Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 93

A Christmas fireside chat

  •   18 December 2014
  •      
  •   

As we wrap up 2014 and position ourselves on the blocks of 2015, it is worth considering how investors and consumers might behave. With Australia’s official cash rate already at 2.5% and having been there for 16 months, is another 25 basis point (0.25%) drop sometime next year going to get you off the couch? Our funds have performed well this year but it will be the more challenging months ahead that determine whether we can continue to deliver.

In simple terms you only need to know a few things. Will the economy grow faster or slower than the majority is expecting? Will inflation be higher or lower than most are currently expecting? And are high quality stocks with bright outlooks cheaper than our estimated valuations of them? These are the big questions because at other times there isn’t really any ‘variant perception’ to help generate easy outperformance.

Consumer confidence has crumbled in the last couple of months. It’s even worse today than when the last survey suggested confidence was at a three year low. CEO’s are telling us this. If low rates were going to stimulate anyone into action, they should already have done so, and another 25 basis point cut will not make any difference to consumer behaviour.

Let’s turn briefly to mining and mining services. As the iron ore price drops, thanks to increasing supply and declining rate of growth of Chinese demand (China’s rate of growth in GDP is forecast by the US Conference Board to fall to 5.5% and then to 3.5%) the impact is felt in job losses. As miners shelve projects and investing intentions slump, and as the higher cost producers close, workers are forced to start looking for work. Inevitably these new jobs will be on lower pay, as the mining boom saw salaries and wages soar for many workers.

And what are CEO’s telling us? We’ve had a car packaging company and a travel agent chain say that “it’s tough”, we had Rio tell investors the near term outlook was “challenging” and we’ve had rumours of Myer and DJ’s bringing forward their Christmas sales. This could reset consumer spending habits, and destroy the second spending boom that boosts retailers’ full year profits after the Christmas avalanche.

Hard to find compelling investments in most sectors

Why is it that low interest rates aren’t stimulating consumption? I think the reason is relatively uncomplicated. Those low rates have stimulated many to buy real estate, and irrespective of whether the purchase was for living or investment purposes, the consumer has geared up. And that’s a very different possibility to the usual ‘wealth effect’ we expect when house prices have been rising.

More recently John Borghetti at Virgin said: “Where there is uncertainty people go and hide in corners, and I think that’s what we’re seeing now in terms of spending … There’s not much hope out there at the moment.”

From an investment perspective, deteriorating prospects from the mining and material sectors has now infected retailing including travel. That takes out large sectors of the Australian equities market from our universe due to unattractive economics and prospects. The Financial Sector, dominated by the banks, may also be impacted in the near term, not only from weaker credit growth but also from the prospects of more punitive capital and mortgage risk weighting ratio requirements.

That doesn’t leave many other sectors from which to select outstanding investment candidates.

What about energy? The collapse of the higher-cost-junk-bond-issuing energy companies spreads volatility and fear further into the ‘high yield’ markets and then down along the risk spectrum. It's the first stimulus-infected bubble to burst and it is happening as we speak. Rates on high yield bonds were at just 5.6% only a few months ago when Janet Yellen said in Washington that she saw “pockets of increased risk-taking”. Today those junk bond yields have jumped to over 9%.

And it’s not just individual junk bond issues and their issuers that are being hammered. Entire countries are affected by the oil price slump. Venezuela, Nigeria, Columbia, Sudan, Iran and Libya are all impacted adversely. Evidently, Nigeria’s government revenues are funded by oil to the tune of 70% and oil represents half of Columbia’s exports.

Contagion. According to Goldman Sachs the high yield (junk bond) index is approximately 17% represented by energy debt issuers. This is significantly higher than the 4.4% exposure in 2006. Deutsche Bank reckon $550 billion of new bonds and loans have been issued by energy companies since 2010 and J.P. Morgan estimate that 12-40% could default.

Little scope to ease rates further

The longer the Fed holds its benchmark lending rate near zero, the greater the risk of more bubbles forming and then inevitably popping. Perhaps the most successful navigator of market and economic cycles has been Ray Dalio, who in early December 2014 noted that we’re currently in a “good environment” for owning stocks and that “we are in a mid-part of the cycle”, adding “We are long equities.” That is somewhat encouraging but in describing the signs to watch out for in the US he, inadvertently perhaps, warned investors in Australia what the next year or so might look like. Dalio noted that when the need for interest rate easing arose, already low rates would render few tools available to deal with it. At that point “asset prices are going to start looking top-heavy.”

And for Australia, that point might just be now.

 

Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller ‘Value.able’. The article is general information and does not address personal financial needs.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

2025: Another bullish year ahead for equities?

What to do about the growing chorus of market correction warnings?

Stagflation is underrated in the shifting economic narrative

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.