Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 25

The evolution of Listed Investment Companies

Listed Investment Companies (LICs) in Australia are going through a renaissance driven by the introduction of FOFA (Future of Financial Advice) and the amendment to the Corporations Act in 2010 allowing LICs to pay dividends when deemed solvent by the board.

This article discusses these topics, the history of the LIC sector and what the future holds for the space.

A LIC is a listed equity fund: a managed share investment fund that is itself a listed share. In Australia there are 61 listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) with a value of $20.4 billion. Currently 46 of them are trading below the value of the shares they own, creating a lot of great value investing opportunities.

The first investment trust was launched in the UK in 1868 by Foreign & Colonial. It was the world’s first collective investment vehicle and planned to raise £1 million to invest in government stock of foreign countries and colonial territories. In the prospectus it said it aimed ‘to give the investor of moderate means the same advantages as the large capitalist in diminishing the risk of investing in foreign and colonial government stocks, by spreading the investment over a number of different stocks’.

Unique structure of LICs

This principle is still the same today. Like unit trusts, LICs are pooled funds invested in a diverse range of shares that are listed on a stock market. But, unlike unit trusts, LICs are incorporated as quoted companies and instead of buying units in a fund, investors buy shares in a company.

LICs are closed end funds with a fixed amount of capital. No one can buy shares in a LIC unless someone else is willing to sell. Therefore the share price moves according to the rules of supply and demand rather than as a direct reflection of the movement in the underlying assets of the LIC. Thus LICs often trade at either a premium or a discount to the value of the assets they own, namely their Net Tangible Assets (NTA).

It is this premium or discount that makes LICs appear complicated. Most investors are familiar with unit trusts, which quote their unit values every day. Investors can buy or sell the units at the stated NTA daily. With LICs, the variance between the value of the LICs assets and its share price is a complication for some, but provides an incredible opportunity for others.

In a market downturn, such as the GFC, investors in a managed fund are likely to sell their units to get cash, forcing the managed fund manager to liquidate some of their holdings to repay the unit holders. This means the manager is selling into a market that has fallen, and may be forced to sell stocks that they believe are cheap. In a bull market, when money is rapidly flowing into managed funds, the reverse is the case. The managed fund manager may be forced to buy shares they know are over-valued as money pours in from investors. This is never the case with LICs. The LIC manager can continue to hold the same portfolio, and is never forced to sell or buy any stock. Their total focus is on managing money for the benefit of all their shareholders — the manager’s investment strategy is not dictated by market sentiment or flow of funds. They may start buying in a downturn and pick up some bargains or sell stocks that become overvalued in a bull market. Supporters of LICs argue that the closed end structure enables them to invest more efficiently and outperform unit trusts or other managed funds over time.

Australian evolution and outlook

The origin of the LIC sector in Australia dates back to the 1920s. The oldest investment company that is now listed is Whitefield Ltd (WHF), which was incorporated in 1923, originally as an investor in mortgage loans. Its business has been solely focused on equity investment since 1949, though it didn’t list on the ASX until 2 August 1971.

The largest Australian LIC started life in 1928 as Were’s Investment Trust Ltd. In 1936 it changed its name to Australian Foundation Investment Trust Ltd and it adopted its present name, Australian Foundation Investment Company Ltd (AFI), in 1938. It listed on the stock market on 30 June 1962.  In 1973 it was used to amalgamate the Capel Court group, which resulted in the takeover of Capel Court Investments, Breton Investments, Clonmore Investments, Haliburton Investments, Jason Investments, Jonathan Investments, National Reliance Investments and Shelbourne Investments. AFIC now has assets of $5 billion. The second-largest LIC, Argo Investments Ltd (ARG), was established in 1946 and listed on the ASX in 1950. It currently has a market cap of $4.3 billion.

The LIC sector is currently benefiting from two major structural changes.

The first is the change to the Corporations Act in June 2010, allowing companies to pay dividends as long as they are solvent. Previously they could only pay a dividend if they had an accounting profit, so the company might have had the cash flow, the cash and the franking credits, but if its assets had fallen in value (as happened during the GFC) it couldn’t pay a dividend. This is no longer the case. This change in legislation will give companies greater flexibility with dividend payments. Since this change was implemented we have seen several LIC’s pay a steady stream of dividends which in my view has helped to narrow the discount to NTA in the last two years.

The second significant structural change is the reform of the financial planning industry. From 1 July 2013, commissions paid to financial planners by providers of managed funds will be banned on new allocations. This will remove a significant impediment for financial planners looking at LICs or other investment products listed on the stock market, such as Exchange Traded Funds.  LICs don’t pay trailing commissions. For years financial planners have had a significant financial incentive to recommend managed funds, and thus LICs have not fully benefited from the significant growth in the funds management industry. Finally, the playing field will be level. In our business at WAM, we are already seeing an increased level of interest from financial planners in LICs with our funds under management increasing from $300 million to $700 million over the last 12 months.


Source: Patersons Securities. EMA = Exponential moving average.

Since these changes were first discussed, the discount to NTA of a number of LICs has decreased. Currently the average discount for the sector is 8.4%. The above chart from Patersons Securities highlights the experience since 2000. To date in 2013, we have seen two successful LIC floats being the Naos Emerging Opportunities Fund and the Watermark Market Neutral Fund. These are the first LICs to make initial public offers since the GFC, further evidence that interest is returning to the sector. I believe that the momentum gained in recent years has scope to continue given the thematics for the sector.

 

Chris Stott is Chief Investment Officer and Portfolio Manager at Wilson Asset Management.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Royal Commission 4: Perverse incentives create perverse outcomes

Millions of households are missing out on good financial planning

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.