Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 539

The future of bank hybrids is open to question

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is currently undertaking a review of hybrid capital bonds (often referred to as 'bail-in bonds') issued by banks, with a focus on those known as Additional Tier 1 (AT1) instruments. This is hardly surprising since recent international experience (particularly the demise of Credit Suisse) has shown them not to work for the purpose for which they are designed. Their continued use, rather than just redesign of some of their features, is open to question.

Context to the review

Bail-in securities were introduced as part of the Basel 3 regulatory framework following the Global Financial Crisis, and introduced in Australia in 2013. AT1 securities are intended to provide the next line of protection, after common equity, against bank failure. This is meant to occur by them being 'bailed-in' to convert into equity should the bank’s equity capital base fall sufficiently for the bank to reach a point of “non-viability”.

APRA would make the decision to require the 'bail-in', but the exact features of what a bail-in would entail (exactly when, how many, and which of, the securities to be bailed-in) has been left purposely vague. Should a bail-in of all AT1 securities be insufficient to adequately recapitalize the bank, then another class of bail-in securities (Tier 2) would be bailed in.

It can be argued that the existence of bail-in securities (used to keep capital ratios above APRA-required levels) helps to reduce risk of depositor (or other creditor) runs by the psychological effect of them providing a larger buffer to absorb losses. But that could also be achieved by simply requiring higher levels of equity, and avoiding the question of whether a bail-in will work when it is implemented.

Problems with bail-in bonds

One reason for doubting the robustness of the bail-in approach is found by asking what happens when a bail-in occurs? The total capital (equity plus bail-in securities) ratio of the bank won’t be changed, just its composition.

So, the bank will likely need to issue new securities to increase its capital ratio - and what investors would want to subscribe to a new issue by a bank which has just been seen to be in difficulty? And larger depositors not covered by the Financial Claims Scheme will likely think it prudent to move their funds elsewhere.

Bail-in is meant, in theory, to enable the bank to continue operations, but in practice is more likely to sound the death-knell of the bank.

Other issues

There are further complications in the specific Australian situation. AT1 securities generally pay franked dividends, and have hence been attractive to Australian retail investors, and unattractive to foreign investors who do not value the franking credits.  The foreigners prefer the AT2 securities which pay unfranked distributions.

It is difficult (impossible) to imagine John Lonsdale (CEO of APRA) not consulting the Australian Treasurer before doing a bail-in of a bank’s AT1 securities. And it is even more difficult to imagine the Treasurer being willing to have Australian retail investor holders of AT1 securities being bailed-in while foreign investors holding Tier 2 hybrids are not bailed in. The politics would prevent the bail-in regime from operating in the way it is designed to.

One way to overcome that problem might be to preclude retail investors from the AT1 market. The introduction of Design and Distribution Obligations (DDOs) powers to ASIC has meant that retail investors are no longer generally able to participate in new issues of AT1’s. But, paradoxically, once issued, the AT1’s trade on the ASX and so are available to retail investors.

Given the difficulties in pricing the bail-in risk of these complex AT1 securities, and thus identifying their appropriate yield, it is also paradoxical that they should be available to retail investors who really cannot evaluate the risks. If nothing else, legislation to prevent AT1 securities from paying franked distributions could be expected to diminish retail investor interest.

There are numerous other problems with the bail-in approach – most particularly that it is unlikely to work! But the fundamental question which should be asked is why require these complicated bail-in securities as part of the bank’s capital base rather than simply having a higher required level of common equity. It is by no means apparent that replacing bail-in securities with common equity would substantially increase the overall cost of bank funding.

 

Kevin Davis is Emeritus Professor of Finance at The University of Melbourne. 

 

6 Comments
Michael
December 17, 2023

While APRA would clearly understand that the removal of franking would be attractive to the current Federal Government, the simple test for APRA on this question is whether they will make logically consistent decisions.

For example , why would retail investors be permitted to participate in the highly likely scenario of the issue of bank shares through an entitlement, before AT1's are bailed in, and for which the risks may also not be properly understood (as with AT1)?

