in August 2000 by Andrew Lo, Harry Mamaysky and Jiang Wang at MIT. Using sophisticated techniques, these researchers examined the merits of a wide range of shapes and patterns, and they found a few surprises.

Their work confirmed the widely-held view that traditional charting concepts like support and resistance do not have practical value. However, they showed that two technical indicators – momentum and reversal – do have value. Put simply, they (as well as other researchers) confirmed that stocks that have performed well in the recent past (typically up to 12 months) tend to perform well in the future, whereas stocks that have performed well over longer periods of time (3-5 years) tend to underperform in future. These so called ‘anomalies’ are now widely accepted as real, and it is possible to construct profitable trading strategies that exploit them.

On this basis, there is value in technical analysis. However, that value is somewhat limited. Different studies show different results, but as a general observation, after allowing for trading costs and risk it is not entirely clear that reversal strategies work in the real world, and there have been extended periods when momentum strategies haven’t worked, notably around the time of the GFC.

While esoteric concepts like ‘head and shoulders’ patterns are unlikely to help much in the real world, there probably is merit in the old adage ‘the trend is your friend’, and having a disciplined approach to trend-following appears to be a simple and legitimate way to generate returns that beat the market by a noticeable margin. However, the upside is less than compelling, and there is another saying about rich chartists being a very rare breed.

While it is easy to draw up a long list of spectacularly successful and wealthy fundamental investors, coming up with a list of comparable technical analysts would be rather more challenging. Accordingly, if your aspirations for investment success lie beyond ‘a noticeable margin’ then you may be better off putting in the hard yards of fundamental analysis, or find a good manager to do it for you.

 

Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller ‘Value.able

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Cheap stocks: how to find them and how to buy them

Technical analysis using four trading tools

A Christmas fireside chat

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

9 winning investment strategies

There are many ways to invest in stocks, but some strategies are more effective than others. Here are nine tried and tested investment approaches - choosing one of these can improve your chances of reaching your financial goals.

Latest Updates

Taxation

100 Aussies: seven charts on who earns, pays, and owns

The Labor government is talking up tax reform to lift Australia’s ailing economic growth. Before any changes are made, it’s important to know who pays tax, who owns assets, and how much people have in their super for retirement.

7 key charts on the state of the Australian property market

The Australian property market stirs fierce debate - often bullish optimism versus crash predictions. But beyond the noise, seven charts reveal what's really driving prices and the outlook for residential real estate.

A simple alternative to the $3 million super tax

Division 296 aims to introduce improved fairness into the superannuation system, yet is overly complex. This scours the world for better ideas and suggests a simpler alternative which can achieve the same goals.

CBA and the index conundrum for super funds

After the hyperbolic rise in CBA shares, super funds are floating the idea of carving out the weightings of ASX bank securities and indexing them within their portfolios. This looks at why that might be a big error.

Strategy

10 policies to drive Australian productivity higher

Here's a comprehensive list of proposed reforms to fix Australia's stagnating economy, including introducing a flat income tax rate, reducing migration, and making childcare tax-deductible.

Interviews

Where to find big winners in Asia

As more money looks for a home outside the US, Asia may soon get some love. Fidelity's Anthony Srom outlines the best places in Asia to invest, including in Chinese consumer names, Indian financials, and Thailand.

Investment strategies

We have trouble understanding the time value of money

We overvalue the present and underestimate the future - it’s a cognitive glitch called hyperbolic discounting. It affects savings, spending, and loans, and it's more common - and costly - than we think. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.