Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 25

The evolution of Listed Investment Companies

Listed Investment Companies (LICs) in Australia are going through a renaissance driven by the introduction of FOFA (Future of Financial Advice) and the amendment to the Corporations Act in 2010 allowing LICs to pay dividends when deemed solvent by the board.

This article discusses these topics, the history of the LIC sector and what the future holds for the space.

A LIC is a listed equity fund: a managed share investment fund that is itself a listed share. In Australia there are 61 listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) with a value of $20.4 billion. Currently 46 of them are trading below the value of the shares they own, creating a lot of great value investing opportunities.

The first investment trust was launched in the UK in 1868 by Foreign & Colonial. It was the world’s first collective investment vehicle and planned to raise £1 million to invest in government stock of foreign countries and colonial territories. In the prospectus it said it aimed ‘to give the investor of moderate means the same advantages as the large capitalist in diminishing the risk of investing in foreign and colonial government stocks, by spreading the investment over a number of different stocks’.

Unique structure of LICs

This principle is still the same today. Like unit trusts, LICs are pooled funds invested in a diverse range of shares that are listed on a stock market. But, unlike unit trusts, LICs are incorporated as quoted companies and instead of buying units in a fund, investors buy shares in a company.

LICs are closed end funds with a fixed amount of capital. No one can buy shares in a LIC unless someone else is willing to sell. Therefore the share price moves according to the rules of supply and demand rather than as a direct reflection of the movement in the underlying assets of the LIC. Thus LICs often trade at either a premium or a discount to the value of the assets they own, namely their Net Tangible Assets (NTA).

It is this premium or discount that makes LICs appear complicated. Most investors are familiar with unit trusts, which quote their unit values every day. Investors can buy or sell the units at the stated NTA daily. With LICs, the variance between the value of the LICs assets and its share price is a complication for some, but provides an incredible opportunity for others.

In a market downturn, such as the GFC, investors in a managed fund are likely to sell their units to get cash, forcing the managed fund manager to liquidate some of their holdings to repay the unit holders. This means the manager is selling into a market that has fallen, and may be forced to sell stocks that they believe are cheap. In a bull market, when money is rapidly flowing into managed funds, the reverse is the case. The managed fund manager may be forced to buy shares they know are over-valued as money pours in from investors. This is never the case with LICs. The LIC manager can continue to hold the same portfolio, and is never forced to sell or buy any stock. Their total focus is on managing money for the benefit of all their shareholders — the manager’s investment strategy is not dictated by market sentiment or flow of funds. They may start buying in a downturn and pick up some bargains or sell stocks that become overvalued in a bull market. Supporters of LICs argue that the closed end structure enables them to invest more efficiently and outperform unit trusts or other managed funds over time.

Australian evolution and outlook

The origin of the LIC sector in Australia dates back to the 1920s. The oldest investment company that is now listed is Whitefield Ltd (WHF), which was incorporated in 1923, originally as an investor in mortgage loans. Its business has been solely focused on equity investment since 1949, though it didn’t list on the ASX until 2 August 1971.

The largest Australian LIC started life in 1928 as Were’s Investment Trust Ltd. In 1936 it changed its name to Australian Foundation Investment Trust Ltd and it adopted its present name, Australian Foundation Investment Company Ltd (AFI), in 1938. It listed on the stock market on 30 June 1962.  In 1973 it was used to amalgamate the Capel Court group, which resulted in the takeover of Capel Court Investments, Breton Investments, Clonmore Investments, Haliburton Investments, Jason Investments, Jonathan Investments, National Reliance Investments and Shelbourne Investments. AFIC now has assets of $5 billion. The second-largest LIC, Argo Investments Ltd (ARG), was established in 1946 and listed on the ASX in 1950. It currently has a market cap of $4.3 billion.

The LIC sector is currently benefiting from two major structural changes.

The first is the change to the Corporations Act in June 2010, allowing companies to pay dividends as long as they are solvent. Previously they could only pay a dividend if they had an accounting profit, so the company might have had the cash flow, the cash and the franking credits, but if its assets had fallen in value (as happened during the GFC) it couldn’t pay a dividend. This is no longer the case. This change in legislation will give companies greater flexibility with dividend payments. Since this change was implemented we have seen several LIC’s pay a steady stream of dividends which in my view has helped to narrow the discount to NTA in the last two years.

The second significant structural change is the reform of the financial planning industry. From 1 July 2013, commissions paid to financial planners by providers of managed funds will be banned on new allocations. This will remove a significant impediment for financial planners looking at LICs or other investment products listed on the stock market, such as Exchange Traded Funds.  LICs don’t pay trailing commissions. For years financial planners have had a significant financial incentive to recommend managed funds, and thus LICs have not fully benefited from the significant growth in the funds management industry. Finally, the playing field will be level. In our business at WAM, we are already seeing an increased level of interest from financial planners in LICs with our funds under management increasing from $300 million to $700 million over the last 12 months.



Source: Patersons Securities. EMA = Exponential moving average.

Since these changes were first discussed, the discount to NTA of a number of LICs has decreased. Currently the average discount for the sector is 8.4%. The above chart from Patersons Securities highlights the experience since 2000. To date in 2013, we have seen two successful LIC floats being the Naos Emerging Opportunities Fund and the Watermark Market Neutral Fund. These are the first LICs to make initial public offers since the GFC, further evidence that interest is returning to the sector. I believe that the momentum gained in recent years has scope to continue given the thematics for the sector.

Chris Stott is Chief Investment Officer and Portfolio Manager at Wilson Asset Management. 


Royal Commission 4: Perverse incentives create perverse outcomes

Millions of households are missing out on good financial planning


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.