Buy-side credit analyst
December 14, 2023

Professor, can you please work us through how "it is by no means apparent that replacing bail-in securities with common equity would substantially increase the overall cost of bank funding"? Big assertion that is not backed up with research (ironic).

T2 (not AT2 as you incorrectly stated) cost on weighted market cap average over the past 10 years for the Big Four is 3mBBSW +1.60%.
AT1 economic cost (franking included) over the same period for B4 is 3mBBSW +3.00%.
Average B4 bank dividend yield (franking included) over 10 years is ~7.75% (3mBBSW+6.00%).

Also interested to see the Professor's research on majority of our T2 securities being sold to offshore investors? Just one example I could quickly find but Suncorp's T2 issued in September had $2bn in demand of which 91% was Australian according to deal stats.

AT1 and T2 is not for everyone, but serve a purposes to banks, depositors, investors and regulators.

Jonathan
December 14, 2023

Hi Kevin, what do you mean by "recent international experience has shown them not to work for the purpose for which they are designed." For Credit Suisse, taxpayers and depositors were spared so arguably they did fulfil their primary purpose, to protect higher ranking creditors for losses.

Aussie HIFIRE
December 15, 2023

They are supposed to rank higher in the capital structure than ordinary shareholders, but in the case of Credit Suisse shareholders received a payout and those who held the hybrid securities did not. This is the subject of a lawsuit at the moment, but if you owned the hybrids and got zeroed whilst sharesholders got paid out you might not think that you were treated fairly.

Nic
December 18, 2023

The terms of the Credit Suisse hybrids specifically stated that they would be written off to nothing if the bank failed. The investors knew this. Any lawsuit by Credit Suisse investors is pointless. The only people complaining about the Credit Suisse outcome are people who didn't look at the terms. These structures are not issued in Australia and so are pointless to discuss in tandem.

SGN
December 14, 2023

Who are the majority holders of big bank Hybrids ?
They Australian investors and in my opinion are there because of Franking. Your suggestion " If nothing else, legislation to prevent AT1 securities from paying franked distributions could be expected to diminish retail investor interest."That will drive Australian Investors out of the market quick However how new hybrids can survive without Franking credit ? The cost for baks will go higher ?
Bank hybrids is one avenue where banks can utilise their franking credit ? and The reason to issue the Hybrids.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

How 'ridiculous' are hybrids for retail investors?

Replacing bank hybrids with something similar

Last call on bank hybrids

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Australian house price speculators: What were you thinking?

Australian housing’s 50-year boom was driven by falling rates and rising borrowing power — not rent or yield. With those drivers exhausted, future returns must reconcile with economic fundamentals. Are we ready?

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 627 with weekend update

This week, I got the news that my mother has dementia. It came shortly after my father received the same diagnosis. This is a meditation on getting old and my regrets in not getting my parents’ affairs in order sooner.

  • 4 September 2025

Latest Updates

Shares

Why the ASX may be more expensive than the US market

On every valuation metric, the US appears significantly more expensive than Australia. However, American companies are also much more profitable than ours, which means the ASX may be more overvalued than most think.

Economy

No one holds the government to account on spending

Government spending is out of control and there's little sign that Labor will curb it. We need enforceable rules on spending and an empowered budget office to ensure governments act responsibly with taxpayers money.

Retirement

Why a traditional retirement may be pushed back 25 years

The idea of stopping work during your sixties is a man-made concept from another age. In a world where many jobs are knowledge based and can be done from anywhere, it may no longer make much sense at all.

Shares

The quiet winners of AI competition

The tech giants are in a money-throwing contest to secure AI supremacy and may fall short of high investor expectations. The companies supplying this arms race could offer a more attractive way to play AI adoption.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Infrastructure

Renewable energy investment: gloom or boom?

ESG investing has fallen out of favour with many investors, and Trump's anti-green policies haven't helped. Yet, renewables investment is still surging, which could prove a boon for infrastructure companies.

Investing

The enduring wisdom of John Bogle in five quotes

From buying the whole market to controlling emotions, John Bogle’s legendary advice reminds investors that patience, discipline, and low costs are the keys to investment success in any market environment.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